Jump to content

HTC One preview thread (was "Any M7 takers?")


Feech

Recommended Posts

I might be the minority in this, but I think phone screens have gotten too big for every day use. I was impressed that HTC crammed in a 1080p screen into a 4.7" physical display, but I think that's the largest for me. I can't see myself using a phone with a larger screen one-handed, which is what I normally do today.

 

Waiting patiently to get my hands on the One, should be a blast to use.

 

I personally would like something around 5" - 5.1". The Note 2 is slightly too large for my every day use. But going back to the EVO LTE or GS3 feels small. I desire something in the middle. A mini phablet.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't see myself using a phone with a larger screen one-handed, which is what I normally do today.

 

Waiting patiently to get my hands on the One, should be a blast to use.

 

Don't you mean that you are waiting patiently to get your "hand" on the One?

 

:P

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I might be the minority in this, but I think phone screens have gotten too big for every day use. I was impressed that HTC crammed in a 1080p screen into a 4.7" physical display, but I think that's the largest for me. I can't see myself using a phone with a larger screen one-handed, which is what I normally do today.

 

Waiting patiently to get my hands on the One, should be a blast to use.

 

I'm with you there. I can barely hold the EVO LTE in my hand.

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I might be the minority in this, but I think phone screens have gotten too big for every day use. I was impressed that HTC crammed in a 1080p screen into a 4.7" physical display, but I think that's the largest for me. I can't see myself using a phone with a larger screen one-handed, which is what I normally do today.

 

Waiting patiently to get my hands on the One, should be a blast to use.

 

Yep, was messing with my friends DNA (insert AJ joke here) and it just seems a little unwieldy - my daughters GS3 seems just about on the high end of how large a phone I want so the One may be the trick (of course I just blew the $100 I would get back from HTC on the deductible for a replacement 3D that I just shattered last night - the pain of which may make me hold out until the GS4 is announced just to be sure).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm with you there. I can barely hold the EVO LTE in my hand.

 

Small hands? Do you smell like cabbage?

 

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The quad band LTE is the AT&T version, the dual band LTE, the T-Mobile version. Really, that article is a week behind the times.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is my honest question to everyone. Why does it matter that the device does not have LTE available on BC26 or BC41? For 90% of the potential sales, LTE on BC25 is good enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ahh I thought they were all sprint phones haha. Yes I remember your article regarding this topic and how the sprint variant is only single band.

 

And to be clear, that was no knock against you. It was a criticism of the article and its writer, who really seems late to the game and under informed. I am puzzled, in particular, by this quote:

 

Furthermore, the model in question also includes 802.11ac support, a clear indicator that the HTC One is definitely heading towards the Now Network.

 

Unless I am missing something, how does support for the new 802.11ac Wi-Fi standard have anything to do with Sprint?

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

And to be clear, that was no knock against you. It was a criticism of the article and its writer, who really seems late to the game and under informed. I am puzzled, in particular, by this quote:

 

 

 

Unless I am missing something, how does support for the new 802.11ac Wi-Fi standard have anything to do with Sprint?

 

AJ

 

I'm not offended at all. Yes I caught that to. Wi-Fi is Wi-Fi, the last few days authors have been getting sloppy and not knowing their information.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is my honest question to everyone. Why does it matter that the device does not have LTE available on BC26 or BC41? For 90% of the potential sales, LTE on BC25 is good enough.

 

I don't get it, especially since it's going to be a while before either of those bands are deployed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess it depends on how often you get a new phone. I plan on using my kids' upgrades and giving them my hand me downs. My prerogative since I pay the bill. If I had to wait for my contract cycle I would wait to ensure my next phone was a little more future proof. I am seriously considering using my son's upgrade to get this phone, but with all the new phones coming out in the next couple months it's hard to decide. I do know that I am really irritated by having to cycle airplane mode constantly to pick up 4G for my Sensorly endeavors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess it depends on how often you get a new phone. I plan on using my kids' upgrades and giving them my hand me downs. My prerogative since I pay the bill. If I had to wait for my contract cycle I would wait to ensure my next phone was a little more future proof. I am seriously considering using my son's upgrade to get this phone, but with all the new phones coming out in the next couple months it's hard to decide. I do know that I am really irritated by having to cycle airplane mode constantly to pick up 4G for my Sensorly endeavors.

 

There will always be new phones coming out within the next couple of months so if you like it just get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There will always be new phones coming out within the next couple of months so if you like it just get it.

 

Really? But what if like the concept of the film "Children of Men," in which new babies mysteriously stop being born, all new phones mysteriously stop being manufactured? Pretty soon, the world's "youngest" phone would be several years old.

 

;)

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, I like it. And, I'll probably get it.

 

We all understand the tech game. But, If I had listened to AJ about the antenna before the EVO 4G LTE came out perhaps I would have waited for a different phone.

 

So, AJ, please let us know your interpretation of the test results when they come out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, AJ, please let us know your interpretation of the test results when they come out.

 

The FCC OET authorization test results that I wrote up the same day they were released last week?

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/blog/1/entry-342-all-for-htc-one-htc-one-for-all/

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get it, especially since it's going to be a while before either of those bands are deployed.

 

That's my point. Why delay a launch of a device due to certification when the network will not be in place for some time.

 

Voice on 1x (BC10) was a requirement for a multitude of reasons, including SDC. This is totally different, and having LTE on BC26 will help, but for the vast majority, in-building penetration is exactly that, in building, where WIFI is usually available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess it depends on how often you get a new phone. I plan on using my kids' upgrades and giving them my hand me downs. My prerogative since I pay the bill. If I had to wait for my contract cycle I would wait to ensure my next phone was a little more future proof. I am seriously considering using my son's upgrade to get this phone, but with all the new phones coming out in the next couple months it's hard to decide. I do know that I am really irritated by having to cycle airplane mode constantly to pick up 4G for my Sensorly endeavors.

 

I don't blame you, and as an employee, I share your frustration. I am bound by the same rules as our customers, so I have to pick and choose wisely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

The FCC OET authorization test results that I wrote up the same day they were released last week?

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/blog/1/entry-342-all-for-htc-one-htc-one-for-all/

 

AJ

 

I read that. Thank you for posting it, but I really haven't had time to decipher it. Like Deval said we'll just have to wait until someone gets their hands on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone else obsessively checking for updates on the release date of this phone?

 

On the topic of in building reception, should we expect in a building, say the supermarket, where we currently get a shaky signal (pre NV), should we expect that NV will not improve this much? I'm guessing the 1X 800 would improve, but EVDO not so much, with LTE 1900 being similarly shaky; I hope that's wrong. Is the 3D considered a pretty poor RF performer, though?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone else obsessively checking for updates on the release date of this phone?

 

On the topic of in building reception, should we expect in a building, say the supermarket, where we currently get a shaky signal (pre NV), should we expect that NV will not improve this much? I'm guessing the 1X 800 would improve, but EVDO not so much, with LTE 1900 being similarly shaky; I hope that's wrong. Is the 3D considered a pretty poor RF performer, though?

 

You'll get some improvement, a few dB gained, but yes, reality is that the 1x coverage will surpass it, and you'll be able to text and make voice calls. I will say though, if during the course of the NV upgrade, they tilt the antenna panels even a few degrees, you'll see a much larger improvement.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Was at the Yankees vs Tigers game today and besides being a terrible day to have good seats, T-Mobile had great speeds via the stadium's DAS. I consistently saw 500-600Mbps on 5G and on LTE I got upwards of 200Mbps. I noticed that the stadiums DAS is broadcasting 140MHz n41 while macros that surround the stadium are at 80MHz. 
    • Throwed Roll Lambert's Cafe 
    • I've now seen how things work in Kobe, Hiroshima, and Osaka, as well as some areas south of Osaka (e.g. Wakayama, Kinokawa), and tried three more SIMs. The two physical SIMs (different branding for each) both use IIJ, which provides a Japanese IP address/routing on NTT, aleit LTE-only, so latency is ~45ms to Tokyo. The catch with NTT is that it uses two frequency bands (B42/3500 MHz LTE, n79/4900 MHz NR) that you're not going to get on an Android sold in the US, and I'm guessing that B42 would be helpful speed-wise on that network, as it doesn't have B41. I also found one place that doesn't have cell service: a vending machine in the back of the Osaka Castle tower. Or, rather, the B8/18/19 signal is weak enough there to be unusable. Going back to 5G for a moment, I saw a fair amount of Softbank n257 in Hiroshima, as well as in some train stations between Osaka and Kobe. 4x100 MHz bandwidth, anchored by B1/3/8, with speeds sometimes exceeding 400 Mbps on the US Mobile roaming eSIM. Not quite the speeds I've seen on mmW in the States, but I've probably been on mmW for more time over the past few days than I have in the US over the past year, so I'll take it. My fastest speed test was actually on SoftBank n77 though, with 100 MHz of that plus 10x10 B8 hitting ~700 Mbps down and ~80 Mbps up with ~100ms latency...on the roaming eSIM...on the 4th floor of the hotel near Shin-Kobe station. Guessing B8 was a DAS or small cell based on signal levels, and the n77 might have been (or was just a less-used sector of the site serving the train station). I'm now 99% sure that all three providers are running DSS on band 28, and I've seen 10x10 on similar frequencies from both NTT and SoftBank IIRC, on both LTE and 5G. I also picked up one more eSIM: my1010, which is different from 1010/csl used by US Mobile's eSIM unfortunately, as it's LTE-only. On the bright side, it's cheap (10GB/7 days is like $11, and 20GB for the same period would be around $15), and can use both KDDI and SoftBank LTE. It also egresses from Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom), though latency isn't really any better than the Singapore based eSIMs. Tomorrow will include the most rural part of our journey, so we'll see how networks hold up there, and from tomorrow night on we'll be in Tokyo, so any further reports after that will be Tokyo-centric.
    • I think the push for them is adding US Mobile as a MVNO with a priority data plan.  Ultimately, making people more aware of priority would allow them (and other carriers) to differentiate themselves from MVNOs like Consumer Cellular that advertise the same coverage. n77 has dramatically reduced the need for priority service at Verizon where the mere functioning of your phone was in jeopardy a couple of years ago if you had a low priority plan like Red Pocket. Only have heard of problems with T-Mobile in parts of Los Angeles. AT&T fell in between. All had issues at large concerts and festivals, or sporting events if your carrier has no on-site rights. Edit: Dishes native 5g network has different issues: not enough sites, limited bandwidth. Higher priority would help a few. Truth is they can push phones to AT&T or T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...