Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I might be able to swing by there at some point. So far the only small/pico sites I have seen around Baltimore have been Verizon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RCR Wireless is already jumping to conclusions based on 1H2016 RootMetrics tests

 

http://www.rcrwireless.com/20160405/carriers/verizon-tops-att-t-mobile-jumps-sprint-initial-rootmetrics-2016-tests-tag2

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

How many markets have been test so far? It might be a bit premature to write this kind of article.

 

However, it doesnt feel like sprint is making very much progress and the tests so far seem to bare out that feeling.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many markets have been test so far? It might be a bit premature to write this kind of article.

 

However, it doesnt feel like sprint is making very much progress and the tests so far seem to bare out that feeling.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

Actually, Sprint has improved massively in the most contested area... download speed. 

 

Just not in every market..

 

The only reason Sprint hasn't won more awards is because of the bizarre way rootmetrics credits uploads and download speeds what looks to be equally, which is kinda ridiculous.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, Sprint has improved massively in the most contested area... Download speed.

 

Just not in every market..

Well, maybe my point of view is skewed by being in a market that has had b41and a second carrier for a while, but i haven't seen any new deployment of b41 since about 6 months ago, certainly haven't run across any new builds and none of the 3g only sites have been converted to LTE. Progress here has been virtually none existent for at least 6 months.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RCR Wireless is already jumping to conclusions based on 1H2016 RootMetrics tests

 

http://www.rcrwireless.com/20160405/carriers/verizon-tops-att-t-mobile-jumps-sprint-initial-rootmetrics-2016-tests-tag2

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

It appears as if they are coming to that conclusion because T-Mobile has won/shared 1st place in more markets. Though I'm pretty sure that RootMetrics determines who comes in what place based on multiple other factors, rather than total market wins.

 

-Anthony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It appears as if they are coming to that conclusion because T-Mobile has won/shared 1st place in more markets. Though I'm pretty sure that RootMetrics determines who comes in what place based on multiple other factors, rather than total market wins.

 

-Anthony

Yes, but if you look at all the other cities t mobile is ahead in most... the 1st half reports come out in june unless sprint makes significant strides t mobile might take the 3rd spot.

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, maybe my point of view is skewed by being in a market that has had b41and a second carrier for a while, but i haven't seen any new deployment of b41 since about 6 months ago, certainly haven't run across any new builds and none of the 3g only sites have been converted to LTE. Progress here has been virtually none existent for at least 6 months.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

Yes , that what it comes down to has sprint made enough progress. The only number 1 ranking that i have seen them maintain is in las vegas and denver...the rest they have dropped from number 1

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just hope they still plan to make "nearly all" cell sites triband. There are many urban areas and mid size cities without any band 41 at all. Those areas could seriously use that band's congestion relief.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This report pretty much tells what will happen the rest of the way. SPRINT ain't gonna pass Tmobile in NYC Tri state , Philadelphia, DC, Boston, Los Angeles, and Dallas Forth worth

 

Sprint will beat Tmobile in Chicago, Kansas city, and Houston.

 

The problem with Sprint is, they threaten for the number 1 spot in markets like Cincinnati, Dayton and Pittsburgh then drop down. There is not consistency besides Denver and Las Vegas.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

SPRINT ain't gonna pass Tmobile in NYC Tri state , Philadelphia, DC, Boston, Los Angeles, and Dallas Forth worth

 

Sprint will beat Tmobile in Chicago, Kansas city, and Houston.

That's it folks, call RootMetrics and tell them they don't need to test anymore. SprintNYC from S4GRU already knows the results.

 

The problem with Sprint is, they threaten for the number 1 spot in markets like Cincinnati, Dayton and Pittsburgh then drop down. There is not consistency besides Denver and Las Vegas.

I think you might be in for a surprise when the Dayton and Cincinnati reports come out for this half. Since 2H2015 Sprint has deployed 10x10 LTE in both markets and just recently lit up multiple B41 carriers with CA. I'm in the Dayton area for school and I've seen a huge improvement in just the past few months. Other members from the Cincinnati/Dayton market have noticed similar improvement too.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Truth is Marcelo made the statement of "18 to 24 months" in May of last year so it hasn't even been a year. People must've misunderstood that to mean 18 to 24 hours, which is when they want their upgrades, now. Sprint hasn't been the Now Network in many years.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Truth is Marcelo made the statement of "18 to 24 months" in May of last year so it hasn't even been a year. People must've misunderstood that to mean 18 to 24 hours, which is when they want their upgrades, now. Sprint hasn't been the Now Network in many years.

I cant imagine they are 6 to 12 months away from Marcelo's goal.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I cant imagine they are 6 to 12 months away from Marcelo's goal.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

Then Marcelo failed and we'll hold him to it.

 

Until then we all should take a step back and remain skeptical yet not too optimistic or pessimistic and let it all play out.

 

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X

  • Like 13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Sprint network might be going through the greatest changes it has made since Network Vision started in 2012. I kind of expected this to be a transition half to be honest. What is needed is a massive boost in network change through a change in the network topology. Small cells can go to the places that 2.5 didn't go in the past. Sprint also has to do more small cells to get more out of their CapEx, I am tired of Sprint spending $2 billion a year more in CapEx and getting beat by T-Mobile in network speeds. Fortunately, Sprint is adjusting their approach from the past and, based on what I can see on their plans, learning from past mistakes.

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then Marcelo failed and we'll hold him to it.

 

Until then we all should take a step back and remain skeptical yet not too optimistic or pessimistic and let it all play out.

 

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X

 

Agreed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then Marcelo failed and we'll hold him to it.

 

Until then we all should take a step back and remain skeptical yet not too optimistic or pessimistic and let it all play out.

Without the info that we had for NV 1.0 we'll just have to trust Sprint's claims...which isn't easy (but they have different, maybe better, leadership now)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This report pretty much tells what will happen the rest of the way. SPRINT ain't gonna pass Tmobile in NYC Tri state , Philadelphia, DC, Boston, Los Angeles, and Dallas Forth worth

 

Sprint will beat Tmobile in Chicago, Kansas city, and Houston.

 

The problem with Sprint is, they threaten for the number 1 spot in markets like Cincinnati, Dayton and Pittsburgh then drop down. There is not consistency besides Denver and Las Vegas.

 

John Saw (CTO) said in one of those "Harrison Wiley Show" Videos from a few months back that Sprint is talking less, and doing more. I'm fine with that as long as there's evidence of doing more.

 

I think we'll be presently surprised by year end 2016 on what Sprint is able to accomplish. Remember, WiMAX was supposed to be completely off on November 5, 2015 and the final day of service in the staged shutdown wound up being March 31, 2016 due to the Court Order.

 

Even Shentel said how having WiMAX on substantially delayed network deployments in their area. Sprint has been making these network improvements with one hand behind its back this whole time. Now that WiMAX is finally shutdown, Sprint can make substantial progress on 2xCA, 3xCA etc.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the delay of the WiMax shutdown, should we add a few months to Marcelo's timeline? 

 

I think that it would be reasonable given the circumstances. Hopefully, Sprint was able to make the best of it given it was a shutdown done in stages, which would have hopefully enabled Sprint to start in those markets as they were shut down. Perhaps others can speak on this more.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that it would be reasonable given the circumstances. Hopefully, Sprint was able to make the best of it given it was a shutdown done in stages, which would have hopefully enabled Sprint to start in those markets as they were shut down. Perhaps others can speak on this more.

 

I vote no. With this type of industry you should be planning for the what ifs ahead of time. The 18-24 is still what he needs to be held to. If everything went perfect it would be 18 months this 3 month delay still falls in the 6 month window he gave himself..... Now if other things start happening.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I vote no. With this type of industry you should be planning for the what ifs ahead of time. The 18-24 is still what he needs to be held to. If everything went perfect it would be 18 months this 3 month delay still falls in the 6 month window he gave himself..... Now if other things start happening.......

 

It's actually closer to a 3, 4 or 5 month delay for the respective markets.

 

See the WiMAX Shutdown Schedule: http://www.mobilebeacon.org/wimax-shutdown/

 

This pushed everything back a few months at least.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • So, in summary, here are the options I tested: T-Mobile intl roaming - LTE on SoftBank, routes back to the US (~220ms to 4.2.2.4) IIJ physical SIM - LTE on NTT, local routing Airalo - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer SoftBank), routed through Singapore (SingTel) Ubigi - 5G on NTT, routed through Singapore (Transatel) US Mobile East Asia roaming - 5G on SoftBank, routed through Singapore (Club SIM) Saily - 5G on NTT, routed through Hong Kong (Truphone)...seems to be poorer routing my1010 - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer KDDI), routed through Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom) I wouldn't buy up on the T-Mobile international roaming, but it's a solid fallback. If you have the US Mobile roaming eSIM that's a great option. Otherwise Ubigi, Airalo, or my1010 are all solid options, so get whatever's cheapest. I wouldn't bother trying to find a physical SIM from IIJ...the Japanese IP is nice but there's enough WiFi that you can get a Japanese IP enough for whatever you need, and eSIM flexibility is great (IIJ as eSIM but seems a bit more involved to get it to work).
    • So, the rural part of the journey still has cell service for nearly all the way, usually on B18/19/8 (depending on whether we're talking about KDDI/NTT/SoftBank). I think I saw a bit of B28 and even n28 early on in the trip, though that faded out after a bit. Once we got to where we were going though, KDDI had enough B41 to pull 150+ Mbps, while NTT and SoftBank had B1/B3 IIRC. Cell service was likewise generally fine from Kawaguchiko Station to Tokyo on the express bus to Shinjuku Station, though there were some cases where only low-band LTE was available and capacity seemed to struggle. I also figured out what I was seeing with SoftBank on 40 MHz vs. 100 MHz n77: the 40 MHz blocks are actually inside the n78 band class, but SoftBank advertises them as n77, probably to facilitate NR CA. My phone likely preferred the 40 MHz slices as they're *much* lower-frequency, ~3.4 GHz rather than ~3.9, though of course I did see the 100 MHz slice being used rather often. By contrast, when I got NR on NTT it was either n28 10x10 or, more often, 100 MHz n78. As usual, EMEA bands on my S24 don't CA, so any data speeds I saw were the result of either one LTE carrier or one LTE carrier plus one NR carrier...except for B41 LTE. KDDI seems to have more B41 bandwidth live at this point, so my1010 or Airalo works well for this, and honestly while SoftBank and NTT 5G (in descending order of availability) have 5G that's readily available it may be diminishing returns, particularly given that I still don't know how to, as someone not from Hong Kong, get an eSIM that runs on SoftBank 5G that isn't the USM "comes for free with the unlimited premium package" roaming eSIM (NTT is easy enough thanks to Ubigi). In other news, I was able to borrow someone's Rakuten eSIM and...got LTE with it. 40 Mbps down, 20 Mbps up, 40ms latency to Tokyo while in Tokyo...which isn't any worse than the Japan-based physical SIMs I had used earlier. But not getting n77 or n257 was disappointing, though I had to test the eSIM from one spot rather than bouncing around the city to find somewhere with better reception. It's currently impossible to get a SIM as a foreigner that runs on Rakuten, so that was the best I could do. Also, I know my phone doesn't have all the LTE and 5G bands needed to take full advantage of Japanese networks. My S24 is missing: B21 (1500 MHz) - NTT B11 (1500 MHz) - KDDI, SoftBank B42 (3500 MHz) - NTT, KDDI, SoftBank n79 (4900 MHz) - NTT Of the above, B42/n79 are available on the latest iPhones, though you lose n257, and I'm guessing you're not going to find B11/B21 on a phone sold outside Japan.
    • T-Mobile acquiring SoniqWave's 2.5 GHz spectrum  Another spectrum speculator down! T-Mobile is acquiring all of their licenses and their leases. Details are lacking but it looks like T-Mobile might be giving them 3.45GHz in exchange in some of the markets where they're acquiring BRS/EBS to sweeten the deal and stay below the spectrum screen. Hopefully NextWave is at the negotiating table with T-Mobile so NYC can finally get access to the full BRS/EBS band as well. 
    • Maybe. The taller buildings on one side of the street all have Fios access and the NYCHA buildings are surrounded by Verizon macros that have mmWave. I don’t think this site will add much coverage. It’d be better off inside the complex itself.
    • Looks like a great place for for FWA. Many apartment dwellers only have one overpriced choice.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...