Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Washington DC Market


dstrait

Recommended Posts

 

I'm trying to understand the logic twitch used in calling it  and not calling it DCA or Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport.

I don't see what the issue is. If one is well versed in IATA codes, as you obviously are, then it is painfully clear what airport he was talking about. Stop at DCA, you are good there, don't read into it.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the link!

 

I have always found it irritating that I don't get cell service in the Metro rail system.

 

I always thought that Verizon phones got coverage in the Metro tunnels, but after reading the article, I guess not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the link!

 

I have always found it irritating that I don't get cell service in the Metro rail system.

 

I always thought that Verizon phones got coverage in the Metro tunnels, but after reading the article, I guess not.

 

Verizon phones do have better coverage, but it has certainly deteriorated since PowerWave half converted the network. Now all of carriers are sort of in limbo....

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As best I can tell, AT&T and T-Mobile have no service in the tunnels. Verizon has spotty service in the tunnel, which Sprint roams on, but there are plenty of places (which tend to be where the trains sit when "there's a train ahead of us, we'll be moving momentarily").

 

It's not really useful while on the go, at least not as a Sprint customer.

 

Most of the stations have service, at least. 3G.

 

- Trip

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My mornings excitement for today is that I actually have LTE service in my office building on Crestwood blvd in Frederick, almost 1-2 bars short of full signal. 

 

It will in fact snow tonight. :)

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've started picking up good signal in a lot of places.

 

Especially strong in Reston VA (which makes sense considering that it used to be the home of Sprint)

 

One odd thing that I have noticed, however, is that I seem to be on LTE 800 frequently. It's all good, it just seems odd that I don't seem to be connecting to the other bands as frequently.

bb53bb72f8adf541b6713ccdb080fdec.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've started picking up good signal in a lot of places.

 

Especially strong in Reston VA (which makes sense considering that it used to be the home of Sprint)

 

One odd thing that I have noticed, however, is that I seem to be on LTE 800 frequently. It's all good, it just seems odd that I don't seem to be connecting to the other bands as frequently.

 

I find that if you go into an area with weak service, you will connect to LTE 800 as you should.  But when you exit the poor area, quite often you will remain on 800 LTE for a long time.  This does not always work that way, but it is quite common for me.  I would assume that the system does not see any compelling reason to shift me to 1900 LTE.  However, I also will sometimes get kicked off 800 LTE quickly.  I have to assume that Sprint is looking at load on each of the carriers, signal strength and maybe something else. 

I also notice that it will resist switching bands if you are using any data. Steaming music or video will tend to keep you on the carrier until it absolutely has to switch bands for some reason.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I continue to be amazed at how quickly upgrades are occurring.  Yesterday I drove to visit my parents and then today I drove back.  On my way down, I had LTE all the way from my home next to the Huntington Metro all the way around the beltway, on 66, on 15, and then it finally gave out when I was on 29 after clinging to B26 from Buckland for a really long time.  I think it finally gave up about half-way to Warrenton and flipped to 3G then.  Then, again, at Opal, it jumped on B26 and hung onto it until I got to Brandy Station.  Not this market, but when I got to Farmville, I was on B26 the entire time I was in town, including indoors.

 

There was also a surprising amount of B41 additions,  I saw at least 3 more towers (probably more, would have to check) running B41 than when I went down at New Year's, and that was with all the bad weather we've had. 

 

Now if only they could do something about nTelos land...

 

- Trip

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone have an idea when Frederick city area will get LTE? I have been impressed how quickly the signal strength has improved over here on Crestwood Blvd. Somewhere near Bentz Street and Trail Avenue I think there was a WiMax tower, I'd guess that would be an easy upgrade??? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone have an idea when Frederick city area will get LTE? I have been impressed how quickly the signal strength has improved over here on Crestwood Blvd. Somewhere near Bentz Street and Trail Avenue I think there was a WiMax tower, I'd guess that would be an easy upgrade???

I was amazed at how i have full LTE bars in the Crestwood McDonald's parking lot but drop back to 3G in Farmbrook. Please tell me this will be fully available soon i ditched verizon for sprint and I need 4G

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I went to the patriot center for some UFC action today and could not believe how absurdly awful the service is at GMU. Sitting in my truck in the parking lot I volleyed between LTE and 1X, and could not use my phone in the arena. I remember being on the event floor in 2010 for graduation and not being able to use it but 5 years later and no improvement is embarrassing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The good news is when the Massey building is torn down at the Fairfax court complex, the big 4 will be moving their antennas to The Fairfax Building, which my company owns. So once the city green lights all the site plans we have from Sitelink Wireless for their antennas on OUR roof, I'll be posting plenty of build out pictures.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I think it is likely that T-Mobile will be forced to honor any existing US cellular roaming agreements in those areas as a condition of them taking over the spectrum.  In that case, there would be no improvement of service unless T-Mobile improves the service offering in those areas.
    • My understanding is the MNO carriers are the one who have objected to the use of cell phones in commercial planes.  I understand that it ties down too many cell phones at once, thus I can not see this changing. However this depends on how it is structured. Use of a different plmn for satellite service might make it possible for planes only to connect with satellite. Private pilots have been using cellphones in planes for many decades. Far fewer phones at a lower altitude.
    • On Reddit, someone asked (skeptically) if the US Cellular buyout would result in better service.  I'd been pondering this very issue, and decided to cross-post my response here: I've been pondering the question in the title and I've come to the conclusion that the answer is that it's possible. Hear me out. Unlike some of the small carriers that work exclusively with one larger carrier, all three major carriers roam on US Cellular today in at least some areas, so far as I know. If that network ceases to exist, then the carriers would presumably want to recover those areas of lost service by building out natively. Thus, people in those areas who may only have service from US Cellular or from US Cellular and one other may gain competition from other carriers backfilling that loss. How likely is it? I'm not sure. But it's definitely feasible. Most notably, AT&T did their big roaming deal with US Cellular in support of FirstNet in places where they lacked native coverage. They can't just lose a huge chunk of coverage whole still making FirstNet happy; I suspect they'll have to build out and recover at least some of that area, if not most of it. So it'd be indirect, but I could imagine it. - Trip
    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...