Jump to content

LTE Plus / Enhanced LTE (was "Sprint Spark" - Official Name for the Tri-Band Network)


Recommended Posts

I was in the car but I was able to get 20 down. Was out of range before the upload could process

I still don't understand why the inconsistent B41, if it is indeed something remote that has to be activated on the Device, why would it connect to any site at all. I am completely surrounded by Band 41, and at one point went to a verified place, (where I know the HTC One Max connects without issue) and no dice..stuck on 25.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still don't understand why the inconsistent B41, if it is indeed something remote that has to be activated on the Device, why would it connect to any site at all. I am completely surrounded by Band 41, and at one point went to a verified place, (where I know the HTC One Max connects without issue) and no dice..stuck on 25.

Band priority? eCSFB issue maybe. Try setting it in LTE only,  if you connect to band 41 then it could be eCSFB issues with clearwire

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Band priority? eCSFB issue maybe. Try setting it in LTE only,  if you connect to band 41 then it could be eCSFB issues with clearwire

I have tried every possible combination of LTE priority settings, and as far as I know, most of NYC does not suffer from the eCSFB issue, and again, the HTC One Max, connects flawlessly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have tried every possible combination of LTE priority settings, and as far as I know, most of NYC does not suffer from the eCSFB issue, and again, the HTC One Max, connects flawlessly.

 

Something that needs to be considered, is that there are current software problems with multiband LTE connectivity on the N5/G2. Hence the reason an update is needed before triband is enabled.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could that just be the regular lte rollout perhaps? I feel so few spark phones out there wouldn't affect the avg that fast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt that the New York uptick is due to Spark so much as it is due to maturation of the Network Vision rollout and adoption of LTE capable devices.

 

June 2011 - December 2013:

1zdxf81.png

 

AJ

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That could be the case as KC (Sprint home market) doesn't have triband/Spark network active yet but does show faster than ATT/VZW...

 

http://www.netindex.com/download/4,158/Kansas-City/?tab=1

 

But I couldn't find any other market that Sprint outperforms other carriers (yet).  Is a good indicator as Sprint completes markets, they should be in good shape.  800 LTE will also help avg in hard to reach areas.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are many reasons why it may not work as expected. Perhaps the equipment isn't fully implemented. Perhaps a software update to the tower is needed. Perhaps the antenna isn't adjusted yet. Perhaps the power is turned down. Perhaps the phones need more than just the band's enabled. Whatever it may be, technically Sprint isn't expecting or saying that band 41 is ready for use in all of these locations that we have spotted it in. Until Sprint says it's ready, they don't expect customers to be connecting to it yet. There is no expectation on our part that it's ready for prime time yet.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

You need to stop double, triple, quadruple cross posting these.  Pick one thread, and put them there.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any indication when first 800LTE could show up?  A month, months or mid-year?  I would think that should be higher priority for Sprint.  Coverage is badly needed now. 2500 is good for capacity down the road but they direly need to improve coverage, especially indoors.  Surprised not to see 800LTE as higher priority.

Edited by TyrellCorpse
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any indication when first 800LTE could show up?  A month, months or mid-year?  I would think that should be higher priority for Sprint.  Coverage is badly needed now. 2500 is good for capacity down the road but they direly need to improve coverage, especially indoors.  Surprised not to see 800LTE as higher priority.

 

The rumor that I've heard many times and many places is by the end of this year or December.  We don't know how it'll happen, either.  Perhaps Sprint will just flip the switch from home base and it'll go live everywhere that has 1x800SMR and appropriate backhaul in place?  Or perhaps it'll need tower by tower approval like 1900LTE and such has.

 

Someone please correct me if this is wrong.  I've kept tabs on these things loosely from many different threads and can't afford a premiere sponsorship level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I figured it was the regular rollout. Its probably the difference between wimax and lte. They may only have 1/2 the bandwidth but also half the subs so sprint should hold decently against art and Verizon with their 10x10 markets. Besides the fact that they have 700. But just think 800 will also have another 5x5 and then another 20 mhz for td lte. Should take a lot to weight down the network when its finished because the load will be distributed on all 3. Besides just the 2 band vs has or att I've heard is in a even worse position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any indication when first 800LTE could show up?  A month, months or mid-year?  I would think that should be higher priority for Sprint.  Coverage is badly needed now. 2500 is good for capacity down the road but they direly need to improve coverage, especially indoors.  Surprised not to see 800LTE as higher priority.

 

Premiere forum has a deployment timeline.

 

Mind you, Sprint isn't exactly hitting the dates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Was at the Yankees vs Tigers game today and besides being a terrible day to have good seats, T-Mobile had great speeds via the stadium's DAS. I consistently saw 500-600Mbps on 5G and on LTE I got upwards of 200Mbps. I noticed that the stadiums DAS is broadcasting 140MHz n41 while macros that surround the stadium are at 80MHz. 
    • Throwed Roll Lambert's Cafe 
    • I've now seen how things work in Kobe, Hiroshima, and Osaka, as well as some areas south of Osaka (e.g. Wakayama, Kinokawa), and tried three more SIMs. The two physical SIMs (different branding for each) both use IIJ, which provides a Japanese IP address/routing on NTT, aleit LTE-only, so latency is ~45ms to Tokyo. The catch with NTT is that it uses two frequency bands (B42/3500 MHz LTE, n79/4900 MHz NR) that you're not going to get on an Android sold in the US, and I'm guessing that B42 would be helpful speed-wise on that network, as it doesn't have B41. I also found one place that doesn't have cell service: a vending machine in the back of the Osaka Castle tower. Or, rather, the B8/18/19 signal is weak enough there to be unusable. Going back to 5G for a moment, I saw a fair amount of Softbank n257 in Hiroshima, as well as in some train stations between Osaka and Kobe. 4x100 MHz bandwidth, anchored by B1/3/8, with speeds sometimes exceeding 400 Mbps on the US Mobile roaming eSIM. Not quite the speeds I've seen on mmW in the States, but I've probably been on mmW for more time over the past few days than I have in the US over the past year, so I'll take it. My fastest speed test was actually on SoftBank n77 though, with 100 MHz of that plus 10x10 B8 hitting ~700 Mbps down and ~80 Mbps up with ~100ms latency...on the roaming eSIM...on the 4th floor of the hotel near Shin-Kobe station. Guessing B8 was a DAS or small cell based on signal levels, and the n77 might have been (or was just a less-used sector of the site serving the train station). I'm now 99% sure that all three providers are running DSS on band 28, and I've seen 10x10 on similar frequencies from both NTT and SoftBank IIRC, on both LTE and 5G. I also picked up one more eSIM: my1010, which is different from 1010/csl used by US Mobile's eSIM unfortunately, as it's LTE-only. On the bright side, it's cheap (10GB/7 days is like $11, and 20GB for the same period would be around $15), and can use both KDDI and SoftBank LTE. It also egresses from Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom), though latency isn't really any better than the Singapore based eSIMs. Tomorrow will include the most rural part of our journey, so we'll see how networks hold up there, and from tomorrow night on we'll be in Tokyo, so any further reports after that will be Tokyo-centric.
    • I think the push for them is adding US Mobile as a MVNO with a priority data plan.  Ultimately, making people more aware of priority would allow them (and other carriers) to differentiate themselves from MVNOs like Consumer Cellular that advertise the same coverage. n77 has dramatically reduced the need for priority service at Verizon where the mere functioning of your phone was in jeopardy a couple of years ago if you had a low priority plan like Red Pocket. Only have heard of problems with T-Mobile in parts of Los Angeles. AT&T fell in between. All had issues at large concerts and festivals, or sporting events if your carrier has no on-site rights. Edit: Dishes native 5g network has different issues: not enough sites, limited bandwidth. Higher priority would help a few. Truth is they can push phones to AT&T or T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...