Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I hadn't noticed that, although I just noticed that I no longer get LTE at my home - I used to get a pretty solid LTE signal there, but now I am only seeing 1xRTT and EvDO Rev A (not even eHRPD anymore)...wonder if they turned that tower off for some reason...

 

Interesting coincidence...I work/live in the north LA market and noticed ehrpd was off yesterday afternoon. It's back on this morning though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cant wait for this Network Vision thing to be over.Thus is like a roller coaster.sometimes up and suddenly a huge drop..since 6pm getting these speeds(1xRTT..not even eHPRD) almost cant do nothing and for more bad things..i dont have wifi right now...hirrible day

 

Remember that it was not too long ago the entire network stunk. Now there are more and more places getting better and better. Do not be frustrated.

 

If you lived in a place like San Antonio where deployment is crawling, then you can get frustrated. ;)

 

In LA, there is something new and exciting occurring every day. :tu:

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Forum Runner

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im getting a ping of 176ms, 0.32 DL, 0.45 UP today in my office in Glendale.

Im getting a ping of 176ms, 0.32 DL, 0.45 UP today in my office in Glendale.

I am getting different speeds all around the city I just got the craziest one,lol....at chevy chase ans san fernando...0.65 down and 1.56 up..isnt it crazy??lol
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember that it was not too long ago the entire network stunk. Now there are more and more places getting better and better. Do not be frustrated.

 

If you lived in a place like San Antonio where deployment is crawling, then you can get frustrated. ;)

 

In LA, there is something new and exciting occurring every day. :tu:

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Forum Runner

Remember that it was not too long ago the entire network stunk. Now there are more and more places getting better and better. Do not be frustrated.

 

If you lived in a place like San Antonio where deployment is crawling, then you can get frustrated. ;)

 

In LA, there is something new and exciting occurring every day. :tu:

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Forum Runner

Yup Robert thats true,yesterday was not a good day,i dont know maybe they were doing something.one day is great and then the other cant even open yahoo mail.....Glendale is asking for LTE so bad.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think honestly we are all just waiting on an official word from Sprint for a launch date. Right now, everything is in testing phases. Calabasas LTE may never get 'tested' before the official launch just like Glendale LTE may never get a taste before it goes official. There are certainly more areas than not that don't have LTE in the Los Angeles proper area. Anything better than 0.05Mbps download speeds are welcome news to me since I never saw anything higher than that at my house in Calabasas for 9 months straight until early this month!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think honestly we are all just waiting on an official word from Sprint for a launch date. Right now, everything is in testing phases. Calabasas LTE may never get 'tested' before the official launch just like Glendale LTE may never get a taste before it goes official. There are certainly more areas than not that don't have LTE in the Los Angeles proper area. Anything better than 0.05Mbps download speeds are welcome news to me since I never saw anything higher than that at my house in Calabasas for 9 months straight until early this month!

 

Yup I'm starting to think that LTE won't reach me here in El Monte until the official launch :-

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup I'm starting to think that LTE won't reach me here in El Monte until the official launch :-

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

Yeah, whatever areas get it before the launch is special and great for them, but honestly we have no grounds to complain that 'we aren't getting any birthday presents right now even though our 'official' birthday is a ways off'.

 

Keyword: Testing: Take measures to check the quality, performance, or reliability of (something), esp. before putting it into widespread use or practice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At some point in the near future, any tower that is complete should be activated, if they follow the trend in SF, Chicago, and Boston. So if you don't have LTE in the next few days, likely this means there are no towers completed in your area, and an official "launch" isn't going to change anything. In areas which have been soft launched such as LA, the trend has been for Sprint to release towers into the wild right away, with limited exceptions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been using sensorly with my EVO 4G in the Glendale to/from WestL.A. area and will continue when I upgrade to an LTE phone. I sure would like to see more LTE before saying bye to WiMax.

u should wait a little bit more..because Glendale is still off..
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll be getting a galaxy nexus lte this Monday that I couldn't resist for 185$ shipping included and clean ESN... I've heard that the signal isnr the greatest but surely better than the evos lte issue lol. I hopefully get to go exploring around downey, paramount, south gate, and so on. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll be getting a galaxy nexus lte this Monday that I couldn't resist for 185 shipping included and clean ESN... I've heard that the signal isnr the greatest but surely better than the evos lte issue lol. I hopefully get to go exploring around downey' date=' paramount, south gate, and so on. :)[/quote']

 

Signal is fine in LTE. Its the 1x/EVDO signal that is weak in the GNex. Also, the 3G data will not complete handshake to connect to data occasionally. Other than these things, the GNex is a wonderful device.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • On Reddit, someone asked (skeptically) if the US Cellular buyout would result in better service.  I'd been pondering this very issue, and decided to cross-post my response here: I've been pondering the question in the title and I've come to the conclusion that the answer is that it's possible. Hear me out. Unlike some of the small carriers that work exclusively with one larger carrier, all three major carriers roam on US Cellular today in at least some areas, so far as I know. If that network ceases to exist, then the carriers would presumably want to recover those areas of lost service by building out natively. Thus, people in those areas who may only have service from US Cellular or from US Cellular and one other may gain competition from other carriers backfilling that loss. How likely is it? I'm not sure. But it's definitely feasible. Most notably, AT&T did their big roaming deal with US Cellular in support of FirstNet in places where they lacked native coverage. They can't just lose a huge chunk of coverage whole still making FirstNet happy; I suspect they'll have to build out and recover at least some of that area, if not most of it. So it'd be indirect, but I could imagine it. - Trip
    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...