Jump to content

Sprint Reportedly Bowing Out of T-Mobile Bid (was "Sprint offer" and "Iliad" threads)


thepowerofdonuts

Recommended Posts

Marcelo sounds like he is a very busy person.  Hope he will not be distracted.  Being CEO of Sprint will be a full time plus position.  They need all of his attention.

 

Robert

  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this is plan B, im ready for a rebranding in next 12 months.

 

And good for Hesse. No matter what can be said about sprints weaknesses, the man single-handedly saved sprint from being sold off for pennies or bankrupted years ago. He kept the ship afloat in sprints darkest days with a steady and metered strategy and fiscal discipline.

 

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

  • Like 13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint must be executing "plan b"

I am sure they aren't happy if dish is really entertaining buying Tmo...

That could really help Tmo with dishes spectrum

It can but Sprint will still triumph with 2.5. Maybe sprint should bid for Aws auction!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Sprint does acquire US cellular. It would be awesome if they can bring the brand nationwide kind of like metro pcs.

 

Maybe make US cellular as a combined Boost mobile and Virgin mobile.

 

What spectrum licenses does tmobile have?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They should start buying the regional carriers one at the time or the duopoly will come for them. Look what happened when the board denied Hesse MetroPCS, tmobile grabbed it.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many 10x10 mhz PCS A-F markets beg to differ.

I'm in the Chicago market, up until a few weeks ago I knew all about congestion...

 

I believe with all three bands they have what they need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wanna see Tmobile and Sprint go head to head next year!

 

It's about to get good and it's going to benefit us at the end of the day!

Unless TMO gets bought or has a large cash flow change - they will be in much tougher spot than Sprint. Just my 2 cents. I think the TMO fans are really in denial...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this is plan B, im ready for a rebranding in next 12 months.

 

And good for Hesse. No matter what can be said about sprints weaknesses, the man single-handedly saved sprint from being sold off for pennies or bankrupted years ago. He kept the ship afloat in sprints darkest days with a steady and metered strategy and fiscal discipline.

 

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

Just my two cents, but I completely agree with everything you said!

 

Hesse saved Sprint!

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just realized but do you think Masa Son realized he didn't need tmobile. I mean it seems sprint is on pace to add subscribers probably Q4 2014/ Q1 2015.

 

Maybe he feels Sprint has an actual chance and this is why a lot of changes are happening quickly.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just realized but do you think Masa Son realized he didn't need tmobile. I mean it seems sprint is on pace to add subscribers probably Q4 2014/ Q1 2015.

 

Maybe he feels Sprint has an actual chance and this is why a lot of changes are happening quickly.

Yes.

 

Or perhaps T-Mobile had too much momentum/lovers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is great news! Sprint didn't need the distraction of integrating another company. It needs to complete and optimize its NV buildout and then effectively market itself. I'm not sure just calling it "America's Newest Network" and airing odd Framily commercials is enough. Either way I think positive things are going to happen with Sprint.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like others have said, I think Hesse made about the most he could out of a bad hand and deserves to go off into retirement with his head held high. I'm sure the plan was to stick around until the merger was consummated; without a merger, though, you don't need him as the steady hand at the wheel to offset Legere's, uh, eccentricity among the more sober minded.

 

As for the network, I think going forward the priorities have to be (not that any of these are particularly innovative ideas):

  1. 2.5-2.6 rollout and PCS rebanding where NV is at approaching or at capacity, if necessary incentivizing long-term subscribers to upgrade to new equipment; in particular, try to get devices that can't do ESMR 1x off the network so some data and voice channels on PCS can be rebanded to LTE.
  2. Get 800 LTE tuned and up to full power to get reality up to what the LTE coverage maps show.
  3. Get interim backhaul (microwave or non-scalable) in place where they haven't been able to secure the ideal backhaul, and finish the GMO upgrades to get 1x800 and LTE 800 into the rural areas where it can cut down on roaming expenditures and gain cash flow from CCA partner roaming that's going to Verizon today. Stop LTE upgrades being on the legacy backhaul providers' timetable.
  4. Build out or enlist CCA partners where Sprint is going to lose preferred roaming coverage in 2015, using ex-Nextel towers if still under lease anyway. "There's a map for that" marketing isn't going away.
  5. Build out PCS G block in the western markets where they're in a use-it or lose-it situation.

Of course a lot of this is already underway, but Claure needs to light a fire under Saw to get these items done so they can rebrand after (not before) the network is up to snuff.

  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint under Hesse leadership made a big mistake suing the cable companies for VoIP patents. This is the reason of the whole backhaul delays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes.

 

Or perhaps T-Mobile had too much momentum/lovers.

I agree. I think it's a combination of a lot of things and I think masa realized the merger wasn't worth it. It will just delay things and end up sprint paying a break up fee.

 

I'm in favor of roaming deals. Sprint can roam on 700/1700/2100 and tmobile can roam on 2.5ghz and 800 lte

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint under Hesse leadership made a big mistake suing the cable companies for VoIP patents. This is the reason of the whole backhaul delays.

No, Sprint made the mistake of shedding their landline division and getting in bed with the cable cos to begin with. Then not going through and abandoning SpectrumCo so that they were forced to sel it to Verizon. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, Sprint made the mistake of shedding their landline division and getting in bed with the cable cos to begin with. Then not going through and abandoning SpectrumCo so that they were forced to sel it to Verizon.

 

 

Sure that was a big mistake, but suing the cable companies was a bad decision when you need them for fiber backhaul. The cable companies basically sabotaged sprint fiber deployment for network vision 1.0.in other words the cable cos made sprint look bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, Sprint made the mistake of shedding their landline division and getting in bed with the cable cos to begin with. Then not going through and abandoning SpectrumCo so that they were forced to sel it to Verizon. 

 

It's not Sprint fault.

Shedding the landline unit is the condition from FCC in order to approve the nextel merger.

Then FCC in all those merger after that allows ATT/VERIZON keeps their landline unit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • A heavy n41 overlay as an acquisition condition would be a win for customers, and eventually a win for T-Mobile as that might be enough to preclude VZW/AT&T adding C-Band for FWA due to spreading the market too thinly (which means T-Mobile would just have local WISPs/wireline ISPs as competition). USCC spacing (which is likely for contiguous 700 MHz LTE coverage in rural areas) isn't going to be enough for contiguous n41 anyway, and I doubt they'll densify enough to get there.
    • Boost Infinite with a rainbow SIM (you can get it SIM-only) is the cheapest way, at $25/mo, to my knowledge; the cheaper Boost Mobile plans don't run on Dish native. Check Phonescoop for n70 support on a given phone; the Moto G 5G from last year may be the cheapest unlocked phone with n70 though data speeds aren't as good as something with an X70 or better modem.
    • Continuing the USCC discussion, if T-Mobile does a full equipment swap at all of USCC's sites, which they probably will for vendor consistency, and if they include 2.5 on all of those sites, which they probably will as they definitely have economies of scale on the base stations, that'll represent a massive capacity increase in those areas over what USCC had, and maybe a coverage increase since n71 will get deployed everywhere and B71 will get deployed any time T-Mobile has at least 25x25, and maybe where they have 20x20. Assuming this deal goes through (I'm betting it does), I figure I'll see contiguous coverage in the area of southern IL where I was attempting to roam on USCC the last time I was there, though it might be late next year before that switchover happens.
    • Forgot to post this, but a few weeks ago I got to visit these small cells myself! They're spread around Grant park and the surrounding areas, but unfortunately none of the mmwave cells made it outside of the parks along the lake into the rest of downtown. I did spot some n41 small cells around downtown, but they seemed to be older deployments limited to 100mhz and performed poorly.    
    • What is the cheapest way to try Dish's wireless network?  Over the past year I've seen them add their equipment to just about every cell site here, I'm assuming just go through Boost's website?  What phones are Dish native?  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...