Jump to content

Sprint VoLTE Discussion Thread Redux


Recommended Posts

Is there a reason for this? Are Essential Phones not VoLTE capable?

It needs the sprint volte profile to be loaded onto the device. Forcing VoLTE breaks the calling function unfortunately.

 

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, lilotimz said:

The essential phones does not use VoLTE. It's calling plus with no QOS.

 

This was verified by a help enthusiast who downloaded and used NSG.

 

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

 

 

 

 

Tim,

Do you know if the Moto X4 will get VoLTE?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

VOLTE is working in So-Cal right now on Pixel 3 XL. It is not rootede51dd8672b06c683a51e6029624b4000.jpg

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk


Guess more testing is needed... Any updates recently?

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, maxx880 said:

VOLTE is working in So-Cal right now on Pixel 3 XL. It is not rooted

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk
 

Wonder if its VOLTE or calling plus like the Essential phone that also started working recently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wonder if its VOLTE or calling plus like the Essential phone that also started working recently.
My guess is VoLTE, since the Pixel has the correct profile for it. I'm finishing up a write-up on VoLTE vs Calling+ and the differences, including NSG screenshots to explain. But there's no way to really know for sure without NSG or connecting it to a computer running diagnostic software that can read modem engineering info.

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

when viewing the IMS status from the Phone Info menu, and it shows IMS Registration: Registered and then Voice Over LTE: Available, will it show available even for just calling plus?
https://imgur.com/a/jPQrNkH#yyfuCJY
I'm not sure, but maybe. Calling+ is sort of like a hack because Sprint didn't have the LTE layer ready yet. Calling+ is essentially wifi calling over LTE.

What you're seeing is probably an artifact of them repurposing the existing VoLTE interface in Android. They essentially removed the part that sets up a dedicated LTE interface for it. I can say with certainty though that as of the March update, the Essential phone is using Calling+ and not VoLTE.

Whenever Robert approves my write up it should help clear things up.

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Made a call earlier this afternoon and noticed the ringing sounded a bit different. Checked and the call was running VoLTE on my PH-1. Confirmed this with another call or two shortly thereafter. Double-confirmed since I was getting notifications in the background while on the call with WiFi turned off. Call was to someone roaming on VZW so I can't yet say whether HD voice can kick in.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just called the echo line at 925-259-0082 and the call went over LTE and sounded markedly clearer than a standard call. Switched to VoWiFi and quality was similar there. Latency was comparable across both connections...maybe slightly better on LTE...which is impressive given that I can hit Sprint's speedtest server in <20ms from here on the connection that's providing WiFi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Made a call earlier this afternoon and noticed the ringing sounded a bit different. Checked and the call was running VoLTE on my PH-1. Confirmed this with another call or two shortly thereafter. Double-confirmed since I was getting notifications in the background while on the call with WiFi turned off. Call was to someone roaming on VZW so I can't yet say whether HD voice can kick in.
Eph1 uses calling plus which uses the same codecs as Volte (amr/amr-wb 12.65/23.85).



Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, lilotimz said:

Eph1 uses calling plus which uses the same codecs as Volte (amr/amr-wb 12.65/23.85).



Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk
 

I don't have any Calling+ branding on this phone, and this just went live today...or within the past few days. Silly question, but which apps do I need to confirm, and do they need root?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, iansltx said:

Just called the echo line at 925-259-0082 and the call went over LTE and sounded markedly clearer than a standard call. Switched to VoWiFi and quality was similar there. Latency was comparable across both connections...maybe slightly better on LTE...which is impressive given that I can hit Sprint's speedtest server in <20ms from here on the connection that's providing WiFi.

What's an echo line? Sorry if I should know but I do not.  Thanks in advance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have any Calling+ branding on this phone, and this just went live today...or within the past few days. Silly question, but which apps do I need to confirm, and do they need root?
Root + NSG as it'll show you information from the modem info.

This was verified using that and the official internal Volte supported device list.

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably old news as well, but I did see an LTE -> WiFi handoff for a call I was on earlier this evening.

EDIT: Apologies to folks on this thread for lack of reading-the-previous-posts-comprehension and combativeness about "I swear this is VoLTE".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, iansltx said:

I don't have any Calling+ branding on this phone, and this just went live today...or within the past few days. Silly question, but which apps do I need to confirm, and do they need root?

this calling behavior went live on the essential phone a few weeks back, there are prior posts about it which sounds like you have found at this point.  However, starting about a week and a half ago, my essential no longer has this available so i am not sure if they disabled it for my area or what.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, JonnygATL said:

...and to what end?? It begs the question. I'm assuming to evaluate the quality of one's connection?

Your assumption is correct. That particular line supports HD voice, which is why I went with it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I figured out there is a way to check if a phone is using Calling+ or VoLTE without root. If engineering (not SCP) reports the PLMN as 310120, then it is not VoLTE. VoLTE only runs on 312530.

That being said, a phone can be on 312530 but not use VoLTE (Pixel 2 for example). So being on 312530 is not sufficient to say that it is using VoLTE, but being on 310120 IS sufficient to rule out VoLTE being used.

As for the "flag" Sprint uses to enable/disable it on supported devices, I suspect that they use the TAC. I think there is a hardcoded whitelist of TACs where it will be enabled. So they can change the TACs for a market to "enable" it, but by default it's "disabled". If this is the case, then Magic Box TACs are simply not whitelisted yet, even though it works fine on them. I've verified that VoLTE works on a Magic Box with at least the 440a firmware, and possibly earlier versions as well.

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there a way to force the device to use a different PLMN? Maybe via chameleon (like on Samsung devices via ##omadm...need the engineering password though) or some other method?
000000 works for the msl password on the omadm menu. I was to afraid to change my S9 from Sprint Production though as i am unfamiliar with that menu.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • S23 and S24 (at least ultra versions) have 4xCA NR. I currently have n41+n41+n25+n71 most places I go.  I think select devices have 2xCA upload but I do not think it is in widespread use yet. CA is still mostly download focused.
    • If they use n41 + n41 2CA, people that are somewhat distant from the cell site will have an OK download but the upload will be a disaster.  Upload capability on b-41 was always a disaster on the old Sprint Network.   Now, with n25 + n41 combination, even the more distant users have a more decent upload.  I see n41 + n41 + n25 now with my S22 and I understand that we will see 4xCA with newer phones in the future.     I also see n41 + n41 + n71 sometimes too. Also some other combinations of 25, 41, 71.  I would think that eventually we will see AWS paired with n41 too.  What I am not sure of is ----  when I see 3xCA on my S22, I can see the 3 channels involved in the download but I am never sure just what I have on the upload. I do not think I have 3xCA on the upload.
    • I don't know enough about the nuts and bolts of NR to know the answer, but is there a reason they're not doing two overlapping 100 MHz n41 carriers and using selective resource shutoff to make each one 97 MHz?  Thus making use of the full 194 MHz instead of leaving 4 MHz unused as implied by the current standard 100+90 configuration? - Trip
    • Looks like another T-Mobile 5G bump happened over the past week and a half, maybe less: n41 carriers are now 90+100 MHz, up from 80+100 (which in turn is up from 40+100 back in early March). This is on top of the new n25 carrier recently. As part of this, it looks like T-Mobile is starting to prefer n25+n41 2CA even when pushing data, rather than having higher levels of CA that would hit higher peak speeds; at least indoors I need to force n41-only if I want to see the full 190 MHz there. To be fair the speeds are plenty quick with that amount of spectrum, and I'm sure they're load balancing, and my guess is this is a little better for battery life? With this expansion, they're now at 10x10+10x10 n25, 15x15 n71, 100+90 n41, for a total of 260 MHz (including FD uplink) of deployed NR here, up from 250 MHz a week ago, 230 MHz two weeks ago, and 190 MHz six months ago. VZW is at 140 MHz minus mmW, 170 if you count n2 DSS. AT&T is at 150 MHz (80+40 n77, 15x15 n5), 210 MHz I think if you count n2 and n66 DSS (guessing they're still running those). With this level of spectrum they should be able to continue offering home internet wherever. Guessing this is the last upgrade they can make before they need to throw new equipment on sites for C-Band. At this rate I figure that'll happen next year on a few dozen high-traffic sites.
    • https://www.lightreading.com/wireless/tds-telecom-to-launch-mobile-service-via-nctc-s-mvno Surprising given merger.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...