Jump to content

Sprint LTE Coverage Maps via Sensorly

S4GRU
 Share

Recommended Posts

sensorly Member Level: 1x Advanced

sensorly

Posted
Posted

The issue is that LTE is reported as a "telephony network" so we have no way of knowing what the underlying "real" telephony network is.

 

Maps didn't update for the past 12 hours, investigating why. Backlog is "down" to about 2 million pieces of maps to update, it will probably finish over the night as this is peak hour.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

S4GRU
S4GRU

http://www.sensorly.com/iframe2/S4GRU/map/4G/US/USA/Sprint/lte_310sprint">Your browser doesn't support IFRAMEs, please upgrade

S4GRU
S4GRU

I just want to thank our sources here at S4GRU. You have to hide in the shadows and never get the public accolades you deserve. Thanks for all you do you to give us heads up about things like Howell.

SWMich4G
SWMich4G

I was bored and like comparing how Sprint is catching up to AT&T on the sensorly map so I made a map of all the spots Sprint has LTE where AT&T doesn't and vice-verse.  This ignores signal qua

Posted Images

scottm48 Member Level: 3G EVDO

scottm48

Posted
Posted

Here is the dumb question of the day!!!  When I use sensorly to map my areas in Omaha for 4G will sensorly find the 4G signal as I map my trip or will i need to toggle airplane mode first to find the 4G signal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
digiblur Member Level: LTE Advanced

digiblur

Posted
Posted

Here is the dumb question of the day!!!  When I use sensorly to map my areas in Omaha for 4G will sensorly find the 4G signal as I map my trip or will i need to toggle airplane mode first to find the 4G signal?

 

That is a device/baseband decision not one by Sensorly.  Your phone controls all of that.  If your device is steadily using a 3G connection and drive into a 4G covered area it will not "step up" to the 4G as you have the radio busy transferring data instead of it being able to scan for LTE every once in a while.  Running Sensorly all the time can lessen your chance to catch a LTE signal since it is sending up the 3G points.  What I do to force my device to scan for LTE is run LTE Discovery in "Cycle while not connected to LTE" mode along with Sensorly running in Map Trip Started mode.  Then I pull up my LTE Engineering screen to look for new serving cells I haven't seen before.  All while mapping out in the background and catching the LTE that I might not have known about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jsage Member Level: 1xRTT

jsage

Posted
Posted

The issue is that LTE is reported as a "telephony network" so we have no way of knowing what the underlying "real" telephony network is.

 

Thanks for the explanation. I went back to the same area yesterday and mapped extensively, but I did not observe the same curiosity as on Sunday. When I had 4G coverage, only the 4G number updated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mozamcrew Member Level: eHRPD

mozamcrew

Posted
Posted

That is a device/baseband decision not one by Sensorly.  Your phone controls all of that.  If your device is steadily using a 3G connection and drive into a 4G covered area it will not "step up" to the 4G as you have the radio busy transferring data instead of it being able to scan for LTE every once in a while.  Running Sensorly all the time can lessen your chance to catch a LTE signal since it is sending up the 3G points.  What I do to force my device to scan for LTE is run LTE Discovery in "Cycle while not connected to LTE" mode along with Sensorly running in Map Trip Started mode.  Then I pull up my LTE Engineering screen to look for new serving cells I haven't seen before.  All while mapping out in the background and catching the LTE that I might not have known about.

 

This is why I like to set Sensorly to only upload on Wifi, sometimes the upload activity will keep you 1x or EVDO even when  EVDO or 4G is available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
digiblur Member Level: LTE Advanced

digiblur

Posted
Posted

This is why I like to set Sensorly to only upload on Wifi, sometimes the upload activity will keep you 1x or EVDO even when  EVDO or 4G is available.

 

Run the LTE Discovery app like I stated and problem solved and you'll pick up all the LTE out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WiWavelength Member Level: LTE Advanced

WiWavelength

Posted
Posted

To cut right to the "chase," some Sensorly mappers are more thorough than others...

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ve46w_pL8dY

 

You are missing out if you have not yet watched this video while thinking of these guys as potentially being Sensorly mappers filling in the gaps between city streets about which one recent poster complained.  The idea cracks me up -- I laugh and laugh...

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
digiblur Member Level: LTE Advanced

digiblur

Posted
Posted

Definitely a cool video!  I have thought about letting my phone hitch a ride with some friends that work for the postal service and UPS routes but the LTE coverage ended up being too sparse in LTE active areas between the sites so it would take some babysitting which they of course wouldn't be able to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Yuhfhrh Member Level: eHRPD

Yuhfhrh

Posted
Posted

You are missing out if you have not yet watched this video while thinking of these guys as potentially being Sensorly mappers filling in the gaps between city streets about which one recent poster complained.  The idea cracks me up -- I laugh and laugh...

 

AJ

 

If they had sensorly mapping, I would go visit them in jail lol  :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iScReAm612 Member Level: Morse Code

iScReAm612

Posted
Posted

I've noticed on Sensorly and previous posts on Sprint forums, 4G is finally starting to pop up in Omaha, NE. YAAAY!

 

Question: Based on previous 4G LTE market rollouts, and based on this current results of Sensorly, how much longer can I expect to wait for Omaha to be fully covered by 4G?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dkoellerwx Member Level: LTE Advanced

Dkoellerwx

Posted
Posted

Thanks for your post. However, we already have a thread dedicated to the Nebraska/Omaha/Lincoln areas. Please use that thread for further discussion.

 

To answer your question, it can be anywhere from a month to 6 months depending on how quickly work is able to progress. 

 

Here's the link to the Nebraska thread: http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/2495-network-visionlte-market-west-iowanebraska-market-omahacouncil-bluffslincoln/

Link to comment
Share on other sites
clbowens Member Level: 4G WiMax

clbowens

Posted
Posted

Does Sprint 2G - 3G on Sensorly also include the old Nextel iDen network?  I ask because sensoryly shows that Sprint has 3G in an area that I know they definitely do not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dkoellerwx Member Level: LTE Advanced

Dkoellerwx

Posted
Posted

Does Sprint 2G - 3G on Sensorly also include the old Nextel iDen network?  I ask because sensoryly shows that Sprint has 3G in an area that I know they definitely do not.

 

I don't believe it includes iDen, but it does show roaming as 3G. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jsage Member Level: 1xRTT

jsage

Posted
Posted

Something interesting happened today when I was mapping some areas around site -redacted-.

 

Sorry that someone needed to redact that, I thought that I'd been careful to use a Google Maps link but I think I included the site ID in the text of my post. I apologize for any problem  :(

 

In any case, you can find the tower on Sprint's network improvement map, but that's not really the point of this reply. When I went back to that area to see if I could duplicate the 3G/4G simultaneously updating in Sensorly, I took some photos of the tower. It's one of the fake palm tree towers that are common around San Diego. Here's a pic:

 

thumb-2013-07-01%2017.54.23-1.jpg

 

 

Since San Diego is in an Alcatel-Lucent area, I expected to see one of their antennas. But if you look close, the antenna is quite a bit different from the Alcatel-Lucent gear:

 

close-2013-07-01%2017.54.23-1.jpg close-2013-07-01%2017.54.52-1.jpg close-2013-07-01%2017.54.47-1.jpg

 

 

They look surprisingly like the Samsung antennas, particularly this one in the Samsung-spotting thread. It looks like a PCS-only Samsung antenna for IBEZ deployments. Since the above tower is only about 25 miles from the Mexican border, would that be an accurate guess? If so, I guess most of San Diego County will not be seeing CDMA & LTE on 800Mhz.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
eljayyy91 Member Level: 1x Advanced

eljayyy91

Posted
Posted

Just curious does sensory report ur lte signal strength or ur 1x? This has probably been covered somewhere but couldn't find anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gr8nuguy Member Level: 4G LTE

gr8nuguy

Posted
Posted

Lte on most devices. There is 1 device in particular which it does 1x but counts as lte. Fail for that device. (Galaxy nexus I think, someone correct me if I'm wrong)

 

Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk 2

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
eljayyy91 Member Level: 1x Advanced

eljayyy91

Posted
Posted

Well I don't know if its because they are applying lte to all sites but in my experiance they almost always end up reflecting my 1x signal strength. I've also noticed this jumpin into roaming boosted my signal on sensory too so it confusing. Also if every tower is getting lte and 1x and evdo are suppose to travel farther. But I have been roamin with 4g many times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gr8nuguy Member Level: 4G LTE

gr8nuguy

Posted
Posted

You were roaming on voice while connected to sprint lte. It is impossible to "roam on another carriers lte". If your device is reporting 1x signal instead of lte signal to sensorly then I would suggest (request) that you dont map lte. Certain roms cause this issue as well. The down tilt or direction the lte antenna on the tower could also be different then legacy equipment causing u to have lte and be roaming on voice coverage

 

Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk 2

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
eljayyy91 Member Level: 1x Advanced

eljayyy91

Posted
Posted

I know I woudnt be roaming on anyone's else's lte. Why would I ask about 4g having better signal then 1x. Duh. And I'm guessing maybe less downtilt til there are more towers live?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
z250kid Member Level: eHRPD

z250kid

Posted
Posted

Well I don't know if its because they are applying lte to all sites but in my experiance they almost always end up reflecting my 1x signal strength. I've also noticed this jumpin into roaming boosted my signal on sensory too so it confusing. Also if every tower is getting lte and 1x and evdo are suppose to travel farther. But I have been roamin with 4g many times.

I've noticed this in ct also im roaming with lte? I was like ummmmmm

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SWMich4G Member Level: 3G EVDO

SWMich4G

Posted
Posted

Lte on most devices. There is 1 device in particular which it does 1x but counts as lte. Fail for that device. (Galaxy nexus I think, someone correct me if I'm wrong)

 

Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk 2

Which device maps the gray "no coverage" on the map?  It's barely there for Sprint, but the AT&T and T-Mobile maps almost have more gray than purple. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Paynefanbro
      Network Vision/LTE - New York City Market

      By Paynefanbro · Posted

      This site is built but not live. eNB 41150 is still live. eNB 41188 is decommissioned but as far as I can tell the site at 200 West 55th is not built yet. This site is live gNB 1346302. This site is live gNB 1092074 This site is live gNB 1371671 This site is live gNB 1371860 — — — — — Sprint eNB 6156 -> T-Mobile gNB 1349260 Sprint eNB Unknown -> T-Mobile gNB 1325016 — — — — — Bonus T-Mobile 5G small cell, gNB 1348688 in Queens:  
    • iansltx
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By iansltx · Posted

      FTTH JVs are city by city as well, so it's not going to really be sector by sector. It sounds like TMo wants to be able to sell everyone home broadband, but if that requires building additional infrastructure that infra will take the form of FTTH builds rather than mobile densification. Which involves tradeoffs, but the product is better than e.g. what AT&T is doing for me right now, which is offering only Internet Air in an area where they have 100/20 DSL available but not (yet) fiber.
    • chamb
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By chamb · Posted

      Hopefully they do not wait until these sectors get so overloaded that they start getting nasty reviews and people abandon them. Getting fiber coverage to the area of a overloaded sector can take a year or more. I also question if this can all be managed.  Lots of sectors all over the country can get congested fairly quick.  Lots of work and money to get fiber installed and there goes the profitability on the venture.
    • dkyeager
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By dkyeager · Posted

      MoffetNathanson Conference This is a conference where the CFO talks telecom financial analysts so obviously it takes a return on investment approach.  Broadly T-Mobile divides there world into top 100 markets (60%) and small town/rural (40%). They ultimately want to have at least 1/3 market share in rural. They also look at demographics like 50+ and Hispanic.  Reputation is now starting to help them with CIOs.  Did mention c-band buildout beginning in major cities as well as continued band migration to 5g. IMO they may become more aggressive at offering 5g phones to LTE holdover and 5g users without VoNR at a future date. mmWave not discussed. Price increases not discussed iirc. Did mention spectrum purchases from speculators. $9 billion all goes through same ROI process. FWA is down to hexagonal patterns by sector of fallow spectrum. Fiber JVs will go where sectors are overloaded.
    • PedroDaGr8
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By PedroDaGr8 · Posted

      I am lucky to be served by an excellent fiber ISP and that is the only reason I haven't tried TMOs FWA. Once you go fiber, it is REALLY hard to go back. The choice of sub-10ms ping times is a very artificial bucket, FWA will seldom get much below 10ms ping times but fiber regularly gets me 1-3ms ping times. Basically, at around those times, the speed of light and the distance you are from the server become the limiting factors. As an aside, my internet provider, ZiplyFiber, has been awesome. They peer like crazy at all the major IX in the area and, as a result, you end up with what essentially amounts to direct fiber connections to the vast majority of major data sources. While it isn't sexy, it makes my 1Gb/1Gb connection load pages significantly faster than my works 10Gb/10Gb connection. On the "sexy" side, they are also fastest ISP in the nation. They offer up to 50Gb/50Gb via a direct fiber connection to the router, albeit for an eye watering $900/mo.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...