Jump to content

Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, tyroned3222 said:

Yup in my market

Sprint : 60 macro sites

T-mobile : 156

It would take Sprint a long time to catch up to that macro count

 

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Yea that’s a mess. As they keep adding so will T-Mobile. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea that’s a mess. As they keep adding so will T-Mobile. 

And one of sprints biggest markets which is New Jersey they do not have even close to uniform coverage or even contiguous coverage for that matter. Their overall coverage has improved but is still nowhere near T-Mobile is actual coverage. Along the highway where near where I live on for carriers work well because there’s a big cell site I say at least a couple hundred feet tall that services All for carriers But once you leave the main highway that runs through the east part of my town the coverage with the carriers does start to deteriorate.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, tyroned3222 said:

Yup in my market

Sprint : 60 macro sites

T-mobile : 156

It would take Sprint a long time to catch up to that macro count

 

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

I have some family that went out to Bethany Beach, Delaware for vacation this week. Spoke with them today via Google Hangouts and the first thing they told me was that they were on WiFi because Sprint’s coverage/speeds were terrible (They have an HTC U11 and Samsung S8+, both fully updated.). Sure enough, I checked out the Rootmetrics “Fastest Speed Found” Map Layer for the Bethany Beach area and it shows a slew of slow red hexes signifying slow data. The other carriers show much better. Same for the “Best Technology Found” Map Layer. This isn’t a terrain issue. This is a site density and capacity issue. (I helped them report the issue via the My Sprint App) If T-Mobile Roaming can help address this in the event the merger fails, and until Sprint’s Capex catches up, so much the better.

Edited by RedSpark
Sorry for the Duplicate Posts. On mobile and it didn’t seem that my posts were going through.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, derrph said:

I can probably agree with that. Sprint needs work in many cities. Which is what they are doing now but as a fallback in the case the merger falls through but to for better prep for 5G. This is really their chance to shine. 

If Sprint had more cash, I am sure they would be deploying 5G ready B41 equipment instead of 8T8Rs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint's lack of density is definitely an issue which I encounter now and then.  However, I do find Sprint's site distribution to generally be good.  Rarely do you see two sites practically on top of each other, unless one is a Clear site that was left in place.  With T-Mobile, and with AT&T for that matter, I sometimes see deployments on adjacent towers, and then areas not far away that have poor service because they're not on a nearby tower.  T-Mobile has been fixing some of those areas lately, and I do agree that using T-Mobile as the "base" network makes sense in most cases (Shentel region not included in that).  They've been adding sites around me and it makes their network the one to beat.

I also find that in places where Sprint has bothered to serve a more rural area, they do an equal or better job of it as compared to T-Mobile.  Just look at Fauquier County southeast of VA-28, as an example. 

- Trip

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have some family that went out to Bethany Beach, Delaware for vacation this week. Spoke with them today via Google Hangouts and the first thing they told me was that they were on WiFi because Sprint’s coverage/speeds were terrible (They have an HTC U11 and Samsung S8+, both fully updated.). Sure enough, I checked out the Rootmetrics “Fastest Speed Found” Map Layer for the Bethany Beach area and it shows a slew of slow red hexes signifying slow data. The other carriers show much better. Same for the “Best Technology Found” Map Layer. This isn’t a terrain issue. This is a site density and capacity issue. (I helped them report the issue via the My Sprint App) If T-Mobile Roaming can help address this in the event the merger fails, and until Sprint’s Capex catches up, so much the better.

I can definitely agree with you on this one. When I had boost mobile last year sprints coverage was improved without but it wasn’t much of an improvement. Just hope it got better. The Delaware market could use massive improvements...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dkyeager said:

If Sprint had more cash, I am sure they would be deploying 5G ready B41 equipment instead of 8T8Rs.

I thought in the starter 5G cities they were deploying 5G ready equipment?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint often poorly covers nearby rural towns or rest areas (Shentel does a much better job with this).  These rural areas are likely where much of the site reductions will be made because you can not afford too many sites given lower subscriber density.  This will also work the other way in terms of expansion.  Twice as many users will make a site viable.

The urban areas will have site reductions just given the bulk of the sites are located there.  Co-sites will likely be consolidated on one rack if possible and re-aimed.  Same with the other retained sites.  Small cells for coverage will need to be moved, possibly true for those providing better indoor coverage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, derrph said:

I thought in the starter 5G cities they were deploying 5G ready equipment?

So far we have found a grand total of one Massive MIMO iirc.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, dkyeager said:

So far we have found a grand total of one Massive MIMO iirc.

 

No lies detected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's no way of telling if we've connected to one though since they're pretty much indistinguishable from other sites in the debug menu of our phones and on SignalCheck. So while we've only spotted one (thanks to a photo of it from Sprint), there may be many others around. It also doesn't help that the NYC market is made up of 1,000+ macros.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the merger doesn't go through, I think it would be interesting to see Sprint and T-Mobile work on a network sharing agreement, or a collaborative build-out WITHOUT having to merge completely. Bell and Telus did it in Canada when they did their 3G build-out and were abandoning CDMA, and it's not uncommon with carriers in different parts of the world. 

  • Like 2
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Thomas L. said:

If the merger doesn't go through, I think it would be interesting to see Sprint and T-Mobile work on a network sharing agreement, or a collaborative build-out WITHOUT having to merge completely. Bell and Telus did it in Canada when they did their 3G build-out and were abandoning CDMA, and it's not uncommon with carriers in different parts of the world. 

This honestly is my dream scenario. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the merger doesn't go through, I think it would be interesting to see Sprint and T-Mobile work on a network sharing agreement, or a collaborative build-out WITHOUT having to merge completely. Bell and Telus did it in Canada when they did their 3G build-out and were abandoning CDMA, and it's not uncommon with carriers in different parts of the world. 

I’m interested to see how this whole thing pans out because there is still sad chance that the merger maybe kiboshed so let’s see what happens if it takes more than a year I wouldn’t be surprised due to the scale of this merger.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Thomas L. said:

If the merger doesn't go through, I think it would be interesting to see Sprint and T-Mobile work on a network sharing agreement, or a collaborative build-out WITHOUT having to merge completely. Bell and Telus did it in Canada when they did their 3G build-out and were abandoning CDMA, and it's not uncommon with carriers in different parts of the world. 

That would be great but I'm not holding my breath.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, BlueAngel said:

That would be great but I'm not holding my breath.

Neither am I, but since they insist that they can't compete successfully apart, if the merger isn't approved then it would seem to me that would be their only option if they want to survive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Thomas L. said:

If the merger doesn't go through, I think it would be interesting to see Sprint and T-Mobile work on a network sharing agreement, or a collaborative build-out WITHOUT having to merge completely. Bell and Telus did it in Canada when they did their 3G build-out and were abandoning CDMA, and it's not uncommon with carriers in different parts of the world. 

That’ll be awesome. Then at that point, they’ll need to compete on price or the things that come included with your plan outside of talk, text and data. 

Also why is it that T-Mobile is the only carrier who hasn’t announced their initial 5G markets? They said they’ll have 30 in first half of 2019 but there’s no list provided. It’s just kinda odd only because they’re always vocal about things. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That’ll be awesome. Then at that point, they’ll need to compete on price or the things that come included with your plan outside of talk, text and data. 
Also why is it that T-Mobile is the only carrier who hasn’t announced their initial 5G markets? They said they’ll have 30 in first half of 2019 but there’s no list provided. It’s just kinda odd only because they’re always vocal about things. 
I think the roaming aggremeent will be enough for now.. even offering roaming within city limits is a big deal imo and it looks like it will be treated as native coverage which will improve customer experience.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neither am I, but since they insist that they can't compete successfully apart, if the merger isn't approved then it would seem to me that would be their only option if they want to survive.

This is just sprint adding more fuel to the merger review.. I'm sure Sprint could continue to become a better business and continue they have this whole time

 

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.fiercewireless.com/wireless/fcc-denies-motion-to-stop-clock-t-mobile-sprint-deal

The FCC has denied a request to stop the clock or extend the pleading cycle associated with the proposed T-Mobile/Sprint combination.

Denial: https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-18-870A1.pdf

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can somebody take Charlie Ergen out the back and give him a good beating??

https://www.yahoo.com/gma/maria-butina-romance-heart-alleged-russian-influence-operation-120907120--abc-news-topstories.html

He's been a thorn on Sprint's side forever! Does he not realize that the elimination of Sprint's network will allow him to buy certain network elements at fire sale prices, plus get great rents from site owners eager to replace Sprint?

I can understand the other actors objecting to the merger. I am sure that they will be some concessions such as MVNO protections, maybe leaving CDMA up for a while longer for CDMA roaming for CSpire, but man Dish and Ergen just irritate me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, bigsnake49 said:

Can somebody take Charlie Ergen out the back and give him a good beating??

https://www.yahoo.com/gma/maria-butina-romance-heart-alleged-russian-influence-operation-120907120--abc-news-topstories.html

He's been a thorn on Sprint's side forever! Does he not realize that the elimination of Sprint's network will allow him to buy certain network elements at fire sale prices, plus get great rents from site owners eager to replace Sprint?

I can understand the other actors objecting to the merger. I am sure that they will be some concessions such as MVNO protections, maybe leaving CDMA up for a while longer for CDMA roaming for CSpire, but man Dish and Ergen just irritate me.

Looking for the connection to Charlie and this article, perhaps a . . . Russian connection?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Today I was driving over in Bothell/Kenmore area. I noticed the site which used to host Sprint eNB 745953 (where Waynita Way NE turns into 100th Ave NE) before it was fully decommissioned last year is now hosting all new T-Mobile gear. The gear isn't live yet but is fully installed. My guess is they plan to decommission the T-Mobile B2/B66 (enB 84647) only site a few blocks up the hill. This is a great move because decommissioning that old site would reduce interference with eNB 84740/175124. At the same time, the new location should notably improve coverage in the geographically shielded area along Waynita/100th.  The weird thing is I can't find a permit for this anywhere!
    • Mint and Ultra: Welcome to the T-Mobile Family! https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-closes-acquisition-mint-and-ultra-mobile
    • https://www.t-mobile.com/2023-annual-report Most items s4gru members will be aware of, but an interesting read.
    • I've now seen 100 MHz n77 from SoftBank and 100 MHz n78 from NTT. NTT seems to be a bit better south of Osaka, though in some cases it drops down to B19 LTE as some areas around here are pretty rural. SoftBank has n77 around, but it's flakey enough that I switched eSIMs earlier this morning.
    • I'm currently typing this from a bullet train headed from Tokyo to Osaka. Using a roaming eSIM rather than T-Mobile as it's a lot cheaper, but I'll start with T-Mobile's roaming experience. Since I have a business line, I can't add data packs online, so I'm just using the 256 kbps baseline service you get by default. That service runs on Softank 4G. SoftBank has a well-built-out LTE network though, with plenty of B41, falling back to B1/3/8 as needed. 5G roaming from T-Mobile doesn't appear to exist though. I've seen 20+10 MHz B41 when I've looked, generally speaking. WiFi calling works well, and voice calls over LTE work fine too (I forgot to turn WiFi back on after doing some testing, so I expect my bill to be a dollar more next month). I want to say I even got HD voice over the cell network for the VoLTE call I did. I have a bunch of eSIMs and a couple of physical SIMs to try out. I've gotten the eSIMs up and running, but last I checked the physical SIM wasn't working even after activation so I'll run through eSIMs for the moment and update this thread with pSIM info and details on not-Tokyo in the coming days. First off, there's US Mobile's complimentary East Asia eSIM (5GB) that I grabbed before my unlimited plan Stateside expired. That SIM uses SIM Club, routing through Singapore, running on SoftBank LTE and 5G. I've seen 40 MHz n77, as well as 10x10 n28, and have seen download speeds in excess of 200 Mbps with uploads of more than 50 Mbps, though typical speeds are slower. Routing is via Equinix/Packet.net. 5G coverage is rather spotty, but LTE is plenty fast enough; either my phone doesn't want to use the 5G band combos that have more coverage or 5G coverage is just spottier here than in the US (at least on T-Mibile). Latency is as low as 95ms to sites in Singapore (usually closer to 120ms), which is pretty great considering the 3300 mi between Tokyo and Singapore. Next there's Ubigi. It also routes through Singapore via Transatel (despite being owned by NTT), and sites on top of NTT docomo's network. I didn't see NTT 5G in Tokyo when I tested it, but since then I've seen 10x10 n28, and have seen B1/B3/B19 on the LTE side. So far it's not the fastest thing out there, but I'm guessing coverage will be a little better...or maybe not. This was $17 for 10GB. Latency is a bit higher to Singapore, but still under 150ms it seems. Then there's Airalo, which was the cheapest when I bought it at $9 for 10GB. It also routes through Singapore (on Singtel), but on my S24 I have my pick of KDDI (au) or SoftBank. KDDI has extensive B41 coverage and I've seen 20+20 with UL CA. While waiting for the train at HND Terminal 3 (Keikyu line) I hit 250+ Mbps down and 10+ Mbps up...over LTE...with pretty respectable latency numbers (not much above 100ms). This is in adition to supporting SoftBank, also on LTE (my S24 defaulted to KDDI, while my wife's Pixel 8 defaulted to SoftBank and didn't seem to want to connect to KDDI). Of the various carriers mentioned, I'd say this was the best pick, though prices have bumped back up to $18 for the 10GB plan...but it's probably still what I'd pick if I had to pick just one carrier. Then there's Saily, which uses Truphone out of Hong Kong. I haven't used this as much, as I only grabbed 3GB for $7. It runs on NTT but doesn't seem to have 5G access and doesn't seem to have as good speeds. Yes, Hong Kong is way closer to Japan, but latency didn't seem to be any better, at ~150ms. In all cases, I've had reception even in train tunnels and even at high speed on the bullet train, on all three carriers I've tried (I don't think I'll be able to play with a Rakuten SIM, which is rather disappointing). There have been cases where service has degraded, but it looks like you'd have reasonable cell service no matter which of the big three carriers you picked...and since T-Mobile roams on one of them, that's good enough if you're content to buy day passes.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...