Jump to content

Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread


Recommended Posts

20 hours ago, Cardsfan96 said:

If your talking about tna then you can have that applied on a sprint sim. You said you moved over the other devices to tna via esim which you don’t have to have esim. TNX is switching SIM cards from a sprint to a T-Mobile sim. Tna is applied to your line when on a sprint sim.

Well, the guy moved my (3) Pixel 4's over to TNA over the phone in a matter of a couple minutes. Those 3 have eSim.

My other 3 devices are not eSim, (2) Pixel 2 XL and 1 S8. He said he is mailing 3 sims for those 3 devices???????

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 8.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

And what will this all mean for S4GRU?  We are in a wait and see mode before we decide how to adapt.  Until then, we will be here every day with you all, plotting our wireless destiny. Robert

Alright.  There may not be a Sprint anymore, but the same rules apply.  Just incessant complaining about the old Sprint is getting old.  People will start checking out because it just will become a co

And this is the truth that many of us are going to learn.  T-Mobile is not perfect everywhere.  They have some markets where they have some real bad towers here and there.  And there are some entire m

Posted Images

13 minutes ago, though said:

Well, the guy moved my (3) Pixel 4's over to TNA over the phone in a matter of a couple minutes. Those 3 have eSim.

My other 3 devices are not eSim, (2) Pixel 2 XL and 1 S8. He said he is mailing 3 sims for those 3 devices???????

Well if they show up and are T-Mobile sims then your doing TNX not tna.

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Cardsfan96 said:

Well if they show up and are T-Mobile sims then your doing TNX not tna.

Ok I won't do anything with them if they are T-Mob sims! Thanks for the heads up.

Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Paynefanbro said:

It's dependent on which operator you're roaming on but the main culprit seems to be U.S. Cellular who has implemented some sort of whitelisting to allow devices to roam onto their network. Their whitelist made it so that all iPhones and T-Mobile branded Android phones were able to roam on their network. Unlocked Android phones do not roam on U.S. Cellular at all.

When I drove down to North Carolina last summer, I had zero signal on my unlocked S20 Ultra in what should have been a strong U.S. Cellular region. 

Thanks that explains quite a bit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Trip said:

All I can think while reading all of this is how very user-hostile it all is.  They had two years to plan for the integration and this trainwreck is the result?

- Trip

Well after chatting with a sprint rep (someone who had been with them a LONG time, and knew his stuff) 

Its still very jumbled, was MY take..

So my business was on a shared plan (10 or so lines) I couldn't TNX because of it, TNA was causing me all sorts of issues. So I asked to be put back on the sprint side (I have s20s, 2 ultra, 1 plus, 1 regular)  That have all had some type of issue with call coverage.

So we did 2 things, he moved me over (more on that in a min) and changed my plan for about $5 more ALL lines will be unlimited and more hotspot data.  And I gathered better phone pricing/deals???  Takes effect next billing cycle, and its NOT on any website, but is in their system, since like Nov/Dec..  Hopefully it doesnt bite me.. BUT I can choose to switch to TNX once it takes effect... soooooo we shall see.

Ok the sprint move.....SOOOOOO its kind of tricky.. It didn't really move me over.  I went out later that day and ran SCP.. So the voice was back to 1x800, but 90% of data stayed TMO, unless I was within a few hundred feet of a known sprint tower then it did 1 of 2 things.. Sprint band 26, OR TMO band 41, which we know what that is.. But it still most of the time was band 2 or 12. on occasion 66... But my band 2 speeds in this case were 100% better than when on TNA (2 was ALWAYS giving me crap, and locking up with garbage speeds)   The one thing I NEVER saw band 25.  I am guessing they are taking the bandwidth of 25 and moving it to 2??

Needless to say its not really sprint, except the cdma part and using 1x800..  So obviously they are doing something out here..

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well ok, as I was typing i was on band 12.. and now a few minutes later.. I am on band 25... Thats funny right there, switches inside the 5 mins I was talking about it

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/3/2021 at 10:58 PM, mdob07 said:

Looks like T-Mobile is still evaluating Sprint sites to keep, a site I pass everyday just started broadcasting the 312-250 PLMN this week. 

And on the flip side, T-Mobile has upgraded their site in Mt Washington KY and now the Sprint site in town is no longer broadcasting the 312-250 PMLN. That was the first 312-250 site I found several months ago.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, jreuschl said:

 

One big issue with TNX.. International data still broke

 

I wonder if you have one line already switched to a R15 Sim and still had a International Plan Attached to the phone before switching the sim if it still acts this way or not. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, floorguy said:

So we did 2 things, he moved me over (more on that in a min) and changed my plan for about $5 more ALL lines will be unlimited and more hotspot data.  And I gathered better phone pricing/deals???  Takes effect next billing cycle, and its NOT on any website, but is in their system, since like Nov/Dec..  Hopefully it doesnt bite me.. BUT I can choose to switch to TNX once it takes effect... soooooo we shall see.

Let me know what plan name you get moved to. I'm on the Plus Subsidy business plan, which isn't TNX-eligible, and when I called in I was only given Basic/Essentials/Plus/Premium for $60/60/70/80 as options, all of which are either significantly more expensive or significantly inferior to my $55/mo plan.

Between keep sites and T-Mobile's native network I'm comfortable enough hopping over to TNX to get SA and NR CA, but it's not worth me spending $15/mo extra to make the switch.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apparently ROAMAHOME is no more for new LTE-only device swaps; MOCN is the new hotness: 

MOCN looks to be an upgrade, as ROAMAHOME only allows seamless bouncing between both networks for keep sites; for everything else you have to lose signal first (or force band selection). With MOCN there's a band priority list that doesn't put all Sprint bands at the bottom. This *sounds* equivalent to making every Sprint site a keep site, though from the Reddit post B66 will get priority over B41 LTE (fine except in areas that have B41 CA on either carrier), and B66 will get priority over B2 (which is annoying here as B2 is 5 MHz wider unless you're doing non-contiguous CA).

ROAMAHOME is still in effect for 5G devices apparently, which tells me that keep sites are slightly better integrated than the rest of Sprint's sites, as keep sites don't serve as anchors for NR either way. They probably *could* be, but it would require hosting spectrum entirely within PCS A-F and MFBI'ing that spectrum to B2...so probably not worth the effort.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

TNX has been fantastic for me, in central Ohio.  I can confirm that it will seamlessly switch between 310260 native T-Mobile towers, and 312250 "Sprint Keep" towers, without me doing anything.  I see it daily on my drive to work, AND at home. This has been a relatively recent change.

Something has change recently, however. Before, I was able to connect to my Magic Box, 311490 PLMN, then it would either hang on to that PLMN, or switch back to native T-Mobile, 310260. Now my home site is using the "Keep" PLMN, 312250 and the phone will not connect to the magic box.  Other device will, such as my iPad.

Something else of note, my native Sprint line (no ROAMAHOME or MOCN) will roam seamlessly on 312250 on T-Mobile sites if I band lock to B2, B66, B12.  

There's a lot going on with the back end to integrate the networks without even doing anything on our devices. Also, what is working a certain way today may work differently tomorrow!  
 

One other thing of note: I have been noticing a HUGE speed increase with NSA n71, with B66 as the anchor band, and B2, B71 CA.  I have been hitting over 300 Mb/s.  Again, Columbus, Ohio market

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, 1dante said:

Can MOCN be applied to my account even if I’m on TNX?

No (as posted) but equivalent functionality is expected to be added to TNX as well in due course, according to another post by Chris Price.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I remember the lte rollout with Sprint.  It was rough for many people.  We were all tracking cell site upgrades and reporting issues all over the place.  It was great and wonderful and awful and frustrating.

 

Everyday, someone was threatening to change carriers.  I am glad I stayed.  I only changed to Tmobile in the last couple of years when I relocated to an area where Sprint was weaker and I couldn't get a good signal indoors.

 

I am really glad to read these posts where people are overcoming the rough patches while the new Tmobile is rolled out.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, IrwinshereAgain said:

I remember the lte rollout with Sprint.  It was rough for many people.  We were all tracking cell site upgrades and reporting issues all over the place.  It was great and wonderful and awful and frustrating.

 

Everyday, someone was threatening to change carriers.  I am glad I stayed.  I only changed to Tmobile in the last couple of years when I relocated to an area where Sprint was weaker and I couldn't get a good signal indoors.

 

I am really glad to read these posts where people are overcoming the rough patches while the new Tmobile is rolled out.

Oh I KNOW in the end it will be THEE network.. Way to much bandwidth, to not be..

But this is getting stupid on the backside of things. Calling in to talk to an actual person is an adventure (more so if you are a biz customer and use to your own single point of contact)   I have been having service issues On TMO equipment, but because I am a sprint customer, I have to talk to those reps, who cant really do a whole lot for me, and jerk me around (it really sucks, when you know as much or more than the CSR on the phone) 

Sprints billing/website has ALWAYS been stupid.. and it still is.. I look forward to the day TMO is running it...

But yes, in the end My guess 2 years I hope.. MOST wrinkles should be gone

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, iansltx said:

Let me know what plan name you get moved to. I'm on the Plus Subsidy business plan, which isn't TNX-eligible, and when I called in I was only given Basic/Essentials/Plus/Premium for $60/60/70/80 as options, all of which are either significantly more expensive or significantly inferior to my $55/mo plan.

Between keep sites and T-Mobile's native network I'm comfortable enough hopping over to TNX to get SA and NR CA, but it's not worth me spending $15/mo extra to make the switch.

how many lines do you have??

I am at 10. He said when it hits 13, it drops (odd I know) 

Right now we are on the 60gb  shared for $235, then $10 each line "access"  with roll over each month up to 120, we use roughly 40 each month so we have plenty.  But I guess we got squat for any type of phone deals, unless I played the game of adding lines etc.. (which caught me in the ass this last time)  And now we should get the 2 yr contract on deal, or something like that.. I have a few weeks until we are in the new billing cycle

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, floorguy said:

how many lines do you have??

Single line. So my guess is that the cost of the shared data pool would be excessive for me (and it would be nice not to guess at usage as it varies for me month to month).

Link to post
Share on other sites

i was on tnx for a very short time because i couldnt handle the streaming. in the future, 5g sa will be widespread but for now nsa is good enough for me... i did love 5g sa when on tnx but my problem is that video streaming is capped.

my streaming on my ed1500 is uncapped.
i have youtube tv and when i need to watch it on the go, it just sucks on tnx. unusable.

i went back on my sprint sim that has 312530 as hplmn.
i didnt see any 312250 whenever i checked the servicemode. when i force b41. it uses the 312530.
tmobile sites come up as 310260.

whats the experiences on multocn and mocn so far, esp streaming?
 

Edited by sunmybun
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, sunmybun said:

i was on tnx for a very short time because i couldnt handle the streaming. in the future, 5g sa will be widespread but for now nsa is good enough for me... i did love 5g sa when on tnx but my problem is that video streaming is capped.

my streaming on my ed1500 is uncapped.
i have youtube tv and when i need to watch it on the go, it just sucks on tnx. unusable.

i went back on my sprint sim that has 312530 as hplmn.
i didnt see any 312250 whenever i checked the servicemode. when i force b41. it uses the 312530.
tmobile sites come up as 310260.

whats the experiences on multocn and mocn so far, esp streaming?
 

Same thing I am weighing in my mind. I’m on the same everything data plan. First off it’s bs that they are throttling our video once tnx’d. This needs to be fought. Once TNX is mandatory I will be fighting it. 
 

If that goes no where I will likely eventually TNX and use a vpn to avoid the throttle. The plan feature to cost just isn’t comparable currently. Even paying for a vpn would be cheaper to stay on everything data.

  • Love 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, Cardsfan96 said:

Same thing I am weighing in my mind. I’m on the same everything data plan. First off it’s bs that they are throttling our video once tnx’d. This needs to be fought. Once TNX is mandatory I will be fighting it. 
 

If that goes no where I will likely eventually TNX and use a vpn to avoid the throttle. The plan feature to cost just isn’t comparable currently. Even paying for a vpn would be cheaper to stay on everything data.

yea its bs. ive escalated a ticket about the tnx and our plan. it wont go anywhere but its need to be done. i rather have no throttling than xxGB of hotspot, also.

i havent tried the vpn. does it work well? and hows the latency?

Edited by sunmybun
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, iansltx said:

Single line. So my guess is that the cost of the shared data pool would be excessive for me (and it would be nice not to guess at usage as it varies for me month to month).

Yea I am switching from the shared data pool to unlimited for all...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Are there ground mounted radios? There are 8 jumpers to the Commscope antenna, so 4xLowband/4xMidband should be deployed or coming soon...
    • So I wonder if this Sprint keep site conversion is the same setup just with different antenna. There's only 1 Nokia radio, so its either 600/700 only or 1900/2100 only + 2500. It wouldn't make sense to be 600/700 with 2500 without SA N41 because it would only be able to do B41 LTE without 1900/2100 to serve as anchor for NSA N41. The Sprint B25 radio was retained and is connected to the antenna and is currently the only technology broadcasting. This is also a very dense area for T-Mobile. 
    • It kinda just blows my mind that it's been almost a year and a half since start of auction and there still isn't a band designation. Why spend almost a billion dollars (T-Mobile's $873 million plus Sprint's $114 million) if you can't even get around to working something like that out with the 3GPP? I pray there's something going on behind the scenes, but I'm not too hopeful seeing as the only other owner of the band is DISH, haha.    I'd be shocked if T-Mobile doesn't keep a strong mmWave presence in lower/mid-Manhattan and downtown Brooklyn with their 5G small-cell rollout. That's key use case. But I agree, it'll definitely be interesting to see what they do outside of that area. You gotta imagine that Verizon played a pretty big part in how the nodes were designed, and Verizon typically loads their small cells up with every mid/high-band tech they've got. So it shouldn't be a matter of if the nodes support the tech, just if T-Mobile deploys the radios. IMO, T-Mobile's mmWave strategy (for both macros and small cells) kinda comes down to if T-Mobile is open to exploring the possibility of mmWave-based Home Internet in NYC.   I really hope they do keep them. Even if they aren't immediately upgraded to 5G, they'd be a big benefit for the network in general. Plus, fiber is already run, permits are already signed, sites are already built. Hopefully the neutral-nature of the nodes makes conversion easy.  I haven't spotted any nodes broadcasting the keep PLMN, but I'm not all that surprised about that.   Agreed. There are one or two redditors (who shall not be named) who love to spread questionable info, especially when it comes to NYC. Every carrier has Manhattan blanketed with mmWave! You can get FIOS at any address! T-Mobile has mmWave on every site and it's fast! T-Mobile has the densest small-cell network! Every site has 5gb/s backhaul (or if it doesn't, it's "just about to be upgraded")! It's really weird. Subreddit used to be so much better before it blew up and a handful of great contributors left.
    • My best guess is that it's a combination of the correct equipment not being available to support all of T-Mobile's mmWave bands and n41 taking precedence over mmWave deployment nationwide. It'll be interesting to see whether T-Mobile decides to make mmWave a citywide thing like Verizon (that they'll aggregate with n41 for gigabit speeds in more places) or if they'll just deploy it in stadiums, airports, and convention centers.  When T-Mobile acquired Metro, they retained pretty much all of their DAS sites. If they retain all of Sprint's small cells, they'd have a small cell network easily rivaling Verizon and could have an extremely dense mmWave/LAA/CBRS footprint to compliment their already dense (in most places) macro network. Someone recently made a post about how T-Mobile's tests in C-band were interfering with a local satellite TV operator so it seems like T-Mobile definitely has some interest in getting C-band deployed sooner than later, even if they won't be able to use the spectrum just yet. But like you said, it'll probably be another year or so before we start seeing deployments of that. I completely missed that thread but reading over it, so many people are very confused about the mmWave situation in NYC and T-Mobile's network here as a whole. It's pretty sad how people completely disregarded OP immediately.
    • Interestingly enough, today I came across a site in Seattle where they did the same thing. Previously, Commscope FFHH-65B-R3 panels were live with quadband; now there's only 1900/2100/2500. My knee jerk reaction is that I don't like this deployment. It makes optimizing handoffs sloppy and complicated. I  shot an email to the Seattle network team asking what the logic is - let's see what they say. 
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...