Jump to content

Samsung Galaxy Note 3


linhpham2

Recommended Posts

SPHN900GYK is the black

SPHN900WTK is white

Unfortunately I don't work again until Thursday, otherwise I would check to see what the model number is via software.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 4

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't check. I do know on the box it only listed 1900 LTE.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 4

 

Well there you have it.  We can call off the Unsolved Mysteries detective now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More like some flat-out benchmark cooking. 

 

This wouldn't be such a problem if people didn't over-focus on benchmarks in the first place.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

More like some flat-out benchmark cooking. 

 

This wouldn't be such a problem if people didn't over-focus on benchmarks in the first place.

 

Yeah, pretty sketchy on Samsung's part. Still a beast of a phone though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it's shady at all. It's not like Samsung is overclocking the parts. Samsung is just showcasing the full potential of the SOC inside.

 

And there is no point of going full throttle when not benchmarking to save heat, battery, and increase component longevity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well The galaxy note 3 will be my choice only if and i mean if the Galaxy note 3 active does not come to sprint. (ill be pissed)

But now with the galaxy note 3 active confirmed and supposed to be shown next week im going to wait a week. Check the links if you  want. They are about the galaxy note 3 active. Im also hoping the GN3A has triband support.

 

http://www.sammobile.com/2013/10/02/samsung-will-announce-its-smartphone-with-curved-display-next-week/

 

http://www.androidauthority.com/flexible-displays-lg-z-galaxy-note-3-active-279158/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well The galaxy note 3 will be my choice only if and i mean if the Galaxy note 3 active does not come to sprint. (ill be pissed)

But now with the galaxy note 3 active confirmed and supposed to be shown next week im going to wait a week. Check the links if you  want. They are about the galaxy note 3 active. Im also hoping the GN3A has triband support.

 

http://www.sammobile.com/2013/10/02/samsung-will-announce-its-smartphone-with-curved-display-next-week/

 

http://www.androidauthority.com/flexible-displays-lg-z-galaxy-note-3-active-279158/

 

 

Oh interesting, thanks for the links. The Note 3 active is going to be a flexible display and limited availability apparently.

 

Now too bad the FCC is shut down and it sounds like the FCC document guru's on here won't be able to get any info on this right now. Or have you guys already seen this device documents? Not sure how Samsung would/could release this fairly soon without the FCC operating normally.

 

The phone sounds great so far...if it is tri-band. *crosses fingers but doubts it seriously for some reason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well The galaxy note 3 will be my choice only if and i mean if the Galaxy note 3 active does not come to sprint. (ill be pissed)

But now with the galaxy note 3 active confirmed and supposed to be shown next week im going to wait a week. Check the links if you  want. They are about the galaxy note 3 active. Im also hoping the GN3A has triband support.

 

http://www.sammobile.com/2013/10/02/samsung-will-announce-its-smartphone-with-curved-display-next-week/

 

http://www.androidauthority.com/flexible-displays-lg-z-galaxy-note-3-active-279158/

 

I have doubts that it will even make it to America, seeing as it will be produced in limited quantities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have doubts that it will even make it to America, seeing as it will be produced in limited quantities.

 

Same here.  I have my doubts that it will make it to America especially if its new technology.  I think it would be wise for Samsung and LG to test out the flexible display demand and performance in Korea first before making it available internationally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SM-N900P that is the model number reported via the software.

Game. Set. Match. S4GRU wins.

 

AJ

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it's shady at all. It's not like Samsung is overclocking the parts. Samsung is just showcasing the full potential of the SOC inside.

 

And there is no point of going full throttle when not benchmarking to save heat, battery, and increase component longevity.

One of the uses of benchmarks is to compare one device to another for regular use (normal power management settings) . Now how useful a benchmark actually is in that regard is certainly debatable. But if some devices up throttle while other don't, that sort of defeats the purpose.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 4

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been looking at the Note 3 for my next phone and have a question. If my area does not have LTE, and won't for the foreseeable future, should I care that the Note 3 is not tri-band?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like Android Police did a review of the Sprint variant of the Note 3:

 

http://www.androidpolice.com/2013/10/02/galaxy-note-3-deep-dive-review-still-making-every-other-big-phone-look-bad/

 

Looks like it'll include a SIM slot afterall.

Posted Image

Was the SIM slot in doubt?

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 4

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been looking at the Note 3 for my next phone and have a question. If my area does not have LTE, and won't for the foreseeable future, should I care that the Note 3 is not tri-band?

 

If you plan on keeping the phone for a year- probably not

If you plan on keeping the phone for 2 years- probably

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been looking at the Note 3 for my next phone and have a question. If my area does not have LTE, and won't for the foreseeable future, should I care that the Note 3 is not tri-band?

Do you live in Alaska?

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Was in Red Hook again and I swear there are more Link5G sites as there are Verizon, T-Mobile, and AT&T small cells combined in the entire neighborhood. It seemed like every other street I turned down had one installed. Hopefully carriers will start hopping on them soon. Seems like a lot of effort to go through for no one to use them.  — — — — — T-Mobile converted the Sprint site on top of NYU Langone Brooklyn in Sunset Park. I first mapped one sector of it back in November 2023 but I thought it was a small cell so I never pinned it but I ran into another sector today which caught me off guard. I'm unable to find a permit for the conversion so it's definitely a surprise. There's another T-Mobile site 1 block away that T-Mobile initially installed back in 2019 so I'm kinda surprised they're keeping both considering the Sprint conversion is on a much taller building and coule potentially provide much better coverage to the entire area. 
    • Still not seeing any ULS postings for pending T-Mobile UScellular merger in Dane county Wisconsin.
    • Came across another Crown Castle Solutions multi-tenant oDAS node in Brooklyn. Located at 40.7002286, -73.9612666. Nothing on T-Mobile or AT&T so I'm assuming these are all Verizon nodes that Crown Castle is anticipating another carrier will hop on down the line.
    • Same with factory unlocked
    • June security update is out (S22U TMO)
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...