Jump to content

LG G2 Users Thread!


koiulpoi

Recommended Posts

Can HD calls happen from cell to landline?

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

No

Sprint HD capable handset to another Sprint HD capable handset only.

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No

Sprint HD capable handset to another Sprint HD capable handset only.

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

 

 

You can check the debug screen while on a call.

 

DEBUG can be accessed by dialing ##DEBUG# (##33284#) in the dialer, then going to 1X Engineering. If you are on an HD Voice call it will say "EVRC_NW" under "S0". This shows which audio codeo the phone is using for the call.

 

I just made a test call on my G2 to look right now and happened to get an HD Voice call started, I've never gotten an HD Voice call that I know of before (I don't call much). :P

 

Both phones have to be using a 3G Network Vision-enabled tower (as this has the equipment to support the codec), and both phones have to support HD Voice (as they have to support the wider-band codec). If either of these conditions are not met, the phones will fallback to an older codec instead.

 

With that being said then EVRC_NW can't mean HD call because I get that on Cell to Landline phones also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With that being said then EVRC_NW can't mean HD call because I get that on Cell to Landline phones also.

 

Well, the EVRC-NW codec is the one used for HD Voice. EVRC-B is used for standard calls. Another older codec may be forced by the network if a tower is extremely overloaded and can't handle even that bandwidth for all of the calls. 

 

http://www.anandtech.com/show/5726/sprint-hd-voice-on-htc-evo-4g-lte-is-evrcnw-1x-advanced

 

The only thing I can think is that the phone may still use the EVRC-NW codec on its end if the tower says the bandwidth is available, and then it is converted network-side for transmission to the other end. The EVRC-NW codec can handle everything the EVRC-B one can, plus additional, so it can be encapsulated entirely within the EVRC-NW transmission to the HD-capable handset.

 

I've never seen an EVRC-NW codec listed on a call when it isn't an HD Voice call happening. The call I made the other day was with two HD Voice capable devices on a 3G Network Vision enabled tower, so it should have been HD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only thing that makes sense is something network-side converting it over. Perhaps due to landline calls not supporting either the EVRC-B or EVRC-NW codec and thus needing conversion anyway so it lets the phone transmit what it wants? I am only semi-educated in regards to codecs and know very little about telecom codec specifically so I don't know what is used beyond these two specifically.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4GV apparently is EVRC, according to Wikipedia. NB means narrowband, which is what EVRC-B is. The 4GV suite also consists EVRC-WB, whish is the wideband codec.

 

EVRC_NW stands for Narrow/Wideband, so it is capable of both the narrowband and wideband spectrum with the same codec, the wideband capability is what allows HD Voice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4GV apparently isEVRC, according to Wikipedia. NB means narrowband, which is what EVRC-B is. The 4GV suite also consists EVRC-WB, whish is the wideband codec.

 

EVRC_NW stands for Narrow/Wideband, so it is capable of both the narrowband and wideband spectrum with the same codec, the wideband capability is what allows HD Voice.

Be nice if it just HD but that is to easy. So in reality the real way to verify is to check the map and see if NV has occurred on the two tower and clarity it sounds like.

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trust me, my first HD voice call was today. You'll notice the difference right away. We were on neighboring cell sites, LG G2 to single band GS4. Screenshot -> http://goo.gl/w9nao9

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've yet to experience a HD call as many of my friends have other carriers. On the other hand went to my local Sprint store about my phone dropping 3g and voice for a few seconds then comes back fine. Guy said it has to be my phone ???? oh well

 

Sent from my LG G2 on the Now Network

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, 4GV-NB is a narrowband codec, it is not capable of the extended range that HD Voice requires. It just allows better network-management tan previous codecs from what I've been able to read so far.

 

EVRC-NW we know for certain is a narrowband/wideband codec capable of essentially providing both EVRC-B and EVRC-WB simultaneously. So the rate can drop to a narrower band if the tower gets overloaded versus having to switch codecs (I do not know if switching codecs would require the call to drop).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trust me, my first HD voice call was today. You'll notice the difference right away. We were on neighboring cell sites, LG G2 to single band GS4. Screenshot -> http://goo.gl/w9nao9

I think I've had one but it is hard to confirm if every call says the same as your S0

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I've had one but it is hard to confirm if every call says the same as your S0

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

Well I've noticed that 4GNV or something like that pop up when I've called landlines and Verizon iPhones and even an AT&T phone. Just a few days I've only seen 8K EVRC so something went live here. 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

First pic is non peak hours and second one peak hours at my home site which is legacy. I get in the 60s signal wise on 3G upstairs and low 80s downstairs. I can't imagine how good my signal will be after it gets a 3g/lte upgrade as in every case the 3g signal increases up to around -10 dbm. Places where I would roam or get no coverage I get over 3G now and that's just 1900 3G. If my home tower was a spark tower I would be in mobile heaven lol.usedy7e7.jpg9eze5a8e.jpg

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I recently am getting no 800 showing on my signal check.  My friend who also has a G2 was showing 800 all night while I had none.   The corporate Sprint store said they couldn't even test to see if there was a problem with my 800 reception.  Any input?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First pic is non peak hours and second one peak hours at my home site which is legacy. I get in the 60s signal wise on 3G upstairs and low 80s downstairs. I can't imagine how good my signal will be after it gets a 3g/lte upgrade as in every case the 3g signal increases up to around -10 dbm. Places where I would roam or get no coverage I get over 3G now and that's just 1900 3G. If my home tower was a spark tower I would be in mobile heaven lol.usedy7e7.jpg9eze5a8e.jpg

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

 

 

Question: Why is the 3g icon displayed as the old compared to the current one on the G2 which is 3g in a circular ring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone notice their 3g and voice drop for about 10 or so seconds then come back, but if I switch from lte/cdma to just cdma it won't do it. It was only doing it every so often but lately it's been doing it more and more to the point that trying to do anything that requires data useless. Think it might be the phone or network?

 

Sent from my LG G2 on the Now Network

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone notice their 3g and voice drop for about 10 or so seconds then come back, but if I switch from lte/cdma to just cdma it won't do it. It was only doing it every so often but lately it's been doing it more and more to the point that trying to do anything that requires data useless. Think it might be the phone or network?

 

Sent from my LG G2 on the Now Network

Mine has been doing it since the spark update. It is seems to do that for me when switching from lte to 3g sometimes. I could be wrong though.

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I'm currently typing this from a bullet train headed from Tokyo to Osaka. Using a roaming eSIM rather than T-Mobile as it's a lot cheaper, but I'll start with T-Mobile's roaming experience. Since I have a business line, I can't add data packs online, so I'm just using the 256 kbps baseline service you get by default. That service runs on Softank 4G. SoftBank has a well-built-out LTE network though, with plenty of B41, falling back to B1/3/8 as needed. 5G roaming from T-Mobile doesn't appear to exist though. I've seen 20+10 MHz B41 when I've looked, generally speaking. WiFi calling works well, and voice calls over LTE work fine too (I forgot to turn WiFi back on after doing some testing, so I expect my bill to be a dollar more next month). I want to say I even got HD voice over the cell network for the VoLTE call I did. I have a bunch of eSIMs and a couple of physical SIMs to try out. I've gotten the eSIMs up and running, but last I checked the physical SIM wasn't working even after activation so I'll run through eSIMs for the moment and update this thread with pSIM info and details on not-Tokyo in the coming days. First off, there's US Mobile's complimentary East Asia eSIM (5GB) that I grabbed before my unlimited plan Stateside expired. That SIM uses SIM Club, routing through Singapore, running on SoftBank LTE and 5G. I've seen 40 MHz n77, as well as 10x10 n28, and have seen download speeds in excess of 200 Mbps with uploads of more than 50 Mbps, though typical speeds are slower. Routing is via Equinix/Packet.net. 5G coverage is rather spotty, but LTE is plenty fast enough; either my phone doesn't want to use the 5G band combos that have more coverage or 5G coverage is just spottier here than in the US (at least on T-Mibile). Latency is as low as 95ms to sites in Singapore (usually closer to 120ms), which is pretty great considering the 3300 mi between Tokyo and Singapore. Next there's Ubigi. It also routes through Singapore via Transatel (despite being owned by NTT), and sites on top of NTT docomo's network. I didn't see NTT 5G in Tokyo when I tested it, but since then I've seen 10x10 n28, and have seen B1/B3/B19 on the LTE side. So far it's not the fastest thing out there, but I'm guessing coverage will be a little better...or maybe not. This was $17 for 10GB. Latency is a bit higher to Singapore, but still under 150ms it seems. Then there's Airalo, which was the cheapest when I bought it at $9 for 10GB. It also routes through Singapore (on Singtel), but on my S24 I have my pick of KDDI (au) or SoftBank. KDDI has extensive B41 coverage and I've seen 20+20 with UL CA. While waiting for the train at HND Terminal 3 (Keikyu line) I hit 250+ Mbps down and 10+ Mbps up...over LTE...with pretty respectable latency numbers (not much above 100ms). This is in adition to supporting SoftBank, also on LTE (my S24 defaulted to KDDI, while my wife's Pixel 8 defaulted to SoftBank and didn't seem to want to connect to KDDI). Of the various carriers mentioned, I'd say this was the best pick, though prices have bumped back up to $18 for the 10GB plan...but it's probably still what I'd pick if I had to pick just one carrier. Then there's Saily, which uses Truphone out of Hong Kong. I haven't used this as much, as I only grabbed 3GB for $7. It runs on NTT but doesn't seem to have 5G access and doesn't seem to have as good speeds. Yes, Hong Kong is way closer to Japan, but latency didn't seem to be any better, at ~150ms. In all cases, I've had reception even in train tunnels and even at high speed on the bullet train, on all three carriers I've tried (I don't think I'll be able to play with a Rakuten SIM, which is rather disappointing). There have been cases where service has degraded, but it looks like you'd have reasonable cell service no matter which of the big three carriers you picked...and since T-Mobile roams on one of them, that's good enough if you're content to buy day passes.
    • https://www.phonearena.com/news/t-mobile-older-rate-plan-prices-june_id157821 We're on Sprint Max for our seven phone/two Apple Watch (with Cellular) family plan... Because it doesn't make sense to switch to anything else, especially if we can't even finance all of our devices. Some of you may recall that T-Mobile suddenly cut our credit limit to $1,500 (which is barely more than one iPhone 15 Pro) with no notice at all. I escalated it to the Office of the CEO and was told to pound sand, even though I have 800+ Credit as a longtime customer and was suddenly being treated as a deadbeat. I ultimately upgraded my three iPhone lines directly through Apple and they're Unlocked. I haven't bothered to check on whether my Credit Limit has updated, but I don't plan on upgrading them through T-Mobile again. I guess we'll find out if "Sprint Max" counts as "older" soon enough.
    • From just under a week ago: https://www.t-mobile.com/news/network/t-mobile-announces-163-million-in-completed-network-upgrades-for-arkansas Progress!
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...