clbowens Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 Earnings Report for 2nd Quarter of Fiscal Year 2016 is in: http://newsroom.sprint.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=12357 Anyone joining the Conference Call today? I didn't know they had 10 (that many) 3CA devices available. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedSpark Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 I see they lifted up the hood on 3CA in 8 cities. Stuff we already knew but glad to see they announced it. I'm in the Columbus market and haven't experienced it yet on my 7plus but that could explain as to why I lost b41 while at home but who knows. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Sprint has definitely turned the corner. What's incredible to me is how bloated Sprint was as a company. According to the release, Sprint has realized more than $1.1 Billion of year-to-date reductions in cost of services and selling, general and administrative expenses, with nearly $600 Million of the reduction coming in the fiscal second-quarter. Apparently, the company remains on track to achieve its goal of a sustainable reduction of $2 Billion or more of run-rate operating expenses exiting fiscal year 2016 and has plans for further reductions in fiscal year 2017 and beyond. Sprint's bloated cost structure was a huge liability, and kept the company from being truly competitive. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nexgencpu Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 Marcelo just confirmed over 200 small cells are live in NYC. 9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedSpark Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 Page 8 of the Investor Presentation shows the percentage of Tri-band and CA-capable devices on Sprint. http://s21.q4cdn.com/487940486/files/doc_presentations/2016/3_Fiscal-2Q16-Sprint-Quarterly-Investor-Update-FINAL.pdf "Postpaid tri-band LTE phones represented 78 percent of the 25.7 million ending postpaid phone connection base compared to 54 percent at the end of the year-ago period and 73 percent at the end of the prior quarter. During the quarter, 94 percent of postpaid phones sold were tri-band." "Postpaid carrier aggregation capable phones, which allow for higher data speeds, were 75 percent of postpaid phones sold during the quarter, increasing the number of these phones within the phone base to 42 percent." The iPhone 7 release on Sprint really drove the CA percentage number up this quarter. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeffDTD Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 Sprint has really held its own these last two quarters. Great to see 60M customers total again. I'm confident Marcelo will cut another billion in operating cost as he pledged to do. The old sprint was run by a group of people whose business acumen had matured in a 90s wireline culture. They weren't ever going to see it much differently. Keep cutting the fat, Marcelo. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nexgencpu Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 I almost never had any calling issues with Sprint even before NV. Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk While yes I had limited issues with voice pre-NV, but 1x800 voice solidified Sprint even further. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedSpark Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 Sprint has really held its own these last two quarters. Great to see 60M customers total again. I'm confident Marcelo will cut another billion in operating cost as he pledged to do. The old sprint was run by a group of people whose business acumen had matured in a 90s wireline culture. They weren't ever going to see it much differently. Keep cutting the fat, Marcelo. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Well said. Looking back now, it's remarkable what Marcelo and his team have accomplished so far. Things were really bad across multiple fronts when he came on board due to poor management and execution. It's too easy to forget that. Sprint is being run as SoftBank USA by Marcelo. That's exactly what's needed here. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tajustin95 Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 Marcelo just confirmed over 200 small cells are live in NYC. When did he say that? Also, did he mention other places? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terrell352 Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 When did he say that? Also, did he mention other places?He specifically mentioned 200 small cells live in Manhattan that's it. Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bucdenny Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 Sprint stocks taking a hit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grapkoski Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 Sprint stocks taking a hit. I think analysts still aren't buying their 'denisification' strategy because of the limited field results. I get they don't want to give away their strategy, but I think we can all agree it seems a bit stalled with at least one of their major small cell vendors (**cough** mobilitie **cough**). Oh and the shorts may be trying to cover their arses. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hypeo Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 You can only hype up an overcapacity in the majority of the US so much before it catches up to you. Sent from my 2PS64 using Tapatalk 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laqn1283 Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 mainly people want to see their service revenue stabilizes but so far it still decreases sequentially. remember sprint does not make money selling phones, they make money selling their services. so most if not all of the increase in revenue was from selling phones which at best breaks even or results in a loss. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hmight Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 Paramount Pictures used to control a movies production, distribution and the exhibition (the theatre). In 1948, the Supreme Court ruled that level of vertical integration violated anti-trust. One could argue this merger could be a modern day version of this integration. Time Warner/ATT could in theory control HBO (production of a movie) and then only allow it to be shown on U-verse/ATT wireless devices. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Paramount_Pictures,_Inc. If the regulators want to block this merger, they will find a reason. Drag it up to the Supreme Court will only benefit the lawyers. Democrats tend to be more anti-conglomerate mergers. Assuming Clinton will will the election, the chances for the merger will be less than under a Republican president. It will be interesting to see how this will play out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WillM Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 Assuming Clinton will will the election, the chances for the merger will be less than under a Republican president. It will be interesting to see how this will play out. Obviously you haven't been following the election too closely. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dnicekid Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 Obviously you haven't been following the election too closely. Is trump in the lead now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WillM Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 Is trump in the lead now? No. I'm not sure if he edited his post but I thought he was saying Trump would be more accepting of a merger than Clinton. I may have read it wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danlodish345 Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 No. I'm not sure if he edited his post but I thought he was saying Trump would be more accepting of a merger than Clinton. I may have read it wrong.I read somewhere in the news that Trump said he would block the merger Sent from my F3213 using Tapatalk 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mnjeepmale Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 Sprint stocks taking a hit. I also thought the stock would go up today with the numbers looking better for Sprint. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hmight Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 Obviously you haven't been following the election too cl Well, I think most people stop following when they hear Trump speak and go straight to the polls. It's sad to be a Republican, from Mitt to Trump in four years. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tyroned3222 Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 I also thought the stock would go up today with the numbers looking better for Sprint.Yes, but shareholder don't like the fact that Sprint lowered there capex again Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
utiz4321 Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 Yes, but shareholder don't like the fact that Sprint lowered there capex again Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk I called it two days ago. Their plan is to bluff network improvements (small cells cost less and will give use the improvements we need to maintain competitiveness), starve the network (lowering capex) to improve balance sheet (ie pay debt coming due). Short run good ( no default cash positions stay good), long run bad (network starts to have problems again). Markets are forward looking, they know capex is key to sprint maintaining subscriber growth in a way that will grow revenue and free cash flow. Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tyroned3222 Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 I called it two days ago. Their plan is to bluff network improvements (small cells cost less and will give use the improvements we need to maintain competitiveness), starve the network (lowering capex) to improve balance sheet (ie pay debt coming do). Short run good ( no default cash positions stay good), long run bad (network starts to have problems again). Markets are forward looking, they know capex is key to sprint maintaining subscriber growth in a way that will grow revenue and free cash flow. Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk The small cells would only work in markets where band 41 is substantially rolled out Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paynefanbro Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 Where has the network started deteriorating? Definitely haven't expected that in my area. Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hypeo Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 Where has the network started deteriorating? Definitely haven't expected that in my area. Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk There's lots of areas that lack upgrades, thus taking a hit on the network because of the 50% off deal. Tucson Yuma area is one. But I'm just one area. LTE speeds hoover around. .3mbps down. Sent from my 2PS64 using Tapatalk 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.