Jump to content

Official Magic Box discussion thread


lilotimz

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, mirskyc said:

Does the backhaul module basically connect to the cell via Ethernet?

yes

Could someone take apart a Magic Box and use the relay for free internet? 

no

In no way am I encouraging any illegal activity I'm just wondering if its possible or this is something Sprint has implemented security features against.

yes

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now I am no expert and this could be wrong but I believe the box won't hand shake with cell tower unless it is registered with spring. Each magic box is linked to a account tampering with a unit would most likely get sprints attention they would surely suspend your account and ban you from their service indefinitely.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've taken a peek inside a Gen2 magic box and didn't see anything resembling good 'ol RJ-45 ethernet, but it may use ethernet over a proprietary ribbon cable of some sort. 

 

Unless someone has cracked into one deeper than I have and knows otherwise! ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/27/2018 at 11:15 PM, Bob Newhart said:

The MBs have WiFi that isn't used yet.

Yup, sure does. Sprint has no plans right now to turn it on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/3/2018 at 2:19 AM, Bob Newhart said:

Anything is possible.

Very likely we will never see the WiFi feature used if the merger goes through. And even on the slim chance the merger fails, Sprint has said they're not interested in offering WISP services.

It looks like WiFi may just be on the apparatus for diagnostic purposes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A rep asked at Mobile World Congress, asked the fate of Sprint's Magic Box if the merger goes through... Sprint would not answer question.Sprint Magic Box Uncertain future if Merger green lighted... Sprint didn't answer  

Edited by dro1984
corrected text
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, dro1984 said:

A rep asked at Mobile World Congress, asked the fate of Sprint's Magic Box if the merger goes through... Sprint would not answer question.Sprint Magic Box Uncertain future if Merger green lighted... Sprint didn't answer  

It would be pretty dumb for the "new tmobile" to not adopt the MB. Since they could potentially even add other spectrum to broadcast, like MMWAVE..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not a fan of the whole Magic box thing.   I always just considered it a band aid on a poorly spaced network with too few of towers and horrible low band availability.    Some areas don't even have 800.   

I had a magic box, got annoyed and sent it back.    If the merger goes through, I don't think there will be a real need for MB anymore.   New T-Mobile with have 600 mHz, 700, 800, 1700, 1900, 2100 and B41 (2500 mHz).   

Edited by dro1984
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, dro1984 said:

I'm not a fan of the whole Magic box thing.   I always just considered it a band aid on a poorly spaced network with too few of towers and horrible low band availability.

Out west, where houses are made of stucco and signals can't get inside, the Magic Box would allow you to essentially place a relay in a window to get signal through that would otherwise be blocked by the stucco.  Seems pretty useful to me.

- Trip

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, dro1984 said:

I'm not a fan of the whole Magic box thing.   I always just considered it a band aid on a poorly spaced network with too few of towers and horrible low band availability.    Some areas don't even have 800.   

I had a magic box, got annoyed and sent it back.    If the merger goes through, I don't think there will be a real need for MB anymore.   New T-Mobile with have 600 mHz, 700, 800, 1700, 1900, 2100 and B41 (2500 mHz).   

Every carrier has dead zones unfortunately. Also, your experience most definirely does not reflect everyone else's. There are a couple of building in midtown that I visit that are like a fortresses, only 1x800 work on Sprint Tmobile and Att are completely dead and V can only make 3G calls, Plopped a MB now it covers two of the floors with perfect B41 signal.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Part of the reason why they may want get rid of it is because they want as few people using Band 41 for LTE as possible so they can use all of it for 5G services. When they decide to do fixed wireless over 5G, we may see a 5G Magic Box released instead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Paynefanbro said:

Part of the reason why they may want get rid of it is because they want as few people using Band 41 for LTE as possible so they can use all of it for 5G services. When they decide to do fixed wireless over 5G, we may see a 5G Magic Box released instead.

That's exactly my point. They already mentioned a 5G MagicBox. Since it does indeed broadcast Wifi as well. Once you have 2 or 3 million of these in the wild, you could potentially add fixed wireless services to your arsenal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Paynefanbro said:

Part of the reason why they may want get rid of it is because they want as few people using Band 41 for LTE as possible so they can use all of it for 5G services. When they decide to do fixed wireless over 5G, we may see a 5G Magic Box released instead.

so another partially baked plan by Sprint that's not fully deployed then they decide to change it.   I hope this isn't the case.   They can't afford to keep doing this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, nexgencpu said:

That's exactly my point. They already mentioned a 5G MagicBox. Since it does indeed broadcast Wifi as well. Once you have 2 or 3 million of these in the wild, you could potentially add fixed wireless services to your arsenal.

I hope you're correct Nexgen... that would be great... but I'm not believing until I see it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, dro1984 said:

I hope you're correct Nexgen... that would be great... but I'm not believing until I see it.  

For Sprint alone, it might not make a ton of sense to deploy fixed services because you will potentially cannibalize your spectrum. But Sprint+Tmobile will have quite a bit of spectrum to go around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, nexgencpu said:

It would be pretty dumb for the "new tmobile" to not adopt the MB. Since they could potentially even add other spectrum to broadcast, like MMWAVE..

It will probably be smart of them. They are planning on using the entire band for 5G, which wouldn't leave any room for the MagicBox to operate in.

If people really need in-building coverage, there will be Nationwide B71, T-Mobile Signal Boosters, T-Mobile Cellspot, and Wifi calling. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, greenbastard said:

It will probably be smart of them. They are planning on using the entire band for 5G, which wouldn't leave any room for the MagicBox to operate in.

If people really need in-building coverage, there will be Nationwide B71, T-Mobile Signal Boosters, T-Mobile Cellspot, and Wifi calling. 

Unfortunately, there are scenarios where none of those are an option. Also, allocating 20mhz out of the combined Sprint+Tmobile would have minimal impact on the grand scheme of things to their spectral bottom line. Plus none of those other devices are able to broadcast a WiFi signal from a relay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a heads up on my Magic Box experience as of this weekend...

Took the MB to a cabin we frequent. This is the first time I've taken the MB, since it's on fringe B25 signal, I figured I would give it a try. The MB booted and connected promptly to the donor tower. My Pixel 2 XL connected to it reasonably fast, probably within 5-10 minutes after complete. However, my wife's Pixel 2 XL (same phone as me) WOULD NOT connect to it at all the entire 40 hours we were there. I tried doing a PRL update, Update device config, Airplane toggles, reboots, etc. It simply would not connect to the MB. Instead it bounced between B25, B26, and 3G.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I'll share my magic box experience.  First got the magic box last winter for use in the Birmingham area.  It connected to band 25 but provided consistent 20 to 30 mb downloads.  Recently moved to Atlanta suburbs and plugged in the magic box,  and it connected to a weak band 41 signal (-118 db with poor SINR).  Speeds now are terrible,  1 mb to as high as 4 or 5 mb.  Very disappointed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...