Jump to content

LG G2 Users Thread!


koiulpoi

Recommended Posts

It was BSR Timer. After updating to ZVD from ZVC, it defaulted to 3000 when the correct BSR Timer is actually 3. Oops!

 

This OTA looks kind of small. Was hoping for something a bit bigger (WiFi Calling, or G3 UI.) I guess one can dream, can't I? :P

 

EDIT: If you take the OTA, can you compare Baseband versions? Mine on ZVD is currently M8974A-AAAANAZM-2.0.20046. Wondering if we got an entirely new Baseband as this version matches ZVC, too.

It actually showed 3 when you did *view but when you went to edit, it was clearly wrong, at 3000. If I update today or soon, I'll look at that baseband for you man.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wonder if the LTE updates in ZVE are just the previously known BSRtimer issue or if there is more?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wonder if the LTE updates in ZVE are just the previously known BSRtimer issue or if there is more?

Hopefully we can find out if Baseband is newer or not.  Sometimes that can change power consumption by radio or add extra juice for better performance.  Baseband is closed source but we can at least see if the version is different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully we can find out if Baseband is newer or not.  Sometimes that can change power consumption by radio or add extra juice for better performance.  Baseband is closed source but we can at least see if the version is different.

 

So this pass week I finally updated from JB and my phone was getting hung up on 3G. I let it sit one night to see if it would flip to LTE and 5 hours later it was still camping on 3G. I knew there was the fix for it but couldn't remember where it was but you guys just reassured me that it was the BSRTimer. Sure as hell it was sitting on 3000. We will test again tonight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So this pass week I finally updated from JB and my phone was getting hung up on 3G. I let it sit one night to see if it would flip to LTE and 5 hours later it was still camping on 3G. I knew there was the fix for it but couldn't remember where it was but you guys just reassured me that it was the BSRTimer. Sure as hell it was sitting on 3000. We will test again tonight.

I was going to try and set my BSR Timer down to 3 instead of 3000, but can't seem to get my MSL number.  I tried ##443336772#

 with no luck.  Any other way to get the MSL code?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was going to try and set my BSR Timer down to 3 instead of 3000, but can't seem to get my MSL number. I tried ##443336772#

with no luck. Any other way to get the MSL code?

Only way I know after jellybean is to call Sprint. I never forgot mine once I had it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was going to try and set my BSR Timer down to 3 instead of 3000, but can't seem to get my MSL number.  I tried ##443336772#

 with no luck.  Any other way to get the MSL code?

 

That dialer code was disabled with the ZVC or ZVD update. Shame. Only other way I know of is to ask Sprint for it. But I've never had much luck that way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was BSR Timer. After updating to ZVD from ZVC, it defaulted to 3000 when the correct BSR Timer is actually 3. Oops!

 

This OTA looks kind of small. Was hoping for something a bit bigger (WiFi Calling, or G3 UI.) I guess one can dream, can't I? :P

 

EDIT: If you take the OTA, can you compare Baseband versions? Mine on ZVD is currently M8974A-AAAANAZM-2.0.20046. Wondering if we got an entirely new Baseband as this version matches ZVC, too.

Same baseband after ZVE OTA
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was BSR Timer. After updating to ZVD from ZVC, it defaulted to 3000 when the correct BSR Timer is actually 3. Oops!

 

This OTA looks kind of small. Was hoping for something a bit bigger (WiFi Calling, or G3 UI.) I guess one can dream, can't I? :P

 

EDIT: If you take the OTA, can you compare Baseband versions? Mine on ZVD is currently M8974A-AAAANAZM-2.0.20046. Wondering if we got an entirely new Baseband as this version matches ZVC, too.

Same baseband after ZVE OTA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, such a disappointment.  My call success rate hovers around 50% at home and not to include Wifi calling on this update is really sad.  Honestly,  no excuses especially since the LG Flex has it and essentially the same internals.   Network vision needs to be finished already.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if it's the same baseband does that mean it still takes forever to switch back over to lte when it goes to 3g

 

Did you change your BSRTimer to fix the typo issue?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, such a disappointment. My call success rate hovers around 50% at home and not to include Wifi calling on this update is really sad. Honestly, no excuses especially since the LG Flex has it and essentially the same internals. Network vision needs to be finished already.

Agreed. All the towers around us are updated and it did not help much. Have to rely on an Airave at home. I updated to the g3 and passed on the g2 to my husband with the expectation we would both have wifi calling. Does it look like that's going to happen.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed. All the towers around us are updated and it did not help much. Have to rely on an Airave at home. I updated to the g3 and passed on the g2 to my husband with the expectation we would both have wifi calling. Does it look like that's going to happen.

It's pretty easy to set up a Sprint account with Google Voice. Once you have that you can use the hangouts dialer for WiFi calling and calls over LTE.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Figures..., spouse takes the update and installs it and naturally loses root. :rolleyes::wall:

Ha ha! Well, if that's the worst that happened, then no biggy. Willing to bet ioroot or stump will work on it. I've been busy all day and no time to even look at this yet.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been having issues with my LG G2 where people can't hear me or barely hear me with static interference etc. when I first receive a call after awhile or I make the call despite great reception. I can hear them perfectly loud and clear. If I hang up and call them back immediately, it will always correct the problem and now they can hear me loud and clear. It's almost as if there is delay to activating the microphone properly and therefore subsequent calls work properly after the microphone activation had a chance to actually catch up and then on. This is similar to previous described issues with the G2 microphone but different in that it works properly if I hang up and call back immediately. I don't remember having this specific issues before (Although I had significant triband issues that have improved but not completely). It started maybe a few weeks ago at no specific tower locations. My G2 is stock, with only apps from the playstore. Not sure if it's a Sprint network issue or a phone software or phone hardware issue. Testing on voice recording appears to work properly. Anybody else have this problem? Any fix? I'm about to dump LG and Sprint...

Edited by Medalot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been having issues with my LG G2 where people can't hear me or barely hear me with static interference etc. when I first receive a call after awhile or I make the call despite great reception. I can hear them perfectly loud and clear. If I hang up and call them back immediately, it will always correct the problem and now they can hear me loud and clear. It's almost as if there is delay to activating the microphone properly and therefore subsequent calls work properly after the microphone activation had a chance to actually catch up and then on. This is similar to previous described issues with the G2 microphone but different in that it works properly if I hang up and call back immediately. I don't remember having this specific issues before (Although I had significant triband issues that have improved but not completely). It started maybe a few weeks ago at no specific tower locations. My G2 is stock, with only apps from the playstore. Not sure if it's a Sprint network issue or a phone software or phone hardware issue. Testing on voice recording appears to work properly. Anybody else have this problem? Any fix? I'm about to dump LG and Sprint...

That may be a network issue. I've been having similar issues around the Harrisburg PA area. When I place or receive a call there can be a call connection and no sound or very low volume to the point where I can't hear the other party. Disconnecting and calling back (sometimes multiple times) will fix the problem.

 

At first I thought it was my phone going bad; I was using a Samsung Galaxy Mega at the time. I swapped out the phone to a Samsung Galaxy Note 3 and still had the problem. Not wanting to live life with a single band device, I swapped the Note 3 out for my LG G2 - still have the problem. Currently using an LG G3 and still have the problem. I think it may be a network issue.

 

I reported the issue and Sprint corrected it (known issue in my area). Unfortunately yesterday it's back.

 

EDIT: Forgot to mention that the situation can be reciprocal for the other party as well. Sometimes the situation occurs simultaneously for both parties.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Figures..., spouse takes the update and installs it and naturally loses root. :rolleyes::wall:

Ioroot and towelroot have been blocked in the ZVE update. Fortunately stump root works fine. However if you didn't unroot before taking the OTA, stump root may fail to run because it thinks you are already rooted.

 

For anyone taking the OTA, make sure you go into supersu settings and disable it first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ioroot and towelroot have been blocked in the ZVE update. Fortunately stump root works fine. However if you didn't unroot before taking the OTA, stump root may fail to run because it thinks you are already rooted.

 

For anyone taking the OTA, make sure you go into supersu settings and disable it first.

 

Have you received the OTA yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That may be a network issue. I've been having similar issues around the Harrisburg PA area. When I place or receive a call there can be a call connection and no sound or very low volume to the point where I can't hear the other party. Disconnecting and calling back (sometimes multiple times) will fix the problem.

 

At first I thought it was my phone going bad; I was using a Samsung Galaxy Mega at the time. I swapped out the phone to a Samsung Galaxy Note 3 and still had the problem. Not wanting to live life with a single band device, I swapped the Note 3 out for my LG G2 - still have the problem. Currently using an LG G3 and still have the problem. I think it may be a network issue.

 

I reported the issue and Sprint corrected it (known issue in my area). Unfortunately yesterday it's back.

 

EDIT: Forgot to mention that the situation can be reciprocal for the other party as well. Sometimes the situation occurs simultaneously for both parties.

Not sure if it's the same as I can hear them almost always very loud and clear and I have full reception bars. There's also a lot of forums reporting similar issues on the Verizon version. This may also be a HD voice issue. Who knows. In any case, hopefully the upcoming update from Sprint which is suppose to improve LTE and HD voice will resolve the issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if it's the same as I can hear them almost always very loud and clear and I have full reception bars. There's also a lot of forums reporting similar issues on the Verizon version. This may also be a HD voice issue. Who knows. In any case, hopefully the upcoming update from Sprint which is suppose to improve LTE and HD voice will resolve the issue.

Yeah, I hope that does get resolved with the ZVE update.  When I experience the issue with all my phones, I have a great signal, so for me at least, it must be the network. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • My understanding is the MNO carriers are the one who have objected to the use of cell phones in commercial planes.  I understand that it ties down too many cell phones at once, thus I can not see this changing. However this depends on how it is structured. Use of a different plmn for satellite service might make it possible for planes only to connect with satellite. Private pilots have been using cellphones in planes for many decades. Far fewer phones at a lower altitude.
    • On Reddit, someone asked (skeptically) if the US Cellular buyout would result in better service.  I'd been pondering this very issue, and decided to cross-post my response here: I've been pondering the question in the title and I've come to the conclusion that the answer is that it's possible. Hear me out. Unlike some of the small carriers that work exclusively with one larger carrier, all three major carriers roam on US Cellular today in at least some areas, so far as I know. If that network ceases to exist, then the carriers would presumably want to recover those areas of lost service by building out natively. Thus, people in those areas who may only have service from US Cellular or from US Cellular and one other may gain competition from other carriers backfilling that loss. How likely is it? I'm not sure. But it's definitely feasible. Most notably, AT&T did their big roaming deal with US Cellular in support of FirstNet in places where they lacked native coverage. They can't just lose a huge chunk of coverage whole still making FirstNet happy; I suspect they'll have to build out and recover at least some of that area, if not most of it. So it'd be indirect, but I could imagine it. - Trip
    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...