Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

Hopefully Sprint has a response to this pricing move by T-Mobile.... I guess there's always the Save 50% off of your Bill Offer to cut the Tiered Offerings in half....

 

But see this:

 

4 Unlimited Data Lines with Sprint is $250/month ($70/month for 1st line and $60/month for each additional Unlimited Line)

vs.

4 Unlimited Data Lines with T-Mobile is $150/month.... (Each additional Unlimited Line is $30/month up to 12 lines)

 

Marcelo: I think it's time for another Town Hall

 

Looks like a response to atts unlimited package 4 lines $180

Let's see what sprint does... Should be interesting

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like a response to atts unlimited package 4 lines $180

Let's see what sprint does... Should be interesting

I'm expecting Sprint to match it but honestly if they really wanted to 1-up the competition, they'd just allow the CYBIH promo work for competitor's unlimited data plans.  That'd be amazing.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully Sprint has a response to this pricing move by T-Mobile.... I guess there's always the Save 50% off of your Bill Offer to cut the Tiered Offerings in half....

 

But see this:

 

4 Unlimited Data Lines with Sprint is $250/month ($70/month for 1st line and $60/month for each additional Unlimited Line)

vs.

4 Unlimited Data Lines with T-Mobile is $150/month.... (Each additional Unlimited Line is $30/month up to 12 lines)

 

Marcelo: I think it's time for another Town Hall

except the 50% off does not include this promotion, or any unlimited.  i don't exactly get that t-mobile current regular price for unlimited is $95 they could have done 50% off at $47.50, that would not have been much different that the unlimited iPhone plan they offered awhile ago.  I would love to see a pricing structure simplification like what Metro does with including taxes and fees, what you see is what you pay. something like

 

unlimited 1st line  $60    2nd line $50     line 3-12 $30  include shared hot spot 5 gigs per line, throttled after that

share plans 20 gigs $100        40 gigs $140      80 gigs $160  no access fees 

 

these prices would include taxes fees, everything The current structure is very confusing for everyone, including sprint employees...  I think they need to start from scratch.  The network is much improved, now the price structure needs to follow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like a response to atts unlimited package 4 lines $180

Let's see what sprint does... Should be interesting

what really got my attention is tablets for unlimited data for $40/ month add on. I wonder how bad this is "Data Restrictions: After 22GB of data usage on a line in a bill cycle, AT&T may slow the data on that line during periods of network congestion for the remainder of that cycle. "  I wonder if i had an ipad pro on burned 100 gigs in a month if they would reach out to me, or throttle me?  Not that i would, just a hypothetical could this be Att's first step towards home internet delivered over cellular?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what really got my attention is tablets for unlimited data for $40/ month add on. I wonder how bad this is "Data Restrictions: After 22GB of data usage on a line in a bill cycle, AT&T may slow the data on that line during periods of network congestion for the remainder of that cycle. " I wonder if i had an ipad pro on burned 100 gigs in a month if they would reach out to me, or throttle me? Not that i would, just a hypothetical could this be Att's first step towards home internet delivered over cellular?

Att offer is in a league of it's own. It requires you get direct tv. It is there to steam cord cutting.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Att offer is in a league of it's own. It requires you get direct tv. It is there to steam cord cutting.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

it's an extension of the bundle no doubt, but a lot of people have direct tv, or u verse for people in that situation it's compelling.  don't get me wrong i hate the direction the death star (att) has taken by basically doubling down on bundling.  but at the same time price competition is good for me as a consumer, it will be interesting to see how Verizon with respond since they don't have the tv offerings like ATT does.  I know they have fios but it doesn't have the geographic reach that the u verse direct tv combination, not to mention t-mobile and sprint own nothing similar.  I wonder what the response will be?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

except the 50% off does not include this promotion, or any unlimited. i don't exactly get that t-mobile current regular price for unlimited is $95 they could have done 50% off at $47.50, that would not have been much different that the unlimited iPhone plan they offered awhile ago. I would love to see a pricing structure simplification like what Metro does with including taxes and fees, what you see is what you pay. something like

 

unlimited 1st line $60 2nd line $50 line 3-12 $30 include shared hot spot 5 gigs per line, throttled after that

share plans 20 gigs $100 40 gigs $140 80 gigs $160 no access fees

 

these prices would include taxes fees, everything The current structure is very confusing for everyone, including sprint employees... I think they need to start from scratch. The network is much improved, now the price structure needs to follow.

From T-Mobile Release:

 

"With this deal, families can now get four lines of Unlimited LTE for their smartphones for the unheard of price of $150 total per month for the entire family. Plus, families (and small businesses) can add more lines of Unlimited LTE for just $30 each—up to a total of 12 lines. Or families can get two lines for just $100 per month with 10 GB per line (20 GB total)—no sharing! Or four lines with 10 GB per line (40 GB total) for $120 per month for the whole family—just $30 per line!"

 

You're right about unlimited, but it seems the tiered plans are in play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Att offer is in a league of it's own. It requires you get direct tv. It is there to steam cord cutting.

 

I've mentioned this before, but if you live in a U-Verse area, there is a $20/month (actual cost -- not a promotion) TV plan that you can get to become eligible for the new unlimited plans; and then with combined billing for both, you get a $10/month service credit. At that cost, it's worth it to just throw the receiver in the closet and forget about it.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've mentioned this before, but if you live in a U-Verse area, there is a $20/month (actual cost -- not a promotion) TV plan that you can get to become eligible for the new unlimited plans; and then with combined billing for both, you get a $10/month service credit. At that cost, it's worth it to just throw the receiver in the closet and forget about it.

Which only proves that AT&T could sustain Unlimited Data all along, even as it worked to drive people off of Unlimited Data Plans by throttling at 5GB.

 

But for Sprint, this means a serious pricing adjustment is needed.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From T-Mobile Release:

 

"With this deal, families can now get four lines of Unlimited LTE for their smartphones for the unheard of price of $150 total per month for the entire family. Plus, families (and small businesses) can add more lines of Unlimited LTE for just $30 each—up to a total of 12 lines. Or families can get two lines for just $100 per month with 10 GB per line (20 GB total)—no sharing! Or four lines with 10 GB per line (40 GB total) for $120 per month for the whole family—just $30 per line!"

 

You're right about unlimited, but it seems the tiered plans are in play.

 

That's an insanely low price, so I wonder if it's a limited time play to grab customers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No :(

 

Just received this from my source:

 

 

 

The effective date of the elimination of waived activation and upgrade fees was previously communicated as February 12, 2016. However, we received word from Sprint that this has been extended to February 26, 2016.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be clear - the 4-line tmobile unlimited plan is cheaper than the old Sprint ED1500 plan. 

 

Primary ED1500 -  $110

Each additional Line - $20 (X3)

Each lines 'premium data' charge - $10. (X4)

======================================

Sprints ED1500 (for 4 lines) comes out to ~$210, PLUS Taxes and any Equpiment Fee's or TEP.

 

Tmobile scored big on that one.  Not sure its sustainable, but that is an awesome deal for someone who lives in an area with great Tmobile Coverage.  Wow..

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be clear - the 4-line tmobile unlimited plan is cheaper than the old Sprint ED1500 plan.

 

Primary ED1500 - $110

Each additional Line - $20 (X3)

Each lines 'premium data' charge - $10. (X4)

======================================

Sprints ED1500 (for 4 lines) comes out to ~$210, PLUS Taxes and any Equpiment Fee's or TEP.

 

Tmobile scored big on that one. Not sure its sustainable, but that is an awesome deal for someone who lives in an area with great Tmobile Coverage. Wow..

2 Year phone agreements put ED1500 slightly over the top, but not by much.
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not a long term play, it's a "price low to gain share" play.

 

But once people are on this pricing, they get to keep it... until T-Mobile raises it....

 

Does Sprint have the ability to match this pricing? I'm sure it's under discussion at HQ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly. I bet they have a big commercial to coincide with this deal.

 

Sent from my SM-N910T

 

Oh to be a fly on the wall at Sprint HQ right now as Marcelo and team figure out what to do...

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.androidpolice.com/2016/02/02/t-mobile-releases-30-second-super-bowl-ad-about-how-other-carriers-would-butcher-drakes-hotline-bling/

 

It's a repost but watch all the Tmo commercials there is more than one

This is just in time for the Super Bowl unless they have something else to top it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But once people are on this pricing, they get to keep it... until T-Mobile raises it....

 

Does Sprint have the ability to match this pricing? I'm sure it's under discussion at HQ.

sprint has the ability to do anything, the question is do they want to give the service away in the name of matching price.  does the quality of the network still warrant them being a value play, or does the network quality warrant premium pricing?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sprint has the ability to do anything, the question is do they want to give the service away in the name of matching price. does the quality of the network still warrant them being a value play, or does the network quality warrant premium pricing?

Although they've improved they certainly aren't good enough yet for premium pricing. They should stay the value carrier for a little longer until the public perception of Sprint is a positive one.

 

Sent from my LG-H901 using Tapatalk

Edited by Camcroz
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although they've improved they certainly aren't good enough yet for premium pricing. They should stay the value carrier for a little longer until the public perception of Sprint is a positive one.

 

Sent from my LG-H901 using Tapatalk

I would agree they need to be very aggressive on pricing, however I am not sure if Marcelo agrees with my opinion. :secret:  sprint seems to act like a big bloated company and t-mobile seems to act like a small agile start up, I know that is just perception but you know what they say, perception is reality.  I think back to the tweets Marcelo sent out about the late night brain storming sessions with beer in a conference room... only to announce what was almost identical to last years half off promotion, :twitch:  i remember thinking they must have spent all night writing all that fine print, witch by the way people generally don't like fine print. don't get me wrong it's a good deal, but he hyped the heck out of that, and really it was an updated version of last years plan...        

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I would agree they need to be very aggressive on pricing, however I am not sure if Marcelo agrees with my opinion. :secret: sprint seems to act like a big bloated company and t-mobile seems to act like a small agile start up, I know that is just perception but you know what they say, perception is reality. I think back to the tweets Marcelo sent out about the late night brain storming sessions with beer in a conference room... only to announce what was almost identical to last years half off promotion, :twitch: i remember thinking they must have spent all night writing all that fine print, witch by the way people generally don't like fine print. don't get me wrong it's a good deal, but he hyped the heck out of that, and really it was an updated version of last years plan...

Ya I've learned that if Sprint hypes up a new promotion than its automatically not gonna be good. Remember "all in". With the way they hyped that, I thought it would be the deal that brought millions of customers back but it turned out to not be that great. Same with half off promotion. There just not enticing enough with there deals. Once they improve quality then they can definetly start charging more. Verizon type pricing just doesn't work right now though.

 

Sent from my LG-H901 using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...