Jump to content

T-Mobile LTE & Network Discussion


CriticalityEvent

Recommended Posts

I got my test drive device today because I was taking a small road trip and the highway I took had lte according to sensorly. I will say lte was there but I bounced between that and edge. When I had lte the speeds were barely 1mbps and I got one at 5mbps. My Sprint phone had lte the majority of the ride with speeds no less than 9 but I maxed out at 30mbps. Could someone explain why I was experiencing what I did? I was really expecting more...kinda disappointed in a sense.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

LOL normal for them lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GMO lte. Don't you love it?

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

yup lol

 

I really didn't only because I was expecting more in the speed department. So this highway lte is pretty much a quick lay and your mileage may very.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I know what you mean they seem to say they lead in speeds

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I fully agree 100%. I just had such a good experience around town but once I got out on the highway I was expecting a similar experience but I didn't get that. I thought it was cool there was lte but the speeds weren't there or close to what I saw in the city but there's site density. My biggest gripe was the bouncing of lte and edge.

 

I saw full bars like 4 times during the drive

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

What they bank on, and most carriers to be honest, is enough throughput to support navigation, streaming media, etc. If you're speeding down a highway, there is a finite amount of time that you're actively connected to a single site, so the "load" is handed off between them. The challenge is rest stops and scenic spots, etc. where users will actively park their vehicles and use their devices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What they bank on, and most carriers to be honest, is enough throughput to support navigation, streaming media, etc. If you're speeding down a highway, there is a finite amount of time that you're actively connected to a single site, so the "load" is handed off between them. The challenge is rest stops and scenic spots, etc. where users will actively park their vehicles and use their devices.

Wrong. The load among highway towers is roughly equal since for every person leaving a tower, one is coming onto that tower.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wrong. The load among highway towers is roughly equal since for every person leaving a tower, one is coming onto that tower.

 

Yes, but...how many staationary customers will sit in a sector versus ones barrelling down the highway at 75 MPH.  Also, a stationary customer is more like to be using his data, whereas a mobile customer is most likely driving with some streaming and some being passengers.  We know statistics bear out that highway only sites are the lightest used sites in the Sprint network.  Highway sites located in places with service centers, motels, etc. have more usage.

 

I don't disagree with your initial point that there is a roughly static load on a highway site with people coming in and going out of range rather steadily.  But the point of highway only sites are less used is also valid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, but...how many staationary customers will sit in a sector versus ones barrelling down the highway at 75 MPH.  Also, a stationary customer is more like to be using his data, whereas a mobile customer is most likely driving with some streaming and some being passengers.  We know statistics bear out that highway only sites are the lightest used sites in the Sprint network.  Highway sites located in places with service centers, motels, etc. have more usage.

 

I don't disagree with your initial point that there is a roughly static load on a highway site with people coming in and going out of range rather steadily.  But the point of highway only sites are less used is also valid.

 

That was the argument AJ made way back and I thought it was applicable here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was the argument AJ made way back and I thought it was applicable here.

 

He's right.  It's just not an either or situation in this situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wrong. The load among highway towers is roughly equal since for every person leaving a tower, one is coming onto that tower.

 

Examine data usage patterns near service areas along the Kansas Turnpike with band 41 deployment and many long haul truckers camped overnight in their rigs.

 

That is called a counterpoint.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GMO lte. Don't you love it?

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

 

I think from what he described it's pretty obvious T-Mobile hasn't launched LTE in the area yet (he described as seeing it on Sensorly only). That doesn't necessarily mean the GMO LTE is to blame. 

 

I was driving through some new GPRS -> LTE areas (GMO LTE) on T-Mobile and with one iPad streaming HBO, an iPhone 6 streaming Netflix, my third device was able to speedtest 20Mbps down. I was thoroughly impressed.

 

This was also not an area officially launched yet (as was evident when we hit the one tower that had not been upgraded and all the devices had meltdowns upon hitting GPRS) but I was very pleased with T-Mobile's phenomenal progress.

Hek, T-Mobile even had native service in a town that Verizon was "extended 1x" roaming in. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think from what he described it's pretty obvious T-Mobile hasn't launched LTE in the area yet (he described as seeing it on Sensorly only). That doesn't necessarily mean the GMO LTE is to blame.

 

I was driving through some new GPRS -> LTE areas (GMO LTE) on T-Mobile and with one iPad streaming HBO, an iPhone 6 streaming Netflix, my third device was able to speedtest 20Mbps down. I was thoroughly impressed.

 

This was also not an area officially launched yet (as was evident when we hit the one tower that had not been upgraded and all the devices had meltdowns upon hitting GPRS) but I was very pleased with T-Mobile's phenomenal progress.

Hek, T-Mobile even had native service in a town that Verizon was "extended 1x" roaming in.

Which town?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which town?

 

Legereville or Raytown?

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe it's PositiveNetPostpaidPhoneAdds-town?

 

Maybe it is McDonald's "Billions Served" or Justin Bieber.

 

Because we know that popularity -- especially temporary -- is a sign of lasting quality and a moral good.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe it is McDonald's "Billions Served" or Justin Bieber.

 

Because we know that popularity -- especially temporary -- is a sign of lasting quality and a moral good.

 

AJ

 

he20sees20what20you20did20there_zps346e0

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which town?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Two actually:

 

First is Hannibal, MO in the NE area of Missouri. T-Mobile's got native LTE; Verizon is "Extended 1x". It's the birthplace of Mark Twain and a fairly popular tourist destination for his literary followers.

 

Second is Hermann, MO in the mid-central area of Missouri. T-Mobile's got native coverage; Verizon again is "Extended 1x". The area has very good wineries and scenic overlooks and is an extremely popular weekend getaway for the urban/suburban St. Louis resident. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Second is Hermann, MO in the mid-central area of Missouri. T-Mobile's got native coverage; Verizon again is "Extended 1x".

You would think carriers would want to cover wine country a little better... I haven't been down that way in a while, but I never had coverage problems in the past (pre-NV, very light data usage).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You would think carriers would want to cover wine country a little better... I haven't been down that way in a while, but I never had coverage problems in the past (pre-NV, very light data usage).

sprint hasn't had any issues by me....or in Delaware ....where I go ...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you ever get full bars of lte?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Pretty much all of Honolulu is full bars or at least 3 out of 5.

But speeds are very good here 5d31faaa026bb1306f3f18844e497410.jpg

a732706353e418d99edbcaaa9544de6c.jpg

 

Sent from my Sony Xperia Z3 via the Coconut Wireless \000/

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was driving through some new GPRS -> LTE areas (GMO LTE) on T-Mobile and with one iPad streaming HBO, an iPhone 6 streaming Netflix, my third device was able to speedtest 20Mbps down. I was thoroughly impressed.

Who was driving the car? [emoji6]

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6+

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...