Jump to content

Everything 800mhz (1xA, LTE, coverage, timeline, etc)


Recommended Posts

It seems weird that they don't install the 800MHz RRUs in the IBEZ even though eventually 800 will be available in that area for Sprint to use. Seems like it's unnecessary extra work for the installer techs, no?

The problem with installing those RRU's now is that there's no solution to the IBEZ mess in sight. Sprint is better off saving up their money and waiting.

 

Sorry, I wish I could be the bearer of better news in that regard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with installing those RRU's now is that there's no solution to the IBEZ mess in sight. Sprint is better off saving up their money and waiting.

 

Sorry, I wish I could be the bearer of better news in that regard.

 

Wait, I thought Mexico and the US came to an agreement. Wouldn't help with Canada but still.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems weird that they don't install the 800MHz RRUs in the IBEZ even though eventually 800 will be available in that area for Sprint to use. Seems like it's unnecessary extra work for the installer techs, no?

 

To let everyone know that they have the capability to deploy 800 mhz when it's free to do so and they aren't broadcasting the signal and interfering with the license holders on both sides of the border. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I new to this thread. I have a question about 800MHz LTE and Sprints 2.5GHz band 41. I live in Southern Michigan and about a week ago I talked to some Sprint tower climbers that were installing 2.5 equipment on a water tower in my rural area. The first thing I was wondering is why they would be installing 2.5GHz equipment before 800MHz LTE antennas? Seems like that would be installed in bigger cities this early in the upgrade proce

 

There is no "800MHz antenna" per se at least in our state. Samsung is installing one antenna per sector (sometimes two if it is a high-capacity site). However, depending where you are in Michigan, those antennas may have 1 or more RRUs attached to the backside of each single antenna. So my question to you is how many of these square-ish RRUs are on each antenna on the site you are referring to? If it's one then that site will not be getting 800MHz.

 

If there are two+ then you will be seeing 800MHz sometime in the near future if you haven't already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Full acceptance of all five 800/1900 Network Vision upgrades on a cell site is a prerequisite to Nokia's rollout of 8T8R band 41 upgrades on the same site. That doesn't mean that 800 LTE is indicative of a band 41 upgrade coming soon, just that it won't be possible otherwise.

800 LTE seems spotty, will it improve?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

800 LTE seems spotty, will it improve?

 

It can improve through optimization over time. I can't tell you for certain what will happen, but I can tell you anecdotally that in my area, 800 LTE performance was initially sub-par.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It can improve through optimization over time. I can't tell you for certain what will happen, but I can tell you anecdotally that in my area, 800 LTE performance was initially sub-par.

But it got better? How much better?

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But it got better? How much better?

It reaches everywhere now

 

Once optimized, band 26 LTE 800 slices, dices, juliennes, washes your car, and cures cancer.

 

AJ

  • Like 12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But it got better? How much better?

 

To simplify it greatly.. when they first install the B26 equipment, picture the antennas pointed straight down. Limited range. Eventually, crews come around and point everything in the right direction. So B26 should not only cover the B25 footprint, but also expand beyond it. It's easy to tell if a site isn't optimized if you're not getting B26 beyond the B25 coverage area of a particular site.

 

-Mike

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no "800MHz antenna" per se at least in our state. Samsung is installing one antenna per sector (sometimes two if it is a high-capacity site). However, depending where you are in Michigan, those antennas may have 1 or more RRUs attached to the backside of each single antenna. So my question to you is how many of these square-ish RRUs are on each antenna on the site you are referring to? If it's one then that site will not be getting 800MHz.

 

If there are two+ then you will be seeing 800MHz sometime in the near future if you haven't already.

Thanks for the replies! I wasn't aware that there isn't a separate antenna for 800MHz. Thanks for clarifying. I live west of I-69 in Union City, MI. The tower I am referring to is located in Athens, MI. When I was out there I didn't look that closely at the antennas so I couldn't tell you, but I'll have to make a point and look now. 

 

So if it has one, the site won't be getting 800MHz at all or just not anytime soon? I haven't picked up any 1x800 or 800 LTE around my area. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To simplify it greatly.. when they first install the B26 equipment, picture the antennas pointed straight down. Limited range. Eventually, crews come around and point everything in the right direction.

 

I think I can put Mike's description in words that all you ladies can better understand.  Initially, the band 26 antennas are pointed straight down, limp.  But after a few weeks, if the band 26 antennas hear that you are interested in hooking up with them, they become more erect, pointed in the right direction.

 

Make sense?

 

;)

 

AJ

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can someone analyze my market's scenario?

 

1x800 worked for 2 weeks in my market, everywhere. As of a few days ago, it's totally turned off, everywhere. Were those first few weeks testing, and everything should light up and go "accepted" soon?

 

Just hoping this activity is following a trend that has been present in other markets. I was under the impression that 1x800 was blocked during testing, then released once it was done, but that doesn't seem to be the case here. I was connecting to it everywhere, now, nothing.

 

This was from February I believe:

 

Forecasted (Q3 schedule) BC10 Sites On-air

Current on-air - 10[+]%

End of 2013 - 43%

Mid 2014 - 100%

 

 

Guess we're almost done!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies! I wasn't aware that there isn't a separate antenna for 800MHz. Thanks for clarifying. I live west of I-69 in Union City, MI. The tower I am referring to is located in Athens, MI. When I was out there I didn't look that closely at the antennas so I couldn't tell you, but I'll have to make a point and look now. 

 

So if it has one, the site won't be getting 800MHz at all or just not anytime soon? I haven't picked up any 1x800 or 800 LTE around my area. 

 

Check out the pics I took for these posts:

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/3369-report-in-progress-sites-here/page-67&do=findComment&comment=185326

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/3369-report-in-progress-sites-here/page-68&do=findComment&comment=185327

 

Some members have far better equipment than I and can get closer shots but you should be able to get the idea. You should see a box (RRU) near the top and bottom on the backside of the wider antenna. That is what you are looking for when you're out spotting. Note: these photos were taken some time ago and the legacy equipment (the narrower antennas on both sides of the wider antenna) has been deactivated and most likely removed since leaving only one antenna (and accompanying RRUS) per sector.

 

I couldn't say as for when the Athens site might see 800LTE since that falls under Premier Sponsor status and I couldn't divulge that. However, my speculation is that if Sprint is putting up Band 41 (2500 MHz) then 800MHz couldn't be too far behind if it already hasn't went live.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It can improve through optimization over time. I can't tell you for certain what will happen, but I can tell you anecdotally that in my area, 800 LTE performance was initially sub-par.

Okay, thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Check out the pics I took for these posts:

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/3369-report-in-progress-sites-here/page-67&do=findComment&comment=185326

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/3369-report-in-progress-sites-here/page-68&do=findComment&comment=185327

 

Some members have far better equipment than I and can get closer shots but you should be able to get the idea. You should see a box (RRU) near the top and bottom on the backside of the wider antenna. That is what you are looking for when you're out spotting. Note: these photos were taken some time ago and the legacy equipment (the narrower antennas on both sides of the wider antenna) has been deactivated and most likely removed since leaving only one antenna (and accompanying RRUS) per sector.

 

I couldn't say as for when the Athens site might see 800LTE since that falls under Premier Sponsor status and I couldn't divulge that. However, my speculation is that if Sprint is putting up Band 41 (2500 MHz) then 800MHz couldn't be too far behind if it already hasn't went live.

Thanks for your help. I'll keep this in mind when I'm out spotting. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once optimized, band 26 LTE 800 slices, dices, juliennes, washes your car, and cures cancer.

 

AJ

I'd love it if it would wash my car haha. I've been getting more B26 and love it. I work In a metal building(auto parts store) and have 1 bar of B26 yet still is pretty quick. Now only to see what happens when it's fully optimized.

 

Sent from my Galaxy S5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1xA 800 makes a huge difference! In this room I usually have around -100 and it usually is very hard to place a call on 1xA 1900 as it takes a while for the call to connect or sometimes it doesnt connect at all and I get an error saying "out of the coverage area"

 

My friends have to use my phone sometimes to make a call here becuase tmobile has 0 service in here... they could use wifi calling here but they dont.. i dont know why

post-10099-0-98688800-1402335982_thumb.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies! I wasn't aware that there isn't a separate antenna for 800MHz. Thanks for clarifying. I live west of I-69 in Union City, MI. The tower I am referring to is located in Athens, MI. When I was out there I didn't look that closely at the antennas so I couldn't tell you, but I'll have to make a point and look now. 

 

So if it has one, the site won't be getting 800MHz at all or just not anytime soon? I haven't picked up any 1x800 or 800 LTE around my area. 

Same thing is happening to the tower by Exit 3 (Copeland Rd/Kinderhook) off of I-69 south of Coldwater.

 

No 800 1x or LTE yet, but Band 41 equipment is installed. Low population density area, other than providing signal to the freeway.  Nothing has been switched on yet though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have a direct comparison for in building coverage after the site about 1.5 miles away from me got a 1x800 upgrade.

 

On 1x1900: -85dBm indoors

On 1x800:   -69dBm indoors

 

Now that is a huge difference.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have a direct comparison for in building coverage after the site about 1.5 miles away from me got a 1x800 upgrade.

 

On 1x1900: -85dBm indoors

On 1x800:   -69dBm indoors

 

Now that is a huge difference.

Yes, this is fairly typical.  I have had the NV upgrades in service here for over a year.  I normally see anywhere from a 10 to 15 DB

better signal on 800 over the 1900.   Some buildings are very friendly to 800 and others are not.  Depends on the construction of the building. I do not think I ever seen anything worse than a 10 db improvement.  

When you see reports of 800 not penetrating real well right now, I would suspect that the 800 signal is not coming from the same site as the 1900 OR the 800 antennas are still not optimized for best coverage.  It can take some time(several months) until they get the antennas set up just exactly correct.  The crews that hang the antennas on the towers or other structures are not the people that finally tweak them and make it all work correctly.

 

At my home, I initially had garbled voice service on CDMA 1X-800 for a few months until they hit my area and properly aimed the 800 antennas.  It acted to me like I had about 4 800 signals hitting my home all at about a -85 level.  Using signal check Pro, I could see I had one site that was primary, but it was moving around to 3 other sites quite often.   Then I actually caught the optimizing guys in town doing the adjusting.   My 800 voice is no longer garbled and works perfect.  My main site did crash one day and the other sites were there to pick up the traffic but they were no longer causing distortion to each other.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, this is fairly typical.  I have had the NV upgrades in service here for over a year.  I normally see anywhere from a 10 to 15 DB

better signal on 800 over the 1900.   Some buildings are very friendly to 800 and others are not.  Depends on the construction of the building. I do not thinwk I ever seen anything worse than a 10 db improvement.  

When you see reports of 800 not penetrating real well right now, I would suspect that the 800 signal is not coming from the same site as the 1900 OR the 800 antennas are still not optimized for best coverage.  It can take some time(several months) until they get the antennas set up just exactly correct.  The crews that hang the antennas on the towers or other structures are not the people that finally tweak them and make it all work correctly.

 

At my home, I initially had garbled voice service on CDMA 1X-800 for a few months until they hit my area and properly aimed the 800 antennas.  It acted to me like I had about 4 800 signals hitting my home all at about a -85 level.  Using signal check Pro, I could see I had one site that was primary, but it was moving around to 3 other sites quite often.   Then I actually caught the optimizing guys in town doing the adjusting.   My 800 voice is no longer garbled and works perfect.  My main site did crash one day and the other sites were there to pick up the traffic but they were no longer causing distortion to each other.

do they topically not adjust 800mh antennas until other neighboring sites have 800mhz installed?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

do they topically not adjust 800mh antennas until other neighboring sites have 800mhz installed?

I am not positive, but that is the way I would do it.  All the sites were 800 active here when they optimized it.  Too much running to visit a neighborhood and only do one at a time. Plus they have a limited amount of people that are qualified and skilled enough to do it. Hanging an antenna on a tower is one thing.  Getting it working properly is a completely different animal.

 

I have about 4 different 800 equipped sites in my local area.  I see all of them serve me depending on just what valley I am in or what hill/building I am behind.  When they get it done correctly, it is a beautiful thing.   I am lucky, my area was done first and there has been enough time to tweak it and make it work properly.  No band 41 yet as this is a low population area and it really is not needed quickly for capacity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same thing is happening to the tower by Exit 3 (Copeland Rd/Kinderhook) off of I-69 south of Coldwater.

 

No 800 1x or LTE yet, but Band 41 equipment is installed. Low population density area, other than providing signal to the freeway.  Nothing has been switched on yet though.

Hopefully that is a sign that 1x 800 and 800 LTE will be turned on soon if they are for some reason installing band 41 equipment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • T-Mobile has saved its 28Mhz mmWave licenses by using the point to point method to do environment monitoring inside its cabinets. The attachment below shows the antennas used: https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/ApplicationSearch/applAdmin.jsp;JSESSIONID_APPSEARCH=LxvbnJuvusmIklPhKy6gVK7f9uwylrZ8LiNf3BqIKlDp3_5GxoBr!300973589!225089709?applID=14787154#   Here are the sites for Franklin county OH: https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/attachments/attachmentViewRD.jsp?applType=search&fileKey=66518254&attachmentKey=21989782&attachmentInd=applAttach
    • Yep, there is a label on the side of the box but it doesn't provide any useful info that the city doesn't already provide (Crown Castle Solutions is the franchisee). You can see my graphical interpretation of the city's dataset here.
    • T-Mobile UScellular agreement links from SEC filings: https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/821130/000110465924065665/tm2415626d2_8k.htm Look inside for main link. Credit mdav-dos1 on reddit
    • Totally agree.  In my county and surrounding counties, TM did not place n-41 on every site.  When I look at the sites in question, I probably would have not placed it there either.  I can find just a few with n-71 only and in most of those cases if you live there and know the probable usage of the residents, you would not do a full upgrade on those sites.  One site in particular is set up to force feed n-71 through a long tunnel on the Turnpike.  No stopping allowed in the tunnel. No stores, movie theaters, bathrooms, so n41 would be a waste.    n25 is not really needed either, so it is not there.  The tunnel is going through & under a mountain with more black bears than people.  TM was smart.  Get good coverage in the tunnel but do not waste many many thousands of dollars with extra unused spectrum. I also see sites with only n71 & n25.  Again this makes sense to me.  Depending on what county we are talking about, they moved much of their b25 from LTE to nr.  Some counties have more n25 than a neighboring county, but luckily, it is plenty everywhere.   When you are in a very rural area, n41 can run up the bills and then be barely used.  I am NOT finding sites that should have had n41 but TM failed to provide it.  They may have to come back later in a few years and upgrade the site to n41.  However, we just may eventually see the last little piece on Band 25 leave LTE and move to n25. I am not sure if the satellite to phone service is using band 25 G block as LTE or nr. We also can possibly have at least some AWS move from LTE to nr at some point.  Yes, everybody wants n41. it is not justified in some cases.  When I travel, I desire some decent service along the entire route but it does not have to be 1 or 2 gig download.   If I can get 50/5 on a speedtest with data that will flow and not stutter, I am very happy. Yes, they will swap out the USC gear.  TM needs to match their existing network. The USCC equipment did the job for years, but it is time to retire it.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...