Jump to content

Jelly Bean for our HTC EVO 4G LTE??


kckid

Recommended Posts

I think that they are waiting on AT&T. The flagship phone has to get it first. Remember, for the Sense 4.1 update it came out shortly after AT&T's did. Since the One X+ just came out, I think AT&T will start pushing out JB soon. And then the EVO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that they are waiting on AT&T. The flagship phone has to get it first. Remember, for the Sense 4.1 update it came out shortly after AT&T's did. Since the One X+ just came out, I think AT&T will start pushing out JB soon. And then the EVO.

That would be a pretty bogus reason IMO. The One X is only available on AT&T and Most would consider the EVOLTE the better phone. If the update is ready then they should just release it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you imagine the number of pissed off people if this update is NOT JB?.....

 

If its NOT JB then I can't see what issue other than LTE connection fix would prompt them to spend time on a MR OTA... Especially with JB update around the corner.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

Yep, can't wait to hear all the complaints and comments. It will make for great entertainment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would that cause the phone to reboot though?

 

I don't remember if it rebooted or not but it did look a little similar to update install. I almost did a screen shot but I was driving and did not think it was wise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking more like a hoax. No update yet.

 

This has been confirmed by Sprint so it is not a hoax... ...but the date it will be released is the problem. Working with stuff like this you can enter into a oh no that problem needs to be fixed before we release it phase. I have seen one hour before a release of an update to a software program and it go back to the drawing board and take almost another month.

Edited by Exzir
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey, kckid the pic on page 4 is what the reply was to. Check it out. Only problem i see is there seems to be a que to who will get the update i think it might be due to the size of the update. My guess is it could be over 200mb but time will tell...

Edited by Exzir
Link to comment
Share on other sites

just left evo lte for s3. Still monitoring to see if they ever release this update that is taking forever.

 

Samsung has made a lot of mistakes with previous devices but they really kicked up a notch with the gs2 and now the gs3/note2. As much as I love htc and still prefer the evo(just barely), I don't see how much longer htc can last in this game. I wouldn't be surprised if samsung eventually bought htc out at some point.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Samsung has made a lot of mistakes with previous devices but they really kicked up a notch with the gs2 and now the gs3/note2. As much as I love htc and still prefer the evo(just barely), I don't see how much longer htc can last in this game. I wouldn't be surprised if samsung eventually bought htc out at some point.

 

If they do, I hope they make some build quality improvements instead of just using plastic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Samsung has made a lot of mistakes with previous devices but they really kicked up a notch with the gs2 and now the gs3/note2. As much as I love htc and still prefer the evo(just barely), I don't see how much longer htc can last in this game. I wouldn't be surprised if samsung eventually bought htc out at some point.

This really pains me to say it BUT my mother just got a GS3 and I played with it for awhile and i was impressed.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they do, I hope they make some build quality improvements instead of just using plastic.

 

Samsungs "plastic feel" build quality probably isn't going any where any time soon but I am more concerned about the screen quality since I hate amoled screens. If the galaxy s4 comes out with an slcd 3 screen then it will make my purchase a lot more tolerable.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My evo lte feels awesome when I take it out of my otterbox commuter once a month! Lol

 

In my experience plastic seems to take more punishment then aluminum. Plastic seems to absorb a lot more energy without getting permanent damage. Drop the evo lte and it will scratch the paint or get a major dent. I still love the evo though.

 

Sent from my EVO LTE

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many people compare the "build quality" but slap an otterbox defender or similar case on it anyway?

 

My gs3 came by ups on monday. Went to put the battery in and activate it. Felt like i was going to snap it in half pulling off the battery cover. Then I played with it for about and hour and didnt like how flimsy it felt in my hand. So I jumped in the car and went and picked up a defender. Much better feel now.

 

Just doesn't feel anywhere near as tough naked as my og evo did

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
    • I wouldn’t be shocked if it’s Verizon, too. In my area they have multiple nodes on the same block as full macro sites with mmWave, in direct line of sight. 
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...