Jump to content

Google Nexus 5X by LG (codename "Bullhead")


PythonFanPA

Recommended Posts

Updates about international bands and SIM card now added to The Wall article:

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/blog/1/entry-398-updated-teaser-is-s4gru-5x-certain-that-this-is-the-new-nexus-5x/

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

damnit i dont know what to do.

 

I love the nexus 5 and i have never held onto a phone as long as I have the nexus 5.

 

normally i would wait until a bunch of you have the phones from the pre-order so i could make a good decision versus the 5 and 6 but i have a feeling it will be out of stock for quite awhile and i will have to play the refresh game through the holidays to hopefully get one.

 

i dont care about camera.  i care more about radio performance. judging by the posts on the wall, the 5 wins over the 6 in that department?  how does the 5X stack up to the 5 radio specs wise?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

damnit i dont know what to do.

 

I love the nexus 5 and i have never held onto a phone as long as I have the nexus 5.

 

normally i would wait until a bunch of you have the phones from the pre-order so i could make a good decision versus the 5 and 6 but i have a feeling it will be out of stock for quite awhile and i will have to play the refresh game through the holidays to hopefully get one.

 

i dont care about camera. i care more about radio performance. judging by the posts on the wall, the 5 wins over the 6 in that department? how does the 5X stack up to the 5 radio specs wise?

Based on The Wall articles

The 5X radio performance

B25: 25 dB

B26: 23 dB

B41: 19 dB

 

The 6P radio performance

B25: 22 dB

B26: 19 dB

B41: 22 dB

 

I guess it just depends on which LTE band you value most. In my situation I think B41 performance is more important because that band provides the best speeds and B26 is non existent currently in So Cal so it doesn't matter to me. In terms of B25, I am hoping real world performance doesn't make too much of a difference between the 2 phones.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As an update for anyone that missed it: The 5x does not have dual speakers. One is for the microphones. It also does not have a notification LED if that is important to you.

 

What about the 6P?  I believe it has dual speakers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on The Wall articles

The 5X radio performance

B25: 25 dB

B26: 23 dB

B41: 19 dB

 

The 6P radio performance

B25: 22 dB

B26: 19 dB

B41: 22 dB

 

I guess it just depends on which LTE band you value most.

 

well, thats the other part of the problem...i dont understand the use of those numbers in the wall article.  i gather the higher the number the better in this instance but beyond that i do not understand the context they are used.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well, thats the other part of the problem...i dont understand the use of those numbers in the wall article.  i gather the higher the number the better in this instance but beyond that i do not understand the context they are used.

Both will work great. Higher B25 and B26 performance means the 5x might pick up building penetrating LTE (850 mhz and 1900 mhz) better but the higher B41 performance of the 6P means it might hold on to the big daddy bandwidth B41 signal longer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well, thats the other part of the problem...i dont understand the use of those numbers in the wall article.  i gather the higher the number the better in this instance but beyond that i do not understand the context they are used.

 

The understanding is that the higher the numbers, the better the RF performance.  Remember that these FCC tests are done in a controlled setting so the articles have a disclaimer saying that it can vary on real world performance.  We do not know what the setting that was used to test this but perhaps digging deeper in the FCC docs can give hints but ehhh I don't really think its worth that effort.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

does anyone have the original 5 radio perf. numbers so i can compare to the 5X?

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/5806-lg-google-nexus-5-users-thread/?p=261894

 

 

 

LG G2: 

  • RF ERP/EIRP maximum: 19.80 dBm (CDMA1X/EV-DO 850), 21.64 dBm (CDMA1X/EV-DO 1900), 23.09-27.08 dBm (LTE 1900), 17.77-21.29 dBm (TD-LTE 2600)

SGS4T: (under SAR evaluation report)

  • RF ERP/EIRP maximum: (CDMA BC10) 24.97 dBm, (CL 850 CDMA/EVDO) 24.89 dBm, (PCS CDMA/EVDO) 24.70 dBm , (B25 LTE 1900) 23.00 dBm , (B26 LTE 800) 24.32 dBm , (B41 LTE 2500) LTE 24.35 dBm. 

Nexus 5 : (SAR Evaluation report) 

  • RF ERP/EIRP maximum: (CL 850 CDMA BC0 1xRTT/EVDO) 24.5 dBm, (PCS BC1 CDMA 1xRTT/EVDO) 24.6 dBm, (eSMR 800 CDMA BC10) 24.5 dBm, (LTE Band 25 PCS) 23.5 dBm, (LTE Band 26 eSMR) 23.7 dBm, (LTE TDD Band 41) 21.5 dBm
  •  
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't seem like Google is going to sell the Nexus phones in stores within the US where you can demo the unit (another reason why only the Play Store only option sucks).  I believe Best Buy usually has a Google dedicated booth which they can showcase their products so hopefully the Nexus 5X and 6P are available for demo there even though you won't be able to buy it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/5806-lg-google-nexus-5-users-thread/?p=261894

 

 

 

LG G2: 

  • RF ERP/EIRP maximum: 19.80 dBm (CDMA1X/EV-DO 850), 21.64 dBm (CDMA1X/EV-DO 1900), 23.09-27.08 dBm (LTE 1900), 17.77-21.29 dBm (TD-LTE 2600)

SGS4T: (under SAR evaluation report)

  • RF ERP/EIRP maximum: (CDMA BC10) 24.97 dBm, (CL 850 CDMA/EVDO) 24.89 dBm, (PCS CDMA/EVDO) 24.70 dBm , (B25 LTE 1900) 23.00 dBm , (B26 LTE 800) 24.32 dBm , (B41 LTE 2500) LTE 24.35 dBm. 

Nexus 5 : (SAR Evaluation report) 

  • RF ERP/EIRP maximum: (CL 850 CDMA BC0 1xRTT/EVDO) 24.5 dBm, (PCS BC1 CDMA 1xRTT/EVDO) 24.6 dBm, (eSMR 800 CDMA BC10) 24.5 dBm, (LTE Band 25 PCS) 23.5 dBm, (LTE Band 26 eSMR) 23.7 dBm, (LTE TDD Band 41) 21.5 dBm
  •  

 

 

Do not rely upon those figures.  They probably are not ERP/EIRP.  They could be, but SAR reports typically reference conducted power, not radiated power.  You have to dig into the RF test results filings to glean ERP/EIRP figures.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5X in carbon ordered. will i be able to use the SIM card out of my Nexus 5 without issue?

 

No, not even close.  See The Wall:

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/blog/1/entry-398-updated-teaser-is-s4gru-5x-certain-that-this-is-the-new-nexus-5x/

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5X in carbon ordered. will i be able to use the SIM card out of my Nexus 5 without issue?

You'd have to cut the SIM card. I cut my AT&T SIM card to nano size to fit my S6E and it worked just fine. I used one of those stapler-type SIM card cutters.

 

Sent from my SM-G925P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You'd have to cut the SIM card. I cut my AT&T SIM card to nano size to fit my S6E and it worked just fine. I used one of those stapler-type SIM card cutters.

 

Sent from my SM-G925P using Tapatalk

 

Sprint uses different sim type models. Cutting it down doesn't matter if the model of the sim card does not work. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just FYI, everyone, S4GRU is thinking of publishing a Sprint SIM card primer article.

 

AJ

  • Like 13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint uses different sim type models. Cutting it down doesn't matter if the model of the sim card does not work.

I see. Didn't know that. Is it the same with Verizon & other CDMA carriers? GSM is so much easier.

 

Sent from my SM-G925P using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see. Didn't know that. Is it the same with Verizon & other CDMA carriers? GSM is so much easier.

 

I think the CSIM versus non-CSIM distinction is pretty much a Sprint thing. My understanding of the UICC standards is that there's no technical reason why they couldn't have the CSIM program on all of Sprint's SIM cards. Maybe they save a few bucks in licensing fees or something by only issuing CSIM-capable cards for phones that need the CSIM application.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • After several months of testing, an update to SignalCheck Pro is rolling out on Google Play. It may take up to 48 hours to become available for download. Notable changes include: Added option to display site notes for NSA 5G-NR cells. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show NSA 5G-NR Site Notes) will cause the app to make an "educated guess" as to what the most appropriate site note is linked to the connected NSA 5G cell, using the PCI and the device location. If it finds an existing entry that is likely to be relevant, it will display the note along with the distance from where the strongest signal from that cell was logged. While connected to NSA 5G, these notes cannot be edited; a valid NCI is required to add/edit notes and that information is not available on NSA connections.   Added option to log cells with missing/invalid PLMN (such as NSA 5G-NR cells). Users asked for the ability to log data for NSA 5G, so a new option (Preferences > Logger Settings > Log Cells with Missing PLMN) will permit this.   Added option to display LTE info above 5G-NR info. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show LTE Cells Above 5G-NR Cells) shows the same information that is currently displayed, but moves the LTE information above the 5G-NR information. Other changes: Code optimizations and enhancements. Improved Android 15 compatibility. Overhauled Purchases module. Resolved force closes impacting some GSM/LTE connections. Resolved issue with improper 5G-NR PLMN display when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with improper PLMN display with single-digit MNCs. Resolved issue with incorrect 5G-NR bands displayed on some devices due to Android bug. Resolved issue with incorrect number of neighbor cells displayed when some cells were unknown. Resolved issue with missing 5G-NR data when sector display is enabled. Resolved issue with saving 5G-NR site notes when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with settings to log missing GCI/NCI/TAC/PLMN being ignored. Resolved issues with web data export function. Updated internal libraries. Updated provider database. Updated target API to Android 15. I appreciate all of your support, and a big thank you to the members of the Beta Crew that help with testing and feedback!
    • Oct security update is out.
    • Stopped by again today and the antennas are up but it isn't live just yet. If other Sprint conversions are anything to go by it'll likely take about a month for the site to go live.
    • It is an Android bug that was reportedly fixed in August 2023 but definitely has not been. I have implemented numerous workarounds in SCP to correct the NR bands the app displays. The OS ignores the possibility that many NR-ARFCNs are valid across multiple bands.. it reports the lowest NR band that is valid for the current ARFCN. In your example, channel 432530 can be n1, n65, or n66.. so the OS just (lazily) reports n1.   Awesome, thanks! I will add an n65 override also.
    • Yeah both of those instances were on my AT&T s22 ultra. Seems ro be working as intended today in latest release.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...