Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

Same with me!

 

My Sprint service was just fine during the 'Winter Awakens' Blizzard in the NoVA.

 

Ditto, but I am reminiscent of days of overloaded CDMA and an extra hot Galaxy SIII. It was a great feature when it was cold out.  :P  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a thought. Would it be possible for Sprint to change from data bucket plans to speed plans like cable? For example, 1.5 mbps, 8 mbps(like cricket) and no limit. I think it would be a good counter to binge on, music freedom and wouldn't affect net neutrality. This would make Sprint plans simpler and possibly control network load. I think Sprint has to think out the box and take a step ahead instead of just matching other carriers. Just an idea.

 

Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a thought. Would it be possible for Sprint to change from data bucket plans to speed plans like cable? For example, 1.5 mbps, 8 mbps(like cricket) and no limit. I think it would be a good counter to binge on, music freedom and wouldn't affect net neutrality. This would make Sprint plans simpler and possibly control network load. I think Sprint has to think out the box and take a step ahead instead of just matching other carriers. Just an idea.

 

Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk

It would be very hard to offer a service guarantee of any kind though which would bring down customer satisfaction. Also, you have people like me who are OK with 1 Mbps. The only time I get a speed boost is when cable companies raise their minimum.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a thought. Would it be possible for Sprint to change from data bucket plans to speed plans like cable? For example, 1.5 mbps, 8 mbps(like cricket) and no limit. I think it would be a good counter to binge on, music freedom and wouldn't affect net neutrality. This would make Sprint plans simpler and possibly control network load. I think Sprint has to think out the box and take a step ahead instead of just matching other carriers. Just an idea.

 

Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk

Your idea sounds great, however I don't think it's doable right now in till the network is consistently strong across all markets.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be very hard to offer a service guarantee of any kind though which would bring down customer satisfaction. Also, you have people like me who are OK with 1 Mbps. The only time I get a speed boost is when cable companies raise their minimum.

I know there's many areas lacking sufficient speeds now but it could improve if many users are throttled there. I wouldn't be surprised if T-Mobile does this. They already have. They launched binge on and enabled it on everyone and then gave everyone free unlimited for 3 months. I think it was a big experiment to see how the network handles everyone on unlimited but throttled. Now they offer a great new unlimited promotion. Unlimited but throttled looks like the trend.

 

Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know there's many areas lacking sufficient speeds now but it could improve if many users are throttled there. I wouldn't be surprised if T-Mobile does this. They already have. They launched binge on and enabled it on everyone and then gave everyone free unlimited for 3 months. I think it was a big experiment to see how the network handles everyone on unlimited but throttled. Now they offer a great new unlimited promotion. Unlimited but throttled looks like the trend.

 

Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk

Throttled at dial up speeds is the only type of throttling that works.

 

General throttling (1 Mbps for example) would just clog the network even further. The faster people are in and out, the less congested the network will be. Throttling them would just keep them on the network a lot longer than needed.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

TMO has been showing in the 100's

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Yes.. when no one was there in their seats before the game. 

 

Here: https://www.facebook.com/JohnJLegere/photos/a.1444501559188725.1073741828.1444207845884763/1507106902928190/?type=3&theater

Pic: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CapH7pbUUAAmpa9?format=pjpg&name=large

 

Whereas that speed test is from when the game began and tens of thousands of people are in their seats. 

 

It's fantastic speeds for such an event considering at other similar occasions before hand it would be at the 1-2 mbs or timing out. 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The stadium looks a little more full in this picture

 

 

Sent from my LG-H901 using Tapatalk

 

Do you not see the link I posted that was from JL posting a 100+ mbps speed test?

 

That was the 100 mbps comment i was responding to. 

 

Furthermore your image helps my point. Don't see 100 mbps+ speeds during the game now though it is quite decent speeds. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you not see the link I posted that was from JL posting a 100+ mbps speed test?

 

That was the 100 mbps comment i was responding to.

 

Furthermore your image helps my point. Don't see 100 mbps+ speeds during the game now though it is quite decent speeds.

I'm a little confused by what your trying to say. You said the speed was fast but that there was hardly anyone there in the original pic. I only posted the other pic to show that it is still fast with people there

 

Sent from my LG-H901 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a little confused by what your trying to say. You said the speed was fast but that there was hardly anyone there in the original pic. I only posted the other pic to show that it is still fast with people there

 

Sent from my LG-H901 using Tapatalk

A previous post said tmobile was averaging 100s without context.

 

I provided the image that specified the 100 Mbps speeds which was a JL post on Facebook pregame in a comparison between tmobile and Verizon.

 

You bumped in with a screenshot during game time which is not relevant to the conversation I was in.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A previous post said tmobile was averaging 100s without context.

 

I provided the image that specified the 100 Mbps speeds which was a JL post on Facebook pregame in a comparison between tmobile and Verizon.

 

You bumped in with a screenshot during game time which is not relevant to the conversation I was in.

 

I guess [emoji53]

 

Sent from my LG-H901 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess [emoji53]

 

Sent from my LG-H901 using Tapatalk

 

Friendly conversations! Yay! 

 

50 mbps is nothing to scoff at and you provided valuable information on performance when there's a crowd. Much appreciated. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Today I was driving over in Bothell/Kenmore area. I noticed the site which used to host Sprint eNB 745953 (where Waynita Way NE turns into 100th Ave NE) before it was fully decommissioned last year is now hosting all new T-Mobile gear. The gear isn't live yet but is fully installed. My guess is they plan to decommission the T-Mobile B2/B66 (enB 84647) only site a few blocks up the hill. This is a great move because decommissioning that old site would reduce interference with eNB 84740/175124. At the same time, the new location should notably improve coverage in the geographically shielded area along Waynita/100th.  The weird thing is I can't find a permit for this anywhere!
    • Mint and Ultra: Welcome to the T-Mobile Family! https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-closes-acquisition-mint-and-ultra-mobile
    • https://www.t-mobile.com/2023-annual-report Most items s4gru members will be aware of, but an interesting read.
    • I've now seen 100 MHz n77 from SoftBank and 100 MHz n78 from NTT. NTT seems to be a bit better south of Osaka, though in some cases it drops down to B19 LTE as some areas around here are pretty rural. SoftBank has n77 around, but it's flakey enough that I switched eSIMs earlier this morning.
    • I'm currently typing this from a bullet train headed from Tokyo to Osaka. Using a roaming eSIM rather than T-Mobile as it's a lot cheaper, but I'll start with T-Mobile's roaming experience. Since I have a business line, I can't add data packs online, so I'm just using the 256 kbps baseline service you get by default. That service runs on Softank 4G. SoftBank has a well-built-out LTE network though, with plenty of B41, falling back to B1/3/8 as needed. 5G roaming from T-Mobile doesn't appear to exist though. I've seen 20+10 MHz B41 when I've looked, generally speaking. WiFi calling works well, and voice calls over LTE work fine too (I forgot to turn WiFi back on after doing some testing, so I expect my bill to be a dollar more next month). I want to say I even got HD voice over the cell network for the VoLTE call I did. I have a bunch of eSIMs and a couple of physical SIMs to try out. I've gotten the eSIMs up and running, but last I checked the physical SIM wasn't working even after activation so I'll run through eSIMs for the moment and update this thread with pSIM info and details on not-Tokyo in the coming days. First off, there's US Mobile's complimentary East Asia eSIM (5GB) that I grabbed before my unlimited plan Stateside expired. That SIM uses SIM Club, routing through Singapore, running on SoftBank LTE and 5G. I've seen 40 MHz n77, as well as 10x10 n28, and have seen download speeds in excess of 200 Mbps with uploads of more than 50 Mbps, though typical speeds are slower. Routing is via Equinix/Packet.net. 5G coverage is rather spotty, but LTE is plenty fast enough; either my phone doesn't want to use the 5G band combos that have more coverage or 5G coverage is just spottier here than in the US (at least on T-Mibile). Latency is as low as 95ms to sites in Singapore (usually closer to 120ms), which is pretty great considering the 3300 mi between Tokyo and Singapore. Next there's Ubigi. It also routes through Singapore via Transatel (despite being owned by NTT), and sites on top of NTT docomo's network. I didn't see NTT 5G in Tokyo when I tested it, but since then I've seen 10x10 n28, and have seen B1/B3/B19 on the LTE side. So far it's not the fastest thing out there, but I'm guessing coverage will be a little better...or maybe not. This was $17 for 10GB. Latency is a bit higher to Singapore, but still under 150ms it seems. Then there's Airalo, which was the cheapest when I bought it at $9 for 10GB. It also routes through Singapore (on Singtel), but on my S24 I have my pick of KDDI (au) or SoftBank. KDDI has extensive B41 coverage and I've seen 20+20 with UL CA. While waiting for the train at HND Terminal 3 (Keikyu line) I hit 250+ Mbps down and 10+ Mbps up...over LTE...with pretty respectable latency numbers (not much above 100ms). This is in adition to supporting SoftBank, also on LTE (my S24 defaulted to KDDI, while my wife's Pixel 8 defaulted to SoftBank and didn't seem to want to connect to KDDI). Of the various carriers mentioned, I'd say this was the best pick, though prices have bumped back up to $18 for the 10GB plan...but it's probably still what I'd pick if I had to pick just one carrier. Then there's Saily, which uses Truphone out of Hong Kong. I haven't used this as much, as I only grabbed 3GB for $7. It runs on NTT but doesn't seem to have 5G access and doesn't seem to have as good speeds. Yes, Hong Kong is way closer to Japan, but latency didn't seem to be any better, at ~150ms. In all cases, I've had reception even in train tunnels and even at high speed on the bullet train, on all three carriers I've tried (I don't think I'll be able to play with a Rakuten SIM, which is rather disappointing). There have been cases where service has degraded, but it looks like you'd have reasonable cell service no matter which of the big three carriers you picked...and since T-Mobile roams on one of them, that's good enough if you're content to buy day passes.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...