Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread

joshuam

By joshuam
in General Topics

 Share

Recommended Posts

bucdenny Member Level: 4G WiMax

bucdenny

Posted
Posted

Interesting article I found.  Mobilitie fined for not getting a small cell permit.  

 

http://wirelessestimator.com/articles/2016/one-company-fined-for-not-getting-a-small-cell-permit-another-for-not-permitting-inspectors/

 

Someone in Baltimore to confirm if Sprint small cell?

 

https://www.google.com/maps/@39.2803129,-76.5759582,3a,75y,79.54h,97.49t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1swYQhD6WvV8ubjRMEErM7Fg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 28.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • RedSpark

    2032

  • Arysyn

    1124

  • nexgencpu

    1019

  • WiWavelength

    938

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

S4GRU
S4GRU

I have to tell you all I am near tears right now.  I am so stoked that Marcelo listened to us, directly.  I am sure he listened to all the feedback he heard.  But I believe S4GRU was influential in th

S4GRU
S4GRU

I'm still shocked and amazed how successful S4GRU has been in staying online, remaining relevant and keeping quality members and staff all with member donations from a relatively small pool. When we

JeremiahMcCurry
JeremiahMcCurry

Maybe he's outside of the city limits. He'll tweet as soon as he's back in town with a data connection.

Posted Images

cdk Member Level: 4G LTE

cdk

Posted
Posted

 

I might be able to swing by there at some point. So far the only small/pico sites I have seen around Baltimore have been Verizon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
utiz4321 Member Level: 4G WiMax

utiz4321

Posted
Posted

RCR Wireless is already jumping to conclusions based on 1H2016 RootMetrics tests

 

http://www.rcrwireless.com/20160405/carriers/verizon-tops-att-t-mobile-jumps-sprint-initial-rootmetrics-2016-tests-tag2

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

How many markets have been test so far? It might be a bit premature to write this kind of article.

 

However, it doesnt feel like sprint is making very much progress and the tests so far seem to bare out that feeling.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nexgencpu Member Level: LTE Advanced

nexgencpu

Posted
Posted

How many markets have been test so far? It might be a bit premature to write this kind of article.

 

However, it doesnt feel like sprint is making very much progress and the tests so far seem to bare out that feeling.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

Actually, Sprint has improved massively in the most contested area... download speed. 

 

Just not in every market..

 

The only reason Sprint hasn't won more awards is because of the bizarre way rootmetrics credits uploads and download speeds what looks to be equally, which is kinda ridiculous.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
utiz4321 Member Level: 4G WiMax

utiz4321

Posted
Posted

Actually, Sprint has improved massively in the most contested area... Download speed.

 

Just not in every market..

Well, maybe my point of view is skewed by being in a market that has had b41and a second carrier for a while, but i haven't seen any new deployment of b41 since about 6 months ago, certainly haven't run across any new builds and none of the 3g only sites have been converted to LTE. Progress here has been virtually none existent for at least 6 months.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites
anthony.spina97 Member Level: 4G WiMax

anthony.spina97

Posted
Posted

RCR Wireless is already jumping to conclusions based on 1H2016 RootMetrics tests

 

http://www.rcrwireless.com/20160405/carriers/verizon-tops-att-t-mobile-jumps-sprint-initial-rootmetrics-2016-tests-tag2

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

It appears as if they are coming to that conclusion because T-Mobile has won/shared 1st place in more markets. Though I'm pretty sure that RootMetrics determines who comes in what place based on multiple other factors, rather than total market wins.

 

-Anthony

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tyroned3222 Member Level: 4G WiMax

tyroned3222

Posted
Posted

It appears as if they are coming to that conclusion because T-Mobile has won/shared 1st place in more markets. Though I'm pretty sure that RootMetrics determines who comes in what place based on multiple other factors, rather than total market wins.

 

-Anthony

Yes, but if you look at all the other cities t mobile is ahead in most... the 1st half reports come out in june unless sprint makes significant strides t mobile might take the 3rd spot.

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tyroned3222 Member Level: 4G WiMax

tyroned3222

Posted
Posted

Well, maybe my point of view is skewed by being in a market that has had b41and a second carrier for a while, but i haven't seen any new deployment of b41 since about 6 months ago, certainly haven't run across any new builds and none of the 3g only sites have been converted to LTE. Progress here has been virtually none existent for at least 6 months.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

Yes , that what it comes down to has sprint made enough progress. The only number 1 ranking that i have seen them maintain is in las vegas and denver...the rest they have dropped from number 1

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JonnygATL Member Level: 4G WiMax

JonnygATL

Posted
Posted

I just hope they still plan to make "nearly all" cell sites triband. There are many urban areas and mid size cities without any band 41 at all. Those areas could seriously use that band's congestion relief.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites
NYC126 Member Level: eHRPD

NYC126

Posted
Posted

This report pretty much tells what will happen the rest of the way. SPRINT ain't gonna pass Tmobile in NYC Tri state , Philadelphia, DC, Boston, Los Angeles, and Dallas Forth worth

 

Sprint will beat Tmobile in Chicago, Kansas city, and Houston.

 

The problem with Sprint is, they threaten for the number 1 spot in markets like Cincinnati, Dayton and Pittsburgh then drop down. There is not consistency besides Denver and Las Vegas.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
EvanA Member Level: 4G WiMax

EvanA

Posted
Posted

SPRINT ain't gonna pass Tmobile in NYC Tri state , Philadelphia, DC, Boston, Los Angeles, and Dallas Forth worth

 

Sprint will beat Tmobile in Chicago, Kansas city, and Houston.

That's it folks, call RootMetrics and tell them they don't need to test anymore. SprintNYC from S4GRU already knows the results.

 

The problem with Sprint is, they threaten for the number 1 spot in markets like Cincinnati, Dayton and Pittsburgh then drop down. There is not consistency besides Denver and Las Vegas.

I think you might be in for a surprise when the Dayton and Cincinnati reports come out for this half. Since 2H2015 Sprint has deployed 10x10 LTE in both markets and just recently lit up multiple B41 carriers with CA. I'm in the Dayton area for school and I've seen a huge improvement in just the past few months. Other members from the Cincinnati/Dayton market have noticed similar improvement too.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
rackhivee Member Level: 1x Advanced

rackhivee

Posted
Posted

Truth is Marcelo made the statement of "18 to 24 months" in May of last year so it hasn't even been a year. People must've misunderstood that to mean 18 to 24 hours, which is when they want their upgrades, now. Sprint hasn't been the Now Network in many years.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites
utiz4321 Member Level: 4G WiMax

utiz4321

Posted
Posted

Truth is Marcelo made the statement of "18 to 24 months" in May of last year so it hasn't even been a year. People must've misunderstood that to mean 18 to 24 hours, which is when they want their upgrades, now. Sprint hasn't been the Now Network in many years.

I cant imagine they are 6 to 12 months away from Marcelo's goal.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
lilotimz Member Level: LTE Advanced

lilotimz

Posted
Posted

I cant imagine they are 6 to 12 months away from Marcelo's goal.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

Then Marcelo failed and we'll hold him to it.

 

Until then we all should take a step back and remain skeptical yet not too optimistic or pessimistic and let it all play out.

 

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X

  • Like 13
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fraydog Member Level: LTE Advanced

Fraydog

Posted
Posted

The Sprint network might be going through the greatest changes it has made since Network Vision started in 2012. I kind of expected this to be a transition half to be honest. What is needed is a massive boost in network change through a change in the network topology. Small cells can go to the places that 2.5 didn't go in the past. Sprint also has to do more small cells to get more out of their CapEx, I am tired of Sprint spending $2 billion a year more in CapEx and getting beat by T-Mobile in network speeds. Fortunately, Sprint is adjusting their approach from the past and, based on what I can see on their plans, learning from past mistakes.

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
RedSpark Member Level: LTE Advanced

RedSpark

Posted
Posted

Then Marcelo failed and we'll hold him to it.

 

Until then we all should take a step back and remain skeptical yet not too optimistic or pessimistic and let it all play out.

 

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X

 

Agreed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jones Member Level: 3G EVDO

Jones

Posted
Posted

Then Marcelo failed and we'll hold him to it.

 

Until then we all should take a step back and remain skeptical yet not too optimistic or pessimistic and let it all play out.

Without the info that we had for NV 1.0 we'll just have to trust Sprint's claims...which isn't easy (but they have different, maybe better, leadership now)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RedSpark Member Level: LTE Advanced

RedSpark

Posted
Posted

This report pretty much tells what will happen the rest of the way. SPRINT ain't gonna pass Tmobile in NYC Tri state , Philadelphia, DC, Boston, Los Angeles, and Dallas Forth worth

 

Sprint will beat Tmobile in Chicago, Kansas city, and Houston.

 

The problem with Sprint is, they threaten for the number 1 spot in markets like Cincinnati, Dayton and Pittsburgh then drop down. There is not consistency besides Denver and Las Vegas.

 

John Saw (CTO) said in one of those "Harrison Wiley Show" Videos from a few months back that Sprint is talking less, and doing more. I'm fine with that as long as there's evidence of doing more.

 

I think we'll be presently surprised by year end 2016 on what Sprint is able to accomplish. Remember, WiMAX was supposed to be completely off on November 5, 2015 and the final day of service in the staged shutdown wound up being March 31, 2016 due to the Court Order.

 

Even Shentel said how having WiMAX on substantially delayed network deployments in their area. Sprint has been making these network improvements with one hand behind its back this whole time. Now that WiMAX is finally shutdown, Sprint can make substantial progress on 2xCA, 3xCA etc.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
RedSpark Member Level: LTE Advanced

RedSpark

Posted
Posted

With the delay of the WiMax shutdown, should we add a few months to Marcelo's timeline? 

 

I think that it would be reasonable given the circumstances. Hopefully, Sprint was able to make the best of it given it was a shutdown done in stages, which would have hopefully enabled Sprint to start in those markets as they were shut down. Perhaps others can speak on this more.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
dnicekid Member Level: eHRPD

dnicekid

Posted
Posted

I think that it would be reasonable given the circumstances. Hopefully, Sprint was able to make the best of it given it was a shutdown done in stages, which would have hopefully enabled Sprint to start in those markets as they were shut down. Perhaps others can speak on this more.

 

I vote no. With this type of industry you should be planning for the what ifs ahead of time. The 18-24 is still what he needs to be held to. If everything went perfect it would be 18 months this 3 month delay still falls in the 6 month window he gave himself..... Now if other things start happening.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RedSpark Member Level: LTE Advanced

RedSpark

Posted
Posted

I vote no. With this type of industry you should be planning for the what ifs ahead of time. The 18-24 is still what he needs to be held to. If everything went perfect it would be 18 months this 3 month delay still falls in the 6 month window he gave himself..... Now if other things start happening.......

 

It's actually closer to a 3, 4 or 5 month delay for the respective markets.

 

See the WiMAX Shutdown Schedule: http://www.mobilebeacon.org/wimax-shutdown/

 

This pushed everything back a few months at least.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Dkoellerwx
      T-Mobile to acquire UScellular

      By Dkoellerwx · Posted

      Probably a lot of Midwest towers. Slight bias since Nebraska is a weird market, but there are tons of USCC sites that T-Mobile isn't yet co-located on. Think a similar situation in Iowa, Wisconsin, and Missouri. But some other markets, like yours, probably don't have that issue!
    • topdownat4
      Keep a Word, Drop a Word #7

      By topdownat4 · Posted

      Bubble Gum
    • chamb
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By chamb · Posted

      Sticky Customers - YES, and leave them flip to the T-Mobile PLMN when needed and they will be even more likely to Stick.
    • Trip
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By Trip · Posted

      It seems to me that if the goal is to improve rural, the US Cellular buy-out would get them only part of the way there, considering there are plenty of rural areas that US Cellular does not serve.  But I also have a hard time reading it the way I think that article is, that the cost of this deal comes straight out of the $9 billion.  I mean, they're getting spectrum for their existing operations in US Cellular markets, including places that I wouldn't call rural.  (Roanoke, VA is the 9th largest city in the state, for example.)  It seems like some of it should be allocated to rural expansion, but certainly not the whole purchase price. There's also something to be said for getting the customer base of potentially sticky customers who have been used to US Cellular being the only game in town for potentially decades. - Trip
    • dkyeager
      T-Mobile to acquire UScellular

      By dkyeager · Posted

      T-Mobile has stated 15% of their sites don't have 5g triband. In WV I know WISPs had a lot of 2.5GHz, but T-Mobile was trying to buy as much as possible. More rural FWA would be a big selling point that might overcome any soft bandwidth cap slight overages. Especially since UScellular likely started offering it on c-band.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...