Jump to content

LTE Plus / Enhanced LTE (was "Sprint Spark" - Official Name for the Tri-Band Network)


Recommended Posts

Does the Spark update include anything besides flipping the switches in the ##DATA# menu?  What are the default LTE band priorities set to ##DATA#?  Also is there any added bloatware app on your phone that says Sprint Spark?  Is the B41 LTE stable now? Sorry for the 21 questions.  Thanks in advance.

 

1) no idea

2) I see all of them enabled, but don't have the MSL to check

3) I don't see any

4) no way to check, no B41 at my local site

 

I'll find out more as I drive around the area and see if I can pick up B41.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) no idea

2) I see all of them enabled, but don't have the MSL to check

3) I don't see any

4) no way to check, no B41 at my local site

 

I'll find out more as I drive around the area and see if I can pick up B41.

 

For number 2, you don't need your MSL to view the default LTE priorities.  You only need your MSL to edit the values if you want to change the LTE priorities. 

 

All you have to do is type ##DATA#, click on LTE ->View->Band Priority, all 3 LTE bands should be listed with a number 1, 2, or 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For number 2, you don't need your MSL to view the default LTE priorities.  You only need your MSL to edit the values if you want to change the LTE priorities. 

 

All you have to do is type ##DATA#, click on LTE ->View->Band Priority, all 3 LTE bands should be listed with a number 1, 2, or 3.

 

Doesn't show priorities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone that preordered the LG G2 via Sprint, have you guys gotten your Quickwindow cases yet?  I called Sprint earlier this week and they said they were starting to ship them out on Nov 11th.  I figured it should be coming to our doorsteps any day between now and end of next week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not gonna lie, it was pretty cool to see the Spark logo and LTE next to it. In this day and age, the whole world has LTE, so differentiating it does wonders. I actually got a little giddy because I thought I connected to B41 at first.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So basically, "Turbo" = gigabit fiber backhaul, since I doubt there's a reliable microwave solution available yet for such speeds.

 

Since the NV backhaul contracts & gear call for scalability up to 1Gbps, are you saying that Sprint will be taking full advantage of those and jumping straight from the standard 100 Mbps to 1Gbps for their backhaul, even though the initial TDD deployment only calls for one 20MHz carrier per sector (or 3 total carriers per site, rather than 9)? If so, that is wise forethought- it would allow the deployment of additional LTE carriers on 2600 or even PCS to occur much more quickly.

 

 

A few things here.  Number 1...new microwave equipment with the proper conditions and enough bandwidth can run 1Gbps.  This is not a microwave limitation.  

 

Number 2...I should not have said that the new Spark Turbo backhaul is capable of 3 carriers running at full speed on all three sectors.  I should have said that it is at least sufficient now to support at least 1 20MHz carrier at full speeds and is a clear upgrade from the legacy Clearwire backhaul in place.  It may be enough for all three carriers now, but I bet what is at each Spark Turbo site is highly variable.  I think the point of the Turbo moniker is to let people know this site has been upgraded and can be expected to perform very well...much better than the average Clearwire backhauled site.

 

Number 3...your points about Sprint NV backhaul, while being accurate to Sprint NV sites, is not currently the case for Clearwire sites that have not received NV upgrades (like Spark Turbo sites).  We don't know Sprint's long term plans for Clearwire sites specifically, yet, as far as receiving Network Vision upgrades.  We know they have to be receiving one hell of a backhaul upgrade to support Spark, though.  Your point about NV backhaul will not become relevant until Sprint starts deploying Band 41 on NV sites in 2014.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few things here.  Number 1...new microwave equipment with the proper conditions and enough bandwidth can run 1Gbps.  This is not a microwave limitation.  

 

Number 2...I should not have said that the new Spark Turbo backhaul is capable of 3 carriers running at full speed on all three sectors.  I should have said that it is at least sufficient now to support at least 1 20MHz carrier at full speeds and is a clear upgrade from the legacy Clearwire backhaul in place.  It may be enough for all three carriers now, but I bet what is at each Spark Turbo site is highly variable.  I think the point of the Turbo moniker is to let people know this site has been upgraded and can be expected to perform very well...much better than the average Clearwire backhauled site.

 

Number 3...your points about Sprint NV backhaul, while being accurate to Sprint NV sites, is not currently the case for Clearwire sites that have not received NV upgrades (like Spark Turbo sites).  We don't know Sprint's long term plans for Clearwire sites specifically, yet, as far as receiving Network Vision upgrades.  We know they have to be receiving one hell of a backhaul upgrade to support Spark, though.  Your point about NV backhaul will not become relevant until Sprint starts deploying Band 41 on NV sites in 2014.

 

1.) I had interpreted your post to mean that the backhaul for "Turbo" sites would rely exclusively on fiber rather than microwave.. I apologize if I was mistaken. If Sprint needs to resort to microwave in some areas (probably only on more rural, and therefore non-Clearwire sites) later on, I'll be curious to see what equipment they use.

 

2.) Ok. I figured it must vary somewhat, but hopefully it's at least ~400 Mbps, or more for high-capacity sites. I think they'd be best off just upgrading all sites to 1Gbps backhaul and use the surplus capacity on underutilized sites for fixed wireless. Although that scenario probably wouldn't apply to most Clearwire markets.

 

3.) Yes, I misspoke re the current relevance of the 100 Mbps 4G backhaul requirement. 2014 is just around the corner, however, and "Turbo"-level backhaul to a regular 4G NV site should also end up qualifying as one heck of an upgrade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WHAT THE HELL IS THAT SPINNING? PLEASE TELL ME IT STOPS.

After reading that I couldn't stop laughing lol 

 

I'm not gonna lie, it was pretty cool to see the Spark logo and LTE next to it. In this day and age, the whole world has LTE, so differentiating it does wonders. I actually got a little giddy because I thought I connected to B41 at first.

call me weird, but I actually like it spinning and being different. So you got the Mega, how you like it. (don't want to throw this too off topic so you can pm the answer. lol

 

TS

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

After the htc one max are we expecting anymore Triband phones by the end of the year?

 

Probably a GS4 triband phone refresh.  I am not sure if Sprint is in the process of clearing out their single band LTE GS4 inventory to make wave for the GS4 triband phone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if the Spark icon will be universal or dependent on the particular brand handset you have. The LTE/4G icon is different depending on Sense/TouchWiz/iOS look and version. Is this specifically a Sprint made icon or do the manufacturers put their particular finishing touch on it? I can't see Apple letting just any icon adorn their precious task bar..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if the Spark icon will be universal or dependent on the particular brand handset you have. The LTE/4G icon is different depending on Sense/TouchWiz/iOS look and version. Is this specifically a Sprint made icon or do the manufacturers put their particular finishing touch on it? I can't see Apple letting just any icon adorn their precious task bar..

I would think every phone except the iPhone will get that Sprint made icon. On T-Mobile I have the One and my wife has the S4 and our 4g and 4gLTE icons look the same cuz that's the branding that T-Mobile has. Up until now Sprint hasn't really had a logo for their 4g services like the other big 3 carriers have and have implemented on their phones.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint Spark is on the Sprint coverage map now. Here is portions of Tampa. Its within the "turbo" area of coverage as indicated on the map. This will be very confusing to the uneducated consumer. LTE coverage, Spark coverage, Turbo coverage, Wimax coverage and 3G coverage... Also there area areas that are Sprint Spark areas that DON'T have Turbo coverage.

post-517-0-41814900-1384623493_thumb.png

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if the Spark icon will be universal or dependent on the particular brand handset you have. The LTE/4G icon is different depending on Sense/TouchWiz/iOS look and version. Is this specifically a Sprint made icon or do the manufacturers put their particular finishing touch on it? I can't see Apple letting just any icon adorn their precious task bar..

You know apple won't change anything to show any differences. Sprint will do anything and everything for Apple.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know apple won't change anything to show any differences. Sprint will do anything and everything for Apple.

anyone will do anything for apple, that is why sprint has to sign a commitment contract just to get the iphone. The funny thing now, is that apple wants every carrier to have the iphone, because other companies like htc,lg and Samsung have made better phones the iphone. Also this is why I don't own a iphone, because they have to do things so much different then everyone else and not always to benefit the consumer

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

anyone will do anything for apple, that is why sprint has to sign a commitment contract just to get the iphone. The funny thing now, is that apple wants every carrier to have the iphone, because other companies like htc,lg and Samsung have made better phones the iphone. Also this is why I don't own a iphone, because they have to do things so much different then everyone else and not always to benefit the consumer

I also don't like that Apple makes the user do things their way, and makes all users to things the same way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so even though it is official and maps are up has anyone actually come across band 41 signal?

 

I know some have gotten signal in LA markets. I expect to connect to B41 in OC, but I am waiting for my N5 order. I wouldn't expect coverage to be as wide spread as what listed on the Sprint coverage maps. Gotta remember NV is in progress and it is B41. In the G2 thread someone posted getting around 50-60 megs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • It took NINE MONTHS for contractors to replace the traffic light pole they took down for this, but Verizon contractors finally returned to install an oDAS unit in Downtown Brooklyn. I only saw it in the states of having no antennas and then mmWave antenna, so I'm not sure if they added more on top. I'm once again very confused by the placement of this site since it's on the same block as a macro site with mmWave, and standing in this position I can get 2.5Gbps download speeds. What is Verizon doing?
    • Was at the Yankees vs Tigers game today and besides being a terrible day to have good seats, T-Mobile had great speeds via the stadium's DAS. I consistently saw 500-600Mbps on 5G and on LTE I got upwards of 200Mbps. I noticed that the stadiums DAS is broadcasting 140MHz n41 while macros that surround the stadium are at 80MHz.  Pics of antennas I spotted and speed tests:
    • I've now seen how things work in Kobe, Hiroshima, and Osaka, as well as some areas south of Osaka (e.g. Wakayama, Kinokawa), and tried three more SIMs. The two physical SIMs (different branding for each) both use IIJ, which provides a Japanese IP address/routing on NTT, aleit LTE-only, so latency is ~45ms to Tokyo. The catch with NTT is that it uses two frequency bands (B42/3500 MHz LTE, n79/4900 MHz NR) that you're not going to get on an Android sold in the US, and I'm guessing that B42 would be helpful speed-wise on that network, as it doesn't have B41. I also found one place that doesn't have cell service: a vending machine in the back of the Osaka Castle tower. Or, rather, the B8/18/19 signal is weak enough there to be unusable. Going back to 5G for a moment, I saw a fair amount of Softbank n257 in Hiroshima, as well as in some train stations between Osaka and Kobe. 4x100 MHz bandwidth, anchored by B1/3/8, with speeds sometimes exceeding 400 Mbps on the US Mobile roaming eSIM. Not quite the speeds I've seen on mmW in the States, but I've probably been on mmW for more time over the past few days than I have in the US over the past year, so I'll take it. My fastest speed test was actually on SoftBank n77 though, with 100 MHz of that plus 10x10 B8 hitting ~700 Mbps down and ~80 Mbps up with ~100ms latency...on the roaming eSIM...on the 4th floor of the hotel near Shin-Kobe station. Guessing B8 was a DAS or small cell based on signal levels, and the n77 might have been (or was just a less-used sector of the site serving the train station). I'm now 99% sure that all three providers are running DSS on band 28, and I've seen 10x10 on similar frequencies from both NTT and SoftBank IIRC, on both LTE and 5G. I also picked up one more eSIM: my1010, which is different from 1010/csl used by US Mobile's eSIM unfortunately, as it's LTE-only. On the bright side, it's cheap (10GB/7 days is like $11, and 20GB for the same period would be around $15), and can use both KDDI and SoftBank LTE. It also egresses from Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom), though latency isn't really any better than the Singapore based eSIMs. Tomorrow will include the most rural part of our journey, so we'll see how networks hold up there, and from tomorrow night on we'll be in Tokyo, so any further reports after that will be Tokyo-centric.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...