Jump to content

T-Mobile LTE & Network Discussion


CriticalityEvent

Recommended Posts

It depends on where I am. What's glaring the drop from LTE to nothing. I was walking through Grand Central and my phone was sitting pretty on Emergency Calls only while my Sprint phone had 3G. 

 

It all comes down to site placement, and power output.

 

That's exactly what I was saying when I got to try T-Mobile for a day. There were 0 problems outdoors but once I got inside it took a turn for the worst pretty quickly. You'd drop from LTE to nothing so quickly whereas on Sprint, I'd at least have a decent EVDO signal. Coupled with so many of the 3G sites in NYC having fiber backhaul already, speeds would constantly be 1-1.2 Mbps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's exactly what I was saying when I got to try T-Mobile for a day. There were 0 problems outdoors but once I got inside it took a turn for the worst pretty quickly. You'd drop from LTE to nothing so quickly whereas on Sprint, I'd at least have a decent EVDO signal. Coupled with so many of the 3G sites in NYC having fiber backhaul already, speeds would constantly be 1-1.2 Mbps.

Surprised you didn't get Hspa at least

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surprised you didn't get Hspa at least

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

I did but it isn't a very strong signal at all. One example I can recall is when I was at my mother's workplace and as I walked into the building, Sprint managed to keep a 1 bar LTE signal whereas the T-Mobile device dropped LTE quickly and when it switched to HSPA+ it was 1 bar and then it switched to EDGE which had a stronger signal but not by much. Meanwhile Sprint managed to keep LTE. When I went back outside, both device had a full signal on LTE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did but it isn't a very strong signal at all. One example I can recall is when I was at my mother's workplace and as I walked into the building, Sprint managed to keep a 1 bar LTE signal whereas the T-Mobile device dropped LTE quickly and when it switched to HSPA+ it was 1 bar and then it switched to EDGE which had a stronger signal but not by much. Meanwhile Sprint managed to keep LTE. When I went back outside, both device had a full signal on LTE.

^^^ is why TMO's business foray is doomed.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surprised you didn't get Hspa at least

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

When I tried T-Mobile a few weeks ago, I would usually go from LTE to GSM or no service. I rarely ever saw hspa. LTE was pretty fast, but if I lost it data was unusable.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Delicious words

 

Interestingly, Son also addressed T-Mobile's recent "uncarrier" efforts in the market, and the carrier's recent resurgence in terms of new subscribers. He said T-Mobile's success is a short term phenomenon and that "we need a real fight, not a pseudo fight."

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/softbanks-son-cca-carriers-we-need-fight-back/2014-03-27

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Delicious words

 

Interestingly, Son also addressed T-Mobile's recent "uncarrier" efforts in the market, and the carrier's recent resurgence in terms of new subscribers. He said T-Mobile's success is a short term phenomenon and that "we need a real fight, not a pseudo fight."

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/softbanks-son-cca-carriers-we-need-fight-back/2014-03-27

This is a year old.  I am sure it has already been posted.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's quaint that even he thought tmobile's uncarrier is a short term phenomena.

 

Define "short term."  Orange is the new black.  Something will be the new magenta.  T-Mobile's 15 minutes will not last forever.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's quaint that even he thought tmobile's uncarrier is a short term phenomena.

Now I'm not a fanboy or anything. I am here for knowledge and understanding what is going on in my Sprint market. 

 

You however are a fanboy and clearly only want to point out tmobile.  I don't get it. Trolling a website full of people like myself.  I disagreed with allowing a tmobile discussion thread for items such as this.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Define "short term."  Orange is the new black.  Something will be the new magenta.  T-Mobile's 15 minutes will not last forever.

 

AJ

 

Well... on twitter Neal was sayin that fcc should fix up the 2.5ghz by splitting into 100mhz fdd and rest tdd.

100fdd is plenty for att, vzw, tmo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I've had a similarly good experience in Norwalk, Stamford, and Rochester. Even traveling between Norwalk and Rochester was quite smooth, as I had native access throughout nearly all of my trip up to Rochester and back down to Norwalk last week.

 

I wonder if they have the backhaul scaled up significantly, or something else is going on. I rarely see low speedtests, and that's using multiple servers, and not T-Mobile's own private "Speedtest.net" server.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It won't say band 12 but a easy way of knowing is if it does say band 4. If you need to know just open the engineering screen on the nexus 6 while connected or download LTE Discovery.

Does Signal Check Pro report T-Mobile's LTE B12? I'm wondering if it'll show once I get the band enabled on my Nexus 6 after the 5.1 update.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if they have the backhaul scaled up significantly, or something else is going on. I rarely see low speedtests, and that's using multiple servers, and not T-Mobile's own private "Speedtest.net" server.

TMO doesn't have one anymore in Detroit.

Wonder why they dropped it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny thing is, 2.5 ghz is labeled TDD worldwide, so that is going to work.

Actually, 2.5GHz is generally allocated for FDD technologies, with the major exception of the China and Japan. Technically, the U.S. allows both, but the licensing configuration makes it tough to roll out FDD unless you want to mix BRS and EBS.

 

In most countries, they follow the preferred ITU Option (option 1), which is set up as follows:

  • 2495-2500 MHz is a guard band for ISM, MSS, and BAS
  • 2500-2570 / 2620-2690 MHz is paired for FDD operation (3GPP band 7)
  • 2570-2620 MHz is allocated for TDD operation (3GPP band 38, but band 41 service can run here too)
  • Internal guards at 2570-2575 MHz and 2615-2620 MHz are recommended to prevent interference

This configuration is known as the "IMT Extension" configuration, as it was originally designated for high capacity 3G networks (which is why you can deploy UMTS WCDMA on it). But it is now known as the "IMT Advanced" band, where high capacity 4G networks are to be deployed.

 

Most countries following Option 1 do not bother with allocating the TDD frequencies. In CEPT countries, TDD frequencies are allocated because CEPT recommends it. CITEL (for the Americas) and APT (for Asia and Oceania) do not make the same recommendation, though they do recommend Option 1 configuration.

 

The U.S., China, and Japan technically follow Option 3, which permits mixed FDD and TDD throughout the band, and only mandates a 1MHz guard between ISM/MSS/TLPS/BAS and the 2.6GHz band, so instead of starting at 2495MHz, it starts at 2496MHz (which is why there have been issues launching LTE service on the BRS 1 block). However, China and Japan have set up their allocations and regulatory environment so that significant Band 7 allocations are still possible (though they haven't been done yet). The U.S.' confusingly split regulatory environment makes it difficult (though not impossible) to launch FDD service there.

 

Now, that being said, while 2.6GHz is recommended worldwide under Option 1, 2.3GHz (2300-2400 MHz) is recommended as an all-TDD band. CITEL, CEPT, and APT all recommend 2.3GHz for TDD service, which is designated as Band 40 for LTE. This is live all over Asia and Africa. Latin America and Europe are starting Band 40 deployments now. The U.S. is the only country where it is FDD only, and only a small subset of the band has been allocated for mobile services. That mainly has to do with Sirius XM doing things it shouldn't be doing with its SDARS frequencies (which sit in part of that band) and being permitted to do so. Consequently, WCS is currently set up as an FDD band, but with some work, it could be converted into a TDD band.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, 2.5GHz is generally allocated for FDD technologies, with the major exception of the China and Japan. Technically, the U.S. allows both, but the licensing configuration makes it tough to roll out FDD unless you want to mix BRS and EBS.

 

Will any reconfig + re-auction happen here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Define "short term."  Orange is the new black.  Something will be the new magenta.  T-Mobile's 15 minutes will not last forever.

 

AJ

 

TMO wouldn't be building out to 300mil LTE if they weren't veeeerry confident of their future.

Confidence != actual results, as the Nextel purchase shows, but you don't see Sprint building to 300mil; that difference aught to mean something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...