Jump to content

HTC One preview thread (was "Any M7 takers?")


Feech

Recommended Posts

That is BS my service should work the same inside and out! What if my phone is my only source on inet? That's like the car makers calling roll up windows a luxury because they don't break as often. I agree that in my home I don't need LTE but everywhere else I do. Currently when I go to the mall (Sawgrass Mills, FL) my 3G doesn't work at all (guessing too many people?) I can have a full signal and true 3G connection (not 1X hidden) and I get NO connection. All my requests fail with a perfect signal! And it's not just my EVO LTE as my friends with two different iPhone 5's have the same exact problem and it blows! I'll give the HTC One a shot but there are so many good phones coming out and I'd rather wait and see what Google/Motorola and Samsung have coming.

 

5th

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is BS my service should work the same inside and out! What if my phone is my only source on inet?

 

That sounds like *your* problem.

 

AJ

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"To provide a forum for discussion and education about wireless spectrum, networks, and Sprint Network Vision, in particular, in an online community that is mature, intelligent, and free from uncritical negativity."

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man, don't everyone jump on me at once. I did nothing wrong here. I'll admit there are times on the forum where I've been out of line, but this is NOT one of them. Deval simply stated that, and I quote, "...for the vast majority, in-building penetration is exactly that, in building, where WIFI is usually available..." And I disagreed and called BS on it, while then providing a good example of the issue. I can name a 50 places all at different locations in my area and about 1 in 10 have WiFi available so wireless data building penetration is a must. And my phone doesn't stop charging me money when I go inside? More and more stores and restaurants are installing WiFi inside their locations but that number is still small and I live in South Florida where it is easy for them to get. Also usually these companies require annoying login screens before using them and/or passwords. I would rather leave my LTE on and in most cases that is much faster than their free internet anyway. So lets all take a chill pill and not pile on me. I didn't bash Deval nor Sprint. And I'm not saying that Sprint NEEDS to provide in-building coverage in every building in town but don't act like they shouldn't try simply because WiFi is sometimes available.

 

:jedi:

 

Now...

 

centermedic: We can try, hehe. :secret:

 

WiWavelength: You're 100% right that it is my problem. But it's also Sprint's if they want to do business in this area. :imo:

 

gr8nuguy: Chill, pill... :fro:

 

To all: Don't I get props on my great use of emoticons? LOL

 

5TH

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, Sprint doesn't owe us anything. They provide service to the best of their abilities, simple as that. If we are dissatisfied with the provided coverage, the beauty is, we can leave, and try someone else's service.

 

Back to topic, with the release date of the device a month or so away, I'm starting to hear more buzz about it at work. A lot of the folks I work with did not get a chance to see the phone when it was announced, so it will be cool to get it here so everyone can play around with it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

WiWavelength: You're 100% right that it is my problem. But it's also Sprint's if they want to do business in this area.

 

Short of installing a micro/pico/femtocell or DAS, no carrier guarantees in building coverage. Plain and simple. Get used to it.

 

These are mobile phones, not in building phones, and the macro network is designed to provide coverage to mobile users, not in building users. Furthermore, every carrier -- no matter the frequency band it uses or how mature its network is -- lacks useful in building coverage in many locations. That may be inconvenient to some people, but it is the nature of wireless service.

 

If this is really an insurmountable issue to you, then take it upon yourself to inform businesses that you will no longer patronize their establishments and friends/family that you will no longer visit their homes if they do not have usable wireless coverage inside. Tell them that they need to install in building repeaters because it is their responsibility.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

given spacing between FCC OET and sprint release dates of HTC phones - I'm thinking mid to late march release date.

 

Any other takers?

 

I am thinking sometime this month as well. I really hope the camera on this phone is more than just hype, I would hate for this to turn into another evo 3d situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am thinking sometime this month as well. I really hope the camera on this phone is more than just hype, I would hate for this to turn into another evo 3d situation.

 

The EVO 3D was definitely selling into a trend that did not materialize.

 

I think the trend for higher quality camera bits is a trend that all of the major players will continue to focus on. It's very straight forward that if you have the same size senor you can either cram more pixels closer to have a higher MP count or cram less pixels in and make each one bigger to capture more light.

 

At the end of the day, smartphone cameras don't have problems when it is very sunny out. They have problems in low light situations and situations where you need dynamic range (shade+sun). In that sense, it makes absolutely perfect sense that HTC is making sensor pixels bigger. Nobody else in the smartphone industry has the balls to do it - HTC deserves a LOT of credit for bucking the trend. I am guessing that HTC will combine the 4MP pixel with even a faster lens (f/1.8 perhaps :))

 

HTC has really paid attention to sound quality, display, and camera since the release of the HTC One X. The high quality display found on the EVO 4G LTE is really apparent when held up to a device such as the optimus G.

 

Anyway, I think it's rather obvious I am sold on the getting One.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL, you are definitely sold on it. I am not quite sold but I know I will get it anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The EVO 3D was definitely selling into a trend that did not materialize.

 

I think the trend for higher quality camera bits is a trend that all of the major players will continue to focus on. It's very straight forward that if you have the same size senor you can either cram more pixels closer to have a higher MP count or cram less pixels in and make each one bigger to capture more light.

 

At the end of the day, smartphone cameras don't have problems when it is very sunny out. They have problems in low light situations and situations where you need dynamic range (shade+sun). In that sense, it makes absolutely perfect sense that HTC is making sensor pixels bigger. Nobody else in the smartphone industry has the balls to do it - HTC deserves a LOT of credit for bucking the trend. I am guessing that HTC will combine the 4MP pixel with even a faster lens (f/1.8 perhaps :))

 

HTC has really paid attention to sound quality, display, and camera since the release of the HTC One X. The high quality display found on the EVO 4G LTE is really apparent when held up to a device such as the optimus G.

 

Anyway, I think it's rather obvious I am sold on the getting One.

 

 

I think they said the lens was f/2.0 BSI, if I'm not mistaken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

I think they said the lens was f/2.0 BSI, if I'm not mistaken.

 

It is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I think they said the lens was f/2.0 BSI, if I'm not mistaken.

 

Sorry, I was talking about their next generation phone.

 

It's just been an industry trend, moving towards faster lenses that let more light in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL, you are definitely sold on it. I am not quite sold but I know I will get it anyway.

themuffinman wake up bro! It was you an me fighting in the HTC forum about LTE issues on the EVO LTE! I agree I'm willing to wait for Robert or one of the team to go over the phone first before I pass judgement but I'm not buying into HTC's info without good proof that there are no issues like on the EVO LTE. I really love the new HTC One design and IR Blaster makes me want to get it just for it alone but I'm not too fond of the Sense 5 software AT ALL! And if their camera isn't as good as they say the phone will be DOA and HTC can start getting their Chapter 11 started. But if it is, well then that's a thing of beauty and they might give Samsung a run for their money! HTC needs to pull some market share from Apple and a HTC One that looks better than the iPhone 5 is a great start! Not to mention they just released a new version (or are releasing) HTC Sync which allows straight iPhone backups (or so I read, can't remember where?). Awesome HTC! Now let me disable Blinkfeed and I'd be a lot more anxious for the HTC One!

 

Oh and WiWavelength what about outdoor mall areas where I get a perfect signal but no net? Sawgrass Mills is a great example. Sprint needs to add some capacity or install "micro/pico/femtocell" for outdoor coverage in high traffic areas.

 

Peace,

 

5th

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh and WiWavelength what about outdoor mall areas where I get a perfect signal but no net? Sawgrass Mills is a great example. Sprint needs to add some capacity...

 

Sprint is doing so as we speak. You might have heard of the plan. It is called Network Vision.

 

;)

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

themuffinman wake up bro! It was you an me fighting in the HTC forum about LTE issues on the EVO LTE! I agree I'm willing to wait for Robert or one of the team to go over the phone first before I pass judgement but I'm not buying into HTC's info without good proof that there are no issues like on the EVO LTE. I really love the new HTC One design and IR Blaster makes me want to get it just for it alone but I'm not too fond of the Sense 5 software AT ALL! And if their camera isn't as good as they say the phone will be DOA and HTC can start getting their Chapter 11 started. But if it is, well then that's a thing of beauty and they might give Samsung a run for their money! HTC needs to pull some market share from Apple and a HTC One that looks better than the iPhone 5 is a great start! Not to mention they just released a new version (or are releasing) HTC Sync which allows straight iPhone backups (or so I read, can't remember where?). Awesome HTC! Now let me disable Blinkfeed and I'd be a lot more anxious for the HTC One!

 

Oh and WiWavelength what about outdoor mall areas where I get a perfect signal but no net? Sawgrass Mills is a great example. Sprint needs to add some capacity or install "micro/pico/femtocell" for outdoor coverage in high traffic areas.

 

Peace,

 

5th

 

No device will be perfect, the issues with the evo lte were well known before the phone was released and those(such as myself) that were fortunate to have lte were face with connection issues. With that being said, there were other factors that led me to get and/or keep the phone anyway. Battery life was amazing as we all know and the camera was and for the most part still top notch, not to mention that beautiful 720p slcd2 screen. Now if I could go back in time and do it all over again I think I would still get the evo over the gs3 anyway but that of course is based on what I value. As far as the htc one, I honestly don't know. I really wanted a phone with a 5" display but they still stuck with the 4.7 which is fine I guess. I am definitely sold on the full hd slcd3 screen and front facing stereo speakers as well as the aluminium build. What I am not sold on is the "ultrapixel" marketing term that's being thrown around. Now in theory, plus what I have seen so far, it may be pretty cool but I hope it rocks once the phone is actually released. Also based on what AJ posted on S4GRU's wall it would seem like the one should be better than the evo lte when it comes to connectivitiy, at least on paper anyway. Oh and blinkfeed can be disabled for sure.

 

I am a phone whore, I have to buy something. I don't know the last time I had a phone longer than a year. I am also looking at the gs4 and I definitely don't like samsungs plastic build but more importantly I can't stand pentile screens. Now this time around I think that samsung is not going the way of pentile which should improve the screen quality but then they will still be using samoled screens, which does great with blacks but garbage with everything else and not to mention image retention issues. So it will be between the one and the gs4 but for me what it comes down too the most will be camera and screen.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my limited time with the One, I was sold, more-so on the size of the phone and screen quality. With the rumored specs of the S4 being 5" screen, I find that too big to use with one hand.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my limited time with the One, I was sold, more-so on the size of the phone and screen quality. With the rumored specs of the S4 being 5" screen, I find that too big to use with one hand.

 

You said that on purpose didn't you, LOL!!!!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the rumored specs of the S4 being 5" screen, I find that too big to use with one hand.

 

Do not ask what the other hand is doing...

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

given spacing between FCC OET and sprint release dates of HTC phones - I'm thinking mid to late march release date.

 

Any other takers?

I'm thinking it should be sometime in March, given that the $100 trade-in promotion requires purchase by the 31st.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my limited time with the One, I was sold, more-so on the size of the phone and screen quality. With the rumored specs of the S4 being 5" screen, I find that too big to use with one hand.

I got a big

hand

so I'm not worried about it. LMAO, great fun!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Throwed Roll Lambert's Cafe 
    • I've now seen how things work in Kobe, Hiroshima, and Osaka, as well as some areas south of Osaka (e.g. Wakayama, Kinokawa), and tried three more SIMs. The two physical SIMs (different branding for each) both use IIJ, which provides a Japanese IP address/routing on NTT, aleit LTE-only, so latency is ~45ms to Tokyo. The catch with NTT is that it uses two frequency bands (B42/3500 MHz LTE, n79/4900 MHz NR) that you're not going to get on an Android sold in the US, and I'm guessing that B42 would be helpful speed-wise on that network, as it doesn't have B41. I also found one place that doesn't have cell service: a vending machine in the back of the Osaka Castle tower. Or, rather, the B8/18/19 signal is weak enough there to be unusable. Going back to 5G for a moment, I saw a fair amount of Softbank n257 in Hiroshima, as well as in some train stations between Osaka and Kobe. 4x100 MHz bandwidth, anchored by B1/3/8, with speeds sometimes exceeding 400 Mbps on the US Mobile roaming eSIM. Not quite the speeds I've seen on mmW in the States, but I've probably been on mmW for more time over the past few days than I have in the US over the past year, so I'll take it. My fastest speed test was actually on SoftBank n77 though, with 100 MHz of that plus 10x10 B8 hitting ~700 Mbps down and ~80 Mbps up with ~100ms latency...on the roaming eSIM...on the 4th floor of the hotel near Shin-Kobe station. Guessing B8 was a DAS or small cell based on signal levels, and the n77 might have been (or was just a less-used sector of the site serving the train station). I'm now 99% sure that all three providers are running DSS on band 28, and I've seen 10x10 on similar frequencies from both NTT and SoftBank IIRC, on both LTE and 5G. I also picked up one more eSIM: my1010, which is different from 1010/csl used by US Mobile's eSIM unfortunately, as it's LTE-only. On the bright side, it's cheap (10GB/7 days is like $11, and 20GB for the same period would be around $15), and can use both KDDI and SoftBank LTE. It also egresses from Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom), though latency isn't really any better than the Singapore based eSIMs. Tomorrow will include the most rural part of our journey, so we'll see how networks hold up there, and from tomorrow night on we'll be in Tokyo, so any further reports after that will be Tokyo-centric.
    • I think the push for them is adding US Mobile as a MVNO with a priority data plan.  Ultimately, making people more aware of priority would allow them (and other carriers) to differentiate themselves from MVNOs like Consumer Cellular that advertise the same coverage. n77 has dramatically reduced the need for priority service at Verizon where the mere functioning of your phone was in jeopardy a couple of years ago if you had a low priority plan like Red Pocket. Only have heard of problems with T-Mobile in parts of Los Angeles. AT&T fell in between. All had issues at large concerts and festivals, or sporting events if your carrier has no on-site rights. Edit: Dishes native 5g network has different issues: not enough sites, limited bandwidth. Higher priority would help a few. Truth is they can push phones to AT&T or T-Mobile.
    • Tracfone AT&T sims went from QCI 8 to 9 as well a couple years ago. I'm pretty neutral towards AT&T's turbo feature here, the only bad taste left was for those who had unadvertised QCI 7 a couple months ago moved down to 8. In my eyes it would have been a lot better for AT&T to include turbo in those Premium/Elite plans for free to keep them at QCI 7, while also introducing this turbo add on option for any other plans or devices. As it stands now only a handful of plans can add it, and only if you're using a device on a random list of devices AT&T considers to be 5G smartphones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...