Jump to content

Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread


Recommended Posts

TMobile is crappy..I mean seriously though... Charging $15 to swap your sim card to another phone even if you just take it out they charge you an extra $15 that's ridiculous that's total BS. I'm glad I'm with Verizon prepaid now. I don't have to deal with that crap.


Huh?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, danlodish345 said:

TMobile is crappy..I mean seriously though... Charging $15 to swap your sim card to another phone even if you just take it out they charge you an extra $15 that's ridiculous that's total BS. I'm glad I'm with Verizon prepaid now. I don't have to deal with that crap.

 


Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
 

 

It's for Metro Pcs and it's always been that way. Just didn't enforce it until now.  Dealers are losing money when people get there new phones and leave the store only to swap the device then sell it. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/4/2018 at 9:31 AM, nexgencpu said:

Not in my city, Sprint is currently the fastest! Especially after LTE-A was pushed out a couple of weeks ago!

https://twitter.com/SprintCTO/status/1068227212233633792

I mean, in the borough of Manhattan they are. You'd think they would be more than tied with Verizon too considering their spectrum position. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Thomas L. said:

I mean, in the borough of Manhattan they are. You'd think they would be more than tied with Verizon too considering their spectrum position. 

This is Verizon's home town, not only that, they had politicians in their pockets here until very recently with the whole FIOS fiasco. 

Here is some insight on that..

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/13/nyregion/ny-sues-verizon-fios.html

Despite that, they have had the easy road deploying fiber with massive state subsidies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, nexgencpu said:

This is Verizon's home town, not only that, they had politicians in their pockets here until very recently with the whole FIOS fiasco. 

Here is some insight on that..

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/13/nyregion/ny-sues-verizon-fios.html

Despite that, they have had the easy road deploying fiber with massive state subsidies.

At my one property today I saw Verizon running fiber to a cell tower a few hundred feet away, they must need more bandwidth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Thomas L. said:

I mean, in the borough of Manhattan they are. You'd think they would be more than tied with Verizon too considering their spectrum position. 

For what it's worth, Verizon does have more spectrum in use than Sprint right now in NYC. I think they are using something like 110MHz of spectrum compared to the 100MHz that Sprint is using. Also like nexgencpu said, the main accolade is that Sprint is now beating Verizon in their home borough, a borough that has a daytime population of nearly 4 Million people. Having the fastest speed in Manhattan affects not only those that live there but also the millions that commute there from throughout the tri-state area on a daily basis.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's still bogus. Why screw over the customers who have been with them for a long time. It's not fair. I mean okay new customers sure but customers that have been with them for years will leave them and go to other carriers. So it's not really going to be a proper thing to do for a long T-Mobile has already reversed it.

It's for Metro Pcs and it's always been that way. Just didn't enforce it until now.  Dealers are losing money when people get there new phones and leave the store only to swap the device then sell it. 


Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Paynefanbro said:

For what it's worth, Verizon does have more spectrum in use than Sprint right now in NYC. I think they are using something like 110MHz of spectrum compared to the 100MHz that Sprint is using. Also like nexgencpu said, the main accolade is that Sprint is now beating Verizon in their home borough, a borough that has a daytime population of nearly 4 Million people. Having the fastest speed in Manhattan affects not only those that live there but also the millions that commute there from throughout the tri-state area on a daily basis.

In one way the graphic of Sprint beating VZW. 60megs to 50 in one way is kinda sad.  VZW has 2.5x more customers then Sprint does and they still are competing. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, runagun said:

In one way the graphic of Sprint beating VZW. 60megs to 50 in one way is kinda sad.  VZW has 2.5x more customers then Sprint does and they still are competing. 

You can make that argument on a nationwide scale, but in cities like NYC/Chicago/LA where the carriers have way more customer parity, that disparity is not really an issue. So that argument is somewhat invalid. Where ATT and V win out, is in more rural and suburban areas.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, runagun said:

In one way the graphic of Sprint beating VZW. 60megs to 50 in one way is kinda sad.  VZW has 2.5x more customers then Sprint does and they still are competing. 

That's assuming Verizon has 2.5x more consumers than Sprint in NYC. Anecdotally I don't find that to be the case. I don't doubt that Sprint has the least amount out of the big 4 however the difference between who has the most and who has the least is not as wide as you'd think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, don't forget that Sprint users consume more data than VZW users on cellular.  This will add some offset into the number of additional customers VZW has.

https://www.androidheadlines.com/2017/04/study-consumer-data-consumption-q1-2017-released.html

https://www.fool.com/investing/2018/10/28/heres-how-much-smartphone-data-americans-are-using.aspx

From these two separate reports, 1 Sprint customer equals roughly 1.25~1.3 VZW customers. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, don't forget that Sprint users consume more data than VZW users on cellular.  This will add some offset into the number of additional customers VZW has.
https://www.androidheadlines.com/2017/04/study-consumer-data-consumption-q1-2017-released.html
https://www.fool.com/investing/2018/10/28/heres-how-much-smartphone-data-americans-are-using.aspx
From these two separate reports, 1 Sprint customer equals roughly 1.25~1.3 VZW customers. 
I actually don't use Wi-Fi a whole lot I'm Verizon prepaid I've used over 40 gigs this month

Sent from my BBE100-5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/4/2018 at 10:36 AM, nexgencpu said:

https://www.androidcentral.com/metro-t-mobile-now-charging-15-every-time-you-switch-phones told you they would reverse it!

Edited by BlueAngel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, danlodish345 said:

Has to do with the cellular data consumption

Sent from my BBE100-5 using Tapatalk
 

Your individual example means absoulute zero to the general point he was making. You might has well said the second planet from the sun is Venus in response. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your individual example means absoulute zero to the general point he was making. You might has well said the second planet from the sun is Venus in response. 
Nonetheless it's still relevant and you don't have to be so obnoxious and rude that's not called for understand me

Sent from my Moto Z3 Play using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like Kevin Crull, Chief Strategy Officer is leaving at the end of the year: https://www.bizjournals.com/kansascity/news/2018/12/06/sprint-crull-chief-strategy-officer-leaves.html

Sprint Corp. Chief Strategy Officer Kevin Crull will leave the Overland Park-based company at the end of the year, according to a Thursday filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The mutual decision for Crull to leave was made Monday and will take effect Dec. 31, the filing states.

Crull also leads Sprint's (NYSE: S) Integration Management Office (IMO) and 5G DEVGRU.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites




I don’t see them as crooked... first and foremost they are a COMPANY.

Oh well


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
But none the less though I still see that fee as a ridiculous one.

Sent from my Moto Z3 Play using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Johnner1999 said:

Well this would be the logical path. Otherwise what’s the point

https://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/news/2018/12/10/t-mobile-braxton-carter-sprint-takeover-strategy.amp.html



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It is a bit more nuanced that that. They will use 10,000 of Sprint's sites that are not colocated or close to T-Mobile sites and add 10,000 more. They would probably reuse some of the network equipment (RRHs) and also some of the small cells. But I like the fact that he said that every citywide be analyzed as to what is the best integration strategy.

Edited by bigsnake49
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The new T-Mobile is going to boil down to a neighborhood by neighborhood decision for Sprint customers, some of which will depend on what work gets completed by Sprint assuming merger is successful. 

I am assuming former Clear sites that do not get Triband upgrades are typically toast.  Sites with more recent investments stand a better chance of surviving, assuming they are not co-sites.  Of course all existing equipment could still be junked.  800 RRHs have the best odds, given they will likely be the last bastion of Sprint CDMA.  We are seeing some 1900 firmware changes that would allow for more spectrum to be used for LTE that may affect these RRH's retention.  I would also assume cabinets are toast or at least retrofitted. The main factor in keeping some of the equipment would be new equipment shortages and future 5G compatible replacements being needed in coming years.

Network needs and leasing costs would be main individual site factors.  I would think markets with a low Sprint Market share would lose the most Sprint sites while those with a large Sprint Market share would have better odds for unique Sprint site retention.  Of course the FCC might mandate that VoLTE must cover all areas covered by Sprint CDMA, but this would mostly affect rural areas. 

I am also assuming that the new T-Mobile will start urban in the larger markets given T-Mobile's past history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, dkyeager said:

The new T-Mobile is going to boil down to a neighborhood by neighborhood decision for Sprint customers, some of which will depend on what work gets completed by Sprint assuming merger is successful. 

I am assuming former Clear sites that do not get Triband upgrades are typically toast.  Sites with more recent investments stand a better chance of surviving, assuming they are not co-sites.  Of course all existing equipment could still be junked.  800 RRHs have the best odds, given they will likely be the last bastion of Sprint CDMA.  We are seeing some 1900 firmware changes that would allow for more spectrum to be used for LTE that may affect these RRH's retention.  I would also assume cabinets are toast or at least retrofitted. The main factor in keeping some of the equipment would be new equipment shortages and future 5G compatible replacements being needed in coming years.

Network needs and leasing costs would be main individual site factors.  I would think markets with a low Sprint Market share would lose the most Sprint sites while those with a large Sprint Market share would have better odds for unique Sprint site retention.  Of course the FCC might mandate that VoLTE must cover all areas covered by Sprint CDMA, but this would mostly affect rural areas. 

I am also assuming that the new T-Mobile will start urban in the larger markets given T-Mobile's past history.

What about the 2500MHz RRHs?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

×
×
  • Create New...