Jump to content

Study shows you’re probably not getting the broadband speeds you’re paying for


Paynefanbro

Recommended Posts

Some highlights among top ISPs:

Optimum Online customers saw speeds that were 3% faster than advertised, on average, and Verizon FiOS subscribers averaged about 1% over advertised speeds. Average data speeds seen by Cox customers were exactly in line with advertised speeds.

On the other side of the fence, data speeds for Time Warner Cable customers were 1% slower than advertised, and Comcast speeds averaged 2% slower than advertised.AT&T U-verse data speeds were 8% slower than they should be according to Ookla’s data, and Clear Wireless was the worst of all the ISPs tested, with download speeds that were 41% slower than advertised.

 

I often brag about my Optimum Online speeds. This makes me feel even better about bragging. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Almost every company ive seen has it say up to X Mbps. Never a guaranteed speed. Some other companies might be different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Almost every company ive seen has it say up to X Mbps. Never a guaranteed speed. Some other companies might be different.

 

Mediacom here in Springfield, I have the 20-30Mbps tier, and generally get about 23-26. Sometimes I get as low at 15, but that's short lived.

 

Their other tiers are all "Up to" 10, 15, 50, or 100.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use Verizon FiOS and always get faster than I pay for. I'm on their 75/35 package and average over 85 down and 40 up. When I had time Warner I was lucky to get 75% of what they advertised on a good day.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mediacom here in Springfield, I have the 20-30Mbps tier, and generally get about 23-26. Sometimes I get as low at 15, but that's short lived.

 

Their other tiers are all "Up to" 10, 15, 50, or 100.

$60 plus tax for upto 12/1. Suddenlink just bought northland cables in east Texas. So we are in an upgrade phase to be linked into suddenlink's backend. Once that happens i can move to the 30/2 for $40 i believe. Once the upgrades are complete itll actually be 30/2 :)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I typically dislike Comcast but my local Comcast bumped me up from 36mbps to 60, then doubled that for the same price I paid for the original 36. So now I get 130mbps.

 

Sent from my LG-LS980

When I moved into my neighborhood, they told me they would be bumping us up from like 30 to 50 at no charge. Considering I came from an overpriced att ISP paying about 40 bucks a month just for 6 down, I was pretty happy to only have to pay 29.99 for 50+. However, the one time I did need their customer service it was absolutely dreadful.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 5s using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I typically dislike Comcast but my local Comcast bumped me up from 36mbps to 60, then doubled that for the same price I paid for the original 36. So now I get 130mbps.

 

Sent from my LG-LS980

Id die to get 36Mbps...haha How much was the original 36Mbps?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shentel DSL is the only wired broadband available where I live. I pay $60 for 10/1. That doesn't include the $20 for the mandatory telephone line. If I could at least do away with the telephone charge, it would be quite as bad. It sucks but that's what happens when there's no competition.

 

Edit: I forgot to say that I do get the speeds I pay for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I pay for 18/1.5 and get about 20/1.8

 

I have FTTH, AT&T just doesn't offer much more speed for a reasonable price. I'm hoping for Gigapower since my whole neighborhood is a FTTH development.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). The do have a reserve level. It is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  They did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, RVs in Walmart parking lots where mobile needs all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline in June for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio iirc. No reported sightings.
    • T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
    • Was true in my market. Likely means a higher percentage of 5g phones in your market.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...