Jump to content

Jelly Bean for our HTC EVO 4G LTE??


kckid

Recommended Posts

The package weighs in at 364.54MB' date=' um that is pretty large. Seems like people might need to wipe some stuff off the phone to install...[/quote']

 

The JB update for the S3 came in at 270 mb range

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the GS3 and the EVO LTE are remarkable pieces of hardware, but the GS3 seems to have fewer hardware issues and received the JB update first. Everything's all topsy turvy. I got the EVO because my OG EVO was always at the forefront and was essentially impeccable hardware, and the Samsung phones were rife with GPS and other problems that come with cheap plasticy phones.

Edited by Kinolay
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This really pains me to say it BUT my mother just got a GS3 and I played with it for awhile and i was impressed.

 

Love the Note2 feel. First phone that fits my hands. When typing my thumbs don't feel claustrophobic to each other.

 

No more HTC for me. I mapped a lot of 1x with that phone lately on sensorly. After the touch pro and tp2 fun with swapping those out for keyboard issues all the time I gave them another chance with the EVO LTE. Maybe in 5 years or so.. And I will definitely not be buying it on launch day, it will be a few months after.

 

Sent from a little old Note 2

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Love the Note2 feel. First phone that fits my hands. When typing my thumbs don't feel claustrophobic to each other.

 

No more HTC for me. I mapped a lot of 1x with that phone lately on sensorly. After the touch pro and tp2 fun with swapping those out for keyboard issues all the time I gave them another chance with the EVO LTE. Maybe in 5 years or so.. And I will definitely not be buying it on launch day, it will be a few months after.

 

Sent from a little old Note 2

How did you get it? Did you buy it outright or trade in your EVO LTE? Did you sell your EVO LTE or go to a store and request another phone due to the LTE issues on the EVO? Thanks
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How did you get it? Did you buy it outright or trade in your EVO LTE? Did you sell your EVO LTE or go to a store and request another phone due to the LTE issues on the EVO? Thanks

 

Sold some old tech I had and didn't need. Then used my other lines upgrade and donated the EVO to them.

 

Sent from a little old Note 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is another leak that says people got Jelly been for EVO before they pulled it. The date they say will be December 2nd. Ugh another few days, but that seems kinda early to since the One S does not have it unless i missed something.

Edited by Exzir
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is another leak that says people got Jelly been for EVO before they pulled it. The date they say will be December 2nd. Ugh another few days, but that seems kinda early to since the One S does not have it unless i missed something.

 

That's not happening either, and no noone got the update at all before so dunno how that story got twisted through the grapevine...

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The leak say it was due to higher than exspected sales at black friday that the update was pulled. Sever load for activation would have given new customers a bad tast in their mouth. So they pulled it till the 2nd of December.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The leak say it was due to higher than exspected sales at black friday that the update was pulled. Sever load for activation would have given new customers a bad tast in their mouth. So they pulled it till the 2nd of December.

The other thing I heard is that they pulled the update because HTC/Sprint wanted to modify stability with Sense UI....

Only time will tell the story I guess....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tested Flash on my friends S3 with Jelly Bean and it worked in native browser but not in chrome. I'm good to go when it comes out. Whenever that may be!!! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I heard there was a rumor that there was a rumor that there was a memo that said there might be an upgrade to the rumor generator.

 

My general rule is to believe half of official memos and no rumors.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well to hear something is better than nothing... I am sure there was a reason you brought up this page other than clicking on the check for update. I like shareing info with others. If the update does not come out on Dec 2nd I'll keep it to myself but this date just seems right to me and maybe i am just hopeful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
    • I wouldn’t be shocked if it’s Verizon, too. In my area they have multiple nodes on the same block as full macro sites with mmWave, in direct line of sight. 
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...