Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

Yeah, I'm no fan of the phone leasing system.  I think it's kind of ridiculous.

 

I am leasing some fried chicken.  With an option to buy.  I hope I got a good deal.

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But seriously I think Verizon's score was higher than 10 mbps. There was a 22% speed difference. That is noticable when downloading normal apps and video consistency.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

 

Difference between 16 and 26? It's relative man, 30 seconds in real time?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think too many Android device's value plunge too fast. Whereas idevices tend to hold value well into its lifespan. Also, this Samsung battery debacle do not help the cause.

 

That the iPhone mystique persists to this day among the hoi polloi, thereby artificially propping up the resale value, is astonishing.  Any used phone is still a used phone.  Not "preowned."  USED.

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Were we previously aware of the USCC spectrum swaps in IL, VA, MI, KS, WA? Maybe I've been under a rock.

 

ULS App: http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/ApplicationSearch/applMain.jsp?applID=9546885

 

FCC Electronic Comments: https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/filings?proceedings_name=16-179&sort=date_disseminated,DESC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heck, there are still AT&T areas that are EDGE only. 

 

I can second that - AT&T being still stuck on 2G along I-40 where I used to live in TN was why I switched to Sprint and even found my way here in the first place a few years back.  They've since rectified that from what I'm told, but at the time Sprint (as bad as they were before back then in the eyes of many) was considerably better/faster than AT&T.   Every carrier has areas where they have issues, and AT&T certainly has had as many warts as anyone else.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my (admittedly anecdotal) experience, Sprint is outperforming every other network here in the Richmond, VA area. Was just at our state fair this past weekend and my new iPhone 7 was working great - texting, voice calls, data on the ready when needed (ok, let's be honest - wanted). Other family members there (all on AT&T) had data that performed intermittently, at the very best.

 

I've had similar, recent experiences with Verizon and T-Mobile users,

 

So in my book, Sprint is already the best in my area based on my usage. (I should note I also still have active accounts with the other 3 top carriers that I test on my own from time to time.) I don't travel much anymore (at least for the moment), so Sprint is perfect for me. 

 

I don't know whether this will hold true on a nationwide basis within the next 6-8 months, but if my local area is any indication I can see where Sprint will at least give the others a very significant run for their money.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In Western Washington, if you have B41 you have the best network experience in most situations. I have you have B25 (which is now 10x10), you have an overall pretty good experience. It's the 3G gaps and deep in-building situations because of no B26. But now the end is nigh. Finally.

 

Sprint has solid chance of being the best here when they get B26 deployed. But it's now a fair competitor and will only get better as the gaps are filled with B26.

 

Using Tapatalk on Note 8.0

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No way is Sprint even close to being #1 or #2 by May 2017.  They are still many holes in their LTE network and even though it gets better day by day, I just seriously doubt that they are deploying small cells fast enough to add capacity and coverage around the country to surpass Verizon or ATT.  Heck they can't even deploy B26 in the SB county/Mexico IBEZ and Canadian IBEZ zones yet so there are still plenty of markets that do not have access to LTE 800 and CDMA 800.  

 

I think its gonna take another 2 years when more and more small cells get deployed and adding 3xCA LTE carriers to compete with LTE coverage and performance.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No way is Sprint even close to being #1 or #2 by May 2017. They are still many holes in their LTE network and even though it gets better day by day, I just seriously doubt that they are deploying small cells fast enough to add capacity and coverage around the country to surpass Verizon or ATT. Heck they can't even deploy B26 in the SB county/Mexico IBEZ and Canadian IBEZ zones yet so there are still plenty of markets that do not have access to LTE 800 and CDMA 800.

 

I think its gonna take another 2 years when more and more small cells get deployed and adding 3xCA LTE carriers to compete with LTE coverage and performance.

There are there that have Band 26. Some have 1x800 but, not LTE band 26. The up north area here in Minnesota near Canada has band 26.

 

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In Western Washington, if you have B41 you have the best network experience in most situations. I have you have B25 (which is now 10x10), you have an overall pretty good experience. It's the 3G gaps and deep in-building situations because of no B26. But now the end is nigh. Finally.

 

Sprint has solid chance of being the best here when they get B26 deployed. But it's now a fair competitor and will only get better as the gaps are filled with B26.

 

Using Tapatalk on Note 8.0

 

I couldn't agree more with up here. It's hard because of the terrain but B26 will help a lot with that.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are all most at the 17 month mark. I don't see any miracles happening in the next 30 days, winter will be here shortly as well which may play a role in slowing things down.

But! He did say 18-24 months!

Definitely not in Jacksonville. At my new office downtown, I'm pulling 0.5mbps on LTE. ????
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely not in Jacksonville. At my new office downtown, I'm pulling 0.5mbps on LTE. ????

north florida is different. From the villages onwards even rural cities have b41. Jacksonville market is not getting much love this year. Hundreds of sites with b25/26 only. That's not changing til next year maybe.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

north florida is different. From the villages onwards even rural cities have b41. Jacksonville market is not getting much love this year. Hundreds of sites with b25/26 only. That's not changing til next year maybe.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

I've experienced B41 and it really is awesome. The issue is that it's like seeing a unicorn in Jacksonville. I'm not sure why Jacksonville is a low priority market. I am just guessing Sprint doesn't have a good market share here.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely not in Jacksonville. At my new office downtown, I'm pulling 0.5mbps on LTE.

 

You do realize that not even the #1 rated network is great everywhere, anytime.  Location, location, location, and time, time, time.  VZW, AT&T, and T-Mobile all have similar sore spots in all markets at times.  You cannot generalize any reliable conclusions from that.

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You do realize that not even the #1 rated network is great everywhere, anytime. Location, location, location, and time, time, time. VZW, AT&T, and T-Mobile all have similar sore spots in all markets at times. You cannot generalize any reliable conclusions from that.

 

AJ

This exactly.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Uploaded data without issues on Friday. Now with the latest update I am getting "Cluster #1 skipped: invalid file format detected. File exported for inspection." Doing same with all other clusters. Did this on 4 phones in a row.  Seems to work on s24 ultra just fine. On s21 ultra it says "web data upload failed. No data to send" although 8800 records were displayed. Now gives same error as above. I have not sent the data from 3 other phones.  All should have latest update.
    • After several months of testing, an update to SignalCheck Pro is rolling out on Google Play. It may take up to 48 hours to become available for download. Notable changes include: Added option to display site notes for NSA 5G-NR cells. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show NSA 5G-NR Site Notes) will cause the app to make an "educated guess" as to what the most appropriate site note is linked to the connected NSA 5G cell, using the PCI and the device location. If it finds an existing entry that is likely to be relevant, it will display the note along with the distance from where the strongest signal from that cell was logged. While connected to NSA 5G, these notes cannot be edited; a valid NCI is required to add/edit notes and that information is not available on NSA connections.   Added option to log cells with missing/invalid PLMN (such as NSA 5G-NR cells). Users asked for the ability to log data for NSA 5G, so a new option (Preferences > Logger Settings > Log Cells with Missing PLMN) will permit this.   Added option to display LTE info above 5G-NR info. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show LTE Cells Above 5G-NR Cells) shows the same information that is currently displayed, but moves the LTE information above the 5G-NR information. Other changes: Code optimizations and enhancements. Improved Android 15 compatibility. Overhauled Purchases module. Resolved force closes impacting some GSM/LTE connections. Resolved issue with improper 5G-NR PLMN display when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with improper PLMN display with single-digit MNCs. Resolved issue with incorrect 5G-NR bands displayed on some devices due to Android bug. Resolved issue with incorrect number of neighbor cells displayed when some cells were unknown. Resolved issue with missing 5G-NR data when sector display is enabled. Resolved issue with saving 5G-NR site notes when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with settings to log missing GCI/NCI/TAC/PLMN being ignored. Resolved issues with web data export function. Updated internal libraries. Updated provider database. Updated target API to Android 15. I appreciate all of your support, and a big thank you to the members of the Beta Crew that help with testing and feedback!
    • Oct security update is out.
    • Stopped by again today and the antennas are up but it isn't live just yet. If other Sprint conversions are anything to go by it'll likely take about a month for the site to go live.
    • It is an Android bug that was reportedly fixed in August 2023 but definitely has not been. I have implemented numerous workarounds in SCP to correct the NR bands the app displays. The OS ignores the possibility that many NR-ARFCNs are valid across multiple bands.. it reports the lowest NR band that is valid for the current ARFCN. In your example, channel 432530 can be n1, n65, or n66.. so the OS just (lazily) reports n1.   Awesome, thanks! I will add an n65 override also.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...