Jump to content

Dish Network/Boost Mobile cell/5G buildout thread


PythonFanPA

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, clbowens said:

So is red where they have active coverage (5G towers) and blue where they own spectrum?

Red is active coverage, black is currently permitting (covering imminent) and light blue is roaming. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

DISH and T-Mobile Expand Network Services Partnership

https://about.dish.com/2022-06-21-DISH-and-T-Mobile-Expand-Network-Services-Partnership

Quote

DISH Network (NASDAQ:DISH) and T-Mobile (NASDAQ:TMUS) signed an amendment to the 2020 Master Network Services Agreement (MNSA) that provides customers of DISH's retail wireless brands, including Boost Mobile, access to T-Mobile's nationwide 5G network.

The amendment, which will become effective upon approval by the United States Department of Justice, incorporates financial and operational changes, including improved pricing and enhanced roaming solutions for DISH 5G customers in consideration of an annual minimum revenue commitment through the remaining term of the MNSA.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, clbowens said:

So, this is good news for T-Mobile, right?

If I had to guess, it probably just allows T-Mobile to achieve parity with AT&T with regard to their roaming deal with Dish. Potentially a lot of money in this deal for T-Mobile. The CMO of T-Mobile said;

Quote

"While DISH customers will benefit from our network, this deal also locks in a multi-billion dollar revenue commitment for our business. It's a win-win."

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

More of a big deal for Dish, since now they have really good roaming agreements with everyone except Verizon, so once they get their network stuff set up they'll have the best coverage on cheap plans, so not a whole lot of reason not to use them. At which point Dish can build out a thin network layer for outdoor coverage (tight enough spacing for n70 outdoors) and take their sweet time on providing anything more than that due to cheap roaming. They can add sites based on really high roaming usage as needed, but they'll have a few years to do that, and they could add those sites as n48/77 small cells overlaying their macro grid in a surgical fashion, much as AT&T is adding n77 on their own network. Kinda brilliant for "build a network on a shoestring" use cases.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dish already has customers on a TMobile sim or an AT&T sim.

Genesis customers will have a Dish sim, so should theoretically be able to 5G roam on either AT&T or TMo.

As it says, just an amendment to their existing contract so I don't think anything too exciting.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, iansltx said:

More of a big deal for Dish, since now they have really good roaming agreements with everyone except Verizon

Do they have one with US Cellular?

- Trip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Trip said:

Do they have one with US Cellular?

- Trip

I think there was talk of one, including tower leases. Don't think they do now though. With the TMo overbuild going on though, there may not be much of a need to actually roam on USCC.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, red_dog007 said:

Genesis customers will have a Dish sim, so should theoretically be able to 5G roam on either AT&T or TMo.

That is my hope. They roam on whoever is best.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, iansltx said:

I think there was talk of one, including tower leases. Don't think they do now though. With the TMo overbuild going on though, there may not be much of a need to actually roam on USCC.

i actually roam on Us cellular 5g in parts of fremont, ne, even though tmobile has "1" 5g tower here

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, dkyeager said:

Thanks for posting.  It was sneaky and definitely a direct affront to the rules. They got caught.  And now after all this time, money spent on legal pursuits and fines, this was a very expensive mistake.

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So my hotspot would've gotten delivered today, but Dish screwed up the delivery address. So now I'm waiting for a call back from them as they sort things out with FedEx. Hopefully they call soon enough that I can pick up at a FedEx location here or something, as I really want to play with it both here (Albuquerque) and in Denver, and then in San Marcos/New Braunfels.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Signals Research Group just completed their 25th 5G NR benchmark study and released a preview of their findings in their newsletter. They tested Dish's and T-Mobile's 5G networks in Las Vegas. Here are the key takeaways:

Quote

Dish has 10 MHz of Band n71 (600 MHz) as well as at least 20 MHz of Band n70/n66 (2 GHz), with Band n71 always serving as the primary cell (P cell), meaning the smartphones always used Band n71 for uplink data transfers and for VoNR calls. As a frame of reference, we also tested the T-Mobile 5G network, including 15 MHz of Band n71 and 100 MHz of Band n41 (TDD 2.5 GHz). We tested this network in SA mode to make it easier to compare results between the two networks, as well as in NSA mode when conducting our voice tests. By default, this meant voice calls on the T-Mobile network used VoLTE (Band 66) while they used VoNR on the DISH Wireless network.

— — — — —

[Dish's] overall network performance wasn’t terrible, and there were some indications of quite good performance, but there was no consistency in the performance and consistency is something that consumers expect. For example, downlink testing produced some high throughput, and much better than we observed on the Rakuten network after normalizing for channel bandwidth, but there was very inconsistent use of carrier aggregation (CA). Uplink test results definitely favored UDP while with HTTP there was a big disparity in performance versus the T-Mobile network. It was also quite easy for the data transfer to stop or deliver very low data speeds while mobile. We also observed VoNR voice quality (MOS) that was as good, if not better, than anything we’ve captured with VoLTE, but there were also frequent instances with very poor voice quality, even while stationary and with good RF conditions. Another fly in the ointment, and which impacted our testing, was the frequent switching of the smartphones on the DISH Wireless network to the AT&T network. We excluded these results in our study, but we had to be on our toes when collecting the data to identify when this situation occurred.

Based on the data we have at our disposal (we weren’t able to capture chipset diagnostic messages on the DISH Wireless network), we believe there are opportunities for the operator to improve the RF conditions with more cell sites and better RF optimization and for the vendors to enhance the performance of their platforms via software upgrades. AWS (Amazon Web Services) may also play a factor in the results or at least the use of this platform could have impacted the high latency and voice results we obtained.

https://signalsresearch.com/issue/5g-the-greatest-show-on-earth-25/

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The see Dish as the Beta network for a while. Basically once they have secured their licenses and have inexpensive phones that utilize all their bands I hope to see them reduce the edge space of their network or improve the transfer performance so customers have more of an invisible handoff experience. This will likely be late 2023. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Paynefanbro said:

Signals Research Group just completed their 25th 5G NR benchmark study and released a preview of their findings in their newsletter. They tested Dish's and T-Mobile's 5G networks in Las Vegas. Here are the key takeaways:

https://signalsresearch.com/issue/5g-the-greatest-show-on-earth-25/

Man I wish I could get on their beta right now.  Looks like I'll have to wait until Dec or so. 

The report is not surprising really.  Largely only have employees roaming around running tests and what not.  I am sure lots of testing is needed to iron out bugs, fix things.  Though a lot of it might be denser network.  Only so much you can do and money is spread out very thin when you have such a large target to hit. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, red_dog007 said:

Man I wish I could get on their beta right now.  Looks like I'll have to wait until Dec or so. 

The report is not surprising really.  Largely only have employees roaming around running tests and what not.  I am sure lots of testing is needed to iron out bugs, fix things.  Though a lot of it might be denser network.  Only so much you can do and money is spread out very thin when you have such a large target to hit. 

I see it as more of an economic calculation.  Basically go after the areas where they have the best odds of retaining or attracting customers versus their MVNO arrangements. The quicker they can switch back and forth between 5g and MVNOs the finer grained this decision zone can be. 

Field results will beat theory.  In Sprint days this was up to 15 minutes in theory. In practice AT&T could be quite sticky.  I remember driving by 3 Sprint sites while still stuck on AT&T roaming. Dish will need to do better to thrive. Both their MVNO arrangements reportedly now cost them about $1.50 per GB. With volume that may fall to $1.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got the hotspot, and got it set up (took a call in, but wasn't a big deal). Roaming data is a low-throughput mess without IPv6 connectivity, but it does work. Haven't gotten the hotspot somewhere with a decent DishNet signal so not sure how the native network performs in Albuquerque. Should know in the next few days. IP address while roaming was us-east-1, with the accompanying 200+ms latency penalty. Will be interesting to see whether the device starts roaming on T-Mobile as well now that the agreement includes in-market roaming on that side.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...