Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

Yeah, get rid of surprise overages for sure. I agree too on allowing customers to purchase additional high speed data. This, along with having an unlimited 2g plan would be great for customers. Yet, I still think the 2g speed could be raised somewhat. At least enough to support streaming music, though not video as that takes up more network resources. Doing this way is better I think than saying "music freedom", etc.

128 kbps is good enough for music streaming. I have used 1x for both iHeart and TuneIn without any issues on 64 kbps AAC streams.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With Sprint spending over $500M/year on Verizon roaming charges, wouldn't it be cheaper to just build out the network in the problem areas? 

 

With 800Mhz nationwide, there really is not a reason Sprint shouldn't be able to do this.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With Sprint spending over $500M/year on Verizon roaming charges, wouldn't it be cheaper to just build out the network in the problem areas?

 

With 800Mhz nationwide, there really is not a reason Sprint shouldn't be able to do this.

Yes and then people in major markets get butt hurt when they're getting 1-5 Mbps or less while some boonies gets millions of dollars worth of telecom investments.

 

Sprint has to focus on their existing coverage today. When they fix up their urban areas then they can expand like tmobile has. Until then their money Is better spent improving the networks consistency and performance.

 

Roaming costs is a reason why sprint has capped it at 300 MBs. Imagine what they were paying when it was soft capped and people forced roams gbs of data on Verizon. Shit got expensive real quick.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes and then people in major markets get butt hurt when they're getting 1-5 Mbps or less while some boonies gets millions of dollars worth of telecom investments.

 

Sprint has to focus on their existing coverage today. When they fix up their urban areas then they can expand like tmobile has. Until then their money Is better spent improving the networks consistency and performance.

Sent from my Nexus 5X

Same logic I applied to why Sprint was right in ignoring 600Mhz auction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With Sprint spending over $500M/year on Verizon roaming charges, wouldn't it be cheaper to just build out the network in the problem areas? 

 

With 800Mhz nationwide, there really is not a reason Sprint shouldn't be able to do this.

 

Where are you getting $500M/yr?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a question. Why is T-Mobile's stock tanking right now and Sprint's stock shooting up?

Easy answer. T-Mobile missed estimates and despite having a good quarter was lower on revenue and profit (than expected) as well as falling ARPU.

 

Basically they reported about 15? cents a share net income when analysts were expecting 30 cents a share. Revenue was up @ $7.8 billion but missed expectations of $8.29 billion.

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where are you getting $500M/yr?

 

The T-Mobile CFO mentioned it, basically saying that they chose to skip in-market roaming as a fall-back, and saved the cash that way.

 

Sprint maintains the roaming agreement to ensure that customers are not left with the dreaded No Service message on their devices.

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The T-Mobile CFO mentioned it, basically saying that they chose to skip in-market roaming as a fall-back, and saved the cash that way.

 

Sprint maintains the roaming agreement to ensure that customers are not left with the dreaded No Service message on their devices.

Exactly. T-Mobile is okay with having their customers completely disconnected from their service in rough locations, whereas Sprint goes above and beyond with their roaming agreements to ensure you're always connected. The issue is Sprint should focus on adding service, even if it's 3g only in rural locations, just to get people off Verizon roaming.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly. T-Mobile is okay with having their customers completely disconnected from their service in rough locations, whereas Sprint goes above and beyond with their roaming agreements to ensure you're always connected. The issue is Sprint should focus on adding service, even if it's 3g only in rural locations, just to get people off Verizon roaming.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X

 

And that's my point with the future of the company. The focus needs to be to make the macro as dense as possible in urban areas, and spread outwards afterwards.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where are you getting $500M/yr?

 

This is the better question:  How does the T-Mobile CFO know that Sprint roaming costs on VZW run $500 million/yr?  Roaming costs on one other specific operator are not public information.  Should I take his word for it?  I mean, T-Mobile executives never distort nor exaggerate anything, right?

 

AJ

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly. T-Mobile is okay with having their customers completely disconnected from their service in rough locations, whereas Sprint goes above and beyond with their roaming agreements to ensure you're always connected. The issue is Sprint should focus on adding service, even if it's 3g only in rural locations, just to get people off Verizon roaming.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X

And that's my point with the future of the company. The focus needs to be to make the macro as dense as possible in urban areas, and spread outwards afterwards.

 

It really needs to be a both and strategy. In fact the information about the NGN plans suggest just that (at least to me). The areas that will be built out I would suspect are primarily areas with excessive roaming cost. The other areas that could be considered a build out will probably the former Nextel sites (outside of the current footprint) that are mentioned in the plan and any other locations where Sprint adds sites to meet license's requirements.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This would be the only way I would consider not having a replaceable battery. Droid Turbo 2 Verizon exclusive. Shatterproof screen finally.

 

https://www.motorola.com/us/products/droid-turbo-2#Specifications

 

It looks nice.  But each handset has a diagonal scratch near the bottom.  Lenovo/Motorola quality control must be going downhill.

 

AJ

  • Like 13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the better question: How does the T-Mobile CFO know that Sprint roaming costs on VZW run $500 million/yr? Roaming costs on one other specific operator are not public information. Should I take his word for it? I mean, T-Mobile executives never distort nor exaggerate anything, right?

 

AJ

He also said it topped $1B at one point. So it has drastically improved!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hard capping it at 300 MBs sure as hell helped.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X

True story. But I don't understand how you can use so much data roaming anyways. When my Sprint phone says "Extended 1x"...I have never had a successful outgoing call. Texts will go through...just take forever. It is more comforting to have roaming service instead of "No Service".

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

True story. But I don't understand how you can use so much data roaming anyways. When my Sprint phone says "Extended 1x"...I have never had a successful outgoing call. Texts will go through...just take forever. It is more comforting to have roaming service instead of "No Service".

Loading a custom prl with evdo roaming enabled and going to town with roaming evdo to get out of contract ring a bell or two? Doesn't take much to rack up thousands when every gb of data is $100-200+.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the better question: How does the T-Mobile CFO know that Sprint roaming costs on VZW run $500 million/yr? Roaming costs on one other specific operator are not public information. Should I take his word for it? I mean, T-Mobile executives never distort nor exaggerate anything, right?

 

AJ

They are the church of wireless service. Everything they do, is to epic proportions. John Legere is blessed with the ability to do such things like raising prices, yet having people think he actually lowered them, etc. When other carriers do something that the media criticizes them for, John Legere can not only do the same thing but make it worse, yet have the media glorify him as such a wise marketing genius.

 

So as far as distorting and exaggerating, its just what the un-carrier is all about.

Word! ????

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks nice. But each handset has a diagonal scratch near the bottom. Lenovo/Motorola quality control must be going downhill.

 

AJ

Actually, it is two diagonal scratches which connect in the form of a checkpoint, and Verizon has been kindly adding more of these scratches for their customers as part of the privilege of paying Verizon the $5 additional they recently tacked onto the access fee charge.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where are you getting $500M/yr?

 

Sprint (and Verizon) are both publicly traded companies. I wouldn't be surprised if the number was found somewhere in the documents they have available for investors.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's been speculated that Sprint has paid a lot to Verizon for roaming for a while. I am personally for cutting off roaming. Better to just go on and not worry about the super rural customers (like myself!) who are on VZW anyway.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint (and Verizon) are both publicly traded companies. I wouldn't be surprised if the number was found somewhere in the documents they have available for investors.

 

Yes, total roaming costs can be found as expenses in SEC filings -- but not broken down per other operator.  I could be wrong, but I think that the T-Mobile executive is generalizing all Sprint roaming as being on VZW, though it is not.

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • After several months of testing, an update to SignalCheck Pro is rolling out on Google Play. It may take up to 48 hours to become available for download. Notable changes include: Added option to display site notes for NSA 5G-NR cells. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show NSA 5G-NR Site Notes) will cause the app to make an "educated guess" as to what the most appropriate site note is linked to the connected NSA 5G cell, using the PCI and the device location. If it finds an existing entry that is likely to be relevant, it will display the note along with the distance from where the strongest signal from that cell was logged. While connected to NSA 5G, these notes cannot be edited; a valid NCI is required to add/edit notes and that information is not available on NSA connections.   Added option to log cells with missing/invalid PLMN (such as NSA 5G-NR cells). Users asked for the ability to log data for NSA 5G, so a new option (Preferences > Logger Settings > Log Cells with Missing PLMN) will permit this.   Added option to display LTE info above 5G-NR info. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show LTE Cells Above 5G-NR Cells) shows the same information that is currently displayed, but moves the LTE information above the 5G-NR information. Other changes: Code optimizations and enhancements. Improved Android 15 compatibility. Overhauled Purchases module. Resolved force closes impacting some GSM/LTE connections. Resolved issue with improper 5G-NR PLMN display when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with improper PLMN display with single-digit MNCs. Resolved issue with incorrect 5G-NR bands displayed on some devices due to Android bug. Resolved issue with incorrect number of neighbor cells displayed when some cells were unknown. Resolved issue with missing 5G-NR data when sector display is enabled. Resolved issue with saving 5G-NR site notes when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with settings to log missing GCI/NCI/TAC/PLMN being ignored. Resolved issues with web data export function. Updated internal libraries. Updated provider database. Updated target API to Android 15. I appreciate all of your support, and a big thank you to the members of the Beta Crew that help with testing and feedback!
    • Oct security update is out.
    • Stopped by again today and the antennas are up but it isn't live just yet. If other Sprint conversions are anything to go by it'll likely take about a month for the site to go live.
    • It is an Android bug that was reportedly fixed in August 2023 but definitely has not been. I have implemented numerous workarounds in SCP to correct the NR bands the app displays. The OS ignores the possibility that many NR-ARFCNs are valid across multiple bands.. it reports the lowest NR band that is valid for the current ARFCN. In your example, channel 432530 can be n1, n65, or n66.. so the OS just (lazily) reports n1.   Awesome, thanks! I will add an n65 override also.
    • Yeah both of those instances were on my AT&T s22 ultra. Seems ro be working as intended today in latest release.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...