Jump to content

Sprint Reportedly Bowing Out of T-Mobile Bid (was "Sprint offer" and "Iliad" threads)


thepowerofdonuts

Recommended Posts

I feel bad for iWireless if this deal goes through. They're a T-Mobile affiliate and would be left in the cold if this deal went through. Unless the death Star gobbles them up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't give a damn about tweets. Unless I see changes, then it doesn't matter how many stupid tweets or profane statements Legere makes... I would never switch.

 

I want change, and sprint is providing it at an accelerating rate. I can't ask for any more.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

^^^ What he said. Talk is cheap. People want to see actual results. Not just B.S..

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Folks to avoid this thread getting further sidetracked, all Comcast sharing wi-fi posts have been placed in its own thread here

 

Lets try to keep this one just about the Sprint - T-Mobile offer.

 

TS

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The tmo/sprint could be the biggest thing of the year... The longer it takes to announce the more I think sprint is actually taking time to do it the right in all places of the deal.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't feel like creating a new topic for this but AT&T and T-Mobile are swapping spectrum in 10 states. It's AWS for PCS.


http://www.tmonews.com/2014/07/t-mo-att-to-swap-spectrum-in-a-number-of-markets/

 

 



AWS highlights from AT&T-Leap divestitures:

AWS Bonus:

PCS highlights:

Cons:


  •  


    CMA 448 Kentucky 6 – Madison (reduced from 20 to 15 MHz FDD LTE on AWS E+F

     

    • CMA101 Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX (path to 15 MHz FDD LTE on AWS E+F)
    •  
    • CMA109 Spokane, WA (path to 20 MHz FDD LTE on AWS D+E+F)
    •  
    • CMA112 Corpus Christi, TX (path to 20 MHz FDD LTE on AWS D+E+F)
    •  
    • CMA128 McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX (path to 15 MHz FDD LTE on AWS E+F)
    •  
    • CMA162 Brownsville-Harlingen, TX (path to 15 MHz FDD LTE on AWS E+F)
    •  
    • CMA432 Kansas 5 – Brown [some counties] (path to 15 MHz FDD LTE on AWS C+D+E)
    •  
    • CMA340 California 5 – San Luis Obispo (path to 20 MHz FDD LTE on AWS D+E+F)
    •  
    • CMA661 Texas 10 – Navarro (path to 15 MHz FDD LTE on AWS E+F)
    •  
    • CMA340 California 5 – San Luis Obispo (upgrade from 15 to 20 MHz of PCS)
    •  
    • I won’t detail the rest of the PCS spectrum swaps, but overall T-Mobile gave up PCS where they had more than 30 MHz (to potentially run DC-HSPA+ and GSM) except in parts of Lousiana where they dropped to 20 MHz PCS (they can still run DC-HSPA+ and GSM using NSN narrow WCDMA)
    •  
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't feel like creating a new topic for this but AT&T and T-Mobile are swapping spectra in 10 states. It's AWS for PCS.

 

Please cite your source.  It is bad form to copy and paste someone else's work -- without at least a link to the original.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please cite your source.  It is bad form to copy and paste someone else's work -- without at least a link to the original.

 

AJ

 

http://www.howardforums.com/showthread.php/1841022-T-Mobile-to-pick-up-most-of-AT-amp-T-Leap-spectrum-divestitures

 

and just for you AJ:

 

https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/attachments/attachmentViewRD.jsp?applType=search&fileKey=647463878&attachmentKey=19406490&attachmentInd=applAttach

 

pages 12-18

Edited by bigsnake49
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Do you think I had not already located that very application within three minutes of reading Paynefanbro's post?

 

;)

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you think I had not already located that very application within three minutes of reading Paynefanbro's post?

 

;)

 

AJ

It took you three minutes. Frankly I am disappointed, AJ :P !

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last I remember reading on the topic of the FCC approval; it has to do with spectrum holdings. Can't site it, but I did read it on s4. Basically its been thrown down that in order to have any chance in future auctions and or merger sprint would have to let go in an agreement "spectrum". Now i'm not sure if this would be doable by lets saying T-mobile letting there 1700 go? leaving them to there 1900 / recent 700 holding? This would then allow them to later bid for 600mhz I'd assume on a equal playing field unless wheeler made a decision against that. 

 

Also the other group that would have to approve this is the DOJ... They would have a side with the FCC with what ever they decide to run with. However, they would also probably throw down the combining of the two companies as an issue, leading to a potential monopoly (even though it wouldn't).  So not sure how Son plans to counter that honestly, but the FCC seems the easier fix of the two. lol

 

 

No spectrum needs to be divested in the TMUS/S deal. The solution is to get DISH involved.

Let DISH to use Sprint/TMUS combined network to form an MNVO company owned by both DISH and combined TMUS/S. This company will provide wireless broadband including fixed-LTE for home broadband users. Assign the at least 60 spectrum into the new company then FCC can shut up.

 

The COMCAST/TWC deal will make the home broadband market be controlled by ATT/VZ/COMCAST after that. So FCC will have no argument if they want more competition while they want to block S and DISH to add competition in broadband market.

 

And if FCC block S/DISH to swallow TMUS, then they should also kill COMCAST/TWC deal and ATT/DTV deal for same reason. So ATT/DTV/COMCAST/TWC won't send letters to FCC against SOFTBANK. Then VERIZON just swallowed cincinnati bell, and FCC still needs to approve it. So Softbank won't have any major players in the industry against the deal.

 

But DISH is hard to sell itself. So S is playing with TMUS first to get DISH on board with lower cost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel the majority of people that switch are the people that would switch right back to sprint if someone told them sprints service had greatly improved in their area. But then again, some of them are hard core data abusers and sprint won't tolerate that crap anymore.

 

Just make a promotion like "sign a contract with new SPRINT/TMOBILE combined company" for any top notch phone for $49 and a truly unlimited everything plan for $50, plus if you have a framily plan it will be $40 if you have 3 people or more.

 

Let's do the math, $1 billion can do 2,000,000 subscribers with allowance on $500/each for the low phone price. Prepare $2 billion budget to run this promotion for 12 months.

 

Most people will give a try right away if you give out some real deals. The hard part is how to make them feel the network is good enough to stay with for long term.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever they do, I hope they get it over with. I am a supporter of the deal, but man I am tired of all the waiting...

You and me both. The waiting is the hard part.

 

 

Sent from my Josh's iPad using Tapatalk 2

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Imitation had better be the sincerest form of flattery because somebody is stealing my references...

 

AJ

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • A heavy n41 overlay as an acquisition condition would be a win for customers, and eventually a win for T-Mobile as that might be enough to preclude VZW/AT&T adding C-Band for FWA due to spreading the market too thinly (which means T-Mobile would just have local WISPs/wireline ISPs as competition). USCC spacing (which is likely for contiguous 700 MHz LTE coverage in rural areas) isn't going to be enough for contiguous n41 anyway, and I doubt they'll densify enough to get there.
    • Boost Infinite with a rainbow SIM (you can get it SIM-only) is the cheapest way, at $25/mo, to my knowledge; the cheaper Boost Mobile plans don't run on Dish native. Check Phonescoop for n70 support on a given phone; the Moto G 5G from last year may be the cheapest unlocked phone with n70 though data speeds aren't as good as something with an X70 or better modem.
    • Continuing the USCC discussion, if T-Mobile does a full equipment swap at all of USCC's sites, which they probably will for vendor consistency, and if they include 2.5 on all of those sites, which they probably will as they definitely have economies of scale on the base stations, that'll represent a massive capacity increase in those areas over what USCC had, and maybe a coverage increase since n71 will get deployed everywhere and B71 will get deployed any time T-Mobile has at least 25x25, and maybe where they have 20x20. Assuming this deal goes through (I'm betting it does), I figure I'll see contiguous coverage in the area of southern IL where I was attempting to roam on USCC the last time I was there, though it might be late next year before that switchover happens.
    • Forgot to post this, but a few weeks ago I got to visit these small cells myself! They're spread around Grant park and the surrounding areas, but unfortunately none of the mmwave cells made it outside of the parks along the lake into the rest of downtown. I did spot some n41 small cells around downtown, but they seemed to be older deployments limited to 100mhz and performed poorly.    
    • What is the cheapest way to try Dish's wireless network?  Over the past year I've seen them add their equipment to just about every cell site here, I'm assuming just go through Boost's website?  What phones are Dish native?  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...