Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

First time seeing this pop up on Facebook. Hopefully Sprint's digital team is micro targeting markets all over with favorable RootMetrics results. Anyone else seeing this in their markets?

 

570a769274f07f56ed11369daaec0d69.jpg

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dare we look at the comments on that post? I'm sure people are saying I used Sprint 3 years ago with a top of the line EVO 4G and it sucked.. lies!!!

Sprint was that boyfriend or girlfriend that was "the one" and sprint cheated on them and now they can't move on and love again. They still have scars.

 

For laughs only

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint was that boyfriend or girlfriend that was "the one" and sprint cheated on them and now they can't move on and love again. They still have scars.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

That's exactly why a co-worker moved from Sprint to Verizon: he bought a WiMax phone and never got 4G so now he happily pays way more for 4 lines on Verizon.

 

Laugh but there are many in that situation; Sprint lost them for a few years at least.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's exactly why a co-worker moved from Sprint to Verizon: he bought a WiMax phone and never got 4G so now he happily pays way more for 4 lines on Verizon.

 

Laugh but there are many in that situation; Sprint lost them for a few years at least.

I agree and sadly people only base things off their past experiences. WiMAX wasn't everywhere. I had the evo 4g and I only had 4g when I was home from school but up on campus and in my dorm I had nothing but 3G. The service sucked but I couldn't complain cause my parents was paying my phone bill. Call and text was fine it was just the data which was a hit or miss

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree and sadly people only base things off their past experiences. WiMAX wasn't everywhere. I had the evo 4g and I only had 4g when I was home from school but up on campus and in my dorm I had nothing but 3G. The service sucked but I couldn't complain cause my parents was paying my phone bill. Call and text was fine it was just the data which was a hit or miss

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

People only have past experiences on which to base their decisions because Sprint won't do a TestDrive like TMO!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

People only have past experiences on which to base their decisions because Sprint won't do a TestDrive like TMO!

Or some kind of hey check out our service program they can come up with. So how would they know if things have changed. I agree 100%

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

People only have past experiences on which to base their decisions because Sprint won't do a TestDrive like TMO!

 

Louis Maximus:  Cut the crap.  Your incessant trolling for Magenta is a major pain in the ass.  You insert it into virtually every topic you enter.  Your quoted comment above adds absolutely nothing to the topic being discussed, but then that is a very common thread which weaves through the vast majority of your posts at S4GRU.  I frankly don't give a #### how much you like TMo.  I am here to increase my knowledge about Sprint, not to listen to babbling idiots spout the same irrelevant complaints over and over and over again.  Go away.

  • Like 16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't listen, hopefully someone did...

 

Recording posted now...going to try to listen to it.

 

EDIT:

My notes on CFO conference speech...

 

Biggest 1st Quarter highlight: CHURN

  *Factors improving churn

    *Tighter credit standards

    *"Network doing so much better now"

    *65% growth in "prime" customers from last year 1st quarter

    *2x20 Carrier Aggregation being deployed

    *Going to take time to get to other carriers

 

*One Rate plans are proving to be successful

*Confident in ability to continue positive net-adds

 

*Half of all new adds installment or lease

*1/3 of new adds are lease (so greater than installment)

 

*HUGE cost savings on CAPEX side with Software relationship. Gear costs lower. Better than their competitors.

 

*Net port positive is staying consistent

 

NETWORK Discussion

*800 Voice done (we knew this)

*LTE800 will be done by end of year (we knew this)

 

*2.5 is full steam ahead...look at "speed awards" to see where it is being deployed

*Continue to spend capital to enhance network

 

Question to CFO: "Do you need additional low band spectrum?"

CFO: "Knowing we have wifi layer for calling, given the 800 will be complete...it gives you a reason to ask if we really need the low band"

CFO: "Timing of low band auction will impact whether we participate in it"

 

(side bar: lame update overall)

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or some kind of hey check out our service program they can come up with. So how would they know if things have changed. I agree 100%

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Louis Maximus: Cut the crap. Your incessant trolling for Magenta is a major pain in the ass. You insert it into virtually every topic you enter. Your quoted comment above adds absolutely nothing to the topic being discussed, but then that is a very common thread which weaves through the vast majority of your posts at S4GRU. I frankly don't give a #### how much you like TMo. I am here to increase my knowledge about Sprint, not to listen to babbling idiots spout the same irrelevant complaints over and over and over again. Go away.

 

 

People only have past experiences on which to base their decisions because Sprint won't do a TestDrive

 

 

That better? I gave a real example about a former coworker no longer on sprint because of the WiMAX rollout. Seems relevant. And on topic to the comment which I originally quoted.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recording posted now...going to try to listen to it.

 

EDIT:

My notes on CFO conference speech...

 

Thanks for breaking that down for us!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't really like the idea of sprint not showing up to the 600 auction. That would be short sighted of them. Does sprint need addition low band spectrum? Yes, yes it does. Can sprint afford to let competitors gain access to addition low band spectrum while they don't? No, no the can't.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't really like the idea of sprint not showing up to the 600 auction. That would be short sighted of them. Does sprint need addition low band spectrum? Yes, yes it does. Can sprint afford to let competitors gain access to addition low band spectrum while they don't? No, no the can't.

 

I don't think Sprint will actively sit out the auction, perhaps people reading too much into it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't really like the idea of sprint not showing up to the 600 auction. That would be short sighted of them. Does sprint need addition low band spectrum? Yes, yes it does. Can sprint afford to let competitors gain access to addition low band spectrum while they don't? No, no the can't.

They may not have any financial backing from Softbank, so they're answering in the most vague way possible to prevent stock holders/customers from becoming upset.  I'd say Sprint should bid on spectrum in locations that need work (there's a handful of markets where 600Mhz would benefit Sprint.)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't really like the idea of sprint not showing up to the 600 auction. That would be short sighted of them. Does sprint need addition low band spectrum? Yes, yes it does. Can sprint afford to let competitors gain access to addition low band spectrum while they don't? No, no the can't.

 

 

I don't think Sprint will actively sit out the auction, perhaps people reading too much into it?

 

I think it's that Sprint doesn't want to have to bid on it alone.  The price of the most recent auction has probably scared them a little. They tried to get the FCC to approve a joint bid with T-Mo and I think are still trying to work out a joint bidding arrangement with the rural carriers. I think they would like to have 600 spectrum so long as they don't have to foot the entire bill.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's that Sprint doesn't want to have to bid on it alone. The price of the most recent auction has probably scared them a little. They tried to get the FCC to approve a joint bid with T-Mo and I think are still trying to work out a joint bidding arrangement with the rural carriers. I think they would like to have 600 spectrum so long as they don't have to foot the entire bill.

Seems like a good place for softb to invest more $

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what if Sprint didn't participate in the 600mhz auction, not the end of the world. Nothing magical about the band. Not like you going to have the transmission capabilities of a TV station doing kilowatts to transmit the signal. Than there is the possibility of might be a wash since that frequency range is more prone to sporadic-e layer than 800 or 700.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think if Sprint can densify some areas, the 600Mhz spectrum won't really matter much. Densification might be cheaper than bidding on that lowband stuff...lol. I know in Baltimore, even areas with LTE800 on several towers in a row, I switch to 3G while driving alot still...so sure, 600 might help...but I'd rather see more towers on their existing spectrum than just new antennas.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to see Sprint at least bid on a nationwide 5x5 600mhz band. If they don't bid on any 600 spectrum. Sprint still has PCS spectrum that can be refarmed for LTE use plus the 2.5 spectrum.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what if Sprint didn't participate in the 600mhz auction, not the end of the world. Nothing magical about the band. Not like you going to have the transmission capabilities of a TV station doing kilowatts to transmit the signal. Than there is the possibility of might be a wash since that frequency range is more prone to sporadic-e layer than 800 or 700.

Sprint is weak on low band spectrum. It has to be cheaper to add 600 to existing towers rather than densifying their network to match Volte to their CDMA network not to mention expanding their foot print with their existing spectrum portfolio.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint is weak on low band spectrum. It has to be cheaper to add 600 to existing towers rather than densifying their network to match Volte to their CDMA network not to mention expanding their foot print with their existing spectrum portfolio.

That's right. Sprint would be wise to use 600MHz for VoLTE. One B26 LTE carrier will not be enough to supply all the far range voice and LTE data outside the B25/B41 coverage.

 

Using Tapatalk on Nexus 6

  • Like 12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I felt like he was talking non sense saying they don't need to go to the 600 auction. 800mhz can be brought to its knees with relative ease. 2500 will take much longer to deploy. He said WiFi was everywhere and I had to laugh. Walmart doesn't even have WiFi and there are so many places where WiFi is locked or you have to ask for the password. Its just not as convenient as your own home network yet. If Sprint for some reason decided not to get in that auction I will be very concerned.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I've now seen how things work in Kobe, Hiroshima, and Osaka, as well as some areas south of Osaka (e.g. Wakayama, Kinokawa), and tried three more SIMs. The two physical SIMs (different branding for each) both use IIJ, which provides a Japanese IP address/routing on NTT, aleit LTE-only, so latency is ~45ms to Tokyo. The catch with NTT is that it uses two frequency bands (B42/3500 MHz LTE, n79/4900 MHz NR) that you're not going to get on an Android sold in the US, and I'm guessing that B42 would be helpful speed-wise on that network, as it doesn't have B41. I also found one place that doesn't have cell service: a vending machine in the back of the Osaka Castle tower. Or, rather, the B8/18/19 signal is weak enough there to be unusable. Going back to 5G for a moment, I saw a fair amount of Softbank n257 in Hiroshima, as well as in some train stations between Osaka and Kobe. 4x100 MHz bandwidth, anchored by B1/3/8, with speeds sometimes exceeding 400 Mbps on the US Mobile roaming eSIM. Not quite the speeds I've seen on mmW in the States, but I've probably been on mmW for more time over the past few days than I have in the US over the past year, so I'll take it. My fastest speed test was actually on SoftBank n77 though, with 100 MHz of that plus 10x10 B8 hitting ~700 Mbps down and ~80 Mbps up with ~100ms latency...on the roaming eSIM...on the 4th floor of the hotel near Shin-Kobe station. Guessing B8 was a DAS or small cell based on signal levels, and the n77 might have been (or was just a less-used sector of the site serving the train station). I'm now 99% sure that all three providers are running DSS on band 28, and I've seen 10x10 on similar frequencies from both NTT and SoftBank IIRC, on both LTE and 5G. I also picked up one more eSIM: my1010, which is different from 1010/csl used by US Mobile's eSIM unfortunately, as it's LTE-only. On the bright side, it's cheap (10GB/7 days is like $11, and 20GB for the same period would be around $15), and can use both KDDI and SoftBank LTE. It also egresses from Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom), though latency isn't really any better than the Singapore based eSIMs. Tomorrow will include the most rural part of our journey, so we'll see how networks hold up there, and from tomorrow night on we'll be in Tokyo, so any further reports after that will be Tokyo-centric.
    • I think the push for them is adding US Mobile as a MVNO with a priority data plan.  Ultimately, making people more aware of priority would allow them (and other carriers) to differentiate themselves from MVNOs like Consumer Cellular that advertise the same coverage. n77 has dramatically reduced the need for priority service at Verizon where the mere functioning of your phone was in jeopardy a couple of years ago if you had a low priority plan like Red Pocket. Only have heard of problems with T-Mobile in parts of Los Angeles. AT&T fell in between. All had issues at large concerts and festivals, or sporting events if your carrier has no on-site rights. Edit: Dishes native 5g network has different issues: not enough sites, limited bandwidth. Higher priority would help a few. Truth is they can push phones to AT&T or T-Mobile.
    • Tracfone AT&T sims went from QCI 8 to 9 as well a couple years ago. I'm pretty neutral towards AT&T's turbo feature here, the only bad taste left was for those who had unadvertised QCI 7 a couple months ago moved down to 8. In my eyes it would have been a lot better for AT&T to include turbo in those Premium/Elite plans for free to keep them at QCI 7, while also introducing this turbo add on option for any other plans or devices. As it stands now only a handful of plans can add it, and only if you're using a device on a random list of devices AT&T considers to be 5G smartphones.
    • My Red Pocket AT&T GSMA account was dropped to QCI 9 about a year ago.  Most recently 8 for the last few years prior.  Voice remains at 5.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...