Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

I never heard once any proposal from softb for network sharing, probably because that would've cemented a 4 carrier regime and look how profitable 3-carrier co-opetition is for softbank.

 

With the Japanese domestic telecoms business generating stable cash flow, SoftBank’s main focus will be to create a portfolio of technology companies.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/aac64fde-f7aa-11e4-8bd5-00144feab7de.html#axzz3ZxPe3cQI

 

Son is betting he will be allowed to merge later so he'd rather upgrade sprint now, then pay for TMO including all the upgrades that TMO performed and hopefully wring savings out of that merger; I'll get the humble pie ready.

 

I'm beginning to doubt there will be a merger between Sprint and T-Mobile, plus many T-Mobile employees wouldn't want that. They wouldn't be happy about the extra hassle involved with customers issues with network compatibility issues, unless Google were to give their solution over to the newly merged Sprint/T-Mobile.

 

There seems to be a greater likelihood Dish will purchase T-Mobile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I was at the local T-Mobile store Tuesday, as a resolution with my mother who really wanted to get T-Mobile postpaid as the alternative to my Sprint service we are cancelling later Wednesday afternoon/evening, though not because of the Sprint network, but a bad situation where a Sprint saleslady lied to me about us getting Framily, as confirmed by several people on S4GRU that I should have been able to get it. Although, Sprint has been unwilling to help us convert plans and at least the retentions person while not willing to work with us at all on any resolution to the issue, was very eager and willing to help my mother with the cancellation, even got a number to call for help once the port went through, which did almost instantly at the T-Mobile store. So, while setting up the new service there, I was discussing the merger history of T-Mobile with the very nice sales representative, who mentioned the hassles involved for T-Mobile employees had Sprint merged with T-Mobile, and that many of the employees were relieved it didn't happen. BTW, the sales guy use to work at the nearby former Sprint corporate store and still has friends working at Sprint retail, so it wasn't an anti-Sprint situation at all really.

 

The matter of Dish purchasing Sprint would be a lot easier on the employees at T-Mobile not having to deal with network integration issues. All the staff would have to learn is Dish's television service offerings and any potential new services through the T-Mobile network using Dish services. The great thing to me, is Dish's AWS spectrum purchases recently here in Chicago are quite massive. That would give T-Mobile much needed additional spectrum here in Chicago, which would make the competitive landscape here very interesting. Sprint and T-Mobile would dominate Chicago, which being a massive market, might have an impact on AT&T and Verizon, that could affect their wireless rates which would need to decrease, in order to compete. At risk of being unrealistic, I still am going to mention this idea anyways, that if Dish and T-Mobile merged, then somehow Sprint got involved merging with the other two, despite employee discontent of course, imagine the spectrum and network power involved.

 

Chicago would be a wireless oasis. If someone here could calculate the spectrum holdings between the three companies in Chicago, and give approximate estimations for how much in paired mhz x mhz such a combination could bring to Chicago, I'd be grateful. While there is a lot against the likelihood of such a mass merger happening, it could happen, especially if there is a new government administration with an FCC a bit lighter on mergers, as such may not happen until 2017/2018, but its nice to think about such a powerful network.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the 40mhz SDL, TMO would permanently exert pressure on sprint to keep unlimited; not something son wants.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

What indications do you have that Son doesn't want to keep unlimited? There's nothing leading up to believe that unlimited is going away anytime in the next 5 years that I can see...am I missing something?

Or is this just a conclusion that people still believe mobile broadband is so gosh-darn expensive it can't be unlimited (thanks VZW CEO for saying unlimited was dead)

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What indications do you have that Son doesn't want to keep unlimited? There's nothing leading up to believe that unlimited is going away anytime in the next 5 years that I can see...am I missing something?

Or is this just a conclusion that people still believe mobile broadband is so gosh-darn expensive it can't be unlimited (thanks VZW CEO for saying unlimited was dead)

No CEO wants to keep unlimited any longer than he has to.

 

When did TMO introduce their family unlimited plan (followed by sprint)?

After the merger was definitively killed.

 

Unlimited means data usage increases while revenue doesn't.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint might be the only carrier to keep unlimited data longer since they own an average of 120mhz 2.5ghz Spectrum.

 

I have an unlimited plan with Sprint not because I want to consume 10 to 20gbs every month,but because I don't want to worry about overages. Regardless I only use less than 3gbs every month.I use WiFi only at home.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unlimited means data usage increases while revenue doesn't.

 

There is always the possibility of moving to the wired internet model.  Pay X for up to 5mbps speed.  Pay Y for up to 30mbps speed.  Pay Z for up to 100mbps speed.  That model is still unlimited, approved by the FCC, and it generates additional revenue.  I wouldn't be surprised to see that occur in the future as speeds continue to increase.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is always the possibility of moving to the wired internet model. Pay X for up to 5mbps speed. Pay Y for up to 30mbps speed. Pay Z for up to 100mbps speed. That model is still unlimited, approved by the FCC, and it generates additional revenue. I wouldn't be surprised to see that occur in the future as speeds continue to increase.

They have that in Europe.

 

Id be fine getting unlimited @ 5mbps download.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is always the possibility of moving to the wired internet model.  Pay X for up to 5mbps speed.  Pay Y for up to 30mbps speed.  Pay Z for up to 100mbps speed.  That model is still unlimited, approved by the FCC, and it generates additional revenue.  I wouldn't be surprised to see that occur in the future as speeds continue to increase.

 

I would have  a hard time with that model. If I pay for 30mbps and only get 20mbps at times, would piss me off since I'm paying for 30.  They just can't guarrenty the speed all the time. Especially at events and such.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have a hard time with that model. If I pay for 30mbps and only get 20mbps at times, would piss me off since I'm paying for 30. They just can't guarrenty the speed all the time. Especially at events and such.

It wouldn't be a guarantee if the floor but the ceiling: guaranteed to get no faster than 30mbps.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have  a hard time with that model. If I pay for 30mbps and only get 20mbps at times, would piss me off since I'm paying for  30.  They just can't guarrenty the speed all the time. Especially at events and such.

 

The same thing happens with wired ISP's and people don't have a problem with it. I'm sure it's much more easy to maintain those high speeds when you're running a wired network but it's not like speeds don't dip below the speed tier you pay for.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is always the possibility of moving to the wired internet model. Pay X for up to 5mbps speed. Pay Y for up to 30mbps speed. Pay Z for up to 100mbps speed. That model is still unlimited, approved by the FCC, and it generates additional revenue. I wouldn't be surprised to see that occur in the future as speeds continue to increase.

Wired internet providers like Comcast are starting to have caps as well.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wired internet providers like Comcast are starting to have caps as well.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think only in certain "test" markets. When I login, it says my 250gb cap has been suspended, and it's been like that for a few years I think.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6+

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been arguing with at&t for nearly two years because they say I've been going over my 250gb monthly cap. I know for sure i do not hit the cap, especially when i got two DSL lines to split my traffic. They finally told me last week that they found a problem with their end and the data activity monitor. But they do enforce their cap (for every 50gb over initial 250gb is $10 more until bill cycle.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think only in certain "test" markets. When I login, it says my 250gb cap has been suspended, and it's been like that for a few years I think.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6+

Not anymore at least in my market. I have a soft cap with Comcast at 300 GB a month with 3 months of allowed overage followed by $10 per 50 gb bucket.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been arguing with at&t for nearly two years because they say I've been going over my 250gb monthly cap. I know for sure i do not hit the cap, especially when i got two DSL lines to split my traffic. They finally told me last week that they found a problem with their end and the data activity monitor. But they do enforce their cap (for every 50gb over initial 250gb is $10 more until bill cycle.)

 

 

Not anymore at least in my market. I have a soft cap with Comcast at 300 GB a month with 3 months of allowed overage followed by $10 per 50 gb bucket.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

AT&T says there is a 250GB cap on my Uverse, but no where have I been able to actually find a usage meter or anything like that. As far as I can tell, they're not tracking it, haven't been for the last year. Not sure if that will change in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not anymore at least in my market. I have a soft cap with Comcast at 300 GB a month with 3 months of allowed overage followed by $10 per 50 gb bucket.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ouch. I've never come close to even 50gb on my home wifi. I don't even want it anymore. My wife and I are such casual users at home, that buying 1gb hotspot from sprint would be fine for those two, or three times a month we use a PC or laptop. I really only have wifi because I haven't figured out a way to be able to backup our iPhones without wifi. If I find a workaround that doesn't involve jail breaking, I'm cutting the Comcast cord.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6+

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not for me... I cut the cord last year and now stream all my content so I can blow through several hundred gigs without a problem.. I hope Comcash doesn't enforce a cap here in ABQ... That would drive me to switch carriers.

Ouch. I've never come close to even 50gb on my home wifi. I don't even want it anymore. My wife and I are such casual users at home, that buying 1gb hotspot from sprint would be fine for those two, or three times a month we use a PC or laptop. I really only have wifi because I haven't figured out a way to be able to backup our iPhones without wifi. If I find a workaround that doesn't involve jail breaking, I'm cutting the Comcast cord.


Sent from my iPhone 6+

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AT&T says there is a 250GB cap on my Uverse, but no where have I been able to actually find a usage meter or anything like that. As far as I can tell, they're not tracking it, haven't been for the last year. Not sure if that will change in the future.

Oh they are tracking it, trust me. (Btw, i meant 150gb not 250gb on mine)

 

 

The way it works: until you use a certain amount in a month, they don't show you the usage meter, but once you go past a certain point, it's 100gb on dsl for the 150gb data cap, they send an email saying you are at 65% of your alloted data.

Until you use that amount, likely for you on uverse, it's 175gb or 200gb, you won't know or even be able to view your usage. Once you hit the trigger amount, you can view the use on the tracking site. They only show you weekly totals until you hit 75% then they report daily. It's quite confusing but they do enforce. It's just that most people don't come close to hitting the limit, or even the trigger.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not for me... I cut the cord last year and now stream all my content so I can blow through several hundred gigs without a problem.. I hope Comcash doesn't enforce a cap here in ABQ... That would drive me to switch carriers.

Same here. I got rid of TV and stream most shows. I've used as high as 290gb before but i think I'll probably blow the cap this month.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same here. I got rid of TV and stream most shows. I've used as high as 290gb before but i think I'll probably blow the cap this month.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yep. Same here as well.. One month I did close to 450GB. Lots of streaming and digital PS4 Game downloads.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same here. I got rid of TV and stream most shows. I've used as high as 290gb before but i think I'll probably blow the cap this month.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

We often use well over 500 GB on our home internet every month. We do have three Xboxes, four computers, and seven people who all have iPhone's using the wifi. Plus, all I do is stream music, netflix, youtube, etc. all the time. So it doesn't surprise me that we use so much.

 

-Anthony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • So, in summary, here are the options I tested: T-Mobile intl roaming - LTE on SoftBank, routes back to the US (~220ms to 4.2.2.4) IIJ physical SIM - LTE on NTT, local routing Airalo - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer SoftBank), routed through Singapore (SingTel) Ubigi - 5G on NTT, routed through Singapore (Transatel) US Mobile East Asia roaming - 5G on SoftBank, routed through Singapore (Club SIM) Saily - 5G on NTT, routed through Hong Kong (Truphone)...seems to be poorer routing my1010 - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer KDDI), routed through Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom) I wouldn't buy up on the T-Mobile international roaming, but it's a solid fallback. If you have the US Mobile roaming eSIM that's a great option. Otherwise Ubigi, Airalo, or my1010 are all solid options, so get whatever's cheapest. I wouldn't bother trying to find a physical SIM from IIJ...the Japanese IP is nice but there's enough WiFi that you can get a Japanese IP enough for whatever you need, and eSIM flexibility is great (IIJ as eSIM but seems a bit more involved to get it to work).
    • So, the rural part of the journey still has cell service for nearly all the way, usually on B18/19/8 (depending on whether we're talking about KDDI/NTT/SoftBank). I think I saw a bit of B28 and even n28 early on in the trip, though that faded out after a bit. Once we got to where we were going though, KDDI had enough B41 to pull 150+ Mbps, while NTT and SoftBank had B1/B3 IIRC. Cell service was likewise generally fine from Kawaguchiko Station to Tokyo on the express bus to Shinjuku Station, though there were some cases where only low-band LTE was available and capacity seemed to struggle. I also figured out what I was seeing with SoftBank on 40 MHz vs. 100 MHz n77: the 40 MHz blocks are actually inside the n78 band class, but SoftBank advertises them as n77, probably to facilitate NR CA. My phone likely preferred the 40 MHz slices as they're *much* lower-frequency, ~3.4 GHz rather than ~3.9, though of course I did see the 100 MHz slice being used rather often. By contrast, when I got NR on NTT it was either n28 10x10 or, more often, 100 MHz n78. As usual, EMEA bands on my S24 don't CA, so any data speeds I saw were the result of either one LTE carrier or one LTE carrier plus one NR carrier...except for B41 LTE. KDDI seems to have more B41 bandwidth live at this point, so my1010 or Airalo works well for this, and honestly while SoftBank and NTT 5G (in descending order of availability) have 5G that's readily available it may be diminishing returns, particularly given that I still don't know how to, as someone not from Hong Kong, get an eSIM that runs on SoftBank 5G that isn't the USM "comes for free with the unlimited premium package" roaming eSIM (NTT is easy enough thanks to Ubigi). In other news, I was able to borrow someone's Rakuten eSIM and...got LTE with it. 40 Mbps down, 20 Mbps up, 40ms latency to Tokyo while in Tokyo...which isn't any worse than the Japan-based physical SIMs I had used earlier. But not getting n77 or n257 was disappointing, though I had to test the eSIM from one spot rather than bouncing around the city to find somewhere with better reception. It's currently impossible to get a SIM as a foreigner that runs on Rakuten, so that was the best I could do. Also, I know my phone doesn't have all the LTE and 5G bands needed to take full advantage of Japanese networks. My S24 is missing: B21 (1500 MHz) - NTT B11 (1500 MHz) - KDDI, SoftBank B42 (3500 MHz) - NTT, KDDI, SoftBank n79 (4900 MHz) - NTT Of the above, B42/n79 are available on the latest iPhones, though you lose n257, and I'm guessing you're not going to find B11/B21 on a phone sold outside Japan.
    • T-Mobile acquiring SoniqWave's 2.5 GHz spectrum  Another spectrum speculator down! T-Mobile is acquiring all of their licenses and their leases. Details are lacking but it looks like T-Mobile might be giving them 3.45GHz in exchange in some of the markets where they're acquiring BRS/EBS to sweeten the deal and stay below the spectrum screen. Hopefully NextWave is at the negotiating table with T-Mobile so NYC can finally get access to the full BRS/EBS band as well. 
    • Maybe. The taller buildings on one side of the street all have Fios access and the NYCHA buildings are surrounded by Verizon macros that have mmWave. I don’t think this site will add much coverage. It’d be better off inside the complex itself.
    • Looks like a great place for for FWA. Many apartment dwellers only have one overpriced choice.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...