Jump to content

T-Mobile LTE & Network Discussion


CriticalityEvent

Recommended Posts

The U.S., China, and Japan technically follow Option 3, which permits mixed FDD and TDD throughout the band, and only mandates a 1MHz guard between ISM/MSS/TLPS/BAS and the 2.6GHz band, so instead of starting at 2495MHz, it starts at 2496MHz (which is why there have been issues launching LTE service on the BRS 1 block).

 

I am not so certain that there have been "issues."  We have WiMAX device log records of a 5 MHz TDD WiMAX carrier centered at 2499 MHz.  That is right in the middle of the BRS 1 block.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TMO wouldn't be building out to 300mil LTE if they weren't veeeerry confident of their future.

Confidence != actual results, as the Nextel purchase shows, but you don't see Sprint building to 300mil; that difference aught to mean something.

 

300m LTE pops probably includes token LTE coverage no? Similar to a licence protection site?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

300m LTE pops probably includes token LTE coverage no? Similar to a licence protection site?

 

Depends if you consider this map token coverage.

 

At Deutsche Telekom's 2015 Capital Markets Day event, T-Mobile detailed the full scope of the coverage expansion that is expected to finish this year in the presentation PDF.

SddSbpU.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It won't say band 12 but a easy way of knowing is if it does say band 4. If you need to know just open the engineering screen on the nexus 6 while connected or download LTE Discovery.

Cool thanks.  Just got the update so I'll try it out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

T-mobile has a new user generated map, its not any better, they should of kept the old one in my opinion lol

 

Amen. They took away the signal gradients and gave us hexagons. Which we already had with rootmetrics. WTH?!

#UNunCarrier

They only did this to hide their coverage weak spots.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amen. They took away the signal gradients and gave us hexagons. Which we already had with rootmetrics. WTH?!

#UNunCarrier

They only did this to hide their coverage weak spots.

They are following At&t, and Vzw now lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Woah. I decided to check out the new map out of curiosity and it really is pretty bad. Absolutely no visual distinction between areas of strong and poor signal.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Woah. I decided to check out the new map out of curiosity and it really is pretty bad. Absolutely no visual distinction between areas of strong and poor signal.

yup thats the route AT&T went too last year too

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amen. They took away the signal gradients and gave us hexagons. Which we already had with rootmetrics. WTH?!

#UNunCarrier

 

Nuncarrier?  Amen?

 

vr3h9w.jpg

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got my test drive device today because I was taking a small road trip and the highway I took had lte according to sensorly. I will say lte was there but I bounced between that and edge. When I had lte the speeds were barely 1mbps and I got one at 5mbps. My Sprint phone had lte the majority of the ride with speeds no less than 9 but I maxed out at 30mbps. Could someone explain why I was experiencing what I did? I was really expecting more...kinda disappointed in a sense.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got my test drive device today because I was taking a small road trip and the highway I took had lte according to sensorly. I will say lte was there but I bounced between that and edge. When I had lte the speeds were barely 1mbps and I got one at 5mbps. My Sprint phone had lte the majority of the ride with speeds no less than 9 but I maxed out at 30mbps. Could someone explain why I was experiencing what I did? I was really expecting more...kinda disappointed in a sense.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

GMO lte. Don't you love it?

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

GMO lte. Don't you love it?

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

I really didn't only because I was expecting more in the speed department. So this highway lte is pretty much a quick lay and your mileage may very.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really didn't only because I was expecting more in the speed department. So this highway lte is pretty much a quick lay and your mileage may very.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Even if the max was 1mbps, from a TMO user who's experienced 0mbps on gprs - maps dont load - this is still a massive improvement.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got my test drive device today because I was taking a small road trip and the highway I took had lte according to sensorly. I will say lte was there but I bounced between that and edge. When I had lte the speeds were barely 1mbps and I got one at 5mbps. My Sprint phone had lte the majority of the ride with speeds no less than 9 but I maxed out at 30mbps. Could someone explain why I was experiencing what I did? I was really expecting more...kinda disappointed in a sense.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Did you ever get full bars of lte?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if the max was 1mbps, from a TMO user who's experienced 0mbps on gprs - maps dont load - this is still a massive improvement.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I fully agree 100%. I just had such a good experience around town but once I got out on the highway I was expecting a similar experience but I didn't get that. I thought it was cool there was lte but the speeds weren't there or close to what I saw in the city but there's site density. My biggest gripe was the bouncing of lte and edge.

 

I saw full bars like 4 times during the drive

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I fully agree 100%. I just had such a good experience around town but once I got out on the highway I was expecting a similar experience but I didn't get that. I thought it was cool there was lte but the speeds weren't there or close to what I saw in the city but there's site density. My biggest gripe was the bouncing of lte and edge.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm curious how smooth the transition from volte to EDGE voice was.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm curious how smooth the transition from volte to EDGE voice was.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I thought that too but sadly T-Mobile gave me a 5s.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Your referring to the $25.00 a month Infinite Unlimited plan?  I don't see any other plans on there even cheaper than that on their website.  I was looking at the Motorola 2023 Edge fwiw as well for $10.00 a month. 
    • A heavy n41 overlay as an acquisition condition would be a win for customers, and eventually a win for T-Mobile as that might be enough to preclude VZW/AT&T adding C-Band for FWA due to spreading the market too thinly (which means T-Mobile would just have local WISPs/wireline ISPs as competition). USCC spacing (which is likely for contiguous 700 MHz LTE coverage in rural areas) isn't going to be enough for contiguous n41 anyway, and I doubt they'll densify enough to get there.
    • Boost Infinite with a rainbow SIM (you can get it SIM-only) is the cheapest way, at $25/mo, to my knowledge; the cheaper Boost Mobile plans don't run on Dish native. Check Phonescoop for n70 support on a given phone; the Moto G 5G from last year may be the cheapest unlocked phone with n70 though data speeds aren't as good as something with an X70 or better modem.
    • Continuing the USCC discussion, if T-Mobile does a full equipment swap at all of USCC's sites, which they probably will for vendor consistency, and if they include 2.5 on all of those sites, which they probably will as they definitely have economies of scale on the base stations, that'll represent a massive capacity increase in those areas over what USCC had, and maybe a coverage increase since n71 will get deployed everywhere and B71 will get deployed any time T-Mobile has at least 25x25, and maybe where they have 20x20. Assuming this deal goes through (I'm betting it does), I figure I'll see contiguous coverage in the area of southern IL where I was attempting to roam on USCC the last time I was there, though it might be late next year before that switchover happens.
    • Forgot to post this, but a few weeks ago I got to visit these small cells myself! They're spread around Grant park and the surrounding areas, but unfortunately none of the mmwave cells made it outside of the parks along the lake into the rest of downtown. I did spot some n41 small cells around downtown, but they seemed to be older deployments limited to 100mhz and performed poorly.    
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...