Jump to content

LTE Plus / Enhanced LTE (was "Sprint Spark" - Official Name for the Tri-Band Network)


Recommended Posts

I was in the car but I was able to get 20 down. Was out of range before the upload could process

I still don't understand why the inconsistent B41, if it is indeed something remote that has to be activated on the Device, why would it connect to any site at all. I am completely surrounded by Band 41, and at one point went to a verified place, (where I know the HTC One Max connects without issue) and no dice..stuck on 25.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still don't understand why the inconsistent B41, if it is indeed something remote that has to be activated on the Device, why would it connect to any site at all. I am completely surrounded by Band 41, and at one point went to a verified place, (where I know the HTC One Max connects without issue) and no dice..stuck on 25.

Band priority? eCSFB issue maybe. Try setting it in LTE only,  if you connect to band 41 then it could be eCSFB issues with clearwire

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Band priority? eCSFB issue maybe. Try setting it in LTE only,  if you connect to band 41 then it could be eCSFB issues with clearwire

I have tried every possible combination of LTE priority settings, and as far as I know, most of NYC does not suffer from the eCSFB issue, and again, the HTC One Max, connects flawlessly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have tried every possible combination of LTE priority settings, and as far as I know, most of NYC does not suffer from the eCSFB issue, and again, the HTC One Max, connects flawlessly.

 

Something that needs to be considered, is that there are current software problems with multiband LTE connectivity on the N5/G2. Hence the reason an update is needed before triband is enabled.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could that just be the regular lte rollout perhaps? I feel so few spark phones out there wouldn't affect the avg that fast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt that the New York uptick is due to Spark so much as it is due to maturation of the Network Vision rollout and adoption of LTE capable devices.

 

June 2011 - December 2013:

1zdxf81.png

 

AJ

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That could be the case as KC (Sprint home market) doesn't have triband/Spark network active yet but does show faster than ATT/VZW...

 

http://www.netindex.com/download/4,158/Kansas-City/?tab=1

 

But I couldn't find any other market that Sprint outperforms other carriers (yet).  Is a good indicator as Sprint completes markets, they should be in good shape.  800 LTE will also help avg in hard to reach areas.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are many reasons why it may not work as expected. Perhaps the equipment isn't fully implemented. Perhaps a software update to the tower is needed. Perhaps the antenna isn't adjusted yet. Perhaps the power is turned down. Perhaps the phones need more than just the band's enabled. Whatever it may be, technically Sprint isn't expecting or saying that band 41 is ready for use in all of these locations that we have spotted it in. Until Sprint says it's ready, they don't expect customers to be connecting to it yet. There is no expectation on our part that it's ready for prime time yet.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

You need to stop double, triple, quadruple cross posting these.  Pick one thread, and put them there.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any indication when first 800LTE could show up?  A month, months or mid-year?  I would think that should be higher priority for Sprint.  Coverage is badly needed now. 2500 is good for capacity down the road but they direly need to improve coverage, especially indoors.  Surprised not to see 800LTE as higher priority.

Edited by TyrellCorpse
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any indication when first 800LTE could show up?  A month, months or mid-year?  I would think that should be higher priority for Sprint.  Coverage is badly needed now. 2500 is good for capacity down the road but they direly need to improve coverage, especially indoors.  Surprised not to see 800LTE as higher priority.

 

The rumor that I've heard many times and many places is by the end of this year or December.  We don't know how it'll happen, either.  Perhaps Sprint will just flip the switch from home base and it'll go live everywhere that has 1x800SMR and appropriate backhaul in place?  Or perhaps it'll need tower by tower approval like 1900LTE and such has.

 

Someone please correct me if this is wrong.  I've kept tabs on these things loosely from many different threads and can't afford a premiere sponsorship level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I figured it was the regular rollout. Its probably the difference between wimax and lte. They may only have 1/2 the bandwidth but also half the subs so sprint should hold decently against art and Verizon with their 10x10 markets. Besides the fact that they have 700. But just think 800 will also have another 5x5 and then another 20 mhz for td lte. Should take a lot to weight down the network when its finished because the load will be distributed on all 3. Besides just the 2 band vs has or att I've heard is in a even worse position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any indication when first 800LTE could show up?  A month, months or mid-year?  I would think that should be higher priority for Sprint.  Coverage is badly needed now. 2500 is good for capacity down the road but they direly need to improve coverage, especially indoors.  Surprised not to see 800LTE as higher priority.

 

Premiere forum has a deployment timeline.

 

Mind you, Sprint isn't exactly hitting the dates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...