Jump to content

HTC One max [Tri-Band] (was "HTC "Phablet" aka "T6"")


themuffinman

Recommended Posts

I was so excited about the One max considering I loved the HTC One, and would've gotten it had my contract been up. I was hoping the One max would be a new flagship like the Note 3 (which improved upon the S4 in imaginable every way, with a faster processor, better screen, better camera, and 3 gigs of RAM, not to mention Android 4.3 with new S Pen features), instead of just taking the 4 month old specs of the One and stuffing it into a larger, less awesome design. I'm talking about the snapdragon 600, the 2 gigs of RAM (yes, 3 GB is super rare today, but I was hoping for a future proof phone), same screen quality, and a worse camera (no OIS) in a gargantuan 5.9 inch heavy form factor that is super fat (10.3 mm) and absolutely unwieldy. They took the greatest part of the One, the aluminum unibody design, and compromised it with plastic on the sides and front, like the One mini. Sure, it has an SD card slot, but that appears to be the only thing going for this phone. BoomSound with a beautiful 5.9" (if a bit old) HTC S-LCD 3 1080p screen is an amazing media experience, but in every other way this device fails as a phone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank goodness the government shutdown has been delayed for at least another 3 months or so.  The FCC database is back up so I am expecting to see the HTC One Max for Verizon and Sprint hit the FCC database soon.  All you FCC database gurus start the hunting.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank goodness the government shutdown has been delayed for at least another 3 months or so.  The FCC database is back up so I am expecting to see the HTC One Max for Verizon and Sprint hit the FCC database soon.  All you FCC database gurus start the hunting.

 

The VZW variant HTC One max was submitted to the FCC OET prior to the shutdown.  It has been authorized for the last two weeks.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The VZW variant HTC One max was submitted to the FCC OET prior to the shutdown.  It has been authorized for the last two weeks.

 

AJ

 

I presume then that the Sprint version hasn't made it yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I presume then that the Sprint version hasn't made it yet.

Sprint? We do not care any longer. With Robert's move to Rapid City, we are now VZW4GRU.

 

AJ

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint? We do not care any longer. With Robert's move to Rapid City, we are now VZW4GRU.AJ

 

May it never be!!!

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy Note II using Tapatalk

 

  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, the htc website confirmed that a week ago.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, the htc website confirmed that a week ago.

 

I give more weight to the FCC filing, marketing teams have been known to get things/spec wrong on the mfg website.

 

Now if we can just confirm a sale date

Edited by bitslizer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does the RF radio perform compared to the other tri band devices?

Test measurements do not look good.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm really hoping that someone is able to do a pretty accurate comparison of reception between available bands between the one max and the s4 mini, cause i'm buying whichever preforms better! I do remember Robert stating that the galaxy victory is one of the best lte phones when it came to reception, and I'm hoping that the mini follows in its footsteps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
    • I wouldn’t be shocked if it’s Verizon, too. In my area they have multiple nodes on the same block as full macro sites with mmWave, in direct line of sight. 
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...