Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

I did a speedtests on my dad's phone and it looks like Sprint has activated their full 120Mhz in CA!

99c3a357e7d7c6cf4c50e324c227fd00.jpg

 

 

 

T-Mobile has a faster upload speed. Also with their upcoming Extra Wide Super Speed Strong Extended Band LTE+, they'll easily beat that download speed. 

 

Therefore, you're a Sprint troll.

 

;)

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't mind overages, as long as they were sensible, say $5 per gb or less. However, the current overage rates on carriers is way overpriced at $15 per gb.

But the majority of consumers don't want overages. That is why unlimited plans became popular. Because nobody wants a surprise bill. This is one of the reasons T-Mobile has done so well.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But the majority of consumers don't want overages. That is why unlimited plans became popular. Because nobody wants a surprise bill. This is one of the reasons T-Mobile has done so well.

You make a good point, though there already are MVNOs which are successful using the non-bucket per gb style rate plan. The problem is they still are too expensive to win over the majority of unlimited data users.

 

The rate per gb needs to get down below $3 per gb, in order to accomplish this, and I already have a few ideas I think might work. Eventually it will happen though, which I advocate for super affordable per gb rates to come with sensible across the board bandwidth scaling that will give everyone on a site equal speeds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

T-Mobile has a faster upload speed. Also with their upcoming Extra Wide Super Speed Strong Extended Band LTE+, they'll easily beat that download speed. 

 

Therefore, you're a Sprint troll.

 

;)

 

It's funny, because Legere was making fun of Verizon of 'XLTE', then immediately came up with 'Extended Range LTE'. I just don't believe T-Mobile is getting away with what they are; their coverage map is a complete farce, their 'UnCarrier' stuff is totally 'carrier' stuff. It's...it's...preposterous!

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking forward to Sprint's number's, ATT...OUCH!

 

https://twitter.com/marceloclaure/status/657308077138444288

Not surprised.  AT&T's quickly falling further behind Verizon, while T-Mobile/Sprint are catching up.  Yet, they do not offer the pricing/perk offerings that their smaller competitors do, so they're losing customers that way.  They'll just shrug it off for now, but once investors start taking notice, I expect AT&T to aggressively roll out double data promotions, or new competitive plans.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking forward to Sprint's number's, ATT...OUCH!

 

https://twitter.com/marceloclaure/status/657308077138444288

 

Since Marcelo is touting AT&T losing customers and he knows what his numbers are, the fact he is taunting AT&T publicly must mean good things.

  • Like 23
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since Marcelo is touting AT&T losing customers and he knows what his numbers are, the fact he is taunting AT&T publicly must mean good things.

Indeed. He wouldnt be on twitter slamming att customer numbers if sprint's numbers arent gonna impress!!

 

I cant wait. And bring on the hurt for ATT. They can afford to be far more aggressive with pricing. Im also tired of hearing about Next. For Iphones, ATT has the most expensive early upgrade scheme of all of the carriers, verizon included.

 

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not surprised. AT&T's quickly falling further behind Verizon, while T-Mobile/Sprint are catching up. Yet, they do not offer the pricing/perk offerings that their smaller competitors do, so they're losing customers that way. They'll just shrug it off for now, but once investors start taking notice, I expect AT&T to aggressively roll out double data promotions, or new competitive plans.

My work phone is an AT&T iPhone 6S Plus. My personal carry is a Sprint iPhone 6S.

 

I'll occasionally run a speed test in the same location, and the ratio of Sprint wins to AT&T wins is about 5:1. Most times, it's not really close.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

AT&T fell to last place in Grand Rapids (where I'm from) in terms of media download speed. Which is amazing, considering just a couple years ago I couldn't even muster 1mbps downtown on Sprint. AT&T used to be the 2nd best carrier in MI because they had coverage everywhere. Now that even T-Mobile has coverage up north, they're dropping all over the place. I get faster speeds at my house with Sprint than with AT&T, which is also amazing, because I live on a hill, and barely get a signal from any carrier.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not surprised AT&T is doing so bad. They are trying to do too many things at once with the DirecTV acquisition and the expansion to Mexico. It just is too much for them to also be able to build upon their network here too.

 

I don't doubt for a moment considering these customer losses that AT&T will be rolling out double data promotions soon, which will be great, as it surely will drive Verizon to compete.

 

I'm hoping for the return of the $10 add a line, which use to be the price on family plans for many years. I'm still expecting the higher rate plan buckets to go down in price from the current $6.00 range per gb equivalent rate down to a $5 per gb rate this holiday season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 dollar add a line never applied to smartphones. You always had to buy a data plan making the min. Amount to add a smart phone 25.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I wasn't really referring to smartphones, just the plan.

 

I should've added this notice before, but I was specifically thinking of Verizon's and AT&T's old family plans, even when it was Cingular. I believe they were called the Cingular Family Nation plans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wasn't really referring to smartphones, just the plan.

 

I should've added this notice before, but I was specifically thinking of Verizon's and AT&T's old family plans, even when it was Cingular. I believe they were called the Cingular Family Nation plans.

Technically add a lines are just $15 right now because thats the access cost to add to a family plan.

 

Sent from my SM-T237P using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Technically add a lines are just $15 right now because thats the access cost to add to a family plan.

 

Sent from my SM-T237P using Tapatalk

$20 on Verizon, which has me wondering if/when AT&T will raise the rate to match it. Although, considering AT&T losing over 800,000 customers, I doubt it'll be any time soon that'll happen.

 

Of course, I'm hoping that the reverse will happen with these access fees. I'd like to see them at $10 per line. It'll be interesting how this holiday season will be, all things considered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ATT will raise those access fees and boost the bucket sizes slightly. Bank on it. The access fee is immune to employee discounts , meaning its the holy grail of driving revenue.

 

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ATT will raise those access fees and boost the bucket sizes slightly. Bank on it. The access fee is immune to employee discounts , meaning its the holy grail of driving revenue.

 

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

I think you're probably right about that, though I doubt it would happen until after the new year. Perhaps they and/or Verizon will lower the rate over the holidays, then once 2016 begins, they'll redo their plans again with a higher access fee rate.

 

What is interesting is this article :

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/verizon-launches-national-300-trade-credit-promotion-tries-out-regional-off/2015-10-21

 

It says that in the Central Texas region, Verizon is waiving all access fees on the 18gb $100 plan, which is alot better than I expected Verizon to do. I figure they are "testing" it for the upcoming holiday season promotions, though I suspect it'll be midway between that and their current access fee rate, which I imagine will be that $10 per line access fee I've mentioned.

 

I still think the data buckets on Verizon will only be modified slightly, unless AT&T does something really big, like double data, likely as a result of losing so many customers. Otherwise, it'll be something smaller, like 15gb for $75 monthly and 20gb for $100 monthly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's funny, because Legere was making fun of Verizon of 'XLTE', then immediately came up with 'Extended Range LTE'. I just don't believe T-Mobile is getting away with what they are; their coverage map is a complete farce, their 'UnCarrier' stuff is totally 'carrier' stuff. It's...it's...preposterous!

 

It is humorous, all things aside. Verizon and AT&T's coverage maps are bad as it is, but I don't know how T-Mobile can legally get away with their coverage map. Hopefully there will eventually be an investigation and standards that could even force VZW and AT&T to use more realistic algorithms, but I tend to believe that's a pipe dream.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish they'd just get rid of that mess. I've been with Sprint for years and always had this ASL on my account despite being allowed to have multiple lines and $0 down on whatever I want. Plus when I broke off my parents account and got service under my own name a few years back I had no deposit to pay what so ever. So I don't think that ASL was targeted just towards those with low credit.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • So, in summary, here are the options I tested: T-Mobile intl roaming - LTE on SoftBank, routes back to the US (~220ms to 4.2.2.4) IIJ physical SIM - LTE on NTT, local routing Airalo - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer SoftBank), routed through Singapore (SingTel) Ubigi - 5G on NTT, routed through Singapore (Transatel) US Mobile East Asia roaming - 5G on SoftBank, routed through Singapore (Club SIM) Saily - 5G on NTT, routed through Hong Kong (Truphone)...seems to be poorer routing my1010 - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer KDDI), routed through Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom) I wouldn't buy up on the T-Mobile international roaming, but it's a solid fallback. If you have the US Mobile roaming eSIM that's a great option. Otherwise Ubigi, Airalo, or my1010 are all solid options, so get whatever's cheapest. I wouldn't bother trying to find a physical SIM from IIJ...the Japanese IP is nice but there's enough WiFi that you can get a Japanese IP enough for whatever you need, and eSIM flexibility is great (IIJ as eSIM but seems a bit more involved to get it to work).
    • So, the rural part of the journey still has cell service for nearly all the way, usually on B18/19/8 (depending on whether we're talking about KDDI/NTT/SoftBank). I think I saw a bit of B28 and even n28 early on in the trip, though that faded out after a bit. Once we got to where we were going though, KDDI had enough B41 to pull 150+ Mbps, while NTT and SoftBank had B1/B3 IIRC. Cell service was likewise generally fine from Kawaguchiko Station to Tokyo on the express bus to Shinjuku Station, though there were some cases where only low-band LTE was available and capacity seemed to struggle. I also figured out what I was seeing with SoftBank on 40 MHz vs. 100 MHz n77: the 40 MHz blocks are actually inside the n78 band class, but SoftBank advertises them as n77, probably to facilitate NR CA. My phone likely preferred the 40 MHz slices as they're *much* lower-frequency, ~3.4 GHz rather than ~3.9, though of course I did see the 100 MHz slice being used rather often. By contrast, when I got NR on NTT it was either n28 10x10 or, more often, 100 MHz n78. As usual, EMEA bands on my S24 don't CA, so any data speeds I saw were the result of either one LTE carrier or one LTE carrier plus one NR carrier...except for B41 LTE. KDDI seems to have more B41 bandwidth live at this point, so my1010 or Airalo works well for this, and honestly while SoftBank and NTT 5G (in descending order of availability) have 5G that's readily available it may be diminishing returns, particularly given that I still don't know how to, as someone not from Hong Kong, get an eSIM that runs on SoftBank 5G that isn't the USM "comes for free with the unlimited premium package" roaming eSIM (NTT is easy enough thanks to Ubigi). In other news, I was able to borrow someone's Rakuten eSIM and...got LTE with it. 40 Mbps down, 20 Mbps up, 40ms latency to Tokyo while in Tokyo...which isn't any worse than the Japan-based physical SIMs I had used earlier. But not getting n77 or n257 was disappointing, though I had to test the eSIM from one spot rather than bouncing around the city to find somewhere with better reception. It's currently impossible to get a SIM as a foreigner that runs on Rakuten, so that was the best I could do. Also, I know my phone doesn't have all the LTE and 5G bands needed to take full advantage of Japanese networks. My S24 is missing: B21 (1500 MHz) - NTT B11 (1500 MHz) - KDDI, SoftBank B42 (3500 MHz) - NTT, KDDI, SoftBank n79 (4900 MHz) - NTT Of the above, B42/n79 are available on the latest iPhones, though you lose n257, and I'm guessing you're not going to find B11/B21 on a phone sold outside Japan.
    • T-Mobile acquiring SoniqWave's 2.5 GHz spectrum  Another spectrum speculator down! T-Mobile is acquiring all of their licenses and their leases. Details are lacking but it looks like T-Mobile might be giving them 3.45GHz in exchange in some of the markets where they're acquiring BRS/EBS to sweeten the deal and stay below the spectrum screen. Hopefully NextWave is at the negotiating table with T-Mobile so NYC can finally get access to the full BRS/EBS band as well. 
    • Maybe. The taller buildings on one side of the street all have Fios access and the NYCHA buildings are surrounded by Verizon macros that have mmWave. I don’t think this site will add much coverage. It’d be better off inside the complex itself.
    • Looks like a great place for for FWA. Many apartment dwellers only have one overpriced choice.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...