Jump to content

T-Mobile LTE & Network Discussion V2


lilotimz

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...
1 hour ago, Trip said:

Good find Trip. But I will NOT be buying a new 5G handset today and maybe for years, especially on T-Mobile.   MAYBE, just MAYBE, if T-Mobile does team up with Sprint and get enough spectrum to do 5G right,  I may consider 5G.  Not now however.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, chamb said:

Good find Trip. But I will NOT be buying a new 5G handset today and maybe for years, especially on T-Mobile.   MAYBE, just MAYBE, if T-Mobile does team up with Sprint and get enough spectrum to do 5G right,  I may consider 5G.  Not now however.

My own plans are to get an next generation (Mid Feb or later) unlocked 5g phone that I can select any bands else root (likely LG or Moto since not too many folks like to blow away Samsung Pay). 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, dkyeager said:

My own plans are to get an next generation (Mid Feb or later) unlocked 5g phone that I can select any bands else root (likely LG or Moto since not too many folks like to blow away Samsung Pay). 

Maybe you have a NEED for 5G.  I surely do not. Just give me 4G that works well and I am happy.  Right now, I need Sprint to activate 25+41 aggregation. I have plenty of band 41 signals around here but the upload on my S9 just does not work on weaker band 41.

I do not see anybody coming up with an activation date for 25+41 but it is making life horrible without it. HPUE sure was not the answer to band 41 upload issues.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, chamb said:

HPUE sure was not the answer to band 41 upload issues.

Couldn't agree more with you on this.    Way over-hyped, as "old Sprint" used to do a lot.    HPUE didn't even help pull the band 41 signal in more like it was brainwashed into us at the time.   Was to make B41 signal nearly as strong/available as Band 25.    ... Never in my experiences!  

Edited by dro1984
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, chamb said:

Maybe you have a NEED for 5G.  I surely do not. Just give me 4G that works well and I am happy.  Right now, I need Sprint to activate 25+41 aggregation. I have plenty of band 41 signals around here but the upload on my S9 just does not work on weaker band 41.

I do not see anybody coming up with an activation date for 25+41 but it is making life horrible without it. HPUE sure was not the answer to band 41 upload issues.

So you do have a need for 5G!  Another solution that solves the UL issue B41 has. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, red_dog007 said:

So you do have a need for 5G!  Another solution that solves the UL issue B41 has. 

How does 5G fix the band 41 upload issue???  I have to see that.  The only way I can fix it is turn off Band 41. Maybe moving to another carrier where there is no band 41 would fix the issue too.   At Sprint, 5G uses band 41 for both 4G and 5G.  So 5G on Sprint probably has the same issue. Poor upload. 

Maybe MIMO on 5G helps, but the phones just can not transmit a strong enough signal on band 41.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dro1984 said:

HPUE didn't even help pull the band 41 signal in more like it was brainwashed into us at the time.   Was to make B41 signal nearly as strong/available as Band 25.    ... Never in my experiences!  

Can't say the same for myself. In NYC where Band 41 is deployed on nearly every site and then some, I'm either on Band 41 or Band 26. I'm virtually never on Band 25. In Boston, I'm on Band 25 more but that's because there are still plenty of cell sites without Band 41 equipment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Paynefanbro said:

I saw a few speed tests of T-Mobile's 600MHz 5G in Puerto Rico and they resemble 20x20 LTE honestly. It'll be a great 5G foundation but what T-Mobile really needs is Band 41 to complement their mmWave and low-band. 

Not only does Tmobile need Sprint's 2.5 GHz spectrum (Band 41) that but they badly need Sprint's PCS spectrum assets as well.  In many top metros, it can mean that they can finally launch 20x20 carriers in the PCS band as well.  In the article below it has a chart for the top metros and how the PCS holdings complement each other.  I know 20x20 carriers are sorely needed in Los Angeles.

https://www.speedtest.net/insights/blog/new-t-mobile-spectrum-coverage/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, chamb said:

How does 5G fix the band 41 upload issue???  I have to see that.  The only way I can fix it is turn off Band 41. Maybe moving to another carrier where there is no band 41 would fix the issue too.   At Sprint, 5G uses band 41 for both 4G and 5G.  So 5G on Sprint probably has the same issue. Poor upload. 

Maybe MIMO on 5G helps, but the phones just can not transmit a strong enough signal on band 41.

5G could fix the upload issue once it is standalone, since the full channel width will be used for upload (three times faster @ 60MHz plus 5g speed boost).  There is also the possibility that they could alter the time schedule on demand to increase the upload, but I have only seen this in papers, not mentioned by any carrier yet. Currently 5g in NSA is aggregated with other  LTE bands, thus the LTE primary does the upload.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Paynefanbro said:

I saw a few speed tests of T-Mobile's 600MHz 5G in Puerto Rico and they resemble 20x20 LTE honestly. It'll be a great 5G foundation but what T-Mobile really needs is Band 41 to complement their mmWave and low-band. 

The test I want to really see for N71 is at the cell edge.  If your were at 3Mbps with LTE and now you could get 6Mbps, that would be a noticeable improvement,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline June 1 for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio covering 27500-28350Mhz expiring 6/8/2028. No reported sightings.  Buildout notice issue sent by FCC in March 5, 2024 https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/letterPdf/LetterPdfController?licId=4019733&letterVersionId=178&autoLetterId=13060705&letterCode=CR&radioServiceCode=UU&op=LetterPdf&licSide=Y&archive=null&letterTo=L  No soecific permits seen in a quick check of Columbus. They also have an additional 200Mhz covering at 24350-25450 Mhz and 24950-25050Mhz with no buildout date expiring 12/11/2029.
    • T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
    • Was true in my market. Likely means a higher percentage of 5g phones in your market.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...