Jump to content

Google Nexus 6P by Huawei (was [Rumor] Huawei Nexus phone?)


jefbal99

Recommended Posts

Just an FYI there is a buy-one-get-one free offer for tempered glass screen protectors here:

 

http://www.intelliarmor.com/intelliglass-nexus-6p-the-smarter-real-glass-screen-protector.html

 

Just add two to your cart and apply coupon code = intelli6P

 

Credit to girl_Interrupted513   From android central forums

 

Text my friend the deal who got herself a 6P and her sister the 5X. She text me back right away that she ordered one for each of them. The BOGO deal still works if you mix and match.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My two year contract with sprint was over in may of this year will sprint allow me to activate this device to my current plan or will they try to make me switch plans?

Nope! Everything will stay the same!

 

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

u don't see the wifi logo at the top?

If you look at the time between the test and the time of the screenshot and also look at the icon next to the test above the download speed you can tell its not the wifi signal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who is your home ISP?  Good gravy, that's fast. 

Time Warner Cable. 

 

I can actually get 300 down but I pay for 100 down and TWC overprovisions by 10-15% in my town (Austin) thanks to Google Fiber coming to town. So that 109 down is actually close to the speeds I get connected via ethernet on my computer. Very impressive coming from a very disappointing 5GHz experience with my Nexus 5.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Time Warner Cable. 

 

I can actually get 300 down but I pay for 100 down and TWC overprovisions by 10-15% in my town (Austin) thanks to Google Fiber coming to town. So that 109 down is actually close to the speeds I get connected via ethernet on my computer. Very impressive coming from a very disappointing 5GHz experience with my Nexus 5.

 

I'm in the same boat in Southern California. Pay for 100 get anywhere from 100 - 120. My wifi speed tests are usually done with my N6 and occasionally with my laptop which I had to upgrade the wireless card to access 5ghz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm in the same boat in Southern California. Pay for 100 get anywhere from 100 - 120. My wifi speed tests are usually done with my N6 and occasionally with my laptop which I had to upgrade the wireless card to access 5ghz.

The really impressive thing is those speeds were downstairs opposite my router (an Asus AC-68U) where my N5 would drop to maybe 30-40% of that speed. the N6P also seems to do much better on holding B41 than my N5. I am a very happy camper in terms of RF performance on this device.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, looks like y'all want to be careful with the 6p

 

 

Sent from Moto X Pure via Tapatalk

 

Seems to scratch pretty easily, especially the Graphite color. The 'bending' was already debunked however, to paraphrase the post I'll link below, he pre-broke the glass which made bending the aluminum body of the phone quite a bit easier. https://www.reddit.com/r/Nexus6P/comments/3qtuaj/nexus_6p_does_not_bend/

 

edit: Further down someone points out discrepancies between the phone he used and retail phones. It's suspected he's using pre-production phone and also apparently goes through the effort to structurally weaken them beforehand. Other than the obvious 'it's aluminum, it's going to scratch' you guys can pretty much ignore that and move on to comparing the RF of the phone ;)

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't think about the glass already being broke from the scratch test. Very surprised the glass cracked from being scratched, that is bothersome

 

Sent from Moto X Pure via Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Time Warner Cable. 

 

I can actually get 300 down but I pay for 100 down and TWC overprovisions by 10-15% in my town (Austin) thanks to Google Fiber coming to town. So that 109 down is actually close to the speeds I get connected via ethernet on my computer. Very impressive coming from a very disappointing 5GHz experience with my Nexus 5.

 

You do realize that both 2015 Nexus handsets support 2x2 MIMO on Wi-Fi, right?  The Nexus 5 was more typical single spatial stream.  That is the primary reason for your Wi-Fi speed boost.

 

However, I am not sure why anyone should be concerned about Wi-Fi speeds on mobile devices.  Whether 100 Mbps, 50 Mbps, or 10 Mbps, most handheld activities are going to function and feel the same.  In my case, I have separate SSIDs for 2.4 GHz and 5 GHZ.  I purposely keep my devices (handsets, tablets, printer, gaming system) off of 5 GHz and on 2.4 GHz.  That way, the laptop and the secondary Wi-Fi router connected to several NAS in another room get the 5 GHz super highway all to themselves.  Those are the equipment that can benefit from additional speed.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You do realize that both 2015 Nexus handsets support 2x2 MIMO on Wi-Fi, right?  The Nexus 5 was more typical single spatial stream.  That is the primary reason for your Wi-Fi speed boost.

 

However, I am not sure why anyone should be concerned about Wi-Fi speeds on mobile devices.  Whether 100 Mbps, 50 Mbps, or 10 Mbps, most handheld activities are going to function and feel the same.  In my case, I have separate SSIDs for 2.4 GHz and 5 GHZ.  I purposely keep my devices (handsets, tablets, printer, gaming system) off of 5 GHz and on 2.4 GHz.  That way, the laptop and the secondary Wi-Fi router connected to several NAS in another room get the 5 GHz super highway all to themselves.  Those are the equipment that can benefit from additional speed.

 

AJ

Yes I am aware of the difference. However, my Nexus 5 was always a poor performer on 5GHz even one room away. As a comparison my N6P actually holds higher speeds at longer distance than my wife's iPhone 6s. I consider that pretty impressive. As to why wifi performance matters, In Austin, TWC rolls out wifi for subscribers for events so I am hopeful that as Sprint (and all mobile carriers really) grind into dust under the strain of events here that I will be able to hold a better wifi signal at longer distances. 

 

Mostly it is just cool to see the march forward in technology as now I won't have to manually switch to 2.4 ghz when downstairs and wanting to stream from my Plex server to my phone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As to why wifi performance matters, In Austin, TWC rolls out wifi for subscribers for events so I am hopeful that as Sprint (and all mobile carriers really) grind into dust under the strain of events here that I will be able to hold a better wifi signal at longer distances. 

 

Yes, stadium/arena/event Wi-Fi is a legitimate concern.  I was thinking only of home use, which to me seems transparent at 10 Mbps or greater.  But back to mass public use, you may not need Wi-Fi as much any longer.  In Kansas City, for example, Sprint 2x CA band 41 generally is superior now to the enterprise grade Wi-Fi at Arrowhead Stadium and Sporting Park.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't think about the glass already being broke from the scratch test. Very surprised the glass cracked from being scratched, that is bothersome

 

Sent from Moto X Pure via Tapatalk

It's Gorilla 4 glass. Should do fine against normal scratching. Intentional glass scoring, that's a whole 'nother situation.

 

Sent using Nexus 6P on Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, looks like y'all want to be careful with the 6p

 

 

Sent from Moto X Pure via Tapatalk

 

 

Seems to scratch pretty easily, especially the Graphite color. The 'bending' was already debunked however, to paraphrase the post I'll link below, he pre-broke the glass which made bending the aluminum body of the phone quite a bit easier. https://www.reddit.com/r/Nexus6P/comments/3qtuaj/nexus_6p_does_not_bend/

 

edit: Further down someone points out discrepancies between the phone he used and retail phones. It's suspected he's using pre-production phone and also apparently goes through the effort to structurally weaken them beforehand. Other than the obvious 'it's aluminum, it's going to scratch' you guys can pretty much ignore that and move on to comparing the RF of the phone ;)

 

Some who pretty much backs up your claim.

 

What about the initial crack before the fire test? The crack from the scratch test?

Edited by HTCandroid
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone had a chance to compare the 6p reception to the moto Nexus 6? Also how's the battery life with the bigger battery?

 

Sent from my Nexus 6

Yes, that is the two questions I have as well. 

 

Thanks for anyone's help. ;)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • After several months of testing, an update to SignalCheck Pro is rolling out on Google Play. It may take up to 48 hours to become available for download. Notable changes include: Added option to display site notes for NSA 5G-NR cells. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show NSA 5G-NR Site Notes) will cause the app to make an "educated guess" as to what the most appropriate site note is linked to the connected NSA 5G cell, using the PCI and the device location. If it finds an existing entry that is likely to be relevant, it will display the note along with the distance from where the strongest signal from that cell was logged. While connected to NSA 5G, these notes cannot be edited; a valid NCI is required to add/edit notes and that information is not available on NSA connections.   Added option to log cells with missing/invalid PLMN (such as NSA 5G-NR cells). Users asked for the ability to log data for NSA 5G, so a new option (Preferences > Logger Settings > Log Cells with Missing PLMN) will permit this.   Added option to display LTE info above 5G-NR info. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show LTE Cells Above 5G-NR Cells) shows the same information that is currently displayed, but moves the LTE information above the 5G-NR information. Other changes: Code optimizations and enhancements. Improved Android 15 compatibility. Overhauled Purchases module. Resolved force closes impacting some GSM/LTE connections. Resolved issue with improper 5G-NR PLMN display when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with improper PLMN display with single-digit MNCs. Resolved issue with incorrect 5G-NR bands displayed on some devices due to Android bug. Resolved issue with incorrect number of neighbor cells displayed when some cells were unknown. Resolved issue with missing 5G-NR data when sector display is enabled. Resolved issue with saving 5G-NR site notes when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with settings to log missing GCI/NCI/TAC/PLMN being ignored. Resolved issues with web data export function. Updated internal libraries. Updated provider database. Updated target API to Android 15. I appreciate all of your support, and a big thank you to the members of the Beta Crew that help with testing and feedback!
    • Oct security update is out.
    • Stopped by again today and the antennas are up but it isn't live just yet. If other Sprint conversions are anything to go by it'll likely take about a month for the site to go live.
    • It is an Android bug that was reportedly fixed in August 2023 but definitely has not been. I have implemented numerous workarounds in SCP to correct the NR bands the app displays. The OS ignores the possibility that many NR-ARFCNs are valid across multiple bands.. it reports the lowest NR band that is valid for the current ARFCN. In your example, channel 432530 can be n1, n65, or n66.. so the OS just (lazily) reports n1.   Awesome, thanks! I will add an n65 override also.
    • Yeah both of those instances were on my AT&T s22 ultra. Seems ro be working as intended today in latest release.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...