Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

A mobile provider can never have enough scale. Verizon is proof of this. They can still do network upgrades even with the Vodafone debt on their shoulders. That's impressive.

That's why I have been advocating forever that Sprint and T-mobile merge or at least merge their networks. Capex is shared over 100 million, not 50 each.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A little off topic, but hopefully this is okay here. My sister currently has an iPhone 6 lease which expires in December. She wanted to upgrade to the Galaxy S6 Edge and was willing to pay the remaining lease payments.

On MySprint there is some sort of option where you can add a "delegate" who is suopposed to be able to add Easy Pay or Lease phones to an account at the store without the account holder being present. Said they only needed to be over 18 and show photo ID.

We go to the Sprint store, without the account holder, and they basically had NO idea what we were taalking about, even after showing a screen shot of the webpage. They insisted her name was not listed on the account and the only way we could proceed was to have the account holder call Customer Care and add her as an authorized person. We ended up leaving because it just seemed so ridiculous, and the girl was pretty rude about it.

Why have this option on the website if they don't honor it? Anyone else experience something similar?

Did you successfully add the delegate?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A little off topic, but hopefully this is okay here. My sister currently has an iPhone 6 lease which expires in December. She wanted to upgrade to the Galaxy S6 Edge and was willing to pay the remaining lease payments.

 

On MySprint there is some sort of option where you can add a "delegate" who is suopposed to be able to add Easy Pay or Lease phones to an account at the store without the account holder being present. Said they only needed to be over 18 and show photo ID.

 

We go to the Sprint store, without the account holder, and they basically had NO idea what we were taalking about, even after showing a screen shot of the webpage. They insisted her name was not listed on the account and the only way we could proceed was to have the account holder call Customer Care and add her as an authorized person. We ended up leaving because it just seemed so ridiculous, and the girl was pretty rude about it.

 

Why have this option on the website if they don't honor it? Anyone else experience something similar?

I didn't know about this delegate program, but I was essentially able to do the same thing via customer care chat. They asked for her full name, and her phone number. Two weeks later she was able to go into the store herself and lease a new iPhone 6s without any interaction from me. I thought I would have to order online, and mail the phone to her after I got it but this made it much easier. She was in and out on launch day in less than 20 minutes.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Best way to order a nano sim without calling international support?  Actually, anyone got the international support line?  I need a nano Sprint sim (hopefully CSIM) sent to my house soon.

 

Go to Best Buy Mobile.  Pay the $10 for the CSIM.  That is even less expensive than what T-Mobile charges now, and it avoids any Sprint induced headaches.

 

AJ

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go to Best Buy Mobile. Pay the $10 for the CSIM. That is even less expensive than what T-Mobile charges now, and it avoids any Sprint induced headaches.

 

AJ

Can confirm. This is a great option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go to Best Buy Mobile. Pay the $10 for the CSIM. That is even less expensive than what T-Mobile charges now, and it avoids any Sprint induced headaches.

 

AJ

I just used international online chat. Took no longer than 10 minutes and it was freeeee.

 

Sent from my M8

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just used international online chat. Took no longer than 10 minutes and it was freeeee.

 

Cross your fingers and knock on wood that you get the right SIM.

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Best way to order a nano sim without calling international support? Actually, anyone got the international support line? I need a nano Sprint sim (hopefully CSIM) sent to my house soon.

Out of curiosity. Why would anyone need this?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Out of curiosity. Why would anyone need this?

Nexus devices/Moto Pure that are not sold in store/by Sprint but are compatible and quality phones on the network.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I am on a framily plan and I lease a device instead if easy pay does that still get annual upgrades by having the framily unlimited otoion just like I had with easy pay?

 

Yes. When I picked up my Note 5 they told me it would, anyway.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint (or a Sprint-owned company) officially not counting music streaming towards data allowances.  Isn't this not net neutrality friendly?  Looks like they're matching the T-Mobile streaming services over at Virgin Mobile.

 

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/virgin-mobile-usa-adds-unlimited-140000190.html

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint (or a Sprint-owned company) officially not counting music streaming towards data allowances.  Isn't this not net neutrality friendly?  Looks like they're matching the T-Mobile streaming services over at Virgin Mobile.

 

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/virgin-mobile-usa-adds-unlimited-140000190.html

Yea, I don't agree with this...

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you ask advocates of net neutrality it isn't, why? Near as I can tell because it benefits them, i.e. Content providers. I for the life of me don't understand why consumers care, But it a strict sense yes it is.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That sprint subsidiary and net neutrality was talked about some in this thread:

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/6765-sprint-supporting-net-neutrality-with-condition/

 

Basically I am against it because it is like the highway department making a deal with GM/Ford/Fiat to get free gas (unlimited data) for anyone driving a GM/Ford/Fiat vehicle. Sure, that is great for customers: My mileage on the highway doesn't increase the cost of ownership of my car (cellphone service) and I can spend the pay miles on city roads (other internet services) so I can drive more there!

 

However, it also negatively impacts other players in that market Nissan/Honda/Hyundai/etc by making their services appear more costly

  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint (or a Sprint-owned company) officially not counting music streaming towards data allowances.  Isn't this not net neutrality friendly?  Looks like they're matching the T-Mobile streaming services over at Virgin Mobile.

 

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/virgin-mobile-usa-adds-unlimited-140000190.html

 

I'm concerned this is just another step towards a radically different Internet. I prefer everything to be neutral.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your analogy is not a good one. The highway department is a government enforced monopoly, consumer have no choice but to use highways run by the highway department. Consumer do have choices when it comes to wireless and ip providers. That allows them to shape the market the way they prefer. All that is happen with the net neutrality debate is content providers are trying to use the government to make sure the profit distribution remains where it is currently even though the market might want it structured differently.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your analogy is not a good one. The highway department is a government enforced monopoly, consumer have no choice but to highways run by the highway department. Consumer do have choices when it comes to wireless and ip providers. That allows them to shape the market the way they prefer. All that is happen with the net neutrality debate is content providers are trying to use the government to make sure the profit distribution remains where it is currently even though the market might want it structured differently.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Of course it isn't a perfect analogy. I suppose a better one would be to compare it to a tollway such as the one near Austin which is privately owned. Customers do have choices between carriers, for sure. However, it blurs the lines when certain carriers such as T-Mobile (and now a Sprint subbrand) offer data limits with certain activities not counting against that limit. 

 

To me it is problematic that certain companies get to pick and choose winners. What if Verizon said that their new Go90 (stupid name) video streaming wouldn't count against bandwidth caps? Wouldn't that be a disincentive for Verizon subscribers to use other competing services?

 

The bottom line is it distorts competition while also interfering with consumer choices which is kind of the whole point of net neutrality rules, right? 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could see a future where wireless companies end up more like cable companies, where you would choose your "package" with preferred apps or sites, rendering non-packaged competitors irreverent or just plain inaccessible.

 

Wireless companies will end up being the new Cable Co's, and we all know how well that's worked out for consumers.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I knew that Sprint would eventually join Tmo in this. But I am against it when Sprint does it too. It will just condition us to think that non-neutrality of data is OK if it works out for them in the short term. I just don't like this at all. But it looks like it's here to stay. C'est la vie!

 

Using Tapatalk on BlackBerry Z30

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Yes! That does keep it from wandering off Dish and most importantly, reconnecting immediately (at least where there is n70). Thanks!
    • I have my Dish phone locked to NR-only.  That keeps it on Dish and only occasionally will it see T-Mobile NR SA for brief periods before going to no service. I also don't have mine band locked beyond that, except that I have some of the unused bands turned off just to try to reduce scan time.  Fortunately, my Dish phone is the one with the MediaTek chipset, so it has NR neighbor cells, and I can usually see n71, n70, n66, and sometimes n29 (market-dependent) through those regardless of which band it's connected to as primary. - Trip
    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...