Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - New York City Market


Ace41690

Recommended Posts

yepp thats its, the google street view is from september 2015 and i see a box and antenna on the poll but the placement and size is different, im guessing this was a clear wimaxx mini cell.

 

edit: doesn't show up in the maps on this site but one does for 59th and park, maybe thats its. 

 

Yes. A lot of Clear small cells have been converted by Nokia and Sprint! That plus sprints own new deployment will yield approximately 200 small cells in NYC by the end of summer with hundreds more to come. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. A lot of Clear small cells have been converted by Nokia and Sprint! That plus sprints own new deployment will yield approximately 200 small cells in NYC by the end of summer with hundreds more to come. 

are these cell more aim towards people on the street and ground level in buildings or do they have vertical range to for people higher up in buildings. either way it will relieve the stress on macro cells and remove congestion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

are these cell more aim towards people on the street and ground level in buildings or do they have vertical range to for people higher up in buildings. either way it will relieve the stress on macro cells and remove congestion.

Primarily ground level.

 

The skyscrapers I imagine will be iDAS type of deployments which is a whole other ballgame.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's great to see! The best part is that without advertising, every customer walking by those areas will benefit from the upgrade. Can't wait to see the rest come on air.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

are these cell more aim towards people on the street and ground level in buildings or do they have vertical range to for people higher up in buildings. either way it will relieve the stress on macro cells and remove congestion. 

 

Primarily street level to relieve the capacity on nearby macro sites.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Connected to 2 different sets of small cells.

 

They cover between 53rd street 2nd Ave till about 60th street and Madison.

 

Performance was pretty great, speeds between 20mb to 70mb pings in the teens.

GCI was same as downtown by pearl starting with 0129.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scp shots for small cell..

 

42nd n 5th

https://imgur.com/OmFG9on

Speed test for this location

https://imgur.com/a/w12Kw

 

58th n park Ave

https://imgur.com/FSunjl1

 

47th n 7th Ave

https://imgur.com/Q14PD7V

Interesting. GCI range is new or outside the ones SCP knows about, so it's not identifying it as B41. How far is it from the normal range of GCIs for NYC?

 

Sent from my Nexus 6P

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting. GCI range is new or outside the ones SCP knows about, so it's not identifying it as B41. How far is it from the normal range of GCIs for NYC?

Sent from my Nexus 6P

B41 for Sprint is 013 and 20x for clear. So no, scp does not identify it as B41.

 

But of course engineering screens and speed test verify the band.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

B41 for Sprint is 013 and 20x for clear. So no, scp does not identify it as B41.

 

But of course engineering screens and speed test verify the band.

So it's before the normal range. Interesting, I'd have expected it to be after.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SCP could recognize it as a small cell if it is using the B25 market GCI and the B41 sector bytes. Just imagine if some one tracked the market and was going through logs you could write a script to look for just those things in the logs. Then have the best signal location for the odd GCI to make them easier to confirm in the field.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like they are really going all out. Connected on 42nd 5th and also connected on 47th 7th Ave all with similar speeds.

 

This is getting good!

Did you check signal indoor for these small cells or just outdoor?  Just wonder if outdoor small cells' signals can reach indoor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • S23 and S24 (at least ultra versions) have 4xCA NR. I currently have n41+n41+n25+n71 most places I go.  I think select devices have 2xCA upload but I do not think it is in widespread use yet. CA is still mostly download focused.
    • If they use n41 + n41 2CA, people that are somewhat distant from the cell site will have an OK download but the upload will be a disaster.  Upload capability on b-41 was always a disaster on the old Sprint Network.   Now, with n25 + n41 combination, even the more distant users have a more decent upload.  I see n41 + n41 + n25 now with my S22 and I understand that we will see 4xCA with newer phones in the future.     I also see n41 + n41 + n71 sometimes too. Also some other combinations of 25, 41, 71.  I would think that eventually we will see AWS paired with n41 too.  What I am not sure of is ----  when I see 3xCA on my S22, I can see the 3 channels involved in the download but I am never sure just what I have on the upload. I do not think I have 3xCA on the upload.
    • I don't know enough about the nuts and bolts of NR to know the answer, but is there a reason they're not doing two overlapping 100 MHz n41 carriers and using selective resource shutoff to make each one 97 MHz?  Thus making use of the full 194 MHz instead of leaving 4 MHz unused as implied by the current standard 100+90 configuration? - Trip
    • Looks like another T-Mobile 5G bump happened over the past week and a half, maybe less: n41 carriers are now 90+100 MHz, up from 80+100 (which in turn is up from 40+100 back in early March). This is on top of the new n25 carrier recently. As part of this, it looks like T-Mobile is starting to prefer n25+n41 2CA even when pushing data, rather than having higher levels of CA that would hit higher peak speeds; at least indoors I need to force n41-only if I want to see the full 190 MHz there. To be fair the speeds are plenty quick with that amount of spectrum, and I'm sure they're load balancing, and my guess is this is a little better for battery life? With this expansion, they're now at 10x10+10x10 n25, 15x15 n71, 100+90 n41, for a total of 260 MHz (including FD uplink) of deployed NR here, up from 250 MHz a week ago, 230 MHz two weeks ago, and 190 MHz six months ago. VZW is at 140 MHz minus mmW, 170 if you count n2 DSS. AT&T is at 150 MHz (80+40 n77, 15x15 n5), 210 MHz I think if you count n2 and n66 DSS (guessing they're still running those). With this level of spectrum they should be able to continue offering home internet wherever. Guessing this is the last upgrade they can make before they need to throw new equipment on sites for C-Band. At this rate I figure that'll happen next year on a few dozen high-traffic sites.
    • https://www.lightreading.com/wireless/tds-telecom-to-launch-mobile-service-via-nctc-s-mvno Surprising given merger.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...