Jump to content

LTE Plus / Enhanced LTE (was "Sprint Spark" - Official Name for the Tri-Band Network)


Recommended Posts

I just noticed on the coverage maps at Sprint.com that Orange County, CA is live with Spark. It covers from San Juan Capistrano in the south up to Downey and Santa Fe Springs and west to Long Beach. I haven't seen any evidence on this site to support this. Has Sprint gotten ahead of itself on its own coverage maps? Any thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just noticed on the coverage maps at Sprint.com that Orange County, CA is live with Spark. It covers from San Juan Capistrano in the south up to Downey and Santa Fe Springs and west to Long Beach. I haven't seen any evidence on this site to support this. Has Sprint gotten ahead of itself on its own coverage maps? Any thoughts?

I have the same question for OC. I live in Aliso Viejo and they have my area listed as turbo spark but I never even had WiMax anywhere near me. I am waiting for the nexus update to confirm.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just noticed on the coverage maps at Sprint.com that Orange County, CA is live with Spark. It covers from San Juan Capistrano in the south up to Downey and Santa Fe Springs and west to Long Beach. I haven't seen any evidence on this site to support this. Has Sprint gotten ahead of itself on its own coverage maps? Any thoughts?

 

As with everything else, they are overstating the coverage. 

 

Have you checked out our Clear TD-LTE schedule thread to see where to expect Spark coverage?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As with everything else, they are overstating the coverage.

 

Have you checked out our Clear TD-LTE schedule thread to see where to expect Spark coverage?

I did and neither my area nor the other poster's area have Spark planned for it (yet). Just makes me sad that we can be potentially lied to. I'm keeping up hope until I can prove otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was a able make a phone at a sprint store in Houston...

 

Is that like the Build-A-Bear Workshop?

 

;)

 

AJ

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was wondering about the 800 LTE coverage in the OC. I thought Spark meant TD-LTE and 800 LTE. I figured the old Wimax sites got converted but i wasn't aware of any 800 sites.

WiMax is 2600

Nextel was 800

 

Originally, spark seemed to include 800 and 2600. More recently, it has seemed that Spark stands for the TD-LTE (2600). Although the IBEZ zone seems to stop at San Clemente, the FCC has approved an extension for the public emergency folks to get off the 800 band. Until that happens (anyone's guess), we will not get 800 (LTE or CDMA).

 

Note: the sprint coverage maps refer to spark as 2600.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was wondering about the 800 LTE coverage in the OC. I thought Spark meant TD-LTE and 800 LTE. I figured the old Wimax sites got converted but i wasn't aware of any 800 sites.

 

Spark technically is only TD-LTE.

 

However, Sprint uses Spark to refer to it's whole LTE network... it's a little confusing.

 

The OC will not see 800 LTE anytime soon, you probably knew that. I do not know how Sprint is coming up with it's Spark coverage maps, because they definitely show coverage where there never was any WiMax, and there aren't any TD-LTE sites (yet).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was wondering about the 800 LTE coverage in the OC. I thought Spark meant TD-LTE and 800 LTE. I figured the old Wimax sites got converted but i wasn't aware of any 800 sites.

could be worse. you could live so far in the IBEZ that you are only 7 miles from the border  :wall:  :wall:  :wall:  :wall:  :wall:  :wall:  :wall:

 

Would someone please buyout NIH and fix the southside problems? You there Masayoshi?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WiMax is 2600Nextel was 800Originally, spark seemed to include 800 and 2600. More recently, it has seemed that Spark stands for the TD-LTE (2600)Note: the sprint coverage maps refer to spark as 2600.

There are Spark areas where TD 2600 has not been set up yet for 50 miles or so north of Tampa, areas where Wimax has never been. Why would they mark the area as Spark if there won't be 2600 for more than a year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What does the Band 41 panel look like on a tower? Similar to a 800/1900 panel?

Not even close. There is a thread for spotting Band 41 gear. I'd link but I'm on my phone. In many markets its simply the WiMax gear with an updated RRU.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What does the Band 41 panel look like on a tower? Similar to a 800/1900 panel?

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/4344-how-to-spot-sprint-tdd-lte-antennas-rrus-samsung/

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/4928-how-to-spot-clearwire-tdd-lte-wimax-antennas-rrus-huawei/

 

or something resembling this when they start installing equipment for NV 2.0 nationwide TDD-LTE deployment with 8T8R antennas & radios.

 

mQucO51.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Band 41 in Germantown, Md...

 

Meh, Sprint has no reason to serve Germans.  Leave them to Deutsche Telekom.

 

AJ

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When is sprint aggregating two 20mhz channels for spark? I've read they were going to turn it on sometime late this year but on the galaxy s5 info sheet on sprint.com they said late 2015...

Do you have a link to the Sprint GS5 info sheet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When is sprint aggregating two 20mhz channels for spark? I've read they were going to turn it on sometime late this year but on the galaxy s5 info sheet on sprint.com they said late 2015...

 

With many users, couldn't they be on different channels, and if so, what would be the point of joining channels?

 

Would it get a user anything if more than a few people are using their cells on that tower?

 

On LTE in cities now I get 2Mbps in the daytime, which is fine by me.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When is sprint aggregating two 20mhz channels for spark? I've read they were going to turn it on sometime late this year but on the galaxy s5 info sheet on sprint.com they said late 2015...

 

I think I've only read 2015.  And never a specific time in 2015.  So late 2015 doesn't seem out of line from what I;ve seen.  I think I do remember once reading that B41 CA capable devices may be out before 2015.  Maybe that's what you're thinking of in regards to late 2014?

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With many users, couldn't they be on different channels, and if so, what would be the point of joining channels?

 

Would it get a user anything if more than a few people are using their cells on that tower?

 

On LTE in cities now I get 2Mbps in the daytime, which is fine by me.

Bragging rights about who has the fastest network. This is in no way a criticism of Sprint,  just a reality when dealing with the public who refuse to understand anything other than more = better (excluding taxes). I think it will be beneficial for Sprint as it will allow them to showcase what their network can do in terms the dribbling masses can comprehend. Your average consumer simply isn't equipped to figure out how different frequencies or technologies like lte or mimo will affect their service but throw them something like hey we are faster than Verizon and watch them flock to a Sprint store. Everyone wins then. Sprint has a spectrum advantage at higher frequencies and this allows them to leverage that and frankly I doubt most average customers would know if they were on 2500 or 1900 or 800 lte for normal smartphone usage, but they'll be happy knowing they're on the fastest network. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bragging rights about who has the fastest network. This is in no way a criticism of Sprint,  just a reality when dealing with the public who refuse to understand anything other than more = better (excluding taxes). I think it will be beneficial for Sprint as it will allow them to showcase what their network can do in terms the dribbling masses can comprehend. Your average consumer simply isn't equipped to figure out how different frequencies or technologies like lte or mimo will affect their service but throw them something like hey we are faster than Verizon and watch them flock to a Sprint store. Everyone wins then. Sprint has a spectrum advantage at higher frequencies and this allows them to leverage that and frankly I doubt most average customers would know if they were on 2500 or 1900 or 800 lte for normal smartphone usage, but they'll be happy knowing they're on the fastest network.

 

"I saw I was on that 4g lite the other day"

Often heard phrase at our store as NV has been progressing

 

 

My buddies on the competitors network always hide behind the fact that they are on 4g everywhere. Nevermind the fact that the majority of sensorly speed tests on said network in my area range .5 mbs ~ 3.0mbs. No faster then our 3g network. People are sheep, and will eat a good marketing ploy.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...