Jump to content

Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread


Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, nexgencpu said:

Here comes the anti merger coalition..

https://www.4competition.org/about/

C spire is probably the only one who has legitimate concerns (and probably quite a few other regional carriers) about decreased competition leading to increased roaming rates.

Dish? They have no leg to stand on. They need to get off their behind and actually deploy their spectrum. They might even get some Sprint network elements at a discounted price if the merger goes through.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, bigsnake49 said:

Dish? They have no leg to stand on. They need to get off their behind and actually deploy their spectrum. They might even get some Sprint network elements at a discounted price if the merger goes through.

I agree that Dish really needs to stay away from any real wireless discussions. 

I still do not get how they have effectively duped the government into letting them horde all that spectrum.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, nexgencpu said:

I agree that Dish really needs to stay away from any real wireless discussions. 

I still do not get how they have effectively duped the government into letting them horde all that spectrum.

They have not. The government is on their behinds and may soon start repossessing some of that spectrum.

Dish actually wanted to acquire Clearwire and then Sprint but were rebuffed but managed to make it more expensive for Sprint to acquire Clearwire and then for Softbank to acquire Sprint. Then when that failed, they drove the price for AWS-3 spectrum to stratospheric heights. They made quite a few enemies on the way. They bet on spectrum shortage and speculated that it will be lucrative. They were wrong particularly with the 3.5GHz spectrum and then the C-Band spectrum being made available. They oppose the merger because they think T-Mobile will acquire them for their mid band spectrum if the merger does not go through. T-Mobile has no intention of doing anything of the sort and will try to acquire 3.5GHz and C-Band spectrum should the merger fail.

Edited by bigsnake49
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have not. The government is on their behinds and may soon start repossessing some o that spectrum.

Dish is well in the process of rolling out the spectrum .. in the last week many people report seeing tons of dish network wireless tower permits on their local tower pages


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, bigsnake49 said:

I don't see why not if they have an agreement with Sprint.

This all depends on what the FCC decides to do with 2.5GHz (Band 41).  Currently these groups exist because 5% iirc is to be held back when 2.5 EDS is leased to a commercial firm.  Some of the new proposals will allow the EDS licenses to be sold (which may interest Verizon) which would end this practice.  This reexamination of 2.5 by the FCC is supposed to be occurring about now.    It would also allow the 2.5 that is not licensed to be given away to the non-profits/tribes or sold.  Many of the places that only have CA is because the FCC has not put more 2.5 on the market.  Of course the FCC may choose to delay this until after this merger question is decided.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, tyroned3222 said:


Dish is well in the process of rolling out the spectrum .. in the last week many people report seeing tons of dish network wireless tower permits on their local tower pages


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yup! saw they signed a big deal with Ericsson for deployment. It all seems "legit" but I think it's mostly posturing and once again meeting minimum requirements.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, dkyeager said:

This all depends on what the FCC decides to do with 2.5GHz (Band 41).  Currently these groups exist because 5% iirc is to be held back when 2.5 EDS is leased to a commercial firm.  Some of the new proposals will allow the EDS licenses to be sold (which may interest Verizon) which would end this practice.  This reexamination of 2.5 by the FCC is supposed to be occurring about now.    It would also allow the 2.5 that is not licensed to be given away to the non-profits/tribes or sold.  Many of the places that only have CA is because the FCC has not put more 2.5 on the market.  Of course the FCC may choose to delay this until after this merger question is decided.

The EBS spectrum is a big boondoggle. In the 70s and 80s it was actually used for remote learning by actual educational institutions. For example in the Dallas area there were quite a few educational institutions that banded together and offered classes to students of other institutions and private companies via TV broadcasting. I remember attending couple of those classes. The majority of educational institutions and non-profits never implemented anything and have been squatting on the spectrum for 40-50 years. Others were obsoleted by the advent of the web. They need to clean up the EBS spectrum pronto. There is no reason for Sprint to be paying the Catholic Church billions of $$$ to lease the spectrum. I'd rather they paid the government.

Edited by bigsnake49
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, nexgencpu said:

I agree that Dish really needs to stay away from any real wireless discussions. 

I still do not get how they have effectively duped the government into letting them horde all that spectrum.

Government doesn't care who is bidding so long as they pay.  If you don't meet build out deadlines then they get it back.  Dish isn't the only one to do this.  It is part of the agreement so it is expected to happen.  Shoot, Dish even paid a premium to the FCC for PCS H-Block to extended AWS4 buildout deadlines.  

Most of the spectrum they have really that is due soon for deployments is AWS4.  We can actually thank dish for making this cellular spectrum.  They got it on the cheap, originally as satellite spectrum.  They asked FCC if it can be used for cellular and the FCC put buildout deadlines on it.  

Dish clearly didn't want to build a network.  They wanted to buy one or partner with one.  Didn't work, so now they build. 

Edited by red_dog007
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Me too, I wonder if sprint would have even raised capex if it wasn’t for a possible merger ..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm still interested in seeing if this merger gets cleared I'm not saying yes it's going to happen no it's not going to happen I just leave the odds at 50-50.

Sent from my Moto Z3 Play using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm still interested in seeing if this merger gets cleared I'm not saying yes it's going to happen no it's not going to happen I just leave the odds at 50-50.

 

Sent from my Moto Z3 Play using Tapatalk

 

Yup, ether way the sprint customer is going to get a better network .. merger or not .. carry the same amount of capex into fiscal 19 should work wonders for sprint and might actual show native coverage expansion .

Sprint has 4 years of T-mobile roaming and can close the gap in the 4 years it took tmo 5

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup, ether way the sprint customer is going to get a better network .. merger or not .. carry the same amount of capex into fiscal 19 should work wonders for sprint and might actual show native coverage expansion .
Sprint has 4 years of T-mobile roaming and can close the gap in the 4 years it took tmo 5
 
 
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm still waiting to see whether spring falls through with the promise of expanding coverage. I've gotten to the point where I will only believe it when I see it. So when I start seeing full LTE service with Sprint at my parents place which gets pretty much Verizon roaming and only one bar of 1 x then I will believe Sprint.

Sent from my Moto Z3 Play using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm still waiting to see whether spring falls through with the promise of expanding coverage. I've gotten to the point where I will only believe it when I see it. So when I start seeing full LTE service with Sprint at my parents place which gets pretty much Verizon roaming and only one bar of 1 x then I will believe Sprint.

Sent from my Moto Z3 Play using Tapatalk


Well for now if tmo has lte service there you would connect to that


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Well for now if tmo has lte service there you would connect to that


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ironically enough I have T-Mobile. but now TMobile is also under investigation as well as Verizon for lying about coverage.

Sent from my Moto Z3 Play using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Ya, they both will claim expected coverage on most of these ..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
But you're so required to be honest about the coverage not lie about it. The fact they took Federal money and then lied about their coverage they are obviously going to be investigated. That's the government's right.

Sent from my Moto Z3 Play using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does the merger get to a monopoly? There woukd still be three players?  
You have three main players that in the market space would stifle innovation for 1. And then you would have higher prices among the three carriers and then also smaller competitor carriers will be charged higher roaming rates an access to networking equipment for their Network gear would be more expensive. and then there's even a possibility the chips going inside the phones would be more expensive there for making it prohibitively expensive all around. And then on top of that those are on prepaid would have higher prices too. Its overall more expensive and not very good for the cellular industry here in the United States. You need one extra carrier for competition in order to keep prices low and innovation going.

Sent from my Moto Z3 Play using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting... in the following CNN link, T Mobile Indicated the Justice Dept, Homeland Security and Defense Dept all withdrew a request for a merger delay.... "Cleared key hurdles"...   I like the video feed, if you can see it... with Marcelo and John.    John is always the key spokesperson.    Marcelo is kinda just in the background mostly...

Could this mean that the merger is very quickly drawing to a close?    What's your take?   How soon do you think this can this happen?

T-Mobile and Sprint just cleared key hurdles to their huge merger  

Edited by dro1984
fix spelling
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, dro1984 said:

Interesting... in the following CNN link, T Mobile Indicated the Justice Dept, Homeland Security and Defense Dept all withdrew a request for a merger delay.... "Cleared key hurdles"...   I like the video feed, if you can see it... with Marcelo and John.    John is always the key spokesperson.    Marcelo is kinda just in the background mostly...

Could this mean that the merger is very quickly drawing to a close?    What's your take?   How soon do you think this can this happen?

T-Mobile and Sprint just cleared key hurdles to their huge merger  

It's basically up to the FCC now. I expect it to be approved in the first Quarter of 2019 and close soon thereafter.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, bigsnake49 said:

It's basically up to the FCC now. I expect it to be approved in the first Quarter of 2019 and close soon thereafter.

I am hoping for an early gift.      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Internet Air arrived at my parents' place last week, and got set up over the weekend. Upload speeds were respectable at ~30 Mbps in some areas. Downloads, less than 100 Mbps. T-Mobile performs a lot better, off of AFAIK the same site (albeit with lower upload speeds). So after some more testing the AT&T box will probably get returned.
    • https://news.samsung.com/global/one-ui-6-1-brings-galaxy-ai-from-s24-series-to-even-more-galaxy-devices So it will be missing the advanced photo editing.  Likely the same for the S21 series. Google may be covering that for phones from Android 8 with 3GB of Ram, although they are reserving some functions just for Pixels.
    • Google is opening up its AI type editing features to "To use some features, you must have at least 3 GB RAM and Android 8.0 and up." Of course some features are reserved for Pixel phones.    Wonder if this will cause Samsung to expand what the s21 can do in terms of AI in future firmware updates?    Of course what we are really talking about is the data that they can capture from photos. Access to all your photos is required.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...