Jump to content

Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread


Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, chamb said:

Yep, Sprint's CDMA 1x800 is GREAT.  I sure hope they keep it around as long as possible.  Right now, VOLTE will not have the same coverage that the 1x800 does. Band 26 LTE(800) will never match the coverage provided by the 800 1x coverage, not even close.

They need to add it to more sites. I'm getting 1x800 from site(s) 4-6 miles away not the site .5 mile away. I could definitely use some band 26 broadcasting from that site. While they're at it they need to increase the band 41 to 3 carriers.

Edited by bigsnake49
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, bigsnake49 said:

For Sprint customers, the merger will be a godsend. The New T-Mobile will have 85,000 macro sites vs Sprint's current 45,000. The average signal improvement for Sprint customers will be 12db. For current T-Mobile customers it will only be improved by 1db. For current T-mobile customers , it is all about the promise of 5G.

How many towers does T-mobile currently have?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bigsnake49 said:

65,000

oh wow I didn't think they had that many. I was guessing around 55k. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, derrph said:

oh wow I didn't think they had that many. I was guessing around 55k. 

The New T-mobile will end up with 85, 000. 10,000 Sprint sites and 10,000 new sites.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, bigsnake49 said:

The New T-mobile will end up with 85, 000. 10,000 Sprint sites and 10,000 new sites.

That network will be a beast once 600 is deployed. They will also have 40000 small cells. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/21/2018 at 4:55 PM, nexgencpu said:

I'm already thinking of Verizon myself..

I do not want to be around while integration is happening to say the least.

As long as you are on a new device, I bet the integration will be fairly seem less on the network side.  Beings the underlying technology for both companies is LTE and the changes of a local TMobile and Sprint site going fully down at exactly the same time I doubt will happen. 

And right now with the roaming agreement they are already getting to jump ahead, getting the networks at least a little integrated with each other now.  Depending on their confidence level of the merger happening, I would not be surprised if they do even deeper integration to allow them to turn on with a "switch" once the merger is approved. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PythonFanPA said:

Is there any kind of rough idea on how long the consideration process could/would take now that they've officially filed with the FCC?

A maximum of 180 days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, red_dog007 said:

As long as you are on a new device, I bet the integration will be fairly seem less on the network side.  Beings the underlying technology for both companies is LTE and the changes of a local TMobile and Sprint site going fully down at exactly the same time I doubt will happen. 

And right now with the roaming agreement they are already getting to jump ahead, getting the networks at least a little integrated with each other now.  Depending on their confidence level of the merger happening, I would not be surprised if they do even deeper integration to allow them to turn on with a "switch" once the merger is approved. 

It will be so much easier since Sprint phones could roam on band 4 and band 2 before and after the merger. I expect band 25 to be first integrated into T-Mobile's network, then band 26 then band 41. At least that's the way I'd do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it’s nice that Sprint has a roaming agreement in the event the merger is rejected. From a network perspective, Sprint has a lot of roaming. I wonder what the roaming map looks like and how much Sprint pays? 

I wonder if Sprint will drop most of their roaming partners in areas where there’s T-Mobile service? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, derrph said:

I think it’s nice that Sprint has a roaming agreement in the event the merger is rejected. From a network perspective, Sprint has a lot of roaming. I wonder what the roaming map looks like and how much Sprint pays? 

I wonder if Sprint will drop most of their roaming partners in areas where there’s T-Mobile service? 

I do believe that they will drop them after the merger closes. Of course they have agreements with them and it depends on the terms of agreement whether they are protected or not.

Remember that Sprint already has a roaming agreement with AT&T for LTE. I am guessing that the roaming agreement with T-Mobile is on better terms/cheaper.

Edited by bigsnake49
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, bigsnake49 said:

I do believe that they will drop them after the merger closes. Of course they have agreements with them and it depends on the terms of agreement whether they are protected or not.

Remember that Sprint already has a roaming agreement with AT&T for LTE. I am guessing that the roaming agreement with T-Mobile is on better terms/cheaper.

Well yeah after the merger I would expect that to happen. I wonder if in the event the merger is rejected if most will be dropped in favor of the T-Mobile roaming. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bigsnake49 said:

I do believe that they will drop them after the merger closes. Of course they have agreements with them and it depends on the terms of agreement whether they are protected or not.

Remember that Sprint already has a roaming agreement with AT&T for LTE. I am guessing that the roaming agreement with T-Mobile is on better terms/cheaper.

The FCC filing states that the New Company will become the Preferred Roaming Provider for rural carriers and will help them build out their own 5G-NR network within their service area, basically recreating Verizon's LTEiRA but for 5G.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint and T-Mobile go be congressional committee next Wednesday (June 27th) I believe.   This is their chance to "sell" the merger to congress.   I hope it's successful because I want to come back once the merger is complete.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if this was already asked or not, but what would happen to the Shentel agreement if the merger is approved? Would Shentel keep their current area under the new combined company and be rebranded under T-mobile?

 

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Galaxyguy said:

I don't know if this was already asked or not, but what would happen to the Shentel agreement if the merger is approved? Would Shentel keep their current area under the new combined company and be rebranded under T-mobile?

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Shentel has been prepared for this for a while.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Paynefanbro said:

Note for others: This link works for me  in Chrome but not Firefox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/23/2018 at 2:53 PM, Paynefanbro said:

The FCC filing states that the New Company will become the Preferred Roaming Provider for rural carriers and will help them build out their own 5G-NR network within their service area, basically recreating Verizon's LTEiRA but for 5G.

Interesting analysis over in Seeking Alpha. 

Sprint and T-Mobile Merger: The 12 points from the FCC Filing that signal merger approval and potential appreciation.

TS

 

 

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/26/2018 at 8:11 AM, bucdenny said:

How to watch Sprint and T-Mobile execs pitch their merger to Congress on Wednesday

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/game-of-phones-examining-the-competitive-impact-of-the-t-mobile_sprint-transaction

 

Watched John and Marcelo’s opening statements.

Both of them painted a picture of a more competitive combined company in the wireless and cable spheres....

Marcelo laid it on pretty thick as to what Sprint’s troubles are... Wow....

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Marcelo’s Submitted Statement painted a really bleak picture for Sprint as a stand-alone company: https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/06-27-18 Claure Testimony.pdf

Legere’s Submitted Statement: https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/06-27-18 Legere Testimony.pdf

Page 7:

But even before 5G is deployed, the combination will bring benefits for users of the companies’ existing LTE networks. Because the merger will almost immediately add approximately 11,000 Sprint cell sites to T‐Mobile’s network, and deploy all of Sprint’s spectrum on our T‐Mobile towers, New T‐ Mobile’s network capacity will get a massive boost compared to either company standing alone, practically from day one. That means an improved LTE network during the transition to 5G, because New T‐Mobile will be able to more effectively and efficiently allocate spectrum between its LTE and 5G networks. In addition, approximately 20 million Sprint customers will have near immediate access to the T‐Mobile network because their existing phones can be used on either network. Further, New T‐ Mobile will embrace a policy of “same or better” as part of migrating customers onto the combined network, enabling Sprint customers to keep the same or better plans as they join New T‐Mobile.

 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • S23 and S24 (at least ultra versions) have 4xCA NR. I currently have n41+n41+n25+n71 most places I go.  I think select devices have 2xCA upload but I do not think it is in widespread use yet. CA is still mostly download focused.
    • If they use n41 + n41 2CA, people that are somewhat distant from the cell site will have an OK download but the upload will be a disaster.  Upload capability on b-41 was always a disaster on the old Sprint Network.   Now, with n25 + n41 combination, even the more distant users have a more decent upload.  I see n41 + n41 + n25 now with my S22 and I understand that we will see 4xCA with newer phones in the future.     I also see n41 + n41 + n71 sometimes too. Also some other combinations of 25, 41, 71.  I would think that eventually we will see AWS paired with n41 too.  What I am not sure of is ----  when I see 3xCA on my S22, I can see the 3 channels involved in the download but I am never sure just what I have on the upload. I do not think I have 3xCA on the upload.
    • I don't know enough about the nuts and bolts of NR to know the answer, but is there a reason they're not doing two overlapping 100 MHz n41 carriers and using selective resource shutoff to make each one 97 MHz?  Thus making use of the full 194 MHz instead of leaving 4 MHz unused as implied by the current standard 100+90 configuration? - Trip
    • Looks like another T-Mobile 5G bump happened over the past week and a half, maybe less: n41 carriers are now 90+100 MHz, up from 80+100 (which in turn is up from 40+100 back in early March). This is on top of the new n25 carrier recently. As part of this, it looks like T-Mobile is starting to prefer n25+n41 2CA even when pushing data, rather than having higher levels of CA that would hit higher peak speeds; at least indoors I need to force n41-only if I want to see the full 190 MHz there. To be fair the speeds are plenty quick with that amount of spectrum, and I'm sure they're load balancing, and my guess is this is a little better for battery life? With this expansion, they're now at 10x10+10x10 n25, 15x15 n71, 100+90 n41, for a total of 260 MHz (including FD uplink) of deployed NR here, up from 250 MHz a week ago, 230 MHz two weeks ago, and 190 MHz six months ago. VZW is at 140 MHz minus mmW, 170 if you count n2 DSS. AT&T is at 150 MHz (80+40 n77, 15x15 n5), 210 MHz I think if you count n2 and n66 DSS (guessing they're still running those). With this level of spectrum they should be able to continue offering home internet wherever. Guessing this is the last upgrade they can make before they need to throw new equipment on sites for C-Band. At this rate I figure that'll happen next year on a few dozen high-traffic sites.
    • https://www.lightreading.com/wireless/tds-telecom-to-launch-mobile-service-via-nctc-s-mvno Surprising given merger.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...