Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Jacksonville Market (including Gainesville/St. Augustine/Ocala)


Syph3r

Recommended Posts

False alarm it was the archer site I was by when will the Ocala site be finished by a guess?

 

There's just no way to know. It could be this week. It could be two months. We have seen some Ericsson sites in Kansas sit for months after physical upgrades are complete.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still no visible work going on at the site on Soutel Drive. Although I saw some panels being hung at a site a few miles from here. Hopefully the work will start soon since I decided to live over here another year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anybody having a problem with Sensorly app lately? Seems like when I turn on GPS and then open Sensorly and tap on coverage it always opens showing NYC. I emailed developer but no response yet.

Edited by YGTBSM
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anybody having a problem with Sensorly app lately? Seems like when I turn on GPS and then open Sensorly and tap on coverage it always opens showing NYC. I emailed developer but no response yet.

This happens to me. I thought it was coincidence because I was looking at coverage for new jersey earlier this week and figured my phone remnered what I looked at last. Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anybody having a problem with Sensorly app lately? Seems like when I turn on GPS and then open Sensorly and tap on coverage it always opens showing NYC. I emailed developer but no response yet.

 

Happens to me to but I didn't have GPS turned on.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A tower maybe two went live. I drove from knightbox/blanding to old Jennings to Sr23 all the way to oak leaf with good LTE service. I mapped my route in sensorly.

 

Never showed in sensorly.... I had it for a second at blanding and old Jennings... I'm gonna check for work on towers in the area today

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using JellyBombed Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mapped more 4g at blanding and old Jennings and college and blanding...

 

post-7498-13581827981107_thumb.jpg

 

 

Its another weird location like sr23 sporadic 4g the only towers live are drs inlet and a few near penny farms

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using JellyBombed Tapatalk 2

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Orlando looks to be lighting up like a christmas tree on sensorly. Jax still looking rather dead -- especially over in the beaches/kernan/atlantic areas :-(

 

Yep.

 

For a moment, I actually thought about going to AT&T. Their 4G speeds are pretty good. My mom has a galaxy s2 on AT&T and her 3G+ speeds are impressive.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today.

 

Baymeadows Rd at Baymeadows Way:

tamymere.jpg

 

Old Baymeadows Rd at Southside Blvd:

saduse5y.jpg

 

I had 4G coverage on Southside Blvd from Baymeadows until right before JTB. As soon as I passed Deerwood Park, it switched back to 3G.

 

Now...if they can only work on Downtown...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ocala site somewhere on west 40 by the airport

 

Good speed for a miserably weak signal. :tu:

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found where it was coming from and mapped out 345 points of 4g on sensorly it is on sw state rd 200 about 6 miles away from where I was getting it at I see the panels on the tower is live. this is speeds at the tower

Screenshot_2013-01-17-23-56-15.png

Screenshot_2013-01-17-23-56-01.png

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My site has an orange tube going into the bottom half of the tower and has a black coil (I think fiber line) coming out right next to the panels near the top. Does this mean new panel installation is about to begin? I have a feeling net week will be when they do it but I just don't know yet. Lol seems like they've done a lot since they started (Tuesday).

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Panels are installed on my local site now.

 

How much longer do you think until its live? :P

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

Honestly you never know. The fiber has to be connected to the site so once that gets connected it should be close! Keep an eye to cabinets!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • On Reddit, someone asked (skeptically) if the US Cellular buyout would result in better service.  I'd been pondering this very issue, and decided to cross-post my response here: I've been pondering the question in the title and I've come to the conclusion that the answer is that it's possible. Hear me out. Unlike some of the small carriers that work exclusively with one larger carrier, all three major carriers roam on US Cellular today in at least some areas, so far as I know. If that network ceases to exist, then the carriers would presumably want to recover those areas of lost service by building out natively. Thus, people in those areas who may only have service from US Cellular or from US Cellular and one other may gain competition from other carriers backfilling that loss. How likely is it? I'm not sure. But it's definitely feasible. Most notably, AT&T did their big roaming deal with US Cellular in support of FirstNet in places where they lacked native coverage. They can't just lose a huge chunk of coverage whole still making FirstNet happy; I suspect they'll have to build out and recover at least some of that area, if not most of it. So it'd be indirect, but I could imagine it. - Trip
    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...