Jump to content

Sprint Reportedly Bowing Out of T-Mobile Bid (was "Sprint offer" and "Iliad" threads)


thepowerofdonuts

Recommended Posts

I hope Ericsson scores both deals! ;)

 

Of course, I'd be willing to bet that neither of them will put with Ericsson's shenanigans for too long.

It reminds me of a friend of mine who's a doctor. Good person, but man is she an egomaniac. She had someone come in to take her open Office Manager position. The candidate was perfectly qualified and had a wonderful personality. Seemed her search for an Office Manager was over.

 

However, she called her two professional references. And both said she was perfect, until she was caught stealing from them. So what did my doctor friend do? She hired her. She said the previous employers were just stupid and didn't manage her right. She just needed to put the proper safeguards in place and manage her new Office Manager properly, and she would have no problems.

 

The Office Manager did a good job for the first year. No problems. But then, true to form, the Office Manager did the same exact things. She eventually stole over $20,000 before getting caught.

 

I say this, because Ericsson is like the Office Manager in this scenario. AT&T and Verizon is the Doctor. They may think they're smarter than Sprint. They may even actually be smarter than Sprint. I believe my Doctor friend was likely smarter than the other doctors, especially having that info about her past problems and knowing to put in extra safeguards.

 

AT&T and Verizon will even know many of the pitfalls of using Ericsson for network management and try to mitigate them. However, in my personal opinion, I wouldn't do it. Learn from Sprint's mistake in outsourcing their network management. Don't think you can do the mistake more niftily.

 

Sprint's use of Ericsson seems to be an utter failure from my perch. We have seen time and time again where they go out to problem sites and do nothing, or pretend there isn't a problem, or just can't figure out the problem and just move on. A third party never has the accountability or vested interest in how your network performs. And even if it's an absolute necessity financially to outsource your network management, Ericsson just doesn't seem to be a good call.

 

Let's see if ATT and VZW egos are so large that they blunder into this catastrophe. Doctoritis. There was a part of me that hoped my friend would fail for making such an ego driven poor decision. I counseled her against it. That same part of me now hopes that AT&T and VZW also choose Ericsson. They deserve Ericsson if they choose them knowing what's happened. Let's not forget that Ericsson managed the Clearwire network too.

 

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this post are my personal opinions based on my amateur observations.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 19
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No offense but what do people expect? Sunshine and rainbows?

 

Also, a big shoutout to S. Ali, wherever you are. Thanks for getting us page views! ;)

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love how Tmo's 230M is a triumph and Sprint's 225M is a failure. As if they aren't almost the same. And they are roughly the same when you consider that Sprint has not launched DC and Denver, even though they have significant deployments.

 

If anything, this brings to light that Sprint is sprinting back into the pack and is right there neck and neck with Tmo in the hunt. Sprint has a lot of large markets that will be launching this summer. And Sprint has way more rural LTE coverage and Band 26 overlays.

 

I'm actually more optimistic about a stand alone Sprint now than I have at any point since the deal with SoftBank closed. If Tmo is firing across Sprint's bow again, it's because they realize they are having to compete again with them.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 14
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm actually more optimistic about a stand alone Sprint now than I have at any point since the deal with SoftBank closed. If Tmo is firing across Sprint's bow again, it's because they realize they are having to compete again with them.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

 

Hopefully it is also a sign that they no longer expect that they are going to be bought out....

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since I now know some of the commenters read this thread, thank you for reading S4GRU. Unlimited Framily for one person is $75. Unlimited Simple Choice is $80 for one person.

 

I realize some family plans may add out to less on T-Mobile but it is really not that great a gap.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's actually pretty amusing how the trolls there keep bashing on Sprint and saying how Sprint is still behind Tmo with 230m pops...

 

Hello people?

 

Sprint had over 225 mil covered in May and fired up 28 markets in June for LTE. Three markets, Cleveland, San Jose, and Seattle, already pushes coverage to about an additional 7.5 million people and that's not even counting the other markets in the announcement so Sprint is actually ahead of Tmobile in terms of official LTE coverage. 

 

Edit: I'll actually do a pop count.. hold on..

 

The pops covered with the recent market launches is about 14.7 million people which means Sprint is at around 240 million people officially covered at max. 

 

Edit 2: Las Vegas, Cincinnati, Columbus, and Denver being launched would push Sprint LTE coverage extremely close to 250 million pops covered and it's well within sprints grasp to do so now since the 3 Samsung markets are practically 100% physically converted and Las Vegas is just waiting on the strip. 

 

  • Johnson City, TN
  • San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles, CA
  • Bend, OR
  • Klamath Falls, OR
  • Aberdeen, WA
  • Seattle-Bellevue-Everett, WA
  • Shelton, WA
  • Pine Bluff, AR
  • Bloomington-Normal, IL
  • Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH
  • Fremont, OH
  • Cheyenne, WY
  • Dover, DE
  • Wilmington, DE-MD
  • Yakima, WA
  • Jonesboro-Paragould, AR
  • Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT
  • Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA
  • Reading, PA
  • Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
  • San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA
  • Seneca, SC
  • Bangor, ME
  • Barre, VT
  • Burlington-South Burlington, VT
  • Lewiston-Auburn, ME
  • Rutland-Bennington, VT
  • Port Angeles, WA
Edited by lilotimz
  • Like 13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's actually pretty amusing how the trolls there keep bashing on Sprint and saying how Sprint is still behind Tmo with 230m pops...

 

Hello people?

 

Sprint had over 225 mil covered in May and fired up 28 markets in June for LTE. Three markets, Cleveland, San Jose, and Seattle, already pushes coverage to about an additional 7.5 million people and that's not even counting the other markets in the announcement so Sprint is actually ahead of Tmobile in terms of official LTE coverage. 

 

EXCELLENT POINT!   :2tu:

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's actually pretty amusing how the trolls there keep bashing on Sprint and saying how Sprint is still behind Tmo with 230m pops...

 

Hello people?

 

Sprint had over 225 mil covered in May and fired up 28 markets in June for LTE. Three markets, Cleveland, San Jose, and Seattle, already pushes coverage to about an additional 7.5 million people and that's not even counting the other markets in the announcement so Sprint is actually ahead of Tmobile in terms of official LTE coverage. 

Nuhhh uhhhhhh. I reads in the article differents. hotgifs1015.gif

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The defication from the posterior is really going to hit the rotary oscillator. Fox News just broadcasted the FTC complaint against T-Mobile.

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In addition to the above comments all LTE coverage is most definitely not created equal. In Austin Sprint definitely has a wider spread LTE network than T-Mobile but where T-Mobile has LTE coverage it is certainly faster. The market here is slowly improving for Sprint but the T-Mobile market (my sister has T-Mobile and travels frequently around town) seems to be core downtown and along highways. 

 

 

So, T-Mobile has done an amazing job at getting LTE installed and running here but unfortunately from my experience they seemed to have picked the low hanging fruit where they upgraded the most used towers and towers along major highways and roads but stopped short where Sprint has slowly begun to infill the remaining area for customers to have a more complete LTE coverage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, a big shoutout to S. Ali, wherever you are. Thanks for getting us page views! ;)

 

 

Lol, seeing some of that guy's comments, not just on this particular story, it's safe to say that that dude is truly an idiot.  :lol: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's an actual real world example of T-Mobiles network outside of major cities. I found this on Twitter and thought you would enjoy.

 

First one this morning all excited he got TMobile.

 

y6u3u6eg.jpg

 

 

Hours later when he finds out they provide no coverage in his area.

 

e2u9uqyb.jpg

  • Like 27
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • This site is built but not live. eNB 41150 is still live. eNB 41188 is decommissioned but as far as I can tell the site at 200 West 55th is not built yet. This site is live gNB 1346302. This site is live gNB 1092074 This site is live gNB 1371671 This site is live gNB 1371860 — — — — — Sprint eNB 6156 -> T-Mobile gNB 1349260 Sprint eNB Unknown -> T-Mobile gNB 1325016 — — — — — Bonus T-Mobile 5G small cell, gNB 1348688 in Queens:  
    • FTTH JVs are city by city as well, so it's not going to really be sector by sector. It sounds like TMo wants to be able to sell everyone home broadband, but if that requires building additional infrastructure that infra will take the form of FTTH builds rather than mobile densification. Which involves tradeoffs, but the product is better than e.g. what AT&T is doing for me right now, which is offering only Internet Air in an area where they have 100/20 DSL available but not (yet) fiber.
    • Hopefully they do not wait until these sectors get so overloaded that they start getting nasty reviews and people abandon them. Getting fiber coverage to the area of a overloaded sector can take a year or more. I also question if this can all be managed.  Lots of sectors all over the country can get congested fairly quick.  Lots of work and money to get fiber installed and there goes the profitability on the venture.
    • MoffetNathanson Conference This is a conference where the CFO talks telecom financial analysts so obviously it takes a return on investment approach.  Broadly T-Mobile divides there world into top 100 markets (60%) and small town/rural (40%). They ultimately want to have at least 1/3 market share in rural. They also look at demographics like 50+ and Hispanic.  Reputation is now starting to help them with CIOs.  Did mention c-band buildout beginning in major cities as well as continued band migration to 5g. IMO they may become more aggressive at offering 5g phones to LTE holdover and 5g users without VoNR at a future date. mmWave not discussed. Price increases not discussed iirc. Did mention spectrum purchases from speculators. $9 billion all goes through same ROI process. FWA is down to hexagonal patterns by sector of fallow spectrum. Fiber JVs will go where sectors are overloaded.
    • I am lucky to be served by an excellent fiber ISP and that is the only reason I haven't tried TMOs FWA. Once you go fiber, it is REALLY hard to go back. The choice of sub-10ms ping times is a very artificial bucket, FWA will seldom get much below 10ms ping times but fiber regularly gets me 1-3ms ping times. Basically, at around those times, the speed of light and the distance you are from the server become the limiting factors. As an aside, my internet provider, ZiplyFiber, has been awesome. They peer like crazy at all the major IX in the area and, as a result, you end up with what essentially amounts to direct fiber connections to the vast majority of major data sources. While it isn't sexy, it makes my 1Gb/1Gb connection load pages significantly faster than my works 10Gb/10Gb connection. On the "sexy" side, they are also fastest ISP in the nation. They offer up to 50Gb/50Gb via a direct fiber connection to the router, albeit for an eye watering $900/mo.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...