Jump to content

T-Mobile LTE & Network Discussion


CriticalityEvent

Recommended Posts

I have a question. Does LTE coverage shrink vs HSPA+ like it it does for Sprint vis a vis 1x/EVDO?

 

It shrinks???

 

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used those hypothetical stats for illustrative purposes.  The actual percentages are not important.

 

But there is good reason why T-Mobile advertises its coverage POPs, not its coverage area.  T-Mobile is still -- by good measure -- the weakling among the big four.

 

AJ

Everyone advertises in POPs. AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, and Sprint. No one, aside from Verizon, advertises on geographical coverage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone advertises in POPs. AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, and Sprint. No one, aside from Verizon, advertises on geographical coverage.

 

On that last count, why not?  Why is the "uncarrier" unwilling to advertise its advanced network coverage map against those of any of the other big three?

 

;)

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just like Ts map is they are hiding there 2G EDGE sites, they only give you the street coverage for 3G, 4G, and 4GLTE.  They show the 2G is dark purple but they wont show you zoom in other then you have 2G.  There green maps used to be much better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just like Ts map is they are hiding there 2G EDGE sites, they only give you the street coverage for 3G, 4G, and 4GLTE.  They show the 2G is dark purple but they wont show you zoom in other then you have 2G.  There green maps used to be much better. 

 

This map, or a previous official map?  http://maps.eng.t-mobile.com/

 

- Trip

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Progress still looks shitty here in the Midwest...maybe they're doing a lot more in the rest of the U.S. I haven't seen it here.

 

Yeah, rural Midwest towns/villages appear to be mostly untouched around here too so far. But freeways between cities, or 2G in/near metro suburbs/exurbs -- I've seen a lot of work done to fix that.

 

http://i.imgur.com/kElb20z.png is the changes in Grand Rapids metro. It's not where I wish they would be, but they are much closer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're upgrading Metro towers. That's a smart route.

 

Yeah, the coverage T-Mobile didn't have before (Muskegon, Grand Haven, etc) are Metro upgrades.

 

The urban / overlapping stuff on that map is almost all T-Mobile original sites. They upgraded their own towers to LTE, and are in the process of shutting down most-to-all of the Metro sites in those areas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're upgrading Metro towers. That's a smart route.

The only reason East texas even has Tmobile LTE is due to Metropcs conversion. MetroLTE had LTE here first, spotty at that but thats the same 4-5 sites they use for 100k+ population.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Progress still looks shitty here in the Midwest...maybe they're doing a lot more in the rest of the U.S. I haven't seen it here.

From my view here in the Southeast, T-Mobile seems to be quite aggressive. Not sure why they are less so in the Midwest, but there's a huge amount of network upgrades going on in Mississippi, Alabama, and the Floridian panhandle. Of course, none of it shows up on the map yet...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From my view here in the Southeast, T-Mobile seems to be quite aggressive. Not sure why they are less so in the Midwest, but there's a huge amount of network upgrades going on in Mississippi, Alabama, and the Floridian panhandle. Of course, none of it shows up on the map yet...

They've been busy in Louisiana as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They've been busy in Louisiana as well.

Which parts have you seen?

 

After getting I-10 from Baton Rouge to New Orleans and I-49 from Lafayette to New Orleans, as well as my pushing to get the Causeway modernized from GPRS, I haven't seen anything besides a couple sites towards Opelousas make progress.

 

I believe I-12 Baton Rouge to Hammond has been modernized to LTE, but you still have gaps on I-12 between Hammond and Covington, Covington and Slidell.

 

Have seen no PCS deployment in Louisiana yet. Have seen plenty of PCS LTE in Mississippi however.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where? What locations not indicated on the coverage map?

 

Sent from my XT1096 using Tapatalk

5 MHz Band 2 LTE along I-59 near Picayune, Poplarville, Purvis, just north of Hattiesburg (adjacent to a band 4 site), Laurel, Sandersville, Heidleburg, and Vossburg.

 

On US-45 north of Meridian, Lauderdale, Shuqualak, Macon, and Brooksville are all 5 MHz Band 2 LTE as well.

 

According to Sensorly and RootMetrics it looks like some places like Collins, Mendenhall, Moss Point and Gautier as well.

 

Also worth noting that they deployed some Band 4/UMTS markets in MS within the last 9 months in West Point, Columbus, Oxford, and Vicksburg as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Where? What locations not indicated on the coverage map?

 

Sent from my XT1096 using Tapatalk

 

 

5 MHz Band 2 LTE along I-59 near Picayune, Poplarville, Purvis, just north of Hattiesburg (adjacent to a band 4 site), Laurel, Sandersville, Heidleburg, and Vossburg.

On US-45 north of Meridian, Lauderdale, Shuqualak, Macon, and Brooksville are all 5 MHz Band 2 LTE as well.

 

According to Sensorly and RootMetrics it looks like some places like Collins, Mendenhall, Moss Point and Gautier as well.

 

Also worth noting that they deployed some Band 4/UMTS markets in MS within the last 9 months in West Point, Columbus, Oxford, and Vicksburg as well.

Also, 5MHz FDD Band 2 LTE is active along Clinton-Raymond Road.  Spots of 10MHz FDD Band 4 LTE and WCDMA carriers (two AWS, one PCS) are live within Clinton proper, and it smooths out to ubiquity in Jackson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New York City market is also 15MHz "Wideband" LTE as of yesterday. But they've done it quite creatively.

 

As a refresher, they hold C+D+E+F block AWS spectrum licenses in NYC. It used to be:

- C Block = MetroPCS CDMA

- D + E Block = 10MHz FDD LTE

- F Block = HSPA+42

 

As of yesterday it's:

- C Block = a lone CDMA carrier at the very bottom

- the rest of C + D + E + F guard band = 15MHz FDD LTE (EARFCN: 2236)

- F Block = HSPA+42

 

This is what a few quick 10MHz sweeps show:

 

C + D block:

 

ErjVeRsl.png

 

 

LTE in E block biting into F, as the bottom guard band has been removed: 

 

lQpN8uWl.png

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait, you can deploy in the guard band?

 

They own the guard band, and they own both sides of what it's "guarding". 

 

Seems reasonable enough.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait, you can deploy in the guard band?

 

1.25 MHz FDD + 13.5 MHz FDD = 14.75 MHz FDD

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • From WSJ which is paywalled but they're reporting that T-Mobile and Verizon are working on a joint deal to buy and split up U.S. Cellular. https://www.wsj.com/business/telecom/t-mobile-verizon-in-talks-to-carve-up-u-s-cellular-46d1e5e6?st=qwngrnh4s3bcr76 — — — — —  Summary from a user in the Reddit thread:  
    • So, in summary, here are the options I tested: T-Mobile intl roaming - LTE on SoftBank, routes back to the US (~220ms to 4.2.2.4) IIJ physical SIM - LTE on NTT, local routing Airalo - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer SoftBank), routed through Singapore (SingTel) Ubigi - 5G on NTT, routed through Singapore (Transatel) US Mobile East Asia roaming - 5G on SoftBank, routed through Singapore (Club SIM) Saily - 5G on NTT, routed through Hong Kong (Truphone)...seems to be poorer routing my1010 - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer KDDI), routed through Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom) I wouldn't buy up on the T-Mobile international roaming, but it's a solid fallback. If you have the US Mobile roaming eSIM that's a great option. Otherwise Ubigi, Airalo, or my1010 are all solid options, so get whatever's cheapest. I wouldn't bother trying to find a physical SIM from IIJ...the Japanese IP is nice but there's enough WiFi that you can get a Japanese IP enough for whatever you need, and eSIM flexibility is great (IIJ as eSIM but seems a bit more involved to get it to work).
    • So, the rural part of the journey still has cell service for nearly all the way, usually on B18/19/8 (depending on whether we're talking about KDDI/NTT/SoftBank). I think I saw a bit of B28 and even n28 early on in the trip, though that faded out after a bit. Once we got to where we were going though, KDDI had enough B41 to pull 150+ Mbps, while NTT and SoftBank had B1/B3 IIRC. Cell service was likewise generally fine from Kawaguchiko Station to Tokyo on the express bus to Shinjuku Station, though there were some cases where only low-band LTE was available and capacity seemed to struggle. I also figured out what I was seeing with SoftBank on 40 MHz vs. 100 MHz n77: the 40 MHz blocks are actually inside the n78 band class, but SoftBank advertises them as n77, probably to facilitate NR CA. My phone likely preferred the 40 MHz slices as they're *much* lower-frequency, ~3.4 GHz rather than ~3.9, though of course I did see the 100 MHz slice being used rather often. By contrast, when I got NR on NTT it was either n28 10x10 or, more often, 100 MHz n78. As usual, EMEA bands on my S24 don't CA, so any data speeds I saw were the result of either one LTE carrier or one LTE carrier plus one NR carrier...except for B41 LTE. KDDI seems to have more B41 bandwidth live at this point, so my1010 or Airalo works well for this, and honestly while SoftBank and NTT 5G (in descending order of availability) have 5G that's readily available it may be diminishing returns, particularly given that I still don't know how to, as someone not from Hong Kong, get an eSIM that runs on SoftBank 5G that isn't the USM "comes for free with the unlimited premium package" roaming eSIM (NTT is easy enough thanks to Ubigi). In other news, I was able to borrow someone's Rakuten eSIM and...got LTE with it. 40 Mbps down, 20 Mbps up, 40ms latency to Tokyo while in Tokyo...which isn't any worse than the Japan-based physical SIMs I had used earlier. But not getting n77 or n257 was disappointing, though I had to test the eSIM from one spot rather than bouncing around the city to find somewhere with better reception. It's currently impossible to get a SIM as a foreigner that runs on Rakuten, so that was the best I could do. Also, I know my phone doesn't have all the LTE and 5G bands needed to take full advantage of Japanese networks. My S24 is missing: B21 (1500 MHz) - NTT B11 (1500 MHz) - KDDI, SoftBank B42 (3500 MHz) - NTT, KDDI, SoftBank n79 (4900 MHz) - NTT Of the above, B42/n79 are available on the latest iPhones, though you lose n257, and I'm guessing you're not going to find B11/B21 on a phone sold outside Japan.
    • T-Mobile acquiring SoniqWave's 2.5 GHz spectrum  Another spectrum speculator down! T-Mobile is acquiring all of their BRS/EBS licenses and their leases. Details are lacking but it looks like T-Mobile might be giving them 3.45GHz in exchange in some of the markets where they're acquiring BRS/EBS to sweeten the deal and stay below the spectrum screen. Hopefully NextWave is at the negotiating table with T-Mobile so NYC can finally get access to the full BRS/EBS band as well.  — — — — — Edit: Turns out this is a spectrum swap where T-Mobile is basically giving them DoD spectrum in a bunch of markets in exchange for all of SoniqWave's BRS/EBS. SoniqWave will likely turn around and sell the DoD spectrum to AT&T whenever the FCC removes the 40MHz cap.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...