Jump to content

T-Mobile LTE & Network Discussion


CriticalityEvent

Recommended Posts

Sprint is now ahead of T-Mobile in Little Rock, AR; Louisville, KY; and Mobile, AL according to RootMetrics reports. Sprint seems to be proving that a network is much more than how fast is is.

Pretty soon, Sprint is going to be able to broadcast that they have the nations most reliable network. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty soon, Sprint is going to be able to broadcast that they have the nations most reliable network. 

 

Wouldn't it be awesome for them to claim that title again after all these years of not having it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I've seen with most of the cities sprints calling and texting (the fundamentals) are above T-Mobile. Just that alone is really good. The only thing T-Mo has on Sprint is data speeds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I've seen with most of the cities sprints calling and texting (the fundamentals) are above T-Mobile. Just that alone is really good. The only thing T-Mo has on Sprint is data speeds.

 

10/10 times, I'd rather have more reliable data than fast data. The problem is that consumers are trained to think that faster > better.

 

(Once the Network Vision upgrades are complete, Sprint will challenge any carrier on speed/reliability/call quality/texting)

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10/10 times, I'd rather have more reliable data than fast data. The problem is that consumers are trained to think that faster > better.

 

(Once the Network Vision upgrades are complete, Sprint will challenge any carrier on speed/reliability/call quality/texting)

I fully agree with you. Faster data is always good but really is just a few seconds in difference under the right conditions. But the average customer just wants to get on a social networking site, YouTube and stream music. If they are able to do that then they don't complain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's really good for a smaller player to be able to say it is faster, more reliable, has fewer dropped calls, etc. It wasn't that long ago when Sprint was one of the first carriers to adopt unlimited calling and everyone else followed suit, including Verizon (or Bell Atlantic Mobile). I'd like to see Sprint being a disruptive player again.

Edited by MkVsTheWorld
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I've seen with most of the cities sprints calling and texting (the fundamentals) are above T-Mobile. Just that alone is really good. The only thing T-Mo has on Sprint is data speeds.

 

Speed is nice but it needs to be reliable and not jump all over the place and TMo still offers these super fast 2G speeds in many areas of California.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10/10 times, I'd rather have more reliable data than fast data. The problem is that consumers are trained to think that faster > better.

 

(Once the Network Vision upgrades are complete, Sprint will challenge any carrier on speed/reliability/call quality/texting)

In this day and age it needs to be both.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've really wanted to like tmobile. I've tried switching a few times but ended up canceling. First time was for zero bars in my lab at work, second was for no data coverage at our cabin. Here in Phoenix Sprint LTE coverage is starting to match Tmo. Tmobile still has better speeds but it's not enough of a difference in real world use to make up for the other lack of coverage . I do really like how they basically changed the entire wireless industry with their uncarrier movement.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've really wanted to like tmobile. I've tried switching a few times but ended up canceling. First time was for zero bars in my lab at work, second was for no data coverage at our cabin. Here in Phoenix Sprint LTE coverage is starting to match Tmo. Tmobile still has better speeds but it's not enough of a difference in real world use to make up for the other lack of coverage . I do really like how they basically changed the entire wireless industry with their uncarrier movement.

Speed isn't everything, and once B41 is available Sprint is king.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

sprint in my area has band 41 deployments going on in my area but on one site and lte still doesnt reach my block and sprint should turn on smr already lol and also t mobiles 700 mhz license covers practically my entire state 

 

T-Mobile has definitely started it's 700mhz deployment in the DC area. Found a new long panel on a T-Mobile only site. Couldn't get pics as I was driving but I'm sure this is what I saw

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've really wanted to like tmobile. I've tried switching a few times but ended up canceling. First time was for zero bars in my lab at work, second was for no data coverage at our cabin. Here in Phoenix Sprint LTE coverage is starting to match Tmo. Tmobile still has better speeds but it's not enough of a difference in real world use to make up for the other lack of coverage . I do really like how they basically changed the entire wireless industry with their uncarrier movement.

 

I've stuck with them although with the same issues (building penetration and rural coverage) but I use an old verizon tablet on pay as you go as a hotspot for the gaps. Sprint sadly isn't much better on either count here but they do have plans to change it whereas tmobile haven't announced the purchase of the 700 lower A here yet. Probably still talking to cavalier? about it. Rural coverage is tough, either company would need at least 2 more towers which wouldn't be cheap. At least with Sprint I could roam on Vzw. Can't wait to dump that tablet, sending money their way makes me feel dirty :( As soon as Sprint get 800 etc rolled out island wide it should make them the obvious choice. For people who never leave town they probably already are. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I am using my iPad mini 2 (with a tmobile sim)and saw cellular one and chinook service up top. Iirc cellular one is chinook. And thought they were CDMA given the ties they have with verizon LTE here, am I wrong?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I am using my iPad mini 2 (with a tmobile sim)and saw cellular one and chinook service up top. Iirc cellular one is chinook. And thought they were CDMA given the ties they have with verizon LTE here, am I wrong?

 

My memory is vague, and my knowledge of this is very minimal, but I think Cellular One operates a dual CDMA + GSM network somewhere in/near Arizona.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I am using my iPad mini 2 (with a tmobile sim)and saw cellular one and chinook service up top. Iirc cellular one is chinook. And thought they were CDMA given the ties they have with verizon LTE here, am I wrong?

My memory is vague, and my knowledge of this is very minimal, but I think Cellular One operates a dual CDMA + GSM network somewhere in/near Arizona.

 

Guys, Cellular One is no specific operator.  It is just a marketing name.  Over the years, many different operators -- AirTouch, SBC, WWC, Dobson, et al. -- have owned or licensed the Cellular One brand in at least some of their markets.  For the current example, Cellular One of Northeast Arizona is actually Smith Bagley, and it has no direct link to Chinook.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys, Cellular One is no specific operator.  It is just a marketing name.  Over the years, many different operators -- AirTouch, SBC, WWC, Dobson, et al. -- have owned or licensed the Cellular One brand in at least some of their markets.  For the current example, Cellular One of Northeast Arizona is actually Smith Bagley, and it has no direct link to Chinook.

 

AJ

Sorry after further looking into it it is chinook liscenses, only regional operqtor here. Weird as its two different names shown.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys, Cellular One is no specific operator.  It is just a marketing name.  Over the years, many different operators -- AirTouch, SBC, WWC, Dobson, et al. -- have owned or licensed the Cellular One brand in at least some of their markets.  For the current example, Cellular One of Northeast Arizona is actually Smith Bagley, and it has no direct link to Chinook.

 

AJ

Yup, I recall my Uncle having "Cellular One" service in Nebraska, but that was probably WWC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So with the news that T-Mo has wideband LTE on air in NYC, here's a question. How are they doing their upgrade? A new panel, new card in the basestation, same backhaul?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So with the news that T-Mo has wideband LTE on air in NYC, here's a question. How are they doing their upgrade? A new panel, new card in the basestation, same backhaul?

Base Station modification, call up provider for increased backhaul, and refarm the spectrum from their 3g network.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Base Station modification, call up provider for increased backhaul, and refarm the spectrum from their 3h network.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

Ah ok, makes sense.

 

Makes me wonder if they will have to do a Network Vision style retrofit soon enough, or just keep it piece meal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah ok, makes sense.

 

Makes me wonder if they will have to do a Network Vision style retrofit soon enough, or just keep it piece meal?

The tmobile modernization project is a network vision style rebuild.

 

All new Ericsson base stations and antennas and new Nokia macro setups.

 

It's an extremely solid network where upgraded fully and can do everything sprints equipment could do and then some.

 

It's Att and Verizon that have to do a full style refit which they are doing now starting with their oldest sites.

 

Note their rural GMO style conversions are exempted as LTE GMOs overall are not satisfactory for any provider.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Base Station modification, call up provider for increased backhaul, and refarm the spectrum from their 3h network.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Actually, at this point in NYC they don't have to touch their Base Stations. It's the matter of remotely rearranging/refarming the spectrum, and remotely re-provisioning the backhaul, really fronting the bill to their backhaul providers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Quote from wsj; "The T-Mobile deal could be reached as soon as later this month, while discussions with Verizon on a separate transaction are expected to take longer or might not result in an agreement, the people said." "The rising value of wireless licenses is a driving force behind the deal. U.S. Cellular’s spectrum portfolio touches 30 states and covers about 51 million people, according to regulatory filings." https://specmap.sequence-omega.net/
    • From WSJ which is paywalled but they're reporting that T-Mobile and Verizon are working on a joint deal to buy and split up U.S. Cellular. https://www.wsj.com/business/telecom/t-mobile-verizon-in-talks-to-carve-up-u-s-cellular-46d1e5e6?st=qwngrnh4s3bcr76 — — — — —  Summary from a user in the Reddit thread:  
    • So, in summary, here are the options I tested: T-Mobile intl roaming - LTE on SoftBank, routes back to the US (~220ms to 4.2.2.4) IIJ physical SIM - LTE on NTT, local routing Airalo - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer SoftBank), routed through Singapore (SingTel) Ubigi - 5G on NTT, routed through Singapore (Transatel) US Mobile East Asia roaming - 5G on SoftBank, routed through Singapore (Club SIM) Saily - 5G on NTT, routed through Hong Kong (Truphone)...seems to be poorer routing my1010 - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer KDDI), routed through Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom) I wouldn't buy up on the T-Mobile international roaming, but it's a solid fallback. If you have the US Mobile roaming eSIM that's a great option. Otherwise Ubigi, Airalo, or my1010 are all solid options, so get whatever's cheapest. I wouldn't bother trying to find a physical SIM from IIJ...the Japanese IP is nice but there's enough WiFi that you can get a Japanese IP enough for whatever you need, and eSIM flexibility is great (IIJ as eSIM but seems a bit more involved to get it to work).
    • So, the rural part of the journey still has cell service for nearly all the way, usually on B18/19/8 (depending on whether we're talking about KDDI/NTT/SoftBank). I think I saw a bit of B28 and even n28 early on in the trip, though that faded out after a bit. Once we got to where we were going though, KDDI had enough B41 to pull 150+ Mbps, while NTT and SoftBank had B1/B3 IIRC. Cell service was likewise generally fine from Kawaguchiko Station to Tokyo on the express bus to Shinjuku Station, though there were some cases where only low-band LTE was available and capacity seemed to struggle. I also figured out what I was seeing with SoftBank on 40 MHz vs. 100 MHz n77: the 40 MHz blocks are actually inside the n78 band class, but SoftBank advertises them as n77, probably to facilitate NR CA. My phone likely preferred the 40 MHz slices as they're *much* lower-frequency, ~3.4 GHz rather than ~3.9, though of course I did see the 100 MHz slice being used rather often. By contrast, when I got NR on NTT it was either n28 10x10 or, more often, 100 MHz n78. As usual, EMEA bands on my S24 don't CA, so any data speeds I saw were the result of either one LTE carrier or one LTE carrier plus one NR carrier...except for B41 LTE. KDDI seems to have more B41 bandwidth live at this point, so my1010 or Airalo works well for this, and honestly while SoftBank and NTT 5G (in descending order of availability) have 5G that's readily available it may be diminishing returns, particularly given that I still don't know how to, as someone not from Hong Kong, get an eSIM that runs on SoftBank 5G that isn't the USM "comes for free with the unlimited premium package" roaming eSIM (NTT is easy enough thanks to Ubigi). In other news, I was able to borrow someone's Rakuten eSIM and...got LTE with it. 40 Mbps down, 20 Mbps up, 40ms latency to Tokyo while in Tokyo...which isn't any worse than the Japan-based physical SIMs I had used earlier. But not getting n77 or n257 was disappointing, though I had to test the eSIM from one spot rather than bouncing around the city to find somewhere with better reception. It's currently impossible to get a SIM as a foreigner that runs on Rakuten, so that was the best I could do. Also, I know my phone doesn't have all the LTE and 5G bands needed to take full advantage of Japanese networks. My S24 is missing: B21 (1500 MHz) - NTT B11 (1500 MHz) - KDDI, SoftBank B42 (3500 MHz) - NTT, KDDI, SoftBank n79 (4900 MHz) - NTT Of the above, B42/n79 are available on the latest iPhones, though you lose n257, and I'm guessing you're not going to find B11/B21 on a phone sold outside Japan.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...