Jump to content

LTE Plus / Enhanced LTE (was "Sprint Spark" - Official Name for the Tri-Band Network)


Recommended Posts

Well to be honest, when it comes to browsing websites latency will probably have more of an effect.  Also, we aren't even sure if they were actually connected to band 41.

I doubt they were connected to B41, honestly. This looks like B25 to me.

Exactly. You would have to figure that B41 would be fairly unloaded this early on, which would lead to much faster speeds than they saw.

 

LTE "enginerring" screens or it didn't happen! ;)

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's really refreshing to read multiple favorable articles about Sprint. It looks like "Spark" is igniting  some love from a variety of tech bloggers. I hope the trend continues. Sprint and Softbank both have put a lot of effort and capital into a modern and exciting network. It's about time that they finally get a little recognition for the effort. The fact that many regard AT&T as the king of LTE speed just helps to give Sprint a real headline win on this one. 

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's really refreshing to read multiple favorable articles about Sprint. It looks like "Spark" is igniting some love from a variety of tech bloggers. I hope the trend continues. Sprint and Softbank both have put a lot of effort and capital into a modern and exciting network. It's about time that they finally get a little recognition for the effort. The fact that many regard AT&T as the king of LTE speed just helps to give Sprint a real headline win on this one.

I agree I just hope they will under promise and over deliver with spark

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly. You would have to figure that B41 would be fairly unloaded this early on, which would lead to much faster speeds than they saw.

 

LTE "enginerring" screens or it didn't happen! ;)

I agree, but still, if that is on B25, that is pretty impressive as I don't think Sprint has anywhere near as much spectrum for LTE in B25 than AT&T has for LTE.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Sprint NV and Spark"...

 

Bring the Spark technology to the first 100 markets before the end of 2014 and please do all possible to accelerate the NV rollout throughout the USA. At all cost you most do this fast even if it means higher prices for us "customers" on the Sprint network. I know am willing to pay more if it means better service and more reliable LTE network in more places with less roaming. Otherwise you (Sprint) will bee setting yourself for failure, once more. Just that this time you will not be able to recover from it. Your customers need you to deliver and stop the vague Promise's of a better day and a better network, we've been hearing of that for decades now. Deliver already!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I sniffed out band 41 in St Augustine, but as soon as the engineering screen caught it, it'd disappear and fall back to band 25. I can't hold it long enough to take a screen shot or run any speed tests. Not sure if band 25 is just too strong or if the signal is too faint. My priority is set 26>41>25 currently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I sniffed out band 41 in St Augustine, but as soon as the engineering screen caught it, it'd disappear and fall back to band 25. I can't hold it long enough to take a screen shot or run any speed tests. Not sure if band 25 is just too strong or if the signal is too faint. My priority is set 26>41>25 currently.

 

Doesn't 41-25-26 make the most sense?

-Will

 

 

You just WANT to see band 26  :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want it all. And I want it now!

Cue Veruca in 3...2...1...

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unlike most single band phones the triband phones shows your lte signal strenght bars which is probably lower than your 3g signal. All single band phones with the exception of the iphone 5, 5s, 5c and note 3 shows your 1x signal even when you have lte.

The iPhone 5s and 5c are actually dual-band phones.

 

 

Sent from my iPad/iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your customers need you to deliver and stop the vague Promise's of a better day and a better network, we've been hearing of that for decades now. 

 

Decades? Please show where anything has been promised by Sprint for "decades". Thanks!

  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing, I tried 1 tower in Carol Stream, 1 in West Chicago, and 1 in St. Charles. Nada.

Same here in NYC, I have tried numerous sites, with 0 luck! Band 25 is running pretty decent here in NYC. So I have no problem waiting until they sort it out. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

First off, welcome to the forum! :welcome:  Awesome first post! made it count! 

Also, im assuming you modified your Band settings, and can you post your settings. Priority settings etc, and can you post engineering screens and signal check shots would be that much awesomer! LOL! 

 

 

No matther what band priority I choose after updating my user profile the bands reset to 25 26 41 in that order.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just noticed that when I checked my priority screen now. 

 

No matther what band priority I choose after updating my user profile the bands reset to 25 26 41 in that order.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just noticed that when I checked my priority screen now. 

Ihave been posting this since the 1st day that I got my MSL. Over a week ago I found that no matter which setting was made the user profile update changed them to the order 25 26 41 automaticly. I wonder how many people "thought" that they had a manual band selection that changed after theuser profile was updated.rofl

 

It would be interesting to see what the "SPARK" devices band priorities were set at. Seems to me that SPrint is in control of band priorities through the users profile update. 

Edited by QWIKSTRIKE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be interesting to see what the "SPARK" devices band priorities were set at. Seems to me that SPrint is in control of band priorities through the users profile update. 

 

I don't know if they have included that information in their profiles yet....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be interesting to see what the "SPARK" devices band priorities were set at. Seems to me that SPrint is in control of band priorities through the users profile update. 

 

Well, have you been naughty or nice?  If you are on the list of bad Sprint subs, then Sprint will update your profile and make sure you are stuck with band 25 LTE 1900 only.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, have you been naughty or nice?  If you are on the list of bad Sprint subs, then Sprint will update your profile and make sure you are stuck with band 25 LTE 1900 only.

 

AJ

 

I have been a good sub since January of 1997...and for business averaged $200-600.00 a month in bills in the past. I barely use data and still paid for premium data with out going over 1 gig ever and most months maybe use 500mb max! I have given them their moneys worth and some, with the nickel and dming, and poors ervices through NV conversion. They had been best bang for the buck until NV conversion started! 

 

Again this seems to happen only after updating user profile I think!. However Nexxgen checked this out and notices the same thing as well. Others never checked wthe band settings after they manually updated I bet!

Edited by QWIKSTRIKE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly though, for all the LG users who are having issues connecting to B41, wouldn't it be better if everyone didn't stress themselves out until they got the software update?

 

I would hate to see someone's post that their phone went crappy belly up.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have we seen any recent internal documents confirming the Tri-band S4 (non-mini) besides the FCC OET filing?

I may possibly have witnessed a mention of a "Galaxy S4 Refresh" in a new devices list somewhere recently. Not sure, could have been a hallucination.

 

------------

 

Whomever the first person is to mod the Spark logo to this will have my eternal gratitude and respect.

 

2lame-Sun1.png

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Was at the Yankees vs Tigers game today and besides being a terrible day to have good seats, T-Mobile had great speeds via the stadium's DAS. I consistently saw 500-600Mbps on 5G and on LTE I got upwards of 200Mbps. I noticed that the stadiums DAS is broadcasting 140MHz n41 while macros that surround the stadium are at 80MHz. 
    • Throwed Roll Lambert's Cafe 
    • I've now seen how things work in Kobe, Hiroshima, and Osaka, as well as some areas south of Osaka (e.g. Wakayama, Kinokawa), and tried three more SIMs. The two physical SIMs (different branding for each) both use IIJ, which provides a Japanese IP address/routing on NTT, aleit LTE-only, so latency is ~45ms to Tokyo. The catch with NTT is that it uses two frequency bands (B42/3500 MHz LTE, n79/4900 MHz NR) that you're not going to get on an Android sold in the US, and I'm guessing that B42 would be helpful speed-wise on that network, as it doesn't have B41. I also found one place that doesn't have cell service: a vending machine in the back of the Osaka Castle tower. Or, rather, the B8/18/19 signal is weak enough there to be unusable. Going back to 5G for a moment, I saw a fair amount of Softbank n257 in Hiroshima, as well as in some train stations between Osaka and Kobe. 4x100 MHz bandwidth, anchored by B1/3/8, with speeds sometimes exceeding 400 Mbps on the US Mobile roaming eSIM. Not quite the speeds I've seen on mmW in the States, but I've probably been on mmW for more time over the past few days than I have in the US over the past year, so I'll take it. My fastest speed test was actually on SoftBank n77 though, with 100 MHz of that plus 10x10 B8 hitting ~700 Mbps down and ~80 Mbps up with ~100ms latency...on the roaming eSIM...on the 4th floor of the hotel near Shin-Kobe station. Guessing B8 was a DAS or small cell based on signal levels, and the n77 might have been (or was just a less-used sector of the site serving the train station). I'm now 99% sure that all three providers are running DSS on band 28, and I've seen 10x10 on similar frequencies from both NTT and SoftBank IIRC, on both LTE and 5G. I also picked up one more eSIM: my1010, which is different from 1010/csl used by US Mobile's eSIM unfortunately, as it's LTE-only. On the bright side, it's cheap (10GB/7 days is like $11, and 20GB for the same period would be around $15), and can use both KDDI and SoftBank LTE. It also egresses from Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom), though latency isn't really any better than the Singapore based eSIMs. Tomorrow will include the most rural part of our journey, so we'll see how networks hold up there, and from tomorrow night on we'll be in Tokyo, so any further reports after that will be Tokyo-centric.
    • I think the push for them is adding US Mobile as a MVNO with a priority data plan.  Ultimately, making people more aware of priority would allow them (and other carriers) to differentiate themselves from MVNOs like Consumer Cellular that advertise the same coverage. n77 has dramatically reduced the need for priority service at Verizon where the mere functioning of your phone was in jeopardy a couple of years ago if you had a low priority plan like Red Pocket. Only have heard of problems with T-Mobile in parts of Los Angeles. AT&T fell in between. All had issues at large concerts and festivals, or sporting events if your carrier has no on-site rights. Edit: Dishes native 5g network has different issues: not enough sites, limited bandwidth. Higher priority would help a few. Truth is they can push phones to AT&T or T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...